Peter C.C. Fong, Ann Christin Mörk, Carol Aghajanian, Giovanni Scambia, David Cella, Josh Bedel, Deborah K. Armstrong, Juliette Meunier, Robert W. Holloway, Ana Oaknin, Lara Maloney, Alexandra Leary, Johanne I Weberpals, Margarita Amenedo Gancedo, Elizabeth M. Swisher, Andrew R Clamp, Jeffrey C. Goh, Sandra Goble, Andrew Dean, Domenica Lorusso, David M. O'Malley, Jesús García-Donas, Amit M. Oza, Susana Banerjee, Terri Cameron, Jonathan A. Ledermann, Nicoletta Colombo, Robert L. Coleman, Oza, A, Lorusso, D, Aghajanian, C, Oaknin, A, Dean, A, Colombo, N, Weberpals, J, Clamp, A, Scambia, G, Leary, A, Holloway, R, Gancedo, M, Fong, P, Goh, J, O'Malley, D, Armstrong, D, Banerjee, S, Garcia-Donas, J, Swisher, E, Cella, D, Meunier, J, Goble, S, Cameron, T, Maloney, L, Mork, A, Bedel, J, Ledermann, J, Coleman, R, Institut Català de la Salut, [Oza AM] Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. [Lorusso D] Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. [Aghajanian C] Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. [Oaknin A] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. [Dean A] St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia. [Colombo N] University of Milan-Bicocca and European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy, and Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
Carcinoma d'ovari recurrent; Rucaparib Carcinoma de ovario recurrente; Rucaparib Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma; Rucaparib PURPOSE To investigate quality-adjusted progression-free survival (QA-PFS) and quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) in a post hoc exploratory analysis of the phase III ARIEL3 study of rucaparib maintenance treatment versus placebo. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian carcinoma were randomly assigned to rucaparib (600 mg twice per day) or placebo. QA-PFS was calculated as progression-free survival function × the 3-level version of the EQ-5D questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) index score function. Q-TWiST analyses were performed defining TOX as the mean duration in which a patient experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) or the mean duration in which a patient experienced grade ≥ 2 TEAEs of nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and asthenia. Q-TWiST was calculated as μTOX × TOX + TWiST, with μTOX calculated using EQ-5D-3L data. RESULTS The visit cutoff was Apr 15, 2017. Mean QA-PFS was significantly longer with rucaparib versus placebo in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (375 randomly assigned to rucaparib v 189 randomly assigned to placebo; difference, 6.28 months [95% CI, 4.85 to 7.47 months]); BRCA-mutant cohort (130 rucaparib v 66 placebo; 9.37 months [95% CI, 6.65 to 11.85 months]); homologous recombination deficient (HRD) cohort (236 rucaparib v 118 placebo; 7.93 months [95% CI, 5.93 to 9.53 months]); and BRCA wild-type/loss of heterozygosity (LOH) low patient subgroup (107 rucaparib v 54 placebo; 2.71 months [95% CI, 0.31 to 4.44 months]). With TOX defined using grade ≥ 3 TEAEs, the difference in mean Q-TWiST (rucaparib v placebo) was 6.88 months (95% CI, 5.71 to 8.23 months), 9.73 months (95% CI, 7.10 to 11.94 months), 8.11 months (95% CI, 6.36 to 9.49 months), and 3.35 months (95% CI, 1.66 to 5.40 months) in the ITT population, BRCA-mutant cohort, HRD cohort, and BRCA wild-type/LOH low patient subgroup, respectively. Q-TWiST with TOX defined using select grade ≥ 2 TEAEs also consistently favored rucaparib. CONCLUSION The significant differences in QA-PFS and Q-TWiST confirm the benefit of rucaparib versus placebo in all predefined cohorts. Supported by Clovis Oncology. Additional support was provided in part by the Ann Rife Cox Chair in Gynecology and the Judy Reis/Albert Pisani, MD, Ovarian Cancer Research Fund (to R.L.C.) and by the National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at University College London (to J.A.L.). C.A. is supported in part by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748. Funding was also provided by US Department of Defense Ovarian Cancer Research Program OC120506, a V Foundation Translational Award, and a Stand Up To Cancer–Ovarian Cancer Research Fund Alliance–National Ovarian Cancer Coalition Dream Team Translational Research Grant (Grant No. SU2C-AACR-DT16–15; all to E.M.S.). Stand Up to Cancer is a program of the Entertainment Industry Foundation; research grants are administered by the American Association for Cancer Research, a scientific partner of Stand Up To Cancer.