Search

Objective: The eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union of International Cancer Control esophageal cancer staging system was proposed in early 2018. The eighth edition staging system includes clinical staging, pathological staging, and neoadjuvant pathological staging, which fills in the blank of non‐operative staging of esophageal cancer. However, there are few reports on the eighth edition of clinical staging, and the purpose of the present study was to verify the prognostic value of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging system for esophageal cancer patients who undergo radical radiation therapy. Methods: A total of 544 patients with esophageal cancer from Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between March 2010 and September 2016 were staged according to the eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical staging system. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate the survival rate of the patients. The Cox regression model was used for multivariate prognostic analysis. Results: All the patients were divided into different groups by the eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical tumor–node–metastasis staging system: 40 patients with T2; 157 patients with T3; 347 patients with T4; 132 patients with N0; 193 patients with N1; 172 patients with N2; 47 patients with N3; 81 patients with stage II; 102 patients with state III; and 361 patients with stage IVA. The 3‐year survival rates of stage T2, stage T3, and stage T4 were 60.1%, 45.6%, and 30.8%, respectively (P < 0.001). The 3‐year survival rates of stage N0, stage N1, stage N2, and stage N3 were 48.2%, 40.7%, 29.4%, and 17.3%, respectively (P < 0.001). The 3‐year survival rates of stage II, stage III, and stage IVA were 59.3%, 40.1%, and 31.2%, respectively (P < 0.001). In univariate analysis, age, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, T stage, N stage, Karnofsky marking system, the sixth edition staging system and the eighth edition staging system were important prognostic factors in univariate analyses. In multivariate analysis, concurrent chemotherapy and N stage were important prognostic factors. Conclusions: Based on the data from Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, the eighth edition clinical staging system had a better predictive ability for esophageal cancer patients who underwent radical radiation therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The importance of the thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) dose has not been clearly defined in extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) and it is unclear whether improved TRT dose translates into a survival benefit. Methods 306 patients with ES-SCLC were retrospectively reviewed, of which 170 received IMRT/CRT fractionation RT after ChT, and 136 received chemotherapy (ChT) alone. We adopted the time-adjusted BED (tBED) for effective dose fractionation calculation. Due to the nonrandomized nature of this study, we compared the ChT + RT with ChT groups that matched on possible confounding variables. Results Patients achieved 2-year OS, PFS and LC rates of 19.7%, 10.7% and 28.4%, respectively. After propensity score matching, (113 cases for each group), the rates of OS, PFS and LC at 2 years were 21.4%, 7.7% and 34.5% for ChT + TRT, and 10.3% ( p < 0.001 ), 4.6% ( p < 0.001 ) and 6.3% for ChT only ( p < 0.001 ), respectively. Among propensity score matching patients, 56 cases for each group received the high dose (tBED > 50 Gy) TRT and received low dose (tBED ≤ 50 Gy) TRT. Two-year OS, PFS and LC rates were 32.3%, 15.3% and 47.1% for the high dose compared with 17.0% ( p < 0.001), 12.9% ( p = 0.097) and 34.7% ( p = 0.029) for low dose radiotherapy. Conclusions TRT added to ChT improved ES-SCLC patient OS. High dose TRT improved OS over lower doses. Our results suggest that high-dose thoracic radiation therapy may be a reasonable consideration in select patients with ES-SCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy and safety of surgery and chemotherapy (S +CT) vs. radiotherapy and CT (RT+CT) in patients with limited stage small cell esophageal cancer (LS-SCEC). Patients and methods: Patients included in analysis (from our hospital and the literature) were treated with S+CT or RT+CT between 1989 and 2012. The primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points included tumor response and toxicity. Kaplan–Meier OS curves were compared with the log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was used to determine prognosticators for OS. Results: A total of 127 patients were included: 14 from our hospital and 113 from the literature. Fifty-four (43%) and 73 (57%) patients received S+CT or RT+CT, respectively. The median OS of all patients was 21.0months. OS was longer for those who received RT+CT rather than S+CT (33.0 vs. 17.5months, p =0.02), especially those with N1 disease. Uni- and multi-variate analyses showed tumor location (upper 1/3rd of esophagus) and type of treatment (S+CT) were poor prognostic factors of OS. Conclusion: LS-SCEC patients treated with RT+CT had an improved OS compared to those treated with S+RT. Thus, RT+CT should be considered as a primary approach for these patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]