15 results on '"van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F."'
Search Results
2. A mixed-method study on the generic and ostomy-specific quality of life of cancer and non-cancer ostomy patients
- Author
-
Jansen, Femke, van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F., Braakman, J. Annemieke, van Keizerswaard, Paulina M., Witte, Birgit I., and Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Web-based self-help intervention for partners of cancer patients based on acceptance and commitment therapy and self-compassion training: a randomized controlled trial with automated versus personal feedback.
- Author
-
Köhle, Nadine, Drossaert, Constance H. C., ten Klooster, Peter M., Schreurs, Karlein M. G., Hagedoorn, Mariët, Van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F., Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M., and Bohlmeijer, Ernst T.
- Subjects
POSTTRAUMATIC growth ,ACCEPTANCE & commitment therapy ,CANCER patients ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,PSYCHOLOGICAL distress ,MENTAL health - Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of two versions (personal or automated feedback) of a psychological Web-based self-help intervention targeting partners of cancer patients. The intervention was based on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and self-compassion training. Participants' adherence and their satisfaction were also studied. Methods: Two hundred three partners of patients with heterogeneous entities of cancer were randomized into three conditions: personal feedback (PF) (n = 67), automated feedback (AF) (n = 70), or waiting list (WL) control (n = 66). Participants completed measures at baseline (T0) and post-intervention (T1; 3 months after baseline) to assess psychological distress (HADS; primary outcome), positive mental health, caregiver strain, general health (secondary outcomes), posttraumatic growth, resilience, self-compassion, psychological flexibility, sense of mastery, and relational communication style (process measures). Participants in the two experimental conditions also completed these measures at follow-up (T2; 6 months after baseline). Results: There was no significant difference in change in psychological distress, positive mental health, caregiver strain and general health from T0 to T1 for either of the experimental conditions compared with the WL-condition. However, when compared to a WL-condition, the PF-condition was effective in increasing psychological flexibility (effect size d = 0.49) and resilience (d = 0.12) and decreasing overprotection (d = 0.25), and the AF-condition was effective in reducing overprotection (d = 0.36) and improving protective buffering (d = 0.36). At follow-up, the PF-condition was more effective than the AF-condition for improving mental health (d = 0.36), psychological flexibility (d = 0.60), mastery (d = 0.48), and protective buffering (d = 0.24). Participants positively appreciated the intervention and 69% participants were adherent. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a Web-based intervention based on ACT and self-compassion training with automated or personal feedback does not seem to improve psychological distress; however, it may have the potential to support partners of cancer patients to cope with the difficult situation they are facing. The condition with personal feedback seemed to be more beneficial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Role of eHealth application Oncokompas in supporting self-management of symptoms and health-related quality of life in cancer survivors: a randomised, controlled trial.
- Author
-
van der Hout, Anja, van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F, Holtmaat, Karen, Jansen, Femke, Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I, Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard A P, Hardillo, José A, Baatenburg de Jong, Robert J, Tiren-Verbeet, Nicolette L, Sommeijer, Dirkje W, de Heer, Koen, Schaar, Cees G, Sedee, Robert-Jan E, Bosscha, Koop, van den Brekel, Michiel W M, Petersen, Japke F, Westerman, Matthijs, Honings, Jimmie, Takes, Robert P, and Houtenbos, Ilse
- Subjects
- *
CANCER patients , *QUALITY of life , *HEAD & neck cancer , *WEB-based user interfaces , *HODGKIN'S disease , *CANCER fatigue , *TUMOR treatment , *RESEARCH , *RESEARCH methodology , *PROGNOSIS , *EVALUATION research , *MEDICAL cooperation , *COMPARATIVE studies , *RANDOMIZED controlled trials , *TUMORS , *STATISTICAL sampling , *TELEMEDICINE , *LONGITUDINAL method ,TUMORS & psychology - Abstract
Background: Knowledge about the efficacy of behavioural intervention technologies that can be used by cancer survivors independently from a health-care provider is scarce. We aimed to assess the efficacy, reach, and usage of Oncokompas, a web-based eHealth application that supports survivors in self-management by monitoring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and cancer-generic and tumour-specific symptoms and obtaining tailored feedback with a personalised overview of supportive care options.Methods: In this non-blinded, randomised, controlled trial, we recruited patients treated at 14 hospitals in the Netherlands for head and neck cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, Hodgkin lymphoma, or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Adult survivors (aged ≥18 years) were recruited through the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) and invited by their treating physician through the Patient Reported Outcomes Following Initial Treatment and Long term Evaluation of Survivorship (PROFILES) registry. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by an independent researcher to the intervention group (access to Oncokompas) or control group (access to Oncokompas after 6 months), by use of block randomisation (block length of 68), stratified by tumour type. The primary outcome was patient activation (knowledge, skills, and confidence for self-management), assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month and 6-month follow-up. Linear mixed models (intention-to-treat) were used to assess group differences over time from baseline to 6-month follow-up. The trial is registered in the Netherlands Trial Register, NTR5774 and is completed.Findings: Between Oct 12, 2016, and May 24, 2018, 625 (21%) of 2953 survivors assessed for eligibility were recruited and randomly assigned to the intervention (320) or control group (305). Median follow-up was 6 months (IQR 6-6). Patient activation was not significantly different between intervention and control group over time (difference at 6-month follow-up 1·7 [95% CI -0·8-4·1], p=0·41).Interpretation: Oncokompas did not improve the amount of knowledge, skills, and confidence for self-management in cancer survivors. This study contributes to the evidence for the development of tailored strategies for development and implementation of behavioural intervention technologies among cancer survivors.Funding: Dutch Cancer Society (KWF Kankerbestrijding). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Adoption and implementation of a web-based self-management application "Oncokompas" in routine cancer care: a national pilot study.
- Author
-
Matthijs de Wit, L., van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F., Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I., Melissant, Heleen C., Fleuren, Margot A.H., Cuijpers, Pim, and Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
- Subjects
- *
WEB-based user interfaces , *PILOT projects , *QUALITY of life , *MEDICAL personnel , *CANCER patients - Abstract
Purpose: A web-based self-management application "Oncokompas" was developed to monitor health-related quality of life and to support cancer survivors in finding and obtaining optimal supportive care. Access to this application is provided via a healthcare professional (HCP). The aim of this study was to explore the adoption and implementation of Oncokompas in routine clinical practice and to obtain insights in potentially relevant determinants of implementation.Methods: A pilot study was carried out among 65 hospitals throughout The Netherlands. HCPs filled out a questionnaire on the implementation of Oncokompas in their organization, consisting of study specific items and items based on the Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations (MIDI). The MIDI comprises 29 determinants in four domains that predict the use of innovations: the innovation itself (Oncokompas), the user (HCP), the organization (hospital), and socio-political context.Results: In total, 20/65 eligible hospitals agreed to implement Oncokompas (adoption rate 31%). In these 20 adopting hospitals, the majority of the responding HCPs (72/205) in this study (44/61) indicated their patients were offered access to Oncokompas (implementation rate 72%). Comparing those HCPs who did and did not implement Oncokompas, the groups differed significantly on innovation-related (procedural clarity, complexity) and user-related determinants (importance of outcome expectations, professional obligation, social support, and self-efficacy).Conclusions: During this 1-year study, nationwide adoption rate of Oncokompas was at 31%, and subsequent implementation rate was at 72%. The results of this study contribute to further optimize interventions and strategies to adopt and implement (online) self-management applications in cancer care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Measuring health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer patients: systematic review of measurement properties of the EORTC QLQ-CR29.
- Author
-
Cuijpers, Pim, van der Hout, Anja, Neijenhuijs, Koen I., Jansen, Femke, van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F., Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M., Aaronson, Neil K., van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V., Groenvold, Mogens, Holzner, Bernhard, and Terwee, Caroline B.
- Subjects
QUALITY of life ,COLORECTAL cancer ,META-analysis ,MEASUREMENT errors ,CANCER patients - Abstract
Introduction: The EORTC QLQ-CR29 is a patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate health-related quality of life among colorectal cancer patients in research and clinical practice. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate whether the initial positive results regarding the measurement properties of the QLQ-CR29 are confirmed in subsequent studies.Methods: A systematic search of Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies investigating the measurement properties of the QLQ-CR29 published up to January 2019. For the 11 included studies, data were extracted, methodological quality was assessed, results were synthesized, and evidence was graded according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology on the measurement properties: structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, construct validity (hypothesis testing, including known-group comparison, convergent and divergent validity), cross-cultural validity, and responsiveness.Results: Internal consistency was rated as "sufficient," with low evidence. Reliability was rated as "insufficient," with moderate evidence. Construct validity (hypothesis testing; known-group comparison, convergent and divergent validity) was rated as "inconsistent," with moderate evidence. Structural validity, measurement error, and responsiveness were rated as "indeterminate" and could therefore not be graded.Conclusion: This review indicates that current evidence supporting the measurement properties of the QLQ-CR29 is limited. Additionally, better quality research is needed, taking into account the COSMIN methodology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. 'Oncokompas', a web-based self-management application to support patient activation and optimal supportive care: a feasibility study among breast cancer survivors.
- Author
-
Melissant, Heleen C., Verdonck-de Leeuwa, Irma M., Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I., Konings, Inge R., Pim Cuijpers, and Van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F.
- Subjects
BREAST tumor treatment ,QUALITY of life ,BREAST tumors ,CANCER patients ,COMBINED modality therapy ,NURSES' attitudes ,HEALTH outcome assessment ,PATIENT satisfaction ,PHYSICIAN-patient relations ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,RADIOTHERAPY ,HEALTH self-care ,TELEMEDICINE ,PILOT projects ,SOCIAL support ,PRE-tests & post-tests ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics - Abstract
Oncokompas, cancer survivors monitor their quality of life by completing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), followed by personalized feedback, self-care advice, and supportive care options to stimulate patient activation. The aim of this study was to investigate feasibility and pretest-posttest differences of Oncokompas including a newly developed breast cancer (BC) module among BC survivors. Material and methods: A pretest-posttest design was used. Feasibility was investigated by means of adoption, usage, and satisfaction rates. Several socio-demographic and clinical factors, and healthrelated quality of life (HRQOL) were explored that might be associated with patient satisfaction. Barriers and facilitators of Oncokompas feasibility were investigated by evaluating nurse consultation reports. Differences in patient activation (Patient Activation Measure) and patient-physician interaction (Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions) before and after Oncokompas use were investigated. Results: In total, 101 BC survivors participated. Oncokompas had an adoption rate of 75%, a usage rate of 75-84%, a mean satisfaction score of 6.9 (range 0-10) and a Net Promoter Score (NPS) of -36 (range -100-100) (N¼68). The BC module had a mean satisfaction score of 7.6. BC survivors who received surgery including chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy were significantly more satisfied with Oncokompas than BC survivors with surgery alone (p¼.013). Six facilitators and 10 barriers of Oncokompas feasibility were identified. After using Oncokompas, BC survivors scored significantly higher on patient activation (p¼.007; r¼.24), but not on patient-physician interaction (p¼.75). Conclusion: Oncokompas including a BC module is considered feasible, but needs further optimization to increase user satisfaction. This study shows the value of tailoring eHealth applications for cancer survivors to their specific tumor type. Oncokompas including the BC module seems to improve patient activation among BC survivors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. A systematic review of the measurement properties of the Body Image Scale (BIS) in cancer patients.
- Author
-
Cuijpers, Pim, Melissant, Heleen C., Neijenhuijs, Koen I., van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F., Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M., Jansen, Femke, Aaronson, Neil K., Groenvold, Mogens, Holzner, Bernhard, and Terwee, Caroline B.
- Subjects
CANCER patients ,BODY image ,CANCER treatment ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,STATISTICAL hypothesis testing ,MENTAL health ,QUALITY of life ,TUMORS & psychology ,BODY dysmorphic disorder ,RESEARCH funding ,PSYCHOLOGICAL factors - Abstract
Introduction: Body image is acknowledged as an important aspect of health-related quality of life in cancer patients. The Body Image Scale (BIS) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to evaluate body image in cancer patients. The aim of this study was to systematically review measurement properties of the BIS among cancer patients.Methods: A search in Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was performed to identify studies that investigated measurement properties of the BIS (Prospero ID 42017057237). Study quality was assessed (excellent, good, fair, poor), and data were extracted and analyzed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology on structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, hypothesis testing for construct validity, and responsiveness. Evidence was categorized into sufficient, insufficient, inconsistent, or indeterminate.Results: Nine studies were included. Evidence was sufficient for structural validity (one factor solution), internal consistency (α = 0.86-0.96), and reliability (r > 0.70); indeterminate for measurement error (information on minimal important change lacked) and responsiveness (increasing body image disturbance in only one study); and inconsistent for hypothesis testing (conflicting results). Quality of the evidence was moderate to low. No studies reported on cross-cultural validity.Conclusion: The BIS is a PROM with good structural validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability, but good quality studies on the other measurement properties are needed to optimize evidence. It is recommended to include a wider variety of cancer diagnoses and treatment modalities in these future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Intent to use a web-based psychological intervention for partners of cancer patients: Associated factors and preferences.
- Author
-
Köhle, Nadine, Drossaert, Constance H. C., Van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F., Schreurs, Karlein M. G., Hagedoorn, Mariët, Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M., and Bohlmeijer, Ernst T.
- Subjects
ATTITUDE (Psychology) ,CANCER patients ,COMPUTERS ,INTENTION ,SERVICES for caregivers ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,WORLD Wide Web ,SAMPLE size (Statistics) ,DATA analysis software ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics - Abstract
This study examined partners of cancer patients intention to use a web-based psychological intervention, their preferences regarding its preconditions, functionalities and topics, and factors related to their intention. One hundred and sixty-eight partners completed a questionnaire about these aspects. Forty-eight percent of the partners would (maybe) make use of a web-based intervention. Partners who intended to participate were significantly younger, used the Internet more often, and perceived more caregiver strain. Most partners preferred an intervention that takes less than 1 hour/week, lasts five weeks or more, and contains information and peer support. Half of the partners would like to receive online guidance. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Needs and Preferences of Partners of Cancer Patients Regarding a Web-Based Psychological Intervention: A Qualitative Study.
- Author
-
Kohle, Nadine, Drossaert, Constance HC, Oosterik, Suzan, Schreurs, Karlein MG, Hagedoorn, Mariët, van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F, Leeuw, Irma M Verdonck-de, and Bohlmeijer, Ernst T
- Subjects
CANCER patients ,ONLINE education ,ONCOLOGY ,COUNSELING ,EMOTIONS - Abstract
Background: Evidence-based, easily accessible, supportive interventions for partners of cancer patients are limited, despite the fact that they often suffer from diminished emotional, social, physical, and relational functioning. To develop a new intervention that will fit their demands, it is important to consult potential users. Objective: To examine partners' interest in a Web-based psychological intervention and to identify their needs and wishes regarding such an intervention. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 16 partners of cancer patients, who varied in terms of age, gender, education, employment, type, and stage of disease. Partners were asked (1) whether they would use a psychological Web-based intervention and which preconditions (maximum time, structure, participate alone or with their partner) it should meet; (2) which functionalities (information, peer support, online psychological counseling) the intervention should contain; and (3) which topics (eg, taking care of oneself) should be addressed. Data were coded by 2 coders independently. Results: The need for a Web-based intervention varied. Arguments for being interested in a Web-based intervention included the need for acknowledgement; the need for someone they could talk to; and the need for information, tips, and support. Based on their experiences as a partner of a cancer patient, participants would prefer an intervention that is not too time-consuming (about 1-2 hours a week) and which is based on a "step-by-step" approach, meaning that the content of the intervention should match the stage of their partner's disease. Also, they would prefer a positive approach, which means that the intervention should be a source of hope and energy. Most participants stated that they would prefer to participate without their ill spouse, because they do not want to burden their partners with their own problems. An intervention should contain information and optional peer support. Participants' opinions about online psychological counseling in the intervention were divided. Arguments for online psychological counseling were that a professional could check on them and they were able to ask questions. Arguments against online counseling were that partners were not in need for guidance or they had enough support from usual care. Topics with the highest priority were "coping with feelings and emotions," "should I or shouldn't I spare my partner?," "communicating with each other," "asking for help and refusing help," and "moving on with life after cancer treatment." Furthermore, participants suggested additional topics of "dare to enjoy" and "acceptance of the patient's disease." Conclusions: A Web-based intervention can be a valuable addition to existing support initiatives for partners of cancer patients. This study provides important information about the content and form of such an intervention. Flexibility and a positive approach seem to be the most important features. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Meaning Making in Cancer Survivors: A Focus Group Study.
- Author
-
van der Spek, Nadia, Vos, Joel, van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F., Breitbart, William, Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M., Cuijpers, Pim, and Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
- Subjects
CANCER patients ,CANCER treatment ,FOCUS groups ,QUALITY of life ,EVERYDAY life ,SOCIAL role ,CANCER research - Abstract
Background: Confrontation with a life-threatening disease like cancer can evoke existential distress, which can trigger a search for meaning in people after having survived this disease. Methods: In an effort to gain more insight in the meaning making process, we conducted four focus groups with 23 cancer survivors on this topic. Participants responded to questions about experienced meaning making, perceived changes in meaning making after cancer and the perceived need for help in this area. Results: Most frequently mentioned meaning making themes were relationships and experiences. We found that, in general, cancer survivors experienced enhanced meaning after cancer through relationships, experiences, resilience, goal-orientation and leaving a legacy. Some participants, however, also said to have (also) experienced a loss of meaning in their lives through experiences, social roles, relationships and uncertainties about the future. Conclusions: The results indicated that there is a group of cancer survivors that has succeeded in meaning making efforts, and experienced sometimes even more meaning in life than before diagnosis, while there is also a considerable group of survivors that struggled with meaning making and has an unmet need for help with that. The results of this study contribute to develop a meaning centered intervention for cancer survivors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Patient-initiated online support groups: motives for initiation, extent of success and success factors.
- Author
-
van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F., Drossaert, Constance H. C., Taal, Erik, Seydel, Erwin R., and van de Laar, Mart A. F. J.
- Subjects
- *
ELECTRONIC data processing personnel , *FIBROMYALGIA , *CANCER patients , *WOMEN'S health , *MANAGEMENT science - Abstract
We studied the success and success factors of online support groups (OSGs) for patients, and the motives and goals of people who start such groups. We interviewed 23 webmasters of OSGs for patients with breast cancer, fibromyalgia and arthritis. The majority were women (n = 20) and most were patients (n = 21). Analysis of the interviews revealed that webmasters had altruistic and intrinsic motives for initiating an online support group. They defined success as the fulfilment of the goals they had in mind when they initiated their groups. To be able to make a group successful, decisions about its organization and management need to be coherent with these goals. Most webmasters stressed that promoting the group, keeping it alive and moderating the messages were vital success factors during the evolution stage. Management of the OSGs took up much of the webmasters' time and energy. On average webmasters were occupied with the group for 10-15 hours a week. Our study provides an overview of the pros and cons of differing decisions that have to be made when initiating an OSG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Assessment of a Structured Self-Management Support Intervention by Nurses for Patients With Incurable Cancer.
- Author
-
de Veer, Anke J. E., Slev, Vina N., Pasman, H. Roeline, Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M., Francke, Anneke L., and van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F.
- Subjects
- *
CANCER patients , *MEDICAL care , *NURSES , *PATIENTS , *QUESTIONNAIRES , *RESEARCH funding , *STATISTICAL sampling , *SELF-management (Psychology) , *STATISTICAL hypothesis testing , *TELEMEDICINE , *OCCUPATIONAL roles , *SOCIAL support , *SOCIOECONOMIC factors , *TREATMENT effectiveness , *DATA analysis software , *PATIENTS' attitudes , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics - Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To gain an understanding of the perceptions of patients with incurable cancer regarding a new nurse-led self-management support intervention with an integrated eHealth application (Oncokompas) and its potential effectiveness. SAMPLE & SETTING: 36 patients receiving support in the home setting. METHODS & VARIABLES: A pre- and post-test mixed-methods design was used with a period of 12 weeks between the tests and qualitative interviews. Outcome measures were the perceived application of the intervention, patient satisfaction, patient activation, and quality of life. RESULTS: 85% of patients were satisfied with the assessment of their needs and the advice received. They valued nurses' expertise and the assistance provided in their homes. Twenty-five percent of the patients used Oncokompas. However, no statistically significant changes in patient activation and quality of life were found. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: This intervention can be used for encouraging self-management by patients with incurable cancer. Additional refinement and tailoring is desirable. Offering the intervention as early in the palliative phase as possible is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Self-Management Support in Patients With Incurable Cancer: How Confident Are Nurses?
- Author
-
Jongerden, Irene P., Slev, Vina N., van Hooft, Susanne M., Pasman, H. Roeline, Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M., de Veer, Anke J. E., van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F., and Francke, Anneke L.
- Subjects
- *
ONCOLOGY nursing , *CANCER patients , *COMMUNITY health nursing , *STATISTICAL correlation , *MEDICAL care , *NURSES' attitudes , *PATIENTS , *QUESTIONNAIRES , *REGRESSION analysis , *HEALTH self-care , *SELF-efficacy , *WORLD Wide Web , *LITERATURE reviews , *QUANTITATIVE research , *CROSS-sectional method , *DATA analysis software , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *HOSPITAL nursing staff , *MANN Whitney U Test - Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To explore how nurses perceive their self-efficacy and performance in supporting self-management among patients with incurable cancer, and whether these perceptions differ between community and hospital nurses. SAMPLE & SETTING: 222 hospital nurses (n = 94) and community nurses (n = 128) working with adult patients with incurable cancer. METHODS & VARIABLES: An online survey included the Self-Efficacy and Performance Into Self-Management Support instrument. Possible differences in age, gender, work setting, and additional training in oncology between groups were explored. RESULTS: Nurses felt confident about their selfefficacy, particularly in assessing patients' knowledge and beliefs and in advising about their disease and health status. Nurses felt less confident in their performance, particularly in the use of technology (arranging follow-up care), but also in agreeing on collaborative goals and assisting patients in achieving these goals. Compared to hospital nurses, community nurses reported significantly higher scores on self-efficacy and performance. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: More effort is needed to increase nurses' confidence in providing self-management support, with a focus on arranging follow-up care with the use of technology and on collaborating with patients in setting and achieving goals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Effects of eHealth for patients and informal caregivers confronted with cancer: A meta-review.
- Author
-
Slev, Vina N., Mistiaen, Patriek, Pasman, H. Roeline W., Leeuw, Irma M. Verdonck-de, Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F. van, Francke, Anneke L., Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M, and van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F
- Subjects
- *
ELECTRONIC health records , *CAREGIVERS , *CANCER patients , *MEDICAL informatics , *META-analysis , *HEALTH information services , *MEDICAL decision making , *ADAPTABILITY (Personality) , *PSYCHOLOGY of caregivers , *TELEMEDICINE , *SYSTEMATIC reviews , *DISEASE management ,TUMOR prevention ,TUMORS & psychology - Abstract
Background: eHealth can be defined as information provision about illness or health care and/or support for patients and/or informal caregivers, using the computer or related technologies. eHealth interventions are increasingly being used in cancer care, e.g. to support patients and informal caregivers in managing symptoms and problems in daily life.Objectives: To synthesize evidence from systematic reviews on the effects of eHealth for cancer patients or their informal caregivers.Materials and Methods: A systematic meta-review, in the sense of a systematic review of reviews, was conducted. Searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library. All steps in the review process were either performed by two reviewers independently or checked by a second reviewer. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.Results: Ten systematic reviews were included. All reviews focused on the effects of eHealth for patients and none on effects for informal caregivers. Except for one review of high methodological quality, all reviews were of moderate methodological quality. Evidence was found for effects on perceived support, knowledge levels, and information competence of cancer patients. Indications of evidence were found for health status and healthcare participation. Findings were inconsistent for outcomes related to decision-making, psychological wellbeing, depression and anxiety, and quality of life. No evidence was found for effects on physical and functional wellbeing.Conclusion: There is evidence for positive effects of eHealth on perceived support, knowledge, and information competence of cancer patients. For effects on other outcomes in cancer patients, findings are mainly inconsistent or lacking. This meta-review did not find relevant reviews focusing on or including the effects of eHealth on informal caregivers, which seems a rather unexplored area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.