Search

The present study aimed to investigate whether the addition of ultrasound (US) +/− fine needle aspiration (FNA) to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) improves the diagnostic accuracy in assessing neck lymphadenopathy in oral cancer patients after neck irradiation. We retrospectively reviewed oral cancer patients who had neck lymphadenopathy after radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation therapy (CRT) from February 2008 to November 2019. The following diagnostic modalities were assessed: (1) MRI/CT, (2) MRI/CT with a post-RT US predictive model, and (3) MRI/CT with US + FNA. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic performance. A total of 104 irradiation-treated oral cancer patients who subsequently had neck lymphadenopathy were recruited and analyzed. Finally, there were 68 (65%) malignant and 36 (35%) benign lymphadenopathies. In terms of the diagnostic performance, the area under the ROC curves (C-statistics) was 0.983, 0.920, and 0.828 for MRI/CT with US + FNA, MRI/CT with a post-RT US predictive model, and MRI/CT, respectively. The addition of US to MRI/CT to evaluate cervical lymphadenopathy could achieve a better diagnostic accuracy than MRI/CT alone in oral cancer patients after neck irradiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Malnutrition in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Several nutrition indicators have been reported to be related to the prognosis of HNC. However, the prognostic effect of these multiple nutrition factors in HNC is not well elucidated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic effect of these factors, including the novel hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score, for pharyngeal cancers. Material and methods: From 2008 to 2019, a total of 319 pharyngeal cancer patients were recruited. We collected adult patients with a diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, oropharyngeal carcinoma and hypopharyngeal carcinoma. Patients who completed definite staging workup and treatment were selected for analysis. We traced nutritional and hematological parameters, including body mass index (BMI), albumin, and complete blood count, for survival analysis. Results: We found that multiple nutritional markers, including BMI, hemoglobin, albumin, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), nutritional risk index (NRI) and HALP score, were important predictors for pharyngeal cancers in univariate Cox regression analysis. In multivariate analysis, we found that the HALP score was still an independent factor (HR: 1.62, 1.13–2.32 for overall survival [OS]) after adjusting of gender, age, cancer site, clinical stage, and BMI. The PNI was the most important independent factor for OS (HR: 3.12, 2.18–4.47) and cancer-specific survival (HR: 2.88, 1.88–4.41) in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: We found that multiple nutrition markers, including BMI, hemoglobin, albumin, PNI, NRI and HALP score, are important predictors for pharyngeal cancers. This is the first report confirming the prognostic effect of the HALP score for HNCs. Nutritional status at diagnosis should be given more attention in pharyngeal cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To analyze clinical characteristics in the prediction of death within 1 year in advanced oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with chemoradiation. Methods: One hundred forty-seven advanced oropharyngeal cancer patients who underwent curative-intent chemoradiation treatment were retrospectively enrolled. The pre-treatment clinical parameters including inflammatory markers were reviewed. Results: The 1-year death rate for all patients was 29% [95% confidence interval (CI): 23–37%]. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, hemoglobulin (Hb) < 13.5 g/dl was an independent indicator of death within 1-year [Odds ratio (OR) 5.85, 95% CI 2.17–15.75, p < 0.001]. Systemic immune inflammation (SII) ≥ 1820 was also a significant factor for prediction of death within 1 year (OR 4.78, 95% CI 1.44–15.85, p = 0.011). We further used gander, age, Hb and SII to develop a nomogram to predict death within 1 year. The c-index of the model was 0.75 (95%CI 0.66–0.83). For patients with low nomogram score (< 14) versus high nomogram score (≥ 14), the 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 91 and 71% versus 53 and 29%, respectively. (p < 0.001). A difference in the disease persistence or recurrence rate between patients with high and low nomogram score was significant (73 and 28%, respectively; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The pre-treatment Hb < 13.5 g/dl and SII ≥ 1820 are associated with higher risks of death within 1-year in patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancers. Nomogram can aid in patient counseling and treatment modality adjustment. The development of a more effective treatment protocol for patients with high nomogram score will be essential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are still oral cancer patients without surgery. To improve the survival, it is necessary to know the causes of the oral cancer patients without surgery. 23,217 patients with a newly-diagnosed oral cancer in Taiwan Cancer Registry (TCR) database between 2011 and 2015 were enrolled. Data from TCR database named "Reason for No Surgery of Primary Site" were extracted for analysis of the causes of those without surgery. Overall survival plots were presented using the Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test. 3263 (14%) patients did not received surgery. Among them, there were 720 patients (group 3) without surgery although surgery was advised, 154 patients (group 2) because of poor condition or death before surgery, and 2389 patients (group 1) because of other causes. Twenty-four percent of the patients with surgery were treated one month and more after diagnosis. The 5-year overall survival rates were 68.7%, 25.2%, 9.1% and 17.3% for surgery group, group 3, 2 and 1, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean age of the patients with and without surgery were 54.8 and 59.3, respectively (p < 0.01). Female patients were commoner in group 3 (p < 0.01). The patients without surgery was commoner in the middle (15.7%) and southern (14.8%) than in Northern Taiwan (12.1%). All groups without surgery had more advanced stage and lower BMI (p < 0.01). One-sevenths of patients were not treated surgically because of refusal, poor condition, older age, low BMI, and advanced stage. It is necessary to encourage the patients to undergo surgery with shortening the diagnosis-to-treatment interval. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study seeks to assess quality of life (QOL) and utility scores of head and neck cancer survivors.Methods: We compared QOL as indicated by EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35, utility scores by time trade off (TTO) with previous published reference values and tested series characteristics related to global QOL and utility.Results: A total of 127 patients were recruited. Of the patients, 102 (80%) completed the utility assessment. Cancer survivors had lower scores compared with norm values. Patients without a spouse had a lower utility than those with a spouse. Patients with a low annual family income also had lower global QOL and utility scores (p < 0.05). Other factors were not significantly related to QOL and utility scores.Conclusion: Disease and treatment of head and neck cancer lead to disability and poor health-related QOL and utility. Economic status may contribute to health-related QOL and utility, while marital status is related to utility for head and neck cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Esophageal second primary tumors (SPTs) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients is not uncommon. The impact of image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) screening for esophageal SPT on the outcome of HNC patients has not been well clarified.Methods and Methods: Patients with malignancies of the head and neck region and esophagus were recruited from a hospital-based cancer registry between July 2000-December 2016. IEE screening included magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging and chromoendoscopy with Lugol's solution. Biopsied specimens with revised Vienna classification categories 1 and 2 were defined as group I, and those with categories 3 to 5 were defined as group II. The Kaplan-Meier estimate and Cox regression model were used for survival analysis.Results: Totally 1577 HNC and 501 esophageal cancer patients were enrolled. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of stage I/II HNC, stage III/IV HNC and esophageal cancer patients were 58%, 29%, and 8%, respectively (p < 0.01). The 5-year OS rate of HNC patients with negative IEE results was higher than that of HNC patients without IEE screening, followed by IEE screening groups I, II and esophageal cancer patients (44% vs. 39% vs. 35% vs. 11% vs. 8%, respectively, p for trend <0.01). Among advanced HNC patients, those who received IEE screening had a trend of better prognosis than those without screening (5-year OS rate of 31% vs. 28%, p = 0.17).Conclusions: IEE screening for esophageal SPTs is helpful in risk stratification and prognosis prediction for HNC patients. Routine IEE screening is recommended in HNC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]