Search

Purpose: Cancer patients have to overcome various barriers to obtain diagnostics and treatment at head and neck cancer centers. Travel distance to a specialized hospital may result in psychosocial and financial distress, thus interfering with diagnostics, treatment, and follow-up care. In this study, we have aimed to analyze the association of travel distance with cTNM status, UICC stage at primary diagnosis, and survival outcomes of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Methods: We have analyzed data of 1921 consecutive HNC patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2019 at the head and neck cancer center of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm (CCCU), Germany. Postal code-based travel distance calculation in kilometers, TNM status, and UICC stage were recorded at initial diagnosis. The assembly of travel distance-related groups (short, intermediate, long-distance) has been investigated. Moreover, group-related survival and recurrence analysis have been performed. Results: In contrast to observations from overseas, no association of travel distance and higher cTNM status or UICC stage at primary diagnosis has been observed. Furthermore, no significant differences for recurrence-free survival and overall survival by travel distance were detected. Conclusion: In southern Germany, travel distance to head and neck cancer centers seems to be tolerable. Travel burden is not synonymous with travel distance alone but also involves sociodemographic, monetary, and disease-specific aspects as well as accessibility to proper infrastructure of transport and health care system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The relationship between expression of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein survivin and the presence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remains unclear. This also accounts for its role as a predictor of survival. Therefore, we conducted a multicentre retrospective study on 106 consecutive oropharyngeal cancer patients. Human papillomavirus sequences were detected by nested PCR protocols. Survivin and p16 expression as a surrogate marker for HPV status were analysed by immunohistochemistry. Sequences of high-risk HPV were detected in 29% of cases. Prominent cytoplasmatic expression of survivin was found in 58% of cases and nuclear expression of survivin was found in 19% of the survivin-positive tumours. Nuclear expression of survivin was significantly correlated with HPV-negative tumours (P=0.023) and with a poor disease-free survival rate with an estimated 3-year disease-free survival probability of 35% for tumours with nuclear expression of survivin vs 78% for tumours with non-nuclear expression of survivin (hazard ratio=8.264; 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=2.510-27.210; P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, p16 expression status as well as nuclear expression of survivin were strong independent and opposing prognostic indicators of disease-free survival (hazard ratio=0.068; 95% CI=0.005-0.892; P=0.041 and hazard ratio=15.975; 95% CI=2.377-107.360; P=0.004, respectively). Our data show that nuclear accumulation of survivin correlates with HPV-independent carcinogenesis and is an independent predictor of poor survival in patients with OSCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Second solid tumors are well known late complications after bone marrow transplantation. Treatment strategies are ill defined. We retrospectively evaluated treatment and outcome in a single institution. From August 1974 to July 1996, six solid tumors were observed in five of 387 patients 2 to 13 years after BMT, corresponding to a probability of developing a second solid tumor of 9% (1–17%, 95 CI) at 15 years: these comprised endometrial carcinoma, carcinoma of the thyroid gland, cervical carcinoma, sarcoma of the small intestine, osteosarcoma of the tibia and ovarian carcinoma. All five patients were treated as intensively as they would be without a history of BMT. At last follow-up four of the five patients were alive and without signs of tumor. We postulate that second solid tumors after BMT should be treated as de novo tumors. Early detection based on consequent clinical follow-up of the transplant patients might explain the relatively good outcome. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 895–898. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]