Search

Post radiation mucosal ulcers (PRMU) after treatment for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) can have a huge negative impact on patients' quality of life, but little is known concerning risk factors and the impact of fraction size. Therefore, the goal of this study was to determine the pattern of PRMU development and to identify risk factors after a hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy boost (SBRT) compared to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for OPSCC. We performed a retrospective cohort study (N = 332) of OPSCC patients with ≥ 1-year disease-free survival, treated with 46 Gy Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) (2 Gy fractions) followed by either an SBRT boost of 16.5 Gy (5.5 Gy fractions) (N = 180), or 24 Gy IMRT (2 Gy fractions) (N = 152). PRMU (grade ≥ 2) was scored when observed > three months after the last radiotherapy (RT) fraction (CTCAE v5.0). Potential risk factors were analyzed with Cox regression models using death as competing risk. Dose at the PRMU site was calculated by projecting delineated PRMU on the planning CT. All cases of PRMU (N = 64) occurred within 24 months; all were grade 2. The cumulative incidence at 2 years in the SBRT boost group was 26% (N = 46) vs. 12% (N = 18) for conventional fractionation (p = 0.003). Most PRMU developed within nine months (N = 48). PRMU occurring > nine months (N = 16) were mainly observed in the SBRT boost group (N = 15). Sex (p = 0.048), acute tube feeding (p = < 0.001), tumor subsite tonsil (p = 0.001), and N stage (p = 0.017) were associated with PRMU risk at multivariable regression in the hypofractionated SBRT boost group. All 25 delineated PRMU were located within the high dose regions. The risk of PRMU should be included in the cost benefit analysis when considering future research using a hypofractionated SBRT boost for OPSCC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Purpose: Nowadays, advanced irradiation techniques make it possible to escalate safely the dose in prostate cancer. We studied the effect of a higher dose on tumor control in a randomized trial with a median follow-up of 110months. Patients and methods: Patients with T1b-T4N0 prostate cancer (n =664) were randomized between 78Gy and 68Gy. Primary endpoint was biochemical and/or clinical failure (BCF) according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) guidelines (3 consecutive rises), and to Phoenix (nadir plus 2μg/L). Secondary endpoints were clinical failure (CF), local failure (LF), prostate cancer death (PCD), and overall survival (OS). Explorative subgroup analyses were performed. Results: BCF rate (HR=0.8; 20% less events) and LF rate (HR=0.5; 50% less events) were significantly lower in the 78Gy arm (p <0.05). CF, PCD and OS were similar in both arms. A significant heterogeneity of treatment effect was found for PSA cutoffs between 7 and 10μg/L. Conclusion: We observed significantly less BCF and LF in the high-dose arm. This suggests improvement of the therapeutic ratio. However, we observed similar rates of CF and PCD at the current update. More follow-up is needed to investigate which patients benefit in terms of prolonged OS. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To compare the acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated to a total dose of 78 Gy with either a three-conformal radiotherapy technique with a sequential boost (SEQ) or a simultaneous integrated boost using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT). Patients and Methods: A total of 78 prostate cancer patients participating in the randomized Dutch trial comparing 68 Gy and 78 Gy were the subject of this analysis. They were all treated at the same institution to a total dose of 78 Gy. The median follow-up was 76 and 56 months for the SEQ and SIB-IMRT groups, respectively. The primary endpoints were acute and late GI and GU toxicity. Results: A significantly lower incidence of acute Grade 2 or greater GI toxicity occurred in patients treated with SIB-IMRT compared with SEQ (20% vs. 61%, p = 0.001). For acute GU toxicity and late GI and GU toxicity, the incidence was lower after SIB-IMRT, but these differences were not statistically significant. No statistically significant difference were found in the 5-year freedom from biochemical failure rate (Phoenix definition) between the two groups (70% for the SIB-IMRT group vs. 61% for the SEQ group, p = 0.3). The same was true for the 5-year freedom from clinical failure rate (90% vs. 72%, p = 0.07). Conclusion: The results of our study have shown that SIB-IMRT reduced the toxicity without compromising the outcome in patients with localized prostate cancer treated to 78 Gy radiation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To investigate whether a large rectum filling visible on the planning CT scan was associated with a decrease in freedom from any failure (FFF) and freedom from clinical failure (FFCF) for prostate cancer patients. Methods and Materials: Patients from the Dutch trial (78 Gy vs. 68 Gy) with available acute toxicity data were analyzed (n = 549). A 10-mm margin was applied for the first 68 Gy and 0-5 mm for the 10-Gy boost. The dose in the seminal vesicles (SVs) was prescribed within four treatment groups according to the estimated risk of SV involvement. Two potential risk factors (RFs) for a geometric miss were defined: (1) an anorectal volume > or = 90 cm(3) and > or = 25% of treatment-time diarrhea (RF1); and (2) the mean cross-sectional area of the anorectum (RF2). We tested whether these were significant predictors for FFF and FFCF within each treatment group. Results: Significant results were observed only for patients with a risk of SV involvement > 25% (dose of 68-78 Gy to the SVs, n = 349). We found a decrease in FFF (p = 0.001) and FFCF (p = 0.01) for the 87 patients with RF1 (for RF2, p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively). The estimated decrease in the FFCF rate at 5 years was 15%. Conclusion: Tumor control was significantly decreased in patients with a risk of SV involvement > 25% and at risk of geometric miss. Current image guidance techniques offer several solutions to geometrically optimize the treatment. Additional research is needed to evaluate whether geometric misses can be prevented using these techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) delivered within 6 weeks in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The impact of tumor volume and delivered dose on failure-free interval (FFI) and overall survival (OS) were also studied. Methods and Materials: A Phase I/II trial was performed including inoperable NSCLC patients. According to the relative mean lung dose (rMLD), five risk groups with different starting doses were defined: Group 1, rMLD 0.0 to 0.12; Group 2, rMLD 0.12 to 0.18; Group 3, rMLD 0.18 to 0.24; Group 4, rMLD 0.24 to 0.31; and Group 5, rMLD 0.31 to 0.40. Patients underwent irradiation with 2.25 Gy per fraction and a fixed overall treatment time of 6 weeks. The dose was escalated with 6.75 Gy after 6 months follow-up without dose-limiting toxicity. If more than 30 fractions were prescribed, twice-daily irradiation was performed with at least a 6-h interval. Results: A total of 88 patients were included. Tumor Stage I or II was found in 53%, IIIA in 31%, and IIIB in 17%. The MTD was not achieved in risk Group 1 (reached dose, 94.5 Gy). For risk Groups 2 and 3 the MTD was 81 Gy. The 74.3-Gy dose was determined to be safe for Group 4 and the 60.8-Gy dose for Group 5. In 2 patients (5%) an isolated nodal relapse occurred. Based on multivariable analysis, higher doses significantly increased the FFI (p = 0.02) for the total group. The OS was increased in the lower risk groups (p = 0.05) but not in the higher risk groups (p = 0.4). Conclusion: Dose escalation is safe up to 94.5 Gy in 42 fractions in 6 weeks in patients with an MLD 13.6 Gy or less. Higher doses are associated with a better FFI and OS for smaller tumor volumes. Involved-field irradiation results in a low percentage of isolated nodal relapses. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: Late gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity after radiotherapy can be partly explained by late effects of acute toxicity (consequential late damage). We studied whether there is a direct relationship between acute and late GI toxicity. Patients and Methods: A total of 553 evaluable patients from the Dutch dose escalation trial (68 Gy vs. 78 Gy) were included. We defined three outcomes for acute reactions: 1) maximum Radiation Therapy Oncology Group acute toxicity, 2) maximum acute mucous discharge (AMD), and 3) maximum acute proctitis. Within a multivariable model, late endpoints (overall toxicity and five toxicity indicators) were studied as a function of acute toxicity, pretreatment symptoms, and relevant dose parameters. Results: At multivariable analysis, AMD and acute proctitis were strong predictors for overall toxicity, “intermittent bleeding,” and “incontinence pads” (p ≤ 0.01). For “stools ≥6/day” all three were strong predictors. No significant associations were found for “severe bleeding” and “use of steroids.” The predictive power of the dose parameters remained at the same level or became weaker for most late endpoints. Conclusions: Acute GI toxicity is an independent significant predictor of late GI toxicity. This suggests a significant consequential component in the development of late GI toxicity. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To identify dosimetric parameters derived from anorectal, rectal, and anal wall dose distributions that correlate with different late gastrointestinal (GI) complications after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: In this analysis, 641 patients from a randomized trial (68 Gy vs. 78 Gy) were included. Toxicity was scored with adapted Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/EORTC) criteria and five specific complications. The variables derived from dose–volume histogram of anorectal, rectal, and anal wall were as follows: % receiving ≥5–70 Gy (V5–V70), maximum dose (Dmax), and mean dose (Dmean). The anus was defined as the most caudal 3 cm of the anorectum. Statistics were done with multivariate Cox regression models. Median follow-up was 44 months. Results: Anal dosimetric variables were associated with RTOG/EORTC Grade ≥2 (V5–V40, Dmean) and incontinence (V5–V70, Dmean). Bleeding correlated most strongly with anorectal V55–V65, and stool frequency with anorectal V40 and Dmean. Use of steroids was weakly related to anal variables. No volume effect was seen for RTOG/EORTC Grade ≥3 and pain/cramps/tenesmus. Conclusion: Different volume effects were found for various late GI complications. Therefore, to evaluate the risk of late GI toxicity, not only intermediate and high doses to the anorectal wall volume should be taken into account, but also the dose to the anal wall. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To identify dosimetric variables predictive of acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity and to determine whether hormonal therapy (HT) is independently associated with acute GI and GU toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with conformal radiotherapy (RT). Methods and Materials: This analysis was performed on 336 patients participating in a multicenter (four hospitals) randomized trial comparing 68 Gy and 78 Gy. The clinical target volume consisted of the prostate with or without the seminal vesicles, depending on the risk of seminal vesicle involvement. The margin from the clinical target volume to the planning target volume was 1 cm. For these patients, the treatment plan for a total dose of 68 Gy was used, because nearly all toxicity appeared before the onset of the 10-Gy boost. Acute toxicity (<120 days) was scored according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. The dosimetric parameters were obtained from the relative and absolute dose–volume/surface histograms derived from the rectal wall (rectal wall volume receiving ≥5–65 Gy) and the bladder surface (bladder surface receiving ≥5–65 Gy). Additionally, relative and absolute dose–length histograms of the rectum were created, and the lengths of rectum receiving more than a certain dose over the whole circumference (rectal length receiving ≥5–65 Gy) were computed. The clinical variables taken into account for GI toxicity were neoadjuvant HT, hospital, and dose–volume group; for GU toxicity, the variables pretreatment GU symptoms, neoadjuvant HT, and transurethral resection of the prostate were analyzed. The variable neoadjuvant HT was divided into three categories: no HT, short-term neoadjuvant HT (started ≤3 months before RT), and long-term neoadjuvant HT (started >3 months before RT). Results: Acute GI toxicity Grade 2 or worse was seen in 46% of the patients. Patients with long-term neoadjuvant HT experienced less Grade 2 or worse toxicity (27%) compared with those receiving short-term neoadjuvant HT (50%) and no HT (50%). The volumes of the prostate and seminal vesicles were significantly smaller in both groups receiving neoadjuvant HT compared with those receiving no HT. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, including the two statistically significant clinical variables neoadjuvant HT and hospital, a volume effect was found for the relative, as well as absolute, rectal wall volumes exposed to intermediate and high doses. Of all the length parameters, the relative rectal length irradiated to doses of ≥5 Gy and ≥30 Gy and absolute lengths receiving ≥5–15 and 30 Gy were significant. Acute GU toxicity Grade 2 or worse was reported in 56% of cases. For patients with pretreatment GU symptoms, the rate was 93%. The use of short-term and long-term neoadjuvant HT resulted in more GU toxicity (73% and 71%) compared with no HT (50%). In multivariate analysis, containing the variables pretreatment symptoms and neoadjuvant HT, only the absolute dose–surface histogram parameters (absolute surface irradiated to ≥40, 45, and 65 Gy) were significantly associated with acute GU toxicity. Conclusion: A volume effect was found for acute GI toxicity for relative, as well as absolute, volumes. With regard to acute GU toxicity, an area effect was found, but only for absolute dose–surface histogram parameters. Neoadjuvant HT appeared to be an independent prognostic factor for acute toxicity, resulting in less acute GI toxicity, but more acute GU toxicity. The presence of pretreatment GU symptoms was the most important prognostic factor for GU symptoms during RT. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

• Patient-reported GI symptoms in a locally advanced cervical cancer cohort in the acute phase of treatment are investigated. • Local dose effects in the rectum are found for diarrhea symptoms. • No dose–response relationship reaches significance for bowelbag. To investigate relationships between patient-reported acute gastro-intestinal symptoms in a locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) prospective cohort and clinical and dosimetric parameters, while also taking spatial dose into account. A total of 103 patients was included, receiving radiotherapy based on a plan-library-based plan-of-the-day protocol, combined either with concurrent chemotherapy or with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and concomitant hyperthermia. Toxicity endpoints were extracted from questionnaires sent out weekly during treatment and regularly in the acute phase after treatment. Endpoints were defined for symptoms concerning obstipation, diarrhea, fecal leakage, bowel cramps and rectal bleeding. Dose surface maps were constructed for the rectum. Clinical parameters and dosimetric parameters of the bowel bag and rectum were collected for all patients. The use of concomitant chemotherapy and an increase in Planning Target Volume (PTV) resulted in a significant increase in reported diarrhea. The dose–volume parameters V 5Gy –V 25Gy of the rectum were found to be significant, unlike dose–volume parameters of the bowel bag. Additionally, a significantly higher dose to the inferior part of the rectum was found for patients reporting diarrhea. No significance was reached for fecal leakage and bowel cramps. The significance of results for patients reporting diarrhea symptoms found for PTV volume indicates a potential benefit for a plan-of-the-day protocol. Additionally, the results suggest that a reduction of inferior rectum dose could decrease patient-reported diarrhea symptoms, while the administration of concomitant chemotherapy appears to lead to radiosensitizing effects that increase these symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of a dietary protocol on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image quality, which is an indirect indicator for short-term (intrafraction) prostate motion, and on interfraction motion. Image quality is affected by motion (e.g., moving gas) during imaging and influences the performance of automatic prostate localization on CBCT scans. Methods and Materials: Twenty-six patients (336 CBCT scans) followed the dietary protocol and 23 patients (240 CBCT scans) did not. Prostates were automatically localized by using three dimensional (3D) gray-value registration (GR). Feces and (moving) gas occurrence in the CBCT scans, the success rate of 3D-GR, and the statistics of prostate motion data were assessed. Results: Feces, gas, and moving gas significantly decreased from 55%, 61%, and 43% of scans in the nondiet group to 31%, 47%, and 28% in the diet group (all p < 0.001). Since there is a known relation between gas and short-term prostate motion, intrafraction prostate motion probably also decreased. The success rate of 3D-GR improved from 83% to 94% (p < 0.001). A decrease in random interfraction prostate motion also was found, which was not significant after Bonferroni''s correction. Significant deviations from planning CT position for rotations around the left-right axis were found in both groups. Conclusions: The dietary protocol significantly decreased the incidence of feces and (moving) gas. As a result, CBCT image quality and the success rate of 3D-GR significantly increased. A trend exists that random interfraction prostate motion decreases. Using a dietary protocol therefore is advisable, also without CBCT-based image guidance. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]