Search

Background: Nivolumab + chemotherapy is now a standard of care for HER2-negative, previously untreated, unresectable or recurrent gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (advanced gastric cancer), but long-term follow-up data of clinical trials are limited. Methods: ATTRACTON-4 was a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Patients were randomized to either nivolumab or placebo, both combined with the physician's choice of SOX (oral S-1 [tegafur–gimeracil–oteracil potassium] + oxaliplatin) or CAPOX (capecitabine + oxaliplatin). We report the primary endpoints—centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)—and landmark analyses of OS among patients alive using 3-year follow-up data. Results: At the cutoff date (May 10, 2021), 17/359 patients in the nivolumab + chemotherapy group and 6/358 in the placebo + chemotherapy group were continuing study treatment. PFS (centrally assessed) was longer in the nivolumab + chemotherapy group (median 10.94 vs. 8.48 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–0.82). Although OS did not differ between the two groups (median 17.45 vs. 17.15 months; HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75–1.05), the landmark analysis of OS, calculating HRs at each landmark time point (every month), was getting numerically better in the nivolumab + chemotherapy group over time. Approximately 80% of patients who achieved complete response in the nivolumab + chemotherapy group were alive at 3 years. No new safety signals or major late-onset select treatment-related adverse events were observed for nivolumab + chemotherapy. Conclusion: This 3-year follow-up of ATTRACTION-4 confirmed the long-term clinical benefit and manageable safety of nivolumab + chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer. Trial registration: NCT02746796 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Molecularly targeted therapies have greatly contributed to the development of colorectal cancer treatments. Genomic profiling to identify gene alterations is a rapidly developing field. Liquid biopsies have recently drawn considerable attention because they offer several advantages over tissue biopsies and can be used to detect several soluble factors, including circulating tumor DNA. In this review, we discuss the usefulness of analyzing circulating tumor DNA to design more personalized and effective cancer treatments and discuss several ongoing clinical trials that aim to evaluate its utility. Genomic profiling using circulating tumor DNA could be integrated into clinical strategies for cancer treatment in the near future. Genotyping of tumor tissues to assess RAS and BRAF V600E mutations enables us to select optimal molecularly targeted therapies when considering treatment strategies for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Tissue-based genetic testing is limited by the difficulty of performing repeated tests, due to the invasive nature of tissue biopsy, and by tumor heterogeneity, which can limit the usefulness of the information it yields. Liquid biopsy, represented by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), has attracted attention as a novel method for detecting genetic alterations. Liquid biopsies are more convenient and much less invasive than tissue biopsies and are useful for obtaining comprehensive genomic information on primary and metastatic tumors. Assessing ctDNA can help track genomic evolution and the status of alterations in genes such as RAS, which are sometimes altered following chemotherapy. In this review, we discuss the potential clinical applications of ctDNA, summarize clinical trials focusing on RAS, and present the future prospects of ctDNA analysis that could change daily clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Alpha-Fetoprotein Producing Gastric Cancer (AFPGC) is an aggressive subgroup of gastric cancer. Recently ramucirumab has shown survival benefits in hepatocellular carcinoma, but only in those with higher Alpha-Fetoprotein (AFP) levels. However, the efficacy of ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy in AFPGC remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively assessed 352 patients who received ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy between June 2015 and December 2019. AFPGC was defined when serum AFP levels were elevated at diagnosis and correlated with the disease state during treatment. Non-AFPGC was defined when serum AFP levels were normal at diagnosis. Results: Among the 352 patients, 28 patients were defined as AFPGC and 246 patients were defined as non-AFPGC. AFPGC was characterized by high frequency of liver metastasis and low frequency of peritoneal metastasis compared to non-AFPGC. Ramucirumab containing chemotherapy showed higher response rates in AFPGC (39.1% vs 24.8%, p = 0.198) and disease control rates (86.9% vs 61.5%, p = 0.028) than those of non-AFPGC, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months (95%CI 3.9–7.1) in AFPGC and 4.0 months (95%CI 3.6–4.6) in non-AFPGC (HR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.61–1.36, p = 0.66), and median overall survival (OS) was 10.7 months (95% CI 7.4–20.8) in AFPGC and 9.2 months (95% CI 8.1–10.4) in non-AFPGC (HR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.48–1.08, p = 0.11), respectively. In multivariate analysis, AFPGC was not a negative prognostic factor both for PFS and OS. Conclusion: Ramucirumab containing chemotherapy showed higher response and comparable survival in AFPGC compared to those of non-AFPGC. Considering the generally poor prognosis of AFPGC, ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy might be a promising treatment option in AFPGC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: It remains unclear whether patients' self‐perceptions of symptoms at baseline clinically impact the prognostic relevance, treatment efficacy, or toxicity profiles in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with the first‐line cetuximab and standard chemotherapy. Methods: The data were collected from a prospective trial that assessed the relationships between quality of life (QOL), treatment efficacy, and adverse events (AEs). Results: The analysis of 137 mCRC patients revealed a significant association between the presence of baseline tumor‐related symptoms and a lower overall survival (OS) compared to the absence of symptoms (HR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.37‐4.62; P =.003). The asymptomatic responders had favorable outcomes compared to the symptomatic nonresponders (2‐year OS rates: 83.6% and 35.9%, respectively), while the symptomatic responders had similar outcomes to the asymptomatic nonresponders. The median postprogression survival differed significantly: 10.2 months for the symptomatic patients and 15.9 months for the asymptomatic patients (HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.25‐4.29, P =.008). The objective response rates and patient toxicity profiles were similar irrespective of the severity of baseline symptoms. Conclusion: Baseline symptoms were associated with worse OS but not with impaired treatment efficacy or more frequent AEs in mCRC patients treated with cetuximab in addition to chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adjuvant S-1 monotherapy prolongs the survival of patients with pathological stage II or III gastric cancer undergoing D2 gastrectomy. This therapeutic regimen is standard in Japan. Unfortunately, some patients who undergo this treatment suffer from recurrent disease. However, information regarding the timing and site-specific trends of recurrence is insufficient. Methods: Among 396 patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S-1 monotherapy between 2008 and 2012, 122 experienced a recurrence. We retrospectively determined the timing and sites of recurrence. Results: The median RFS of the 122 patients was 19.5 months, and their 1-, 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 67.2%, 23.0% and 5.7%, respectively. There were no significant differences in RFS among disease substages. Local recurrence, lymph node involvement and peritoneal and hematogenous metastases were found in 6, 25, 63 and 42 patients, respectively. Approximately 10% of patients presented with contemporaneous sites of recurrence. Local recurrence and lymph node metastasis plateaued 3 years after gastrectomy. Peritoneal and hematogenous metastasis increased within 5 years after surgery. In patients with hematogenous metastasis, the number of liver metastases plateaued but increased in others. Conclusions: In patients with recurrent disease who underwent D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S-1 monotherapy, 80% of recurrences occur within 3 years after gastrectomy. The timing of recurrence is not significantly different among substages. Although the rates of local recurrence and lymph node and liver metastasis plateau after 3 years, peritoneal and the other hematogenous metastases increase within 5 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Nivolumab, an anti-programmed death-1 agent, showed survival benefits in Asian patients, including Japanese, with gastric/gastro-esophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer. We report the analysis of the Japanese subpopulation from ATTRACTION-2 that evaluated nivolumab versus placebo in unresectable advanced or recurrent G/GEJ cancer after ≥ 2 chemotherapy regimens.Methods: Data from the Japanese subpopulation in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial were analyzed (data cutoff, February 25, 2017). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR).Results: Among the overall study population of 493 patients, 226 (nivolumab 152; placebo 74) were enrolled from 28 sites in Japan. In the Japanese subset, median OS was longer with nivolumab versus placebo (5.4 months, 95% CI 4.6-7.4 versus 3.6 months, 95% CI 2.8-5.0). The risk of death was lower in the nivolumab versus placebo group (hazard ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.42-0.78; p = 0.0002). Incidences of serious adverse events were 23% (35/152) and 25% (18/72) in the nivolumab and placebo groups, respectively. In the Japanese ITT population, 22% of nivolumab-treated and 28% of placebo-treated patients received prior ramucirumab treatment. Overall, clinical activity of nivolumab was observed regardless of prior ramucirumab use. In the nivolumab group, ORR and PFS were numerically higher in patients with prior ramucirumab use than in those without.Conclusions: In the Japanese subpopulation, patients receiving nivolumab had longer OS, similar to the overall population, with a manageable safety profile. The interaction between nivolumab and ramucirumab will be clarified in ongoing clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: NK012 is a polymeric micelle formulation of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of NK012 in Japanese patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer.Methods: We conducted a multicenter open-label phase II trial of NK012 monotherapy in 58 patients who had been treated with an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimen (group A: 53 patients with UGT1A1 genotype -/-, *6/-, or *28/-; group B: 5 patients with UGT1A1 genotype *6/*28 or *6/*6). The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR). Initial doses of 28 and 18 mg/m2 for group A and group B, respectively, were administered intravenously over 30 min, and these doses were subsequently administered every 3 weeks. Group A was evaluated as the primary efficacy population, while group B was evaluated for reference.Results: In group A, the RR was 3.8%, and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.30 months and 15.03 months, respectively. In both groups, the most common grade ≥ 3 adverse drug reaction (ADR) was neutropenia and the incidence of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea was low or zero. In group A, 17 serious ADRs were observed in 10 patients (17%); all improved or recovered. In group B, no serious ADRs were observed. No treatment-related deaths were reported in either group.Conclusions: NK012 monotherapy yielded an RR similar to the RR of irinotecan monotherapy that was reported in the phase III EPIC trial (4.2%), and the incidence of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea was low. Based on the incidence and severity of febrile neutropenia and grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, the initial dose of NK012 28 mg/m2 may be too high for colorectal cancer patients who have previously been treated with an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: One-year adjuvant S-1 monotherapy following D2 gastrectomy has been the Japanese treatment standard for pathological stage II or III gastric cancer since the Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial of S-1 for Gastric Cancer (ACTS-GC) was concluded in 2007. Trial patients were selected according to the 13th edition of the Japanese classification (JC-13). The JC-13 and the TNM classification underwent major revisions in 2010 (JC-14/TNM-7). However, neither the recent therapeutic results for patients with stage II/III disease defined by the current system nor comparisons with the ACTS-GC-results have been reported.Methods: The 390 study patients had pathological stage II/III gastric cancer defined by the JC-14/TNM-7 and treated with S-1 following D2 gastrectomy between 2008 and 2012. The completion rate of 1-year S-1, first relapse site, and stage-specific survival according to the JC-14/TNM-7, JC-13, and TNM-6 were examined and the results compared with those of the ACTS-GC.Results: The completion rate for 1-year S-1 (69.5%) was slightly higher than in the ACTS-GC. The recurrence pattern was almost identical. The 5-year overall survival rates of pathological IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC in the JC-14/TNM-7 were 96.0, 85.5, 81.8, 72.0, and 51.1%, respectively. Their 5-year overall and relapse-free survival rates by the JC-13 and TNM-6 systems were favorable as compared to those of ACTS-GC patients for all substages.Conclusions: Survival outcome shown in this study of patients treated with 1-year adjuvant S-1 after D2 gastrectomy at a high-volume cancer hospital will provide a reference for future adjuvant trials targeting JC-14/TNM-7 stage II/III disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Backgrounds: In Japan, standard regimens for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) include S-1 chemotherapy. The standard treatment for early relapse after adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine alone is platinum-based chemotherapy, while the standard treatment for early relapse after adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine plus platinum is second-line chemotherapy. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) treatment for AGC patients who relapse within 6 months after S-1-based therapy, we conducted a multicenter phase II trial (NCT01412294).Methods: HER2-negative gastric cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy including S-1 for more than 12 weeks and relapsed within 6 months were treated with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid for 14 days plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 3-week cycle. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were OS, time to treatment failure, overall response rate (ORR) and safety.Results: Forty patients (median age 64) were enrolled; of those, 37 (92.5%) received adjuvant S-1 monotherapy. Median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI 3.6-5.1), which was longer than the 2-month protocol-specified threshold (p < 0.001). Median OS was 13.7 months (95% CI 9.0-17.7) and ORR was 8/30 (26.7%) (95% CI 14.2-44.4). Most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (23%), anemia (18%), elevated serum creatinine (18%), fatigue (13%), diarrhea (7.5%), and anorexia (7.5%).Conclusions: XP was safe and effective in patients with early relapse after S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for curatively resected gastric cancers. XP may be a good option for the treatment of patients after early failure after adjuvant S-1.Trial registration: NCT01412294. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: A prospective trial has not been performed to investigate associations between quality of life (QOL), adverse events (AEs), and overall survival (OS) in the first‐line treatment with cetuximab plus standard chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Associations between patient outcome and health‐related QOL (HRQOL) together with skin toxicity‐related QOL were prospectively evaluated using EORTC QLQ‐C30 and DLQI questionnaires. One hundred and forty mCRC patients were analyzed in this study, and 87.8% received pre‐emptive skin treatment. Skin toxicity had no clinical impact on HRQOL or skin‐related QOL during the first 8 weeks and throughout the study period. An early skin reaction with a grade ≥2 at 8 weeks was significantly associated with a favorable OS compared with a grade of ≤1 (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.24‐0.95; P = .035) and was confirmed to be an independent predictor of OS (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.21‐0.97; P = .040). Patients symptomatic at baseline who responded to treatment had improved HRQOL compared to nonresponding patients. Severe mucositis/stomatitis had a statistically significant and clinically meaningful negative impact on HRQOL (mean changes from baseline throughout the study period in global health status were −12.64 for a grade of ≥2 vs −0.35 for a grade of 0 or 1 (P = .005)). In conclusion, severe early skin reactions predict favorable OS for patients treated with cetuximab plus chemotherapy without impairing QOL. In addition, mucositis/stomatitis was the most substantial AE compromising both QOL and treatment compliance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: AVAGAST was an international, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III study of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab as first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer. We performed exploratory analyses to evaluate regional differences observed in the trial.Methods: Analyses were performed in the placebo plus chemotherapy arm (intention-to-treat population). Chemotherapy was cisplatin 80 mg/m2 for six cycles plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 orally bid days 1-14) or 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m2/day continuous IV infusion days 1-5) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.Results: Overall, 387 patients were assigned to placebo plus chemotherapy (eastern Europe/South America, n = 118; USA/western Europe, n = 81; Korea/other Asia, n = 94; Japan, n = 94). At baseline, poor performance status, liver metastases, and larger tumors were most frequent in eastern Europe/South America and least frequent in Japan. Patients received subsequent chemotherapy after disease progression as follows: eastern Europe/South America (14%); USA/western Europe (37%); Korea/other Asia (61%); and Japan (77%). Hazard ratios for overall survival versus USA/western Europe were 1.47 (95% CI, 1.09-1.99) for eastern Europe/South America, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.67-1.25) for Korea/other Asia, and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.64-1.19) for Japan.Conclusions: Regional differences in the healthcare environment may have contributed to the differences in overall survival observed in the AVAGAST study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There are few chemotherapeutic options for advanced gastric cancer with severe disseminated peritoneal metastases, which are usually accompanied by ascites. Bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin therapy has been widely used against gastrointestinal malignancies, with resulting mild toxicities.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapy with bolus 5-FU plus l-leucovorin in 30 advanced gastric cancer patients who had massive ascites and/or inadequate oral intake. This therapy consisted of 5-FU (600 mg/m2 IV bolus) plus l-leucovorin (250 mg/m2 2-h IV infusion) administered on a 6 weeks on/2 weeks off schedule.Results: Among all the patients, 26 (87%) were unable to eat and 12 (40%) had massive ascites. Major grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (17%), nausea (7%), fatigue (7%), and diarrhea (3%); no treatment-related deaths were observed. The median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 2.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.6-4.1] and 6.0 months (95% CI, 2.1-9.9), respectively. Objective improvement in oral intake was seen in 7 patients (27%). Improvement in ascites occurred in 9 (39%) of 23 patients. In multivariate analyses, the presence of both massive ascites and inadequate oral intake was significantly associated with worse OS (hazard ratio, 5.25; 95% CI, 1.61-17.1). The median OS for patients (n = 22) without this factor was 7.2 months (95% CI, 4.2-10.3).Conclusion: Our study suggests that bolus 5-FU plus l-leucovorin therapy is feasible and has clinical activity as palliative therapy in patients with severe peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Peritoneal cytology positive for carcinoma cells (CY+) is an independent poor prognostic factor in gastric cancer, and patients with CY+ are diagnosed with stage IV disease. However, there is no standard treatment strategy for CY+ gastric cancer, whereas combination chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine and platinum has been established as the standard treatment for unresectable advanced gastric cancer or after R2 resection. Herein, we assessed whether adding cisplatin to S-1 (SP) could improve the outcome of CY+ gastric cancer patients, as compared to S-1 monotherapy. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a single Japanese institute between June 2005 and March 2014. Patients diagnosed with CY+ advanced gastric cancer and treated with S-1-based therapy were enrolled. Patients with incurable factors other than CY+ were excluded. Results: Forty-four patients were enrolled; 25 and 19 were administered S-1 and SP, respectively. The 2-year survival rates were 52.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 31.2-69.2%] and 52.6% (28.7-71.9%) in the S-1 and SP groups, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 28.2 and 15.6 months in the S-1 group and 24.0 and 18.8 months in the SP group, respectively; they were not significantly different. The relative dose intensities were 0.79 (S-1) in the S-1 group and 0.69 (S-1)/0.70 (cisplatin) in the SP group. Conclusion: Adding cisplatin to long-term S-1 monotherapy did not significantly improve the outcome of CY+ advanced gastric cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There are robust data supporting the contribution of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) regarding clinical outcomes for colorectal cancer (CRC) in an adjuvant setting in European and US trials; however, there is no Japanese clinical evidence although L-OHP has been approved since 2009. We examined the transition of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colorectal cancer in our institute. Methods: A total of 642 patients with histopathologically confirmed stage III CRC underwent curative surgery from 2005 to 2010. We examined disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors for stage III CRC patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: A total of 509 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. 3-year DFS and 5-year OS rates were 74.5% and 87.5%, respectively. The frequency of inclusion of L-OHP as adjuvant chemotherapy was increased after 2008. A total of 189 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy from 2005 to 2007 increasing to 320 patients from 2008 to 2010; the 5-year OS rates were 82.4% and 91.5%, respectively, and the 3-year DFS rates were 69.2% and 76.6%, respectively (OS, P = 0.007; DFS, P = 0.023). In univariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy including L-OHP was no significant deference compared to FU monotherapy. (OS: HR 0.88, 95%CI 0.4–1.91, p = 0.75, DFS: HR 0.78, 95%CI 0.21–2.3, p = 0.29). In multivariate analysis, the OS was predicted by means of N stage (HR = 2; 95%CI, 1.1–3.8; P = 0.02) and pathology (HR = 0.28; 95%CI, 0.13–0.59; P = 0.0008). The DFS was predicted by means of N stage (HR = 2.67; 95%CI, 1.82–3.9; P < 0.05), T stage (HR = 1.61; 95%CI, 1.1–2.3; P = 0.01) pathology (HR = 0.47; 95%CI, 0.29–0.75; P < 0.05) and venous invasion (HR = 2.06; 95%CI, 1.12–3.77; P = 0.01). Conclusions: Clinical outcomes of stage III CRC patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy improved. The frequency of L-OHP usage was increasing annually, however it was no influence for clinical outcomes in this study. It will be necessary to reevaluate additional effect of L-OHP with more patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although several markers, including the lymph node ratio (LNR), have been proposed as a clinically prognostic tool for colorectal cancer (CRC), it remains unclear which markers have the most relevance in determining recurrence following adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III CRC. Methods: Independent risk factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) were retrospectively determined using the Cox proportional hazard model in 360 stage III CRC patients and validated using an independent cohort comprising 172 stage III CRC patients. Results: The LNR was independently associated with RFS (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.11 to 3.28; P = 0.020). A higher LNR value was significantly associated with recurrence, microsatellite stable, and shorter time to recurrence. A combination of the LNR with pre-chemotherapy CEA and CA19-9, other independent risk factors, provided accurate risk stratification of RFS and conferred additional information on recurrence within each stage III CRC subgroup, which was then validated in an independent cohort. A beneficial effect in patients at risk of recurrence, and a reduced effect in patients at low risk, was exhibited by the addition of oxaliplatin to 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion: A higher LNR is one of the most aggressive phenotypes with recurrence risk following adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III CRC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Oxaliplatin plus S-1 with Cisplatin plus S-1 in Chemotherapy-naïve Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer (G-SOX) showed the noninferiority of S-1 (an oral fluoropyrimidine-derivative dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor) plus oxaliplatin combination therapy (SOX) to S-1 plus cisplatin therapy (CS) in overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) from proportional hazard model 0.958, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.803-1.142; noninferiority margin 1.15]. To further clarify the clinical position of SOX in advanced gastric cancer (AGC), a meta-analysis including information from other reported studies was conducted. Methods: In addition to G-SOX, Japanese phase III clinical trials including S-1 monotherapy were included in the analyses. Individual patient data for SOX (318 patients) and CS (324 patients) from G-SOX, as well as those for S-1 (160 patients) from the Randomized Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 Alone as First-line Treatment for Advanced Gastric Cancer (GC0301/TOP-002), were available. Published clinical information for S-1 from other studies (total 705 patients) was also collected. A Weibull distribution was assumed for overall survival time, and parameters for SOX, CS, and S-1 were estimated parametrically. Posterior HR distributions were obtained with a Bayesian approach. Results: The HR of SOX to S-1 was 0.817 (95 % credible interval 0.704-0.939), and the probability of the HR <1.00 was 99.8 %. The HR of CS to S-1 was 0.871 (95 % credible interval; 0.754-0.998), and the probability of the HR <1.00 was 97.6 %. The HR of SOX to CS in G-SOX was 0.942 (95 % credible interval; 0.789-1.117), and the probability of HR <1.15 was 98.9 %. Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that SOX was superior to S-1 and noninferior to CS in AGC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This randomized phase II study compared weekly administration of paclitaxel (wPTX) with the best available 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) regimen as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer patients with severe peritoneal metastasis refractory to fluoropyrimidine. Methods: In the best available 5-FU arm, continuous infusion of 5-FU (800 mg/m/day, days 1-5, every 4 weeks) was given to patients with prior chemotherapy including bolus 5-FU, and methotrexate and 5-FU sequential bolus injection (methotrexate at 100 mg/m followed by bolus 5-FU at 600 mg/m with leucovorin, weekly) was given to those who had previously received continuous infusion of 5-FU or oral administration of fluoropyrimidine. In the wPTX arm, paclitaxel (80 mg/m) was administered on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks. This study adopted a screening design (one-sided α = 30 %) with the primary end point of overall survival. Results: One hundred patients were randomized to the 5-FU arm ( n = 49) or the wPTX arm ( n = 51). Although the median survival time was 7.7 months in both arms, the 2-year survival rates were 2.9 % in the 5-FU arm and 9.1 % in the wPTX arm [hazard ratio 0.89 (95 % confidence interval 0.57-1.38), one-sided p = 0.298}. The median progression-free survival was longer with wPTX than with 5-FU [3.7 months vs 2.4 months; hazard ratio 0.58 (95 % confidence interval 0.38-0.88), one-sided p = 0.005]. The incidences of grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, and treatment-related death were 6 %, 4 %, 10 %, and 2 %, respectively, in the 5-FU arm and 2 %, 0 %, 0 %, and 0 %, respectively, in the wPTX arm. Conclusions: As second-line chemotherapy, wPTX appears feasible and promising. This regimen can be included in a test arm in future phase III trials for treatment of advanced gastric cancer with severe peritoneal metastasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The FIRIS study previously demonstrated non-inferiority of IRIS (irinotecan plus S-1) to FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with irinotecan) for progression-free survival as the second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) as the primary endpoint. The overall survival (OS) data were immature at the time of the primary analysis. Methods: Between 30 January 2006 and 29 January 2008, 426 patients with mCRC who failed in first-line chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive either FOLFIRI or IRIS. After the primary analysis, the follow-up survey was cut off on 29 July 2010, and the final OS data were analysed. Results: With a median follow-up of 39.2 months, the median OS was 17.4 months in the FOLFIRI group and 17.8 months in the IRIS group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.900; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.728-1.112]. In the pre-planned subgroup of patients who received prior chemotherapy containing oxaliplatin, the median OS was 12.7 months in the FOLFIRI group and 15.3 months in the IRIS group (HR 0.755; 95 % CI 0.580-0.983). Conclusions: IRIS is non-inferior to FOLFIRI for OS as second-line chemotherapy for mCRC. IRIS can be an option for second-line chemotherapy of mCRC. (ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT00284258). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Correction to: Gastric Cancer https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-021-01244-y In the original publication of the article, the affiliation "Pharmacovigilance Division, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan" should be deleted for the co-author "Hideo Baba". The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-021-01244-y. [Extracted from the article]

Liquid biopsy is a minimally invasive method for detecting soluble factors, including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), in body fluids. ctDNA carrying tumor-specific genetic or epigenetic alterations is released into circulation from tumor cells. ctDNA in the plasma contains somatic mutations that have occurred in the tumor, and reflects tumor progression and therapeutic effects promptly and accurately. Furthermore, ctDNA is useful for early detection of recurrence and estimation of prognosis and may be utilized for diagnosis and personalized medicine for treatment selection. Thus, in the near future, it will be possible to select the most appropriate treatment based on real-time genetic information using ctDNA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The impact of ctDNA changes after chemotherapy on the clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains unclear. The present study evaluated the clinical implications of the early change in ctDNA levels as a predictor of objective response and clinical outcome in mCRC patients who received chemotherapy. We investigated the effects of after/before ratio of ctDNA levels 2 and 8 weeks after initiation of second-line chemotherapy, on objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). ctDNA was detected using amplicon-based deep sequencing with a molecular barcode encompassing >240 hotspot mutations in 14 colon cancer-related genes. In multivariate analysis, as compared to baseline, patients with lower ctDNA level (≤50%) 8 weeks after initiation of chemotherapy showed significantly longer PFS and OS than the patients with higher (>50%) ctDNA level. In patients achieving a partial response or stable disease, the after/before ratio of ctDNA level 8 weeks after initiation of chemotherapy was significantly lower than those in patients with progressive disease. The present study suggests that an early change in the ctDNA level might serve as a biomarker to predict the chemotherapeutic efficacy and clinical outcomes in patients with mCRC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There are no optimal indication criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM). The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the survival benefit of selective NAC administration in this patient population based on tumor characteristics. Methods: Borderline resectable CLM (BR-CLM) were defined as four or more liver metastases, CLM larger than 5 cm, or CLM with concomitant resectable extrahepatic metastases. From 2010 to 2015, NAC was administered to BR-CLM patients. Upfront surgery without NAC was performed to patients having clearly resectable CLM (less than 3 lesions, smaller than 5 cm, and no extrahepatic metastases: CR-US group). Survival outcomes of the two groups were assessed. Results: The BR-NAC group comprised 73 patients and the CR-US group 172. All patients in the BR-NAC group underwent subsequent resection, as none showed disease progression or chemotherapy-associated liver damage. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates of the CR-US group were 83.0% and 74.0%, while patients in the BR-NAC group had comparable 3-year and 5-year overall survivals (80.5% and 66.6%, P = 0.397). Conclusion: Defining BR-CLM based on tumor characteristics optimizes patient selection for NAC. Favorable overall survival can be achieved by upfront surgery in patients with clearly resectable CLM and by NAC in patients with BR-CLM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: It is essential to ensure optimal adherence to adjuvant chemotherapy regimens following gastric cancer surgery. However, treatment intensity for S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy has not as yet been compared between minimally invasive (MI) and open (Open) surgery.We retrospectively compared dose modification of adjuvant S-1 between MI and Open surgery in patients undergoing R0 gastrectomy for gastric or esophago-gastric junction cancer at the Cancer Institute Hospital Tokyo, Japan, during the period from 2012 to 2022, and receiving S-1 for pStage II or S-1 plus docetaxel for pStage III as adjuvant chemotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to adjust for possible confounders.In total, 323 patients were initially included. After PSM, 158 patients remained, 79 in each group. The adjuvant chemotherapy completion rates were similar in the two groups. However, the proportion of patients who required S-1 dose reduction was significantly lower in the MI than in the Open group (43.0% vs. 65.8%, p = 0.004). In addition, the MI group had significantly fewer patients requiring suspension of S-1 than the Open group (46.8% vs. 64.6%, p = 0.025). Moreover, the frequency of adverse events of grade ≥ 3 was significantly lower in the MI than in the Open group (17.7% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.042).In adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer, minimally invasive surgery may offer better treatment intensity for oral S-1 administration than open surgery.Methods: It is essential to ensure optimal adherence to adjuvant chemotherapy regimens following gastric cancer surgery. However, treatment intensity for S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy has not as yet been compared between minimally invasive (MI) and open (Open) surgery.We retrospectively compared dose modification of adjuvant S-1 between MI and Open surgery in patients undergoing R0 gastrectomy for gastric or esophago-gastric junction cancer at the Cancer Institute Hospital Tokyo, Japan, during the period from 2012 to 2022, and receiving S-1 for pStage II or S-1 plus docetaxel for pStage III as adjuvant chemotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to adjust for possible confounders.In total, 323 patients were initially included. After PSM, 158 patients remained, 79 in each group. The adjuvant chemotherapy completion rates were similar in the two groups. However, the proportion of patients who required S-1 dose reduction was significantly lower in the MI than in the Open group (43.0% vs. 65.8%, p = 0.004). In addition, the MI group had significantly fewer patients requiring suspension of S-1 than the Open group (46.8% vs. 64.6%, p = 0.025). Moreover, the frequency of adverse events of grade ≥ 3 was significantly lower in the MI than in the Open group (17.7% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.042).In adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer, minimally invasive surgery may offer better treatment intensity for oral S-1 administration than open surgery.Results: It is essential to ensure optimal adherence to adjuvant chemotherapy regimens following gastric cancer surgery. However, treatment intensity for S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy has not as yet been compared between minimally invasive (MI) and open (Open) surgery.We retrospectively compared dose modification of adjuvant S-1 between MI and Open surgery in patients undergoing R0 gastrectomy for gastric or esophago-gastric junction cancer at the Cancer Institute Hospital Tokyo, Japan, during the period from 2012 to 2022, and receiving S-1 for pStage II or S-1 plus docetaxel for pStage III as adjuvant chemotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to adjust for possible confounders.In total, 323 patients were initially included. After PSM, 158 patients remained, 79 in each group. The adjuvant chemotherapy completion rates were similar in the two groups. However, the proportion of patients who required S-1 dose reduction was significantly lower in the MI than in the Open group (43.0% vs. 65.8%, p = 0.004). In addition, the MI group had significantly fewer patients requiring suspension of S-1 than the Open group (46.8% vs. 64.6%, p = 0.025). Moreover, the frequency of adverse events of grade ≥ 3 was significantly lower in the MI than in the Open group (17.7% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.042).In adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer, minimally invasive surgery may offer better treatment intensity for oral S-1 administration than open surgery.Conclusions: It is essential to ensure optimal adherence to adjuvant chemotherapy regimens following gastric cancer surgery. However, treatment intensity for S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy has not as yet been compared between minimally invasive (MI) and open (Open) surgery.We retrospectively compared dose modification of adjuvant S-1 between MI and Open surgery in patients undergoing R0 gastrectomy for gastric or esophago-gastric junction cancer at the Cancer Institute Hospital Tokyo, Japan, during the period from 2012 to 2022, and receiving S-1 for pStage II or S-1 plus docetaxel for pStage III as adjuvant chemotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to adjust for possible confounders.In total, 323 patients were initially included. After PSM, 158 patients remained, 79 in each group. The adjuvant chemotherapy completion rates were similar in the two groups. However, the proportion of patients who required S-1 dose reduction was significantly lower in the MI than in the Open group (43.0% vs. 65.8%, p = 0.004). In addition, the MI group had significantly fewer patients requiring suspension of S-1 than the Open group (46.8% vs. 64.6%, p = 0.025). Moreover, the frequency of adverse events of grade ≥ 3 was significantly lower in the MI than in the Open group (17.7% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.042).In adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer, minimally invasive surgery may offer better treatment intensity for oral S-1 administration than open surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The additive or synergistic sustained antitumour effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy has previously been reported. We investigated the efficacy of nivolumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy versus placebo plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy for patients with HER2-negative, unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer.Methods: We did a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2-3 trial (ATTRACTION-4) at 130 centres (hospitals, cancer centres, and medical centres) across Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. We enrolled patients aged 20 years and older with previously untreated (except for neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy completed ≥180 days before recurrence), HER2-negative, unresectable, advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (regardless of PD-L1 expression), at least one measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours guidelines (version 1.1), and a baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to chemotherapy every 3 weeks (intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 plus either oral S-1 40 mg/m2 [SOX] or oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 [CAPOX], twice daily on days 1-14), in addition to either 360 mg nivolumab intravenously every 3 weeks (nivolumab plus chemotherapy group) or placebo (placebo plus chemotherapy group). Randomisation was done using an interactive web response system with block sizes of four and stratified by intensity of PD-L1 expression, ECOG performance status score, disease status, and geographical region. Patients, investigators, and the study sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoints were centrally assessed progression-free survival and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02746796. Trial recruitment is complete and follow-up is ongoing.Findings: Between March 23, 2017, and May 10, 2018, 724 patients were randomly assigned to treatment: 362 patients to the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 362 to the placebo plus chemotherapy group. At the time of data cutoff on Oct 31, 2018, with a median follow-up of 11·6 months (IQR 8·7-14·1), median progression-free survival at a prespecified interim analysis was 10·45 months (95% CI 8·44-14·75) in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 8·34 months (6·97-9·40) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·68; 98·51% CI 0·51-0·90; p=0·0007). At the time of data cutoff on Jan 31, 2020, with a median follow-up of 26·6 months (IQR 24·1-29·0), median overall survival at the final analysis was 17·45 months (95% CI 15·67-20·83) in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 17·15 months (15·18-19·65) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (HR 0·90; 95% CI 0·75-1·08; p=0·26). The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were neutrophil count decreased (71 [20%] of 359 patients in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group vs 57 [16%] of 358 patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group) and platelet count decreased (34 [9%] vs 33 [9%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events of any grade were observed in 88 (25%) patients in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and in 51 (14%) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group, of which the most common was decreased appetite (18 [5%] vs ten [3%]). Six treatment-related deaths occurred: three in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group (one each of febrile neutropenia, hepatic failure, and sudden death) and three in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (one each of sepsis, haemolytic anaemia, and interstitial lung disease).Interpretation: Nivolumab combined with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival, but not overall survival, in Asian patients with untreated, HER2-negative, unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer, and could potentially be a new first-line treatment option for these patients.Funding: Ono Pharmaceutical and Bristol-Myers Squibb. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: First-line chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma has a median overall survival (OS) of less than 1 year. We aimed to evaluate first-line programmed cell death (PD)-1 inhibitor-based therapies in gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. We report the first results for nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone.Methods: In this multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial (CheckMate 649), we enrolled adults (≥18 years) with previously untreated, unresectable, non-HER2-positive gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, or oesophageal adenocarcinoma, regardless of PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression from 175 hospitals and cancer centres in 29 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1 while all three groups were open) via interactive web response technology (block sizes of six) to nivolumab (360 mg every 3 weeks or 240 mg every 2 weeks) plus chemotherapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin every 3 weeks or leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin every 2 weeks), nivolumab plus ipilimumab, or chemotherapy alone. Primary endpoints for nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone were OS or progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review, in patients whose tumours had a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of five or more. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02872116.Findings: From March 27, 2017, to April 24, 2019, of 2687 patients assessed for eligibility, we concurrently randomly assigned 1581 patients to treatment (nivolumab plus chemotherapy [n=789, 50%] or chemotherapy alone [n=792, 50%]). The median follow-up for OS was 13·1 months (IQR 6·7-19·1) for nivolumab plus chemotherapy and 11·1 months (5·8-16·1) for chemotherapy alone. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy resulted in significant improvements in OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0·71 [98·4% CI 0·59-0·86]; p<0·0001) and PFS (HR 0·68 [98 % CI 0·56-0·81]; p<0·0001) versus chemotherapy alone in patients with a PD-L1 CPS of five or more (minimum follow-up 12·1 months). Additional results showed significant improvement in OS, along with PFS benefit, in patients with a PD-L1 CPS of one or more and all randomly assigned patients. Among all treated patients, 462 (59%) of 782 patients in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 341 (44%) of 767 patients in the chemotherapy alone group had grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events. The most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (≥25%) were nausea, diarrhoea, and peripheral neuropathy across both groups. 16 (2%) deaths in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and four (1%) deaths in the chemotherapy alone group were considered to be treatment-related. No new safety signals were identified.Interpretation: Nivolumab is the first PD-1 inhibitor to show superior OS, along with PFS benefit and an acceptable safety profile, in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in previously untreated patients with advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, or oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy represents a new standard first-line treatment for these patients.Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, in collaboration with Ono Pharmaceutical. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel was developed to improve paclitaxel solubility and does not need premedication to avoid infusion-related reactions associated with solvent-based (sb)-paclitaxel. We conducted a phase II trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus ramucirumab combination therapy for previously treated advanced gastric cancer. Patients and methods Patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer refractory to first-line chemotherapy were administered nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m 2 intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15, plus ramucirumab 8 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary end-point was Independent Review Committee (IRC)–assessed overall response rate (ORR). Secondary end-points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), safety and quality of life (QOL). Results Forty-five patients were enrolled; 43 received the study treatment. The ORR assessed by the IRC was 54.8% (90% confidence interval [CI] 41.0–68.0) and the primary end-point was met. The DCR was 92.9% (95% CI 80.5–98.5). The IRC-assessed median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI 5.4–8.1). The median OS was not reached at the data cutoff. The main treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (76.7%), decreased white blood cell count (27.9%), anaemia (11.6%), decreased appetite (7.0%), febrile neutropenia (4.7%), hypertension (4.7%) and proteinuria (4.7%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. No QOL deterioration was observed during study treatment. Conclusion Nab-paclitaxel plus ramucirumab combination therapy shows promising activity and manageable toxicities and could be a useful second-line treatment option for patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Fluorouracil and folinic acid with either oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or irinotecan (FOLFIRI) are widely used as first-line or second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. However, infusional fluorouracil-based regimens, requiring continuous infusion and implantation of an intravenous port system, are inconvenient. We therefore planned an open-label randomised controlled trial to verify the non-inferiority of irinotecan plus oral S-1 (a combination of tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine, and potassium oxonate; IRIS) to FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Between Jan 30, 2006, and Jan 29, 2008, 426 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer needing second-line chemotherapy from 40 institutions in Japan were randomly assigned by a computer-based minimisation method to receive either FOLFIRI (n=213) or IRIS (n=213). In the FOLFIRI group, patients received folinic acid (200 mg/m2) and irinotecan (150 mg/m2) and then a bolus injection of fluorouracil (400 mg/m2) on day 1 and a continuous infusion of fluorouracil (2400 mg/m2) over 46 h, repeated every 2 weeks. In the IRIS group, patients received irinotecan (125 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15 and S-1 (40–60 mg according to body surface area) twice daily for 2 weeks, repeated every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, with a non-inferiority margin of 1·333. Statistical analysis was on the basis of initially randomised participants. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00284258. Findings: All randomised patients were included in the primary analysis. After a median follow-up of 12·9 months (IQR 11·5–18·2), median progression-free survival was 5·1 months in the FOLFIRI group and 5·8 months in the IRIS group (hazard ratio 1·077, 95% CI 0·879–1·319, non-inferiority test p=0·039). The most common grade three or four adverse drug reactions were neutropenia (110 [52·1%] of 211 patients in the FOLFIRI group and 76 [36·2%] of 210 patients in the IRIS group; p=0·0012), leucopenia (33 [15·6%] in the FOLFIRI group and 38 [18·1%] in the IRIS group; p=0·5178), and diarrhoea (ten [4·7%] in the FOLFIRI group and 43 [20·5%] in the IRIS group; p<0·0001). One treatment-related death from hypotension due to shock was reported in the FOLFIRI group within 28 days after the end of treatment; no treatment-related deaths were reported in the IRIS group. Interpretation: Progression-free survival with IRIS is not inferior to that with FOLFIRI in patients receiving second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Treatment with IRIS could be an additional therapeutic option for second-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Funding: Taiho Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Daiichi Sankyo Co Ltd. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]