Search

Elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair for patients with a diagnosis of cancer has remained controversial. In the present study, we evaluated the in-hospital outcomes for patients who had undergone AAA repair in the setting of a cancer diagnosis. Inpatients (2008-2018) who had undergone elective AAA repair were selected from the Cerner Health Facts database using International Classification of Diseases, ninth and tenth revision, procedure codes. We used χ2 analysis and logistic regression models to evaluate the association of patient characteristics with the medical and vascular outcomes. A total of 8663 patients who had undergone AAA repair were identified (270 with a cancer diagnosis and 8393 without a cancer diagnosis). No significant demographic differences were found between the two groups, except that more patients with a cancer diagnosis had undergone endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) than open aneurysm repair (88.2% vs 82.1%; P =.01). Male reproductive organ (24.8%) and lung (24.4%) cancer were the most common cancer diagnoses in the cohort. The unadjusted analysis revealed that patients with a cancer diagnosis were more likely to require remedial EVAR (relative risk, 3.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-10.2) or reoperation for bleeding, infection, or thrombosis (relative risk, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.09-2.32). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that, overall, patients with a cancer diagnosis were more likely to require a prolonged length of stay (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% CI, 1.5-3.3) and to have developed respiratory failure (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3-3.4) or infection (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.4). Similar point estimates were found for men with and without a cancer diagnosis. However, women with a cancer diagnosis had a greater odds of a prolonged length of stay compared with women without a cancer diagnosis (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2-5.6). EVAR in the presence of a cancer diagnosis was also significantly associated with poor outcomes. Elective AAA repair for patients with a cancer diagnosis was associated with a prolonged length of stay and the development of infection, respiratory failure, and vascular-specific complications during the inpatient hospitalization. Given that differences in outcomes stratified by gender and treatment modality have been shown for patients with a cancer diagnosis, careful patient selection is important and reinforces the finding that cancer exerts negative systemic postoperative effects even when treated or quiescent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Understanding challenges of family caregivers within specific palliative care contexts is needed. Objective: To describe the challenges of family caregivers of patients with cancer who receive outpatient palliative care. Methods: We summarized the most common and most challenging problems for 80 family caregivers of cancer patients receiving outpatient palliative care in the midwestern United States. Results: Caregiver worry and difficulty managing side effects or symptoms other than pain, constipation, and shortness of breath were most common. "Financial concerns" was cited most as a "top 3" problem. Almost half of caregivers reported "other" problems, including family members, patient physical function, care coordination, and patient emotional state. Conclusions: The most common and most challenging problems of family caregivers of cancer patients receiving outpatient palliative care may differ from those experienced in other serious illness care contexts. Comparative studies on caregiver problems across the cancer care continuum can help develop and refine interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Family caregivers play a vital role in managing the pain of hospice patients with cancer; however, caregivers' knowledge of pain management principles and experiences as pain managers vary widely. Differences in cultural values and access to resources suggest that rural and urban hospice family caregivers may differ with regard to their pain knowledge and experience, but this has not been empirically investigated.Objectives: We sought to determine if rural and urban hospice family caregivers differed in terms of their knowledge of cancer pain management principles and their experiences managing cancer pain.Methods: Our study consisted of a secondary analysis of baseline, cross-sectional data from hospice family caregivers (N = 196) participating in an ongoing cluster randomized crossover pragmatic trial. We performed multivariable regression to model associations between caregivers' demographic characteristics and their scores on the Family Pain Questionnaire (FPQ), which included subscales measuring pain knowledge and experience.Results: When controlling for other demographic variables, rural caregivers' scores on the FPQ knowledge subscale were worse (P = 0.01) than their urban counterparts. FPQ experience subscale scores and FPQ total scores were not statistically significantly different between the two groups.Conclusion: Rural hospice family caregivers report greater pain knowledge deficits than urban hospice family caregivers, although the two groups report comparable pain management experiences. Additional research is needed to better explain observed differences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]