Search

An increasingly diversified demographic landscape in rural and urban America warrants the attention of The University of Kansas Cancer Center (KU Cancer Center) researchers, clinicians, outreach staff and administrators as the institution assesses ways to reach its expansive, bi-state catchment area. Within the counties of the KU Cancer Center catchment area, patient level and public health data are available and categorized by varying geographic regional boundaries. Multiple data sources and different data collection processes complicate summarizing catchment area data. A curated data warehouse that retrieves and structures the data, with a common denominator, can support meaningful use of the data in a standard and consistent format. The KU Cancer Center built a data warehouse to Organize and Prioritize Trends to Inform KU Cancer Center (OPTIK), which functions to streamline the process of synthesizing data regarding Kansas and Missouri demographics, cancer risk factors and incidence and mortality rates. OPTIK standardizes these diverse data sources to enable analyses of the cancer burden at local, regional and national levels while upholding a strict standard of patient privacy. The OPTIK database enables researchers to use available data and create heat maps and other visualizations to aid in funding proposals, presentations and research activities. Furthermore, using knowledge provided by OPTIK, the KU Cancer Center is able to prioritize action items for research and outreach and more effectively communicate the impact of those efforts.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Purpose Patients benefit from receiving cancer treatment closer to home when possible and at high-volume regional centers when specialized care is required. The purpose of this analysis was to estimate the economic impact of retaining more patients in-state for cancer clinical trials and care, which might offset some of the costs of establishing broader cancer trial and treatment networks. Method Kansas Cancer Registry data were used to estimate the number of patients retained in-state for cancer care following the expansion of local cancer clinical trial options through the Midwest Cancer Alliance based at the University of Kansas Medical Center. The 2014 economic impact of this enhanced local clinical trial network was estimated in four parts: Medical spending was estimated on the basis of National Cancer Institute cost-of-care estimates. Household travel cost savings were estimated as the difference between in-state and out-of-state travel costs. Trial-related grant income was calculated from administrative records. Indirect and induced economic benefits to the state were estimated using an economic impact model. Results The authors estimated that the enhanced local cancer clinical trial network resulted in approximately $6.9 million in additional economic activity in the state in 2014, or $362,000 per patient retained in-state. This estimate includes $3.6 million in direct spending and $3.3 million in indirect economic activity. The enhanced trial network also resulted in 45 additional jobs. Conclusions Retaining patients in-state for cancer care and clinical trial participation allows patients to remain closer to home for care and enhances the state economy.

33 Background: With growing numbers of childhood cancer survivors (CCS), having systems for survivorship care coordination is imperative. While studies have compared the comfort and knowledge between primary care and oncology physicians in providing CCS care, few have analyzed primary and subspecialty care rates. Referral trends can be informative for institutions developing systems of care. Correlative measures with referral needs may help institutions prioritize process development for patients. Methods: Retrospective chart reviews were completed on 117 adult CCS from Survivorship Transition Clinic (STC) between 2014-2017. Upon arrival, STC patient self-reports were recorded regarding existing PCP status. Patients with PCPs were enrolled in survivorship consultation care, those without enrolled in survivorship and PCP care. Referrals were tracked by electronic medical record. Two oncology providers performed blinded independent reviews treatment summaries and scored treatments using Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Intensity of Treatment Rating scale (ITR-3). If scores differed, discussion determined consensus. Final scores were matched with data on subspecialty referral patterns. Results: Of 117 patients, 65 (57%) needed both PCP and survivorship care while 50 (43%) had established PCPs. ITR3 scores were low intensity (1 or2) for 54 patients and high intensity (3 or 4) for 63 patients. The low intensity group had 157 total referrals (3 per patient) compared to 391 total referrals (6 per patient) in the high intensity group. The top 5 subspecialty referrals (by patients referred) were psychological services (46), dermatology (44), fertility (29), hematology / oncology / BMT (22), cardiology (20). Conclusions: Our care coordination trends suggest many CCS do not have established PCPs despite their complex care needs. Not surprisingly, higher intensity treatment correlates with higher subspecialty care needs. Psychological care remains the most prevalent need in our patient population. [Table: see text]

Study purpose: The aim of this study was to further explore the lived experiences of women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), to inform the development of interventions to enhance survivorship care for women with advanced disease. Methodology: Four semi-structured focus groups were conducted with women with MBC. The data was analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Participants described the challenges of living with uncertainty, as a result of a lack of information regarding treatment options and symptom management, and a sense of the unknown related to prognosis and survival. Of major concern were changes in role functioning, altered relationships, and self-image. Conclusion: Women with metastatic breast cancer must cope with dramatic changes in all aspects of their lives. Clinicians should tailor survivorship care and evidence-based interventions to individuals’ concerns with changes in role functioning, fatigue, relationships, and self-image. A multidisciplinary approach should be used to address practical and existential concerns focused on improving quality of life.

84 Background: Children's Mercy (CM) established a cancer survivorship clinic that cares for approximately 180 survivors a year. A third of the survivors are 18 years or older requiring transition to adult care. The importance of transitioning childhood cancer survivors from pediatric oncology care to adult primary care has been acknowledged in literature, but obstacles remain. Barriers include patient and provider anxiety, difficulty navigating the complex health care system and lack of knowledge regarding late effects. CM and The University of Kansas Cancer Center (KUCC) collaborated to decrease barriers to transition for childhood cancer survivors. Methods: The work group met for 2 years to develop the clinic at KUCC. Models and delivery of survivorship care, including the breast cancer survivorship clinic at KUCC, were reviewed. A shared nurse navigator was identified as an essential component to a seamless transition. Philanthropic support was obtained and job description was developed. Contracts were negotiated to allow the navigator to be present at both institutions. Results: The Survivorship Transition Clinic (STC) at KUCC launched July 2014, with a navigator supporting patients at CM as they begin their transition. The same navigator then meets with the patient at KUCC STC as they initiate care. The navigator provides treatment summaries, patient education and navigates the referral services for survivors. Since clinic launch, 16 survivors out of 16 have successfully transitioned from pediatric to adult survivorship care. Positive feedback was received from patient satisfaction surveys that were administered. A common theme showed a relief from anxiety due to having a contact person to facilitate communication among providers in a complex healthcare system. Conclusions: The nurse navigator has minimized anxiety about transition for patients and parents as she establishes a relationship with patients at CM, and then is able to provide continuity as they transition to the STC at KUMC. The navigator also improves communication between pediatric providers, adult primary care providers and sub-specialists caring for the patients. Overall, our transition process has been effective and is now serving as a model across both institutions.

23 Background: Advances have been made in elevating cancer survivorship as a public health priority and defining elements needed to deliver high-quality follow-up care to survivors. However, a lack of research on how best to care for survivors and the most effective and efficient strategies for delivering survivorship care in the community setting still exists. We report our assessment of the current state of practice, knowledge and professional development, and plan to increase access to care of urban and rural practices across the state of Kansas. Methods: In 2014, the Midwest Cancer Alliance (MCA), a membership-based outreach arm of The University of Kansas Cancer Center, convened an educational summit and survey to assess the survivorship landscape in Kansas. Post-summit, individual interviews were conducted. Survey and interviews included questions regarding health records, treatment summaries, survivorship care plans (SCP), availability of survivorship programs and resources, access to primary care and specialists, distress screening, community support, and educational needs. Results: Ten MCA member health systems were invited to participate and 7 indicated interest in participating in the project. Only one organization provided an SCP to survivors. Barriers included lack of an integrated approach and knowledge. A majority of survivorship care could be delivered close to home, however, services including fertility preservation, genetic counseling, oncology rehab, sexual health, and second opinions, required travel of more than 50 miles. Identified educational needs focused on comprehensive survivorship care across the health care team. Conclusions: Survivorship care remains fragmented across the state of Kansas. Based on this project, we have secured a CDC survivorship grant that will facilitate clinical and technical assistance related to process improvement and electronic health record integration focused on survivorship care and delivery of an SCP. Next steps include engaging primary care providers and survivors to assure the SCP meets the needs of stakeholders. This work will focus on a translational process to meet the growing needs of the survivors and complex health care organizations.