Search

The main objective was to assess the link between emotional competence (EC) and adjustment outcomes such as supportive care needs (SCN) and anxious–depressive symptoms in cancer patients starting chemotherapy. The second objective was to assess the interaction effect between EC and the COVID‐19 pandemic (i.e. patients included before or during the pandemic) on these outcomes. At the beginning of care, 255 patients with digestive or hematological cancer, recruited before the pandemic began (n = 156, 61.2%) or during the pandemic (n = 99, 38.8%), completed the Short Profile of Emotional Competence, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form. Partial correlations and multiple regressions were used. Intrapersonal EC showed negative significant correlations with psychological unmet SCN (r = −.32, p < .001), anxiety (r = −.37, p < .001), and depression (r = −.46, p < .001). Interpersonal EC showed only significant interaction effects (p < .05): it was only associated with fewer unmet physical and daily SCN (p < .002) and fewer depressive symptoms (p < .004) during pandemic. Results show significant associations between intrapersonal EC and better adjustment of cancer patients from the early stage of care. Interpersonal EC seems to be a significant resource to deal with illness only in difficult contexts such as the COVID‐19 pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors who have been treated for cancer during childhood and adolescence are at great risk of the physical, psychological, and social consequences of cancer and its associated treatments. However, compliance with long-term follow-up is low. One possible explanation is that follow-up care fails to meet the expectations of AYA survivors. This study explored the specific supportive care needs of AYA survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer five years post-diagnosis. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 AYA aged 15 to 25 years old. Thematic analyses were conducted to establish categories of supportive care needs and classify them as being met or unmet. Results: Participants reported between 2 and 20 specific needs (M = 11), including needs concerning fertility issues and reassurance regarding relapse (each mentioned by 67% of AYA), followed by the need for locomotor care, follow-up coordination and multidisciplinary care (60% of AYA for each). Participants also reported needs regarding social relationships, administration and finance, and academic and professional domains. Most (69%) of these needs were reportedly unmet, including need of information about cancer repercussions and follow-up, support in managing fatigue and sleep problems, psychological assistance, and support from peers. Discussion: The supportive care needs are still considerable and varied in AYA survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer 5 years post-diagnosis and are largely unmet. As unmet supportive care needs highlight the gap between available care in follow-up and the real needs of AYA survivors, a better understanding of their supportive care needs and unmet needs, thanks to systematic needs assessment, would enable long-term follow-up care to be adapted, thereby improving compliance and quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Emotional competence (EC) is considered a substantial resource in the adjustment of cancer patients, especially via its effect on anxiety and depression symptoms. This research aimed at assessing the impact of intrapersonal EC in young women (≤45 years) with breast cancer (YWBC) on their specific quality of life (i.e. subjective experience related to daily difficulties and perceived repercussions of the disease and treatments) related to chemotherapy, via anxiety and depression symptoms. Methods: Two hundred fifty YWBC from 24 French centers completed a self‐reported questionnaire after diagnosis (T1) and after the chemotherapy phase (T2), comprising the Young Women Breast Cancer Inventory, the Profile of EC and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The indirect effect of EC (T1) on subjective experience (T2) via anxiety and depression symptoms (T2) was tested using regressions and the Macro PROCESS. Results: Emotional competence predicted fewer anxiety and depression symptoms at T1 and T2, and a better subjective experience at T2 via fewer anxiety and depression symptoms. Depression symptoms appeared to be a stronger mediator than anxiety symptoms on four dimensions (Support from close relatives, feeling of couple cohesion, body image and sexuality, management of children and everyday life), whereas anxiety symptoms appeared to be a stronger mediator on two dimensions (negative affectivity and apprehension about the future, deterioration of relationships). Conclusions: These results support the importance of developing psycho‐affective interventions to reinforce the EC of YWBC during chemotherapy in order to facilitate the cognitive and emotional processes necessary for a better adjustment and subjective experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The mechanisms associating physician empathy (PE) with patient outcomes remain unclear. PE can be considered as a whole (one process) or three subcomponents can be identified (an establishing rapport process; an emotional process; a cognitive process). The objective was to test two competitive models of PE in cancer care: a three‐process model adapted from Neumann's model versus a one‐process model, with the use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy measure (CARE). Methods: The CARE was completed by 488 oesogastric cancer patients from the national French database FREGAT. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and a bifactor model were performed to test the two competitive models. Results: The CFA revealed that the one‐factor structure showed a moderate fit to the data whereas the three‐factor structure showed a good fit. However, the bifactor model favoured unidimensionality. Conclusion: We cannot provide a clear‐cut conclusion about whether PE should be considered as on unique process or not. Further work is still needed. Meanwhile, one should not preclude the use of three subscores in cancer care if specific elements of the encounter need to be assessed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous research conducted among caregivers of patients with cancer revealed a poor Quality of Life (QoL) and high levels of distress. In addition to the influence of patients' clinical state, caregivers' appraisals of patients' difficulties should be considered as another predictor of poor caregiver health. This study aims to test the association between caregivers' health (i.e., QoL, depression and anxiety) and their perception of patients' difficulties. 199 caregivers of patients with cancer completed an online survey based on questionnaires measuring their QoL, depression and anxiety, as well as their perception of patients' cognitive, emotional, functional, psychiatric and interpersonal difficulties. It was found that the appraisal of patients' impairments in all domains was mainly correlated with poor caregivers' QoL (Pearson correlations ranged from 0.14 to 0.45; p ≤.05). Furthermore, linear regression analyses showed that, after controlling for age, sex education level, professional activity and living with or without the patient, the appraisal of patients' interpersonal abilities (β = 0.25, p ≤.05), psychiatric difficulties (β = −0.25, p ≤.01) and living with the patient were the main predictors of caregivers' QoL. This study highlights the importance of better understanding the role of patients' social and psychiatric difficulties when examining caregivers' health. This indicates the importance of providing support and offering information to caregivers to alert them to the role of patients' social and psychiatric difficulties on their own health. Future studies should better understand how these difficulties are associated with caregivers' perception of identity/sociability alterations in patients and how caregivers cope with these changes. • What is the link between caregivers' health and their view of patients' troubles? • Caregivers' appraisal of patients' social deficits reduces their quality of life. • Their appraisal of patients' psychiatric problems also reduce their quality of life. • One must alert caregivers about the role of patients' difficulties on their health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The existing literature shows a significant impact of cancer on caregivers' quality of life (QoL) and divergent results according to associated factors. To better understand the experience of cancer patients' caregivers, the present study aimed at comparing caregivers' QoL according to cancer care pathway and type of cancer, and at identifying the factors associated with their QoL. Caregivers were included in the study either during chemotherapy or follow-up to assess their QoL (CARGOQoL), unmet supportive care needs (SCNS–P&C), and anxiety and depression levels (HADS). CARGOQoL scores were then compared using ANOVA or Mann-Whitney non-parametric tests (objective 1). Based on univariate analyses, a multivariate analysis of covariance or linear regression model was performed for each CARGOQoL dimension (objective 2). Among 583 participants (57.29% included during the follow-up phase), 523 completed the questionnaires. There was no effect of treatment phase and little effect of cancer site or disease stage on caregivers' QoL. Although significant factors associated with caregivers' QoL varied according to the dimensions assessed, the main associated factors were psychological experience (p < 0.05), satisfaction with the patient's care and supportive care needs (p < 0.01), and age of the patient or caregiver (p < 0.005). This study shows the necessity to support caregivers during both active treatment and follow-up. It highlights the crucial role of emotional distress, supportive care and age in caregivers' QoL, regardless of the patients' oncological status. • No effect of treatment phase and little effect of cancer type on caregivers' quality-of-life. • Importance of supporting caregivers during both active treatment and follow-up. • Role of emotional distress, supportive care and age in caregivers' quality-of-life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to identify profiles of caregivers to cancer patients at higher risk of having at least one moderately or highly unmet supportive care need based on 1) relevant socio-demographic (e.g. age, gender) and clinical (e.g. type of cancer, phase of the cancer pathway) variables highlighted in the literature and easily identifiable in routine, and 2) caregivers' anxiety and depression symptoms. Three hundred and sixty-four main caregivers completed a questionnaire assessing their supportive care needs (SCNS-P&C-F) and anxiety and depression symptoms (HADS) during the treatment or follow-up stage of patients with digestive, breast, or lung cancer. Decision trees were used to identify profiles of caregivers with the Conditional inference Tree (CTree) technique. In our study, only the combination of three main variables was important to predict the risk of unmet supportive care needs of caregivers: anxiety and/or depression symptoms, the age of caregivers or patients, and the presence/absence of metastases. Emotional distress has the greatest impact, exceeding that of the socio-demographic and clinical variables considered in this study. This study shows the importance of considering a set of variables and their combinations rather than evaluating their effects separately. Routinely assessing the anxiety and depression symptoms of caregivers using the HADS could improve the screening of caregivers at higher risk of unmet supportive care needs based on socio-demographic and clinical variables only. This study provides recommendations on how to identify caregivers at risk of unmet needs, in the context of an inability to support all caregivers. • The majority of caregivers reported unmet supportive care needs. • Only the combination of three variables can identify at-risk caregivers. • Anxiety/depression symptoms, age and metastases should be assessed in routine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the French version of the Supportive Care Needs Survey for Partners and Caregivers (SCNS‐P&C‐F). The SCNS‐P&C‐F, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the CareGiver Oncology Quality of Life questionnaire (CarGOQoL) were completed by 327 caregivers at the baseline. The SCNS‐P&C‐F was completed a second time by 121 participants within 30 days. Four factors were retained with a good explanation of variance (82.65%) and acceptable internal consistencies (α: 0.70 to 0.94): 1) Health Care Service and Information Needs, 2) Emotional and Psychological Needs, 3) Work and Social Security Needs and 4) Communication and Family Support Needs. Overall, convergent and divergent validities were confirmed. The caregiver's gender, age, professional status and level of anxiety and depression, as well as the type of relationship with the patient and cancer, showed an effect on some caregivers' unmet supportive care needs. Lastly, the test–retest reliability was acceptable (> 0.70), except for the communication and family support dimension. The scale is appropriate for clinical and research use (e.g. good reliability and validity). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]