1. Continuous versus intermittent BRAF and MEK inhibition in patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma: a randomized phase 2 trial
- Author
-
Algazi, Alain P, Othus, Megan, Daud, Adil I, Lo, Roger S, Mehnert, Janice M, Truong, Thach-Giao, Conry, Robert, Kendra, Kari, Doolittle, Gary C, Clark, Joseph I, Messino, Michael J, Moore, Dennis F, Lao, Christopher, Faller, Bryan A, Govindarajan, Rangaswamy, Harker-Murray, Amy, Dreisbach, Luke, Moon, James, Grossmann, Kenneth F, and Ribas, Antoni
- Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Clinical Sciences ,Oncology and Carcinogenesis ,Cancer ,Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities ,Clinical Research ,Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions ,6.1 Pharmaceuticals ,Administration ,Oral ,Adult ,Aged ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,Drug Administration Schedule ,Female ,Humans ,Imidazoles ,MAP Kinase Kinase Kinases ,Male ,Melanoma ,Middle Aged ,Mutation ,Missense ,Oximes ,Protein Kinase Inhibitors ,Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf ,Pyridones ,Pyrimidinones ,Skin Neoplasms ,Survival Analysis ,Treatment Outcome ,Young Adult ,Medical and Health Sciences ,Immunology ,Biomedical and clinical sciences ,Health sciences - Abstract
Preclinical modeling suggests that intermittent BRAF inhibitor therapy may delay acquired resistance when blocking oncogenic BRAFV600 in melanoma1,2. We conducted S1320, a randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial (NCT02196181) evaluating whether intermittent dosing of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib and the MEK inhibitor trametinib improves progression-free survival in patients with metastatic and unresectable BRAFV600 melanoma. Patients were enrolled at 68 academic and community sites nationally. All patients received continuous dabrafenib and trametinib during an 8-week lead-in period, after which patients with non-progressing tumors were randomized to either continuous or intermittent dosing of both drugs on a 3-week-off, 5-week-on schedule. The trial has completed accrual and 206 patients with similar baseline characteristics were randomized 1:1 to the two study arms (105 to continuous dosing, 101 to intermittent dosing). Continuous dosing yielded a statistically significant improvement in post-randomization progression-free survival compared with intermittent dosing (median 9.0 months versus 5.5 months, P = 0.064, pre-specified two-sided α = 0.2). Therefore, contrary to the initial hypothesis, intermittent dosing did not improve progression-free survival in patients. There were no differences in the secondary outcomes, including overall survival and the overall incidence of treatment-associated toxicity, between the two groups.
- Published
- 2020