Search

We performed method comparison for the tumor markers CA 15-3, CA 19-9, and CA 125 measured by luminescent oxygen channeling immunoassay technology on the Dimension Vista 1500 and by classic luminescence technology on the Immulite 2000 XPI. Within-day and total imprecision were determined according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines using three serum pools at different clinically relevant levels. In addition, parallel measurements on both systems were performed in a total of 738 routine serum samples (133 CA 15-3, 395 CA 19-9, and 210 CA 125). Total imprecision of serum pools for CA 15-3 ranged between 4.6% and 5.9%, for CA 19-9 between 4.4% and 7.8%, and for CA 125 between 3.3% and 4.3%. Marker values determined within the measurement range of both systems correlated well with each other (R = 0.88 for CA 15-3, R = 0.93 for CA 19-9, and R = 0.96 for CA 125). Slopes between the Vista and the Immulite method were 0.96 for CA 125, 0.72 for CA 15-3, and 0.87 for CA 19-9, indicating lower values for CA 15-3 and CA 19-9 when measured by the Vista method. This was particularly obvious for CA 19-9 levels in the lower measuring range of <100 U/mL (R = 0.85; slope 0.73). [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The dysregulation of proliferating and apoptotic processes is a common feature in cancerogenesis. Thus, apoptotic products released into blood circulation are suggested as promising markers for the early cancer detection. However though sensitive assays are available, the lack of organ- and tumor-specificity limits the usefulness of most apoptotic parameters for screening purposes. However, they seem to be valuable for the prognosis and the prediction of response to systemic chemo- or radiotherapy in cancer disease. Here, the relevance of diverse circulating apoptotic markers is reviewed for the clinical management of patients with lung cancer. Among those promising markers are ligands and receptors of the FAS-system, members of the intracellular caspase cascade, cleaved apoptosis substrates such as cytokeratines, nucleosomal DNA, and apoptosis modulators like survivin. The review discusses their role for diagnosis, prognosis and therapy monitoring of lung cancer disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nucleosomes, complexes of DNA and histone proteins, are released from dying and stressed cells into the blood circulation. Concentrations of circulating nucleosomes in plasma and serum are frequently found to be elevated in various cancers, and also in such acute conditions as stroke, trauma, and sepsis as well as in autoimmune diseases. The first part of this review focuses on the structural and functional properties of nucleosomes, the potential sources of nucleosome release into the circulation, the metabolism of circulating nucleosomes, and their pathophysiological role in disease. It goes on to describe the relevance of circulating nucleosomes in the diagnosis and prognosis of non-malignant conditions such as sepsis, stroke, and autoimmune disease. Finally, it describes the clinical value of nucleosomes in the diagnosis, staging, prognosis, and monitoring of therapy in cancer; in particular, their potential as a new diagnostic tool for the early estimation of response to cytotoxic cancer therapy is emphasized. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nucleosomes, complexes of DNA and histone proteins, are released during cell death into the blood circulation. Elevated serum and plasma levels have been found in various forms of cancer, but also in autoimmune diseases and acute situations such as stroke, trauma, and during sepsis. Here, the clinical relevance of circulating nucleosomes for diagnosis, staging, prognosis, and therapeutic monitoring of cancer is reviewed. Several studies have shown that levels of nucleosomes are significantly higher in serum and plasma of cancer patients in comparison to healthy controls. However, because of elevations of nucleosome levels in patients with benign diseases relevant for differential diagnosis, they are not suitable for cancer diagnosis. Concerning tumor staging, nucleosome levels correlate with tumor stage and presence of metastases in gastrointestinal cancer, but not in other tumor types. Prognostic value of circulating nucleosomes is found in lung cancer in univariate analyses, but not in multivariate analyses. Circulating nucleosomes are most informative for the monitoring of cytotoxic therapy. Strongly decreasing levels are mainly found in patients with remission of disease, whereas constantly high or increasing values are associated with progressive disease during chemo- and radiotherapy. In addition, therapy outcome is already indicated by the nucleosomal course during the first week of chemo- and radiotherapy in patients with lung, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer as well as in hematologic malignancies. Despite their non-tumor-specificity, kinetics of nucleosomes are valuable markers for the early estimation of therapeutic efficacy and may be helpful to adapting early cancer therapy in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to test the diagnostic utility of the DNA integrity index for detection of cancer. Matched serum and plasma samples of 42 patients with various forms of cancer and 17 patients with corresponding benign diseases were analyzed. DNA was isolated from 1 mL serum and plasma using the MagNA Pure LC system. Cell-free DNA was quantified by real-time PCR using the reference gene of the LightCycler t(14;18) kit. Subsequently, the DNA integrity index was calculated as the ratio in relative abundance of 347-bp versus 137-bp PCR products. We found that DNA concentrations were not different in plasma (median: 4.5 ng/mL) and serum (67.1 ng/mL) of patients with benign diseases when compared with values in plasma (5.1 ng/mL) and serum (65.4 ng/mL) of cancer patients. Similarly, the DNA integrity index in plasma (0.38), and serum of patients with benign diseases (0.29) was comparable to values in plasma (0.33) and serum (0.37) of cancer patients. Diagnostic sensitivity of DNA (AUC 0.53) and DNA integrity (AUC 0.45) was poor in plasma, and was increased only slightly by the combination of both (AUC 0.57). In serum, sensitivity of DNA (AUC 0.52) and DNA integrity (AUC 0.64) was higher and was further improved by the combination of both (AUC 0.72) reaching a sensitivity of 30% at 100% specificity. In conclusion, we could not confirm a high diagnostic utility of the DNA integrity index. However, a combination with other markers such as DNA may enhance sensitivity for cancer detection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]