Search

Gridded precipitation datasets are becoming a convenient substitute for gauge measurements in hydrological modeling; however, these data have not been fully evaluated across a range of conditions. We compared four gridded datasets (Daily Surface Weather and Climatological Summaries [DAYMET], North American Land Data Assimilation System [NLDAS], Global Land Data Assimilation System [GLDAS], and Parameter‐elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model [PRISM]) as precipitation data sources and evaluated how they affected hydrologic model performance when compared with a gauged dataset, Global Historical Climatology Network‐Daily (GHCN‐D). Analyses were performed for the Delaware Watershed at Perry Lake in eastern Kansas. Precipitation indices for DAYMET and PRISM precipitation closely matched GHCN‐D, whereas NLDAS and GLDAS showed weaker correlations. We also used these precipitation data as input to the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model that confirmed similar trends in streamflow simulation. For stations with complete data, GHCN‐D based SWAT‐simulated streamflow variability better than gridded precipitation data. During low flow periods we found PRISM performed better, whereas both DAYMET and NLDAS performed better in high flow years. Our results demonstrate that combining gridded precipitation sources with gauge‐based measurements can improve hydrologic model performance, especially for extreme events. Research Impact Statement: Gridded precipitation datasets vary in capturing different extreme events, both dry and wet, and different precipitation data sources usage led to varying parameter calibrations in watershed modeling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The first phase of a national scale Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model calibration effort at the HUC12 (Hydrologic Unit Code 12) watershed scale was demonstrated over the Mid-Atlantic Region (R02), consisting of 3036 HUC12 subbasins. An R-programming based tool was developed for streamflow calibration including parallel processing for SWAT-CUP (SWAT- Calibration and Uncertainty Programs) to streamline the computational burden of calibration. Successful calibration of streamflow for 415 gages (KGE ≥0.5, Kling-Gupta efficiency; PBIAS ≤15%, Percent Bias) out of 553 selected monitoring gages was achieved in this study, yielding calibration parameter values for 2106 HUC12 subbasins. Additionally, 67 more gages were calibrated with relaxed PBIAS criteria of 25%, yielding calibration parameter values for an additional 150 HUC12 subbasins. This first phase of calibration across R02 increases the reliability, uniformity, and replicability of SWAT-related hydrological studies. Moreover, the study presents a comprehensive approach for efficiently optimizing large-scale multi-site calibration. [Display omitted] • HUC2- region 02 SWAT hydrological calibration was performed for 553 USGS gages. • A successful calibration of 415 gages was achieved at KGE ≥0.5 and PBIAS ≤15. • A detailed methodology to optimize large-scale multi-site calibration was provided. • A R-programming based parallel processing calibration approach was developed. • Input uncertainty analysis for 19 SWAT parameters was generated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]