Search

This paper discusses the intersatellite radiometric calibration for microwave sounders in support of NASA’s Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission. This paper is an extension of previous GPM Intersatellite Calibration Working Group work, which assesses the robustness of the Central Florida Remote Sensing Laboratory “double difference” technique for sounders intercalibration. In this paper, we will analyze the intercalibration between the Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder on board the National Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System Preparatory Project, the Microwave Humidity Sounder on board the MetOp-A and MetOp-B and NOAA-18 and NOAA-19, and the Sondeur Atmosphérique du Profil d’Humidité Intertropicale par Radiométrie sounder onboard the Megha-Tropiques satellite. The sensitivity of the calibration to the geophysical parameters and incidence angles is investigated using two years data. Here, it is observed that a reliable intercalibration can be made only when the path lengths of the two sensors are similar, so when matching the scan angles for the two sensors, the sensitivity of the biases upon the water vapor profiles is significantly reduced. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Landsat-7 ETM+ sensor has been operating on orbit for more than 12 years, and characterizations of its performance have been ongoing over this period. In general, the radiometric performance of the instrument has been remarkably stable: 1) noise performance has degraded by 2% or less overall, with a few detectors displaying step changes in noise of 2% or less; 2) coherent noise frequencies and magnitudes have generally been stable, though the within-scan amplitude variation of the 20 kHz noise in bands 1 and 8 disappeared with the failure of the scan line corrector and a new similar frequency noise (now about 18 kHz) has appeared in two detectors in band 5 and increased in magnitude with time; 3) bias stability has been better than 0.25 DN out of a normal value of 15 DN in high gain; 4) relative gains, the differences in response between the detectors in the band, have generally changed by 0.1% or less over the mission, with the exception of a few detectors with a step response change of 1% or less; and 5) gain stability averaged across all detectors in a band, which is related to the stability of the absolute calibration, has been more stable than the techniques used to measure it. Due to the inability to confirm changes in the gain (beyond a few detectors that have been corrected back to the band average), ETM+ reflective band data continues to be calibrated with the prelaunch measured gains. In the worst case, some bands may have changed as much as 2% in uncompensated absolute calibration over the 12 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]