Search

Aim: Calf circumference, which is a known simple indicator of muscle mass, increases during edema. However, the extent to which edema increases calf circumference in older adults is unclear. Methods: This retrospective cross‐sectional study included patients aged ≥65 years whose nutritional status was assessed by nutrition support teams. Two different types of matching models in each sex were created according to the presence of edema on the right lower limb. All models were adjusted by age, body height, handgrip strength and performance status. Sarcopenia was diagnosed based on both reduced calf circumference and decline of handgrip strength. The prevalence of sarcopenia was estimated before and after adjustment for increment of calf circumference. Results: In total, 2101 patients were included. Multifactor matching models showed that the mean difference in calf circumference between pairs was 1.6 cm (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–2.1, P < 0.001) for women and 2.1 cm (95% CI 1.6–2.7, P < 0.001) for men. The propensity score matching model similarly showed a mean difference of 1.6 cm (95% CI 1.1–2.1, P < 0.001) for women and 2.0 cm (95% CI 1.5–2.6, P < 0.001) for men. The prevalence of sarcopenia before and after adjusting for an edema‐related increase in calf circumference was 42.6%/48.6% for women and 35.3%/38.5%–38.7% for men. Conclusions: Edema in the lower limb increased the calf circumference by approximately 2 cm. When using calf circumference to assess muscle mass in patients with edema, the increase in circumference should be subtracted from the baseline circumference for an accurate assessment. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 993–998. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Report of diagnostic accuracy of possible sarcopenia against sarcopenia by AWGS 2019. • Diagnostic accuracy of possible sarcopenia for definitive sarcopenia is excellent. • Definitive sarcopenia may be missed in case-finding with extremely reduced CC. • Possible sarcopenia is appropriate for the detection of definitive sarcopenia. The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 (AWGS 2019) proposed a simple assessment of sarcopenia called "possible sarcopenia" for the purpose of early detection and intervention of sarcopenia. The purpose of this study was to report the accuracy of possible sarcopenia against definitive sarcopenia and the characteristics of false-negative cases. This was a cross-sectional study using a research registry with outpatients aged ≥65 years who visited a frailty clinic at a geriatric hospital. The diagnosis of possible sarcopenia and sarcopenia was performed according to the AWGS 2019 criteria, using calf circumference (CC) for case-finding. The accuracy of the diagnosis of sarcopenia in participants with possible sarcopenia was evaluated by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and F-value. Of the 349 patients (mean age, 78.0±6.0 years; 63% women) analyzed, 86 (24.6%) revealed possible sarcopenia. Possible sarcopenia predicted sarcopenia with a sensitivity of 0.893 and 0.921, specificity of 0.990 and 0.870, and F-values of 0.926 and 0.714 for men and women, respectively. When either the grip strength test or 5-time chair stand test result was examined, the sensitivity of possible sarcopenia to predict sarcopenia decreased, whereas the specificity remained at 0.990–1.000 in men and 0.890–0.940 in women. An extremely decreased CC was identified as a significant characteristic of patients with sarcopenia not detected in the simplified assessment. The diagnostic accuracy of possible sarcopenia for definitive sarcopenia is excellent. Sarcopenia should be actively examined in patients with extremely decreased CC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]