Search

Purpose To compare the biomechanical properties of a fibula cross-tunnel technique for posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction with those of intact knees. Methods Seven fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were tested while intact, after PLC tear, and after reconstruction. Testing of the parameters listed above was performed at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion. Reconstruction was performed using 2 independent tendon autografts. Afterward, the fibula and graft were loaded to failure. Results Reconstruction restored external rotation (0°: 11.75° ± 2.02° to 9.81° ± 1.81°, P = .57; 30°: 17.91° ± 1.32° to 13.96° ± 2.84°, P = .12; 60°: 15.86° ± 1.68° to 13.26° ± 3.58°, P = .41; 90°: 15.53° ± 1.62° to 14.07° ± 2.95°, P = .54) to the intact state, and posterior translation (0°: 3.66 ± 0.85 mm to 3.31 ± 0.89 mm, P = .87; 60°: 3.15 ± 0.45 mm to 2.96 ± 0.45 mm, P = .73; 90°: 2.74 ± 0.33 mm to 3.05 ± 0.41 mm, P = .41) and varus angulation (0°: 0.92° ± 0.35° to 1.98° ± 0.42°, P = .55; 30°: 2.65° ± 0.27° to 1.09° ± 0.90°, P = .37; 90°: 4.29° ± 0.44° to 2.53° ± 1.13°, P = .19) under most conditions. During load to failure testing, the construct revealed properties similar to those of native structures (yield load: 330.4 ± 45.8 N; ultimate load: 420.9 ± 37.4 N). Conclusions This technique restored external rotation to the intact state after PLC injury in all testing conditions, as well as posterior translation at 0°, 60°, and 90° of flexion, and varus angulation under all conditions tested except 60° of flexion. Clinical Relevance Clinically, this surgical technique may eliminate the need for a tibial tunnel for posterolateral corner reconstruction.

Study Design: Biomechanical, cadaveric study. Objectives: To compare the relative stiffness of unilateral C1 lateral mass-C2 intralaminar fixation to intact specimens and bilateral C1 lateral mass-C2 intralaminar constructs. Methods: The biomechanical integrity of a unilateral C1 lateral mass-C2 intralaminar screw construct was compared to intact specimens and bilateral C1 lateral mass-C2 intralaminar screw constructs. Five human cadaveric specimens were used. Range of motion and stiffness were tested to determine the stiffness of the constructs. Results: Unilateral fixation significantly decreased flexion/extension range of motion compared to intact ( P < .001) but did not significantly affect axial rotation ( P = .3) or bending range of motion ( P = .3). There was a significant decrease in stiffness in extension for both unilateral and bilateral fixation techniques compared to intact ( P = .04 and P = .03, respectively). There was also a significant decrease in stiffness for ipsilateral rotation for the unilateral construct compared to intact ( P = .007) whereas the bilateral construct significantly increased ipsilateral rotation stiffness compared to both intact and unilateral fixation ( P < .001). Conclusion: Bilateral constructs did show improved biomechanical properties compared to the unilateral constructs. However, unilateral C1-C2 fixation using a C1 lateral mass and C2 intralaminar screw-rod construct decreased range of motion and improved stiffness compared to the intact state with the exception of extension and ipsilateral rotation. Hence, a unilateral construct may be acceptable in clinical situations in which bilateral fixation is not possible, but an external orthosis may be necessary to achieve a fusion.

The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the effect of the prosthetic humeral head shape on rotational range of motion and glenohumeral joint kinematics.Six fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested in multiple positions under anatomic muscle loading. Specimens were tested for the native head, and then the spherical and non-spherical prosthetic heads were randomly implanted in the same stem to preserve the center of rotation. Rotational range of motion was measured with 3.3 Nm of torque. Glenohumeral joint kinematics was quantified by the position vectors of the humeral head apex (HHA) and geometric center of the humeral head (GCHH) to calculate translation of HHA and GCHH per degree of humeral rotation.The non-spherical prosthetic head replicated the native head shape more accurately than the spherical prosthetic head. Between the non-spherical and native heads, there was no statistical difference in rotational range of motion (P .05), but a statistical difference in HHA and GCHH translation was found at 60° of scapular plane abduction in the interval from 30° of internal rotation to neutral rotation and at 30° of forward flexion plane abduction in the interval from 30° of external rotation to maximum external rotation, respectively (P .05). The spherical head significantly decreased rotational range of motion (P .05), increased HHA translation per degree (P .05), and decreased GCHH translation per degree (P .05) in multiple positions compared with the native humeral head.The custom, non-spherical prosthetic head more accurately replicated the head shape, rotational range of motion, and glenohumeral joint kinematics than the commercially available, spherical prosthetic head compared with the native humeral head.

Background:The repetitive, excessive compression forces in the radiocapitellar joint caused by elbow valgus stresses during throwing motions can result in osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the humeral capitellum in adolescent athletes.Purpose:To assess the effect of elbow valgus torque on contact pressure in the radiocapitellar joint and that of central and lateral capitellar osteochondral defects on radiocapitellar joint contact pressure, elbow valgus laxity, and ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) strain.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Methods:In 8 matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric upper limbs, lateral osteochondral defects of the humeral capitellum (5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-mm diameters) were evaluated in one side, and central defects were evaluated in the contralateral side. Radiocapitellar joint contact pressure, elbow valgus laxity, and UCL strain were all measured with and without 2 N·m of valgus torque at 30°, 60°, and 90° of elbow flexion in neutral forearm rotation.Results:Applying valgus torque increased contact pressure in radiocapitellar joints with intact or damaged capitula. Contact pressure in joints with 15-mm (90° of elbow flexion) and 20-mm (60° and 90° of elbow flexion) lateral capitellar defects was greater than that in joints with intact capitula. Radiocapitellar contact pressure was greater with a 20-mm lateral capitellar defect than in the same-sized central defect at 60° and 90° of elbow flexion. In both central and lateral defect groups, elbow valgus laxity increased as the size of the capitellar defect increased, and UCL strain remained unchanged regardless of the size of the capitellar defect.Conclusion:Elbow valgus torque increases contact pressure in the radiocapitellar joint. Capitellar osteochondral defects increase elbow valgus laxity and contact pressure without increasing UCL strain. When valgus torque is applied, contact pressure in the radiocapitellar joint is greater with a lateral defect than with a central defect.Clinical Relevance:Adolescent baseball players with capitellar OCD should stop throwing, even if the UCL is intact, to prevent exacerbating the osteochondral defect. Lateral capitellar OCD is more severe than central capitellar OCD.

The purpose of this study was to measure the position of the radius relative to the ulna through a complete range of elbow flexion and forearm rotation. Twenty cadaveric upper extremities were mounted on a testing jig that allowed simultaneous control of elbow flexion and forearm rotation. The longitudinal position of the radius relative to the ulna was measured using a three-dimensional digitizer at full pronation, mid-pronation (45°), neutral (0°), mid-supination (45°) and full supination at 10°, 30°, 60°, 90° and 120° of elbow flexion. Our results showed that the radius is located distally when in supination and is located more proximally as it is rotated into pronation. The longitudinal position of the radius changes over 9 mm when moving through a complete arc of forearm rotation. The angle of elbow flexion had a secondary effect on the longitudinal position of the radius, causing changes of less than 0.8 mm.

Purpose To evaluate the midcarpal contact characteristics at the lunocapitate (LC) and scaphotrapezio-trapezoidal (STT) joints in 3 wrist conditions: intact, after simulating a radioscapholunate (RSL) arthrodesis, and after an RSL arthrodesis with distal scaphoid excision (DSE). Methods Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were tested using a custom jig with the wrist in neutral, 15° and 30° flexion and extension, 10° radial deviation, and 20° ulnar deviation. The RSL arthrodesis was performed using 2.4-mm distal radius plates with locking screws. Using a pressure sensor, contact force, average pressure, peak pressure, and contact area at the STT and LC joints were measured for 3 conditions: intact wrist, RSL arthrodesis, and RSL arthrodesis with DSE. Results Following RSL arthrodesis, average and peak pressure at the LC joint increased significantly compared to the intact wrist. In the STT joint, the average and peak contact pressure increased significantly compared to the intact wrist. Following DSE, average and peak pressure at the LC joint increased further compared to the RSL arthrodesis condition. Conclusions Our findings showed increased contact pressures in the STT and LC joint following RSL arthrodesis, which may explain the clinical findings of midcarpal arthritis. Also, although DSE may improve short-term range of motion and clinical incidence of midcarpal arthritis, our findings showed that this comes at a cost, as the remaining portions of the midcarpal joint are subject to higher forces and pressures following DSE. Clinical relevance Radioscapholunate arthrodesis results in increased midcarpal contact pressures that may explain the clinical incidence of midcarpal arthritis. Excision of the distal scaphoid further increases contact pressures in the remaining midcarpal joint and may further increase the incidence of midcarpal arthritis. These alterations in contact characteristics of the midcarpal joint should be considered when excising the distal scaphoid for improved range of motion.

The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of a massive L-shaped retracted rotator cuff tear repaired with either soft-tissue side-to-side sutures or margin convergence anchorage to bone.Eight matched pairs of cadaveric shoulders were used. The supraspinatus and infraspinatus were secured in a clamp at 30° of glenohumeral abduction. The subscapularis was secured in a separate clamp, and a constant load was applied. A massive L-shaped rotator cuff tear of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon was created. In all specimens the posterior aspect of the tear was repaired by a transosseous-equivalent technique. In 1 group we placed 2 margin convergence sutures between the supraspinatus and the rotator interval. In the comparison group, a suture anchor was inserted at the anterior attachment of the rotator cable. Margin convergence anchorage to bone was then performed between the supraspinatus and the rotator interval. Each specimen was tested with an Instron machine (Instron, Canton, MA) and a video digitizing system. A paired t test was used for statistical analysis.Margin convergence anchorage to bone decreased gap formation at cycle 1, cycle 30, and yield load across the entire footprint (P.05). In both constructs the anterior gap was greater than the posterior gap at cycle 1, cycle 30, and yield load (P.05). Margin convergence anchorage to bone decreased hysteresis and increased stiffness during the first cycle and increased yield load (P.05).Using margin convergence anchorage to bone to restore the anterior attachment of the rotator cable decreased gap formation across the entire footprint and improved biomechanical properties for cycle 1 and yield load compared with soft-tissue margin convergence for massive rotator cuff repairs.Repairing the anterior rotator cuff with margin convergence anchorage to bone may improve clinical outcomes of an L-shaped massive tear repair.

Posterolateral corner (PLC) injury of the knee causes varus and posterolateral rotatory instability. The anatomy of the PLC has been reported in the literature but the importance of PLC reconstruction has only recently been established and ideal reconstruction techniques are still in development. The native function of the PLC is to restrain varus and external rotation. Reconstruction methods should properly restore these functions without overconstraining the joint. Several reconstructions for PLC injury have been reported but with concerns of iatrogenic neurovascular injury, fibular head cutout, and restoration of the knee kinematics. To address these concerns, a new cross fibula tunnel method was developed that may have lower risk of iatrogenic nerve injury and fibula head cutout. The purpose of this study was to verify the stability of this technique using a PLC deficient knee.Copyright © 2010 by ASME

Combined injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee results in posterolateral rotatory instability. The detailed anatomy and kinematics of the PCL is well described in the literature as well as the anatomy of the PLC; however, the detailed kinematics of the posterolateral corner ligaments and tendons are not well understood. This information on the posterolateral corner is important for developing a strategy for accurate anatomical reconstructions. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify the detailed kinematics of the posterolateral corner of the knee ligaments and tendons.