Search

Background Arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) yields good results in young athletes with anterior shoulder instability. However, the treatment for overhead athletes is challenging because recovery of range of motion is necessary for return to play and repeated shoulder motion may lead to recurrent instability. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes and return to sports after ABR on the dominant shoulder in overhead athletes. Methods This study included 24 competitive level overhead athletes who underwent ABR on their dominant shoulders. The mean age at surgery was 17.6 years, and the mean follow-up was 39.7 months. The range of bilateral shoulder motion, the Rowe score, the Japanese Shoulder Society Shoulder Instability Score (JSS-SIS), and the Japanese Shoulder Society Shoulder Sports Score (JSS-SSS) were evaluated before the surgery and at the final visit. Recurrent instability, the final level of return to sports, and the duration before returning to sports were confirmed, as well as the pre-, intra- and postoperative factors, which prohibited complete return to play. Results There were no cases of recurrent instability. The Rowe score, JSS-SIS, JSS-SSS, and the range of flexion, abduction, internal rotation significantly improved postoperatively. Fifteen athletes (62.5%) returned to the same or superior levels without any complaint in their shoulders. The mean duration needed for a complete return was 13.3 months. The postoperative external rotation deficit in abduction was larger in the athletes who returned incompletely than those who returned completely, 7.8° and 2.3°, respectively. Conclusions ABR is a reliable surgery for preventing recurrent instability in overhead athletes, however the rate of a complete return to preinjury level was low and a long duration was needed for complete return to play. The postoperative external rotation may be necessary for a complete return to overhead sports. Level of evidence Level IV: Retrospective Case Series.

To biomechanically compare the dynamic double-sling with single-sling augmentation using the conjoined tendon (CT) with 20% of an anteroinferior glenoid bone defect under the high loads in shoulders.With the shoulder in 60° of glenohumeral abduction and 60° of external rotation, the 12 shoulders stability was tested sequentially in 5 conditions: intact, 20% glenoid bone loss, Bankart repair, single-sling augmentation with the CT, and double-sling augmentation with both the CT and long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). The anteroinferior humeral head (HH) translation force of 20N, 30N, 40N, 50N, or 60N was applied to determine the shoulder stability in each condition.The total HH translation over 8.77 mm represented the anteroinferior shoulder instability (95% confidence interval of bone defect: 7.76-8.77 mm). A significant increase in anteroinferior HH translation was demonstrated after the creation of 20% glenoid bone defect under the 20N translational force (10.52 ± 0.71 mm). Structural failure after the Bankart repair and the single-sling augmentation under the 30N (9.84 ± 1.25 mm) and 40N (9.59 ± 0.66 mm) translational forces, respectively, were observed. The double-sling augmentation effectively prevented the anteroinferior HH translation under the translational force of less than 40N, and only half of the augmentation structure (8.25 ± 1.66 mm) had failed under the 50N translational forces.In the absence of any Hill-Sachs lesion and when tested at 60° abduction and external rotation in shoulders with 20% glenoid bone defects, at time-zero, the double-sling augmentation strategy could effectively prevent anteroinferior translation when compared with the Bankart repair or the single-sling augmentation technique under all magnitudes of the translational force in biomechanical simulation. Nevertheless, none of the constructs restored the HH translation to the normal intact state.Double-sling augmentation technique may represent a reliable option for preventing anteroinferior translation.

Treating recurrent anterior shoulder instability in participants in collision sports, patients with capsulolabral defects, and patients with bipolar bone loss remains challenging. The study purpose was to investigate the effect of long head of the biceps transfer (LHBT) on load-to-dislocation biomechanics in a repetitive serial shoulder dislocation cadaveric model comparing LHBT with the Latarjet and Bankart procedures-the first-line treatment methods for chronic traumatic anterior shoulder instability with and without anterior glenoid bone loss, respectively.In this controlled laboratory study, 8 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders with different conditions were dislocated in sequence using a custom test frame. The muscle loading configuration simulated the arm in the apprehension position, and biceps loads of 20 N and 40 N were used for the static glenohumeral position analysis to evaluate the sling effect. Sequential experimental conditions consisted of the intact state, second and third dislocations, chronic instability, Bankart repair, first LHBT, subcritical glenoid bone loss, second LHBT, and Latarjet procedure.The pectoralis major and joint reaction loads to dislocation sequentially decreased with serial dislocations in all specimens, with the lowest value in the subcritical glenoid bone defect condition. In the setting of chronic instability, the pectoralis load to dislocation was significantly higher with the Bankart repair (P = .031) and LHBT (P.001), at 71% and 85% of the intact value, respectively. Direct comparison of the pectoralis load to dislocation favored LHBT over Bankart repair (P = .015). In the subcritical defect scenario, LHBT did not significantly increase the load to dislocate, and the Latarjet procedure demonstrated a higher load to dislocate than LHBT (P.001). All 3 surgical procedures tested significantly increased the angle of horizontal abduction at the time of dislocation and restored the glenohumeral position to closer to the intact state. Doubling the biceps load leveraged the sling effect, pulling the humeral head farther posterior-superiorly, but this was not enough to overcome the effect of a 20% subcritical glenoid bone defect.In a serial dislocation model, LHBT effectively stabilized the glenohumeral joint in a simulated chronic instability scenario, increasing the pectoralis major load-to-dislocate and glenohumeral joint reaction force components at the time of dislocation and restoring relative glenohumeral positioning to close to the intact state. The Latarjet procedure outperformed LHBT in stabilizing shoulders in the 20% subcritical glenoid bone defect condition.

To report clinical and radiologic outcomes of arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette using 2 cortical suture buttons in a series of patients with previous failed Latarjet and persistent glenoid bone loss.Between 2015 and 2019, patients with recurrent anterior instability after failed Latarjet underwent arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette procedure using 2 cortical buttons for graft fixation. Exclusion criteria were open and primary Eden-Hybinette and less than one year follow-up. Functional assessment was performed using Rowe and Walch-Duplay scores, subjective shoulder value, visual analog scale, and degree of satisfaction. Iliac crest bone graft placement and healing were assessed postoperatively with computed tomography imaging.A total of 17 patients with a mean age of 28 years (range, 21-43 years) at time of revision were included. The mean glenoid bone loss was 23% (range, 18%-42%). Medium or deep Hill-Sachs lesion (Calandra 2 and 3) was present in 65% of cases. At a mean follow-up of 3 ± 1.6 years, all but 1 patient (94%) considered their shoulder stable, and 15 patients (88%) were satisfied or very satisfied. The subjective shoulder value increased from 51% to 87% (P.05), the Walch-Duplay increased from 23 to 86 points (P.05), and Rowe scores improved from 30 to 92 points (P.05). Apprehension was still positive in 3 patients (17.6%), with this percentage being greater in the presence of Hill-Sachs Calandra 3 (P = .02). Postoperative computed tomography scans showed optimal bone autograft position in all patients (below the glenoid equator and flush to the glenoid rim). Iliac crest bone graft healed to the anterior glenoid neck in 16 shoulders (94%). The rate of recurrent instability was 11.7% but only 1 patient required revision surgery (5.8%).Arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette using 2 cortical buttons leads to satisfactory clinical outcomes and a low recurrence rate after failed Latarjet, allowing successful reconstruction of the anterior glenoid rim and simultaneous treatment of capsular deficiency and humeral bone loss.Therapeutic, level IV, retrospective case series.

The purpose of this study was to compare the preoperative magnetic resonance arthrography findings in patients who underwent glenohumeral stabilization with a history of primary instability, recurrent instability, or failed stabilization.All patients who presented with glenohumeral instability and underwent stabilization performed by a single surgeon in our institution between 2008 and 2020 were considered for inclusion in this study. The magnetic resonance arthrography findings of all patients were recorded. Imaging findings were compared between patients with primary instability, those with recurrent instability, and those with failed prior stabilization. P.05 was considered statistically significant.Overall, 871 patients were included, of whom 814 (93.5%) were male patients; the mean age was 23.1 years (range, 13-57 years). There were 200 patients with primary instability, 571 with recurrent instability, and 100 who required revision stabilization surgery, with no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the groups. A significantly higher amount of glenoid bone loss was noted in patients with recurrent instability (43.4%) and failed prior stabilization (56%) than in those with primary instability (26.5%) (P.0001). Additionally, a significantly higher number of Hill-Sachs lesions were observed in patients with recurrent instability (70.1%) and failed prior stabilization (89%) than in those with primary instability (67.5%) (P.0001). We found no significant differences between the groups regarding articular cartilage damage, glenolabral articular disruption, anterior labral periosteal sleeve avulsion, humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligaments, or superior labral anterior-posterior tears (P.05).Patients presenting for stabilization with recurrent instability or following a failed stabilization procedure have higher rates of glenohumeral bone loss than those with primary instability. Therefore, stabilization of primary instability, particularly in high-functioning athletes with a view to preventing recurrence, may reduce the overall progression of glenohumeral bone loss and potential subsequent inferior clinical outcomes.

Purpose To evaluate the rate and duration of return to work in patients undergoing Latarjet for failed soft-tissue stabilization or glenoid bone loss. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing Latarjet from 2005 to 2015 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Patients completed a standardized and validated work questionnaire, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index Survey, and a satisfaction survey. Results Of 89 eligible patients who had Latarjet, 67 patients (75.3%) responded to the questionnaire, of whom 51 patients (76.1%) were employed within 3 years before surgery (mean age: 29.9 ± 11.8 years; mean follow-up: 54.6 ± 11.9 months) and had an average glenoid bone loss of 14.5 ± 6.1%. Fifty patients (98.0%) returned to work by 2.7 ± 3.0 months postoperatively; 45 patients (88.2%) patients returned to the same level of occupational intensity. Those who held sedentary, light, moderate, or heavy intensity occupations returned to their previous occupation at a rate of 100.0%, 93.3%, 90.0%, and 66.7% (P = .2) at a duration of 1.2 ± 1.6 months, 1.8 ± 1.9 months, 3.1 ± 3.5 months, and 6.5 ± 4.1 months (P = .001), respectively. The average postoperative Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score was 70.9 ± 34.2. Fifty patients (98.0%) noted at least “a little improvement” in their quality of life following surgery, with 35 patients (68.6%) noting great improvement. Furthermore, 49 patients (96.1%) reported being satisfied with their procedure, with 25 patients (49.0%) reporting being very satisfied. Four patients (7.8%) returned to the operating room, with 1 patient (2.0%) requiring arthroscopic shoulder stabilization. Conclusions Approximately 98% of patients who underwent Latarjet returned to work by 2.7 ± 3.0 months postoperatively. Patients with greater-intensity occupations had a longer duration of absence before returning to their preoperative level of occupational intensity. Information regarding return to work is imperative in preoperative patient consultation to manage expectations. Level of Evidence IV, case series.

Purpose To systematically review and compare the surgical indications, technique, peri-operative treatment, outcomes measures, and how recurrence of instability was reported and defined after coracoid transfer procedures. Methods A systematic review of the literature examining open coracoid transfer outcomes was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using the Cochrane registry, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases from 2010 to 2020. Inclusion criteria included open coracoid transfer techniques including the Bristow or Latarjet technique, full text available, human studies, and English language. Results A screen of 1096 coracoid transfer studies yielded 72 studies which met inclusion criteria with a total of 4,312 shoulders. One study was a randomized controlled trial, but the majority were retrospective. Of those, 65 studies reported on post-operative outcome scores, complication rates, revision rate, and recurrence rates. Forty-three reported on range of motion results. Thirty studies reported on primary coracoid transfer only, 7 on revision only, and 30 on both primary and revision with 5 not reporting. Average follow-up was 26.9 months (range, 1-316.8 months). Indications for coracoid transfer, technique, peri-operative care, complications, and how failure was reported varied greatly among studies. Conclusions Latarjet and coracoid transfer surgery varies greatly in its indications, technique, and post-operative care. Further, there is great variation in reporting of complications as well as recurrence and failure and how it is defined. Although coracoid transfer is a successful treatment with a long history, greater consistency regarding these factors is essential for appropriate patient education and surgeon knowledge.

Locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder (LPDS) is a challenging condition for the orthopedic surgeon. The problem with cases of chronic LPDS is that they may result in worse clinical outcomes because the size of the reverse Hill-Sachs lesion and cartilage damage can increase over time. Multiple treatment strategies have been reported in the literature for the treatment of chronic cases. The purpose of this study was to report our experience with the modified McLaughlin technique for the treatment of chronic LPDS and evaluate the mid- and long-term functional outcomes.This was a retrospective single-center study including a consecutive series of 10 patients who underwent the modified McLaughlin procedure for the treatment of chronic LPDS. The time between dislocation and treatment ranged from 6 weeks to 14 months (mean, 20.9 weeks). Postoperative imaging and functional evaluation were performed with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up (range, 24-110 months). Functional outcomes were assessed by means of a visual analog scale score for pain and patient satisfaction regarding the operation, the Constant-Murley score, and the University of California, Los Angeles shoulder rating scale.The mean follow-up period was 59.4 months (range, 24-110 months). Range of motion improved significantly after surgery: Mean forward flexion improved from 71° ± 5° to 126°± 37° (P.001), mean external rotation improved from 7°± 7° to 52° ± 18° (P = .012), and mean internal rotation improved from gluteal region ± 1 vertebral level to L1 ± 4 vertebral levels (P = .001). Functional outcome measures demonstrated significant improvements: The mean Constant-Murley score improved from 22 ± 2.4 (range, 20-26) to 65 ± 21.5 (P.001); the mean University of California, Los Angeles score improved from 9.8 ± 1.3 (range, 8-12) to 27 ± 9.7 (P.001); and the mean visual analog scale score improved from 4.6 ± 0.8 (range, 3-6) to 2.4 ± 2.3 (P.001). Of the patients, 8 (80%) were satisfied with the procedure. The 2 remaining cases had a delay from injury to diagnosis6 months and evolved with poor functional outcomes and severe glenohumeral degenerative joint disease. There were no cases of recurrent dislocation, infection, or neurologic injury during the follow-up.Our study findings demonstrated that the modified McLaughlin procedure showed good results over a 2-year minimum follow-up period. The clinical outcomes of this procedure are worse when there is a delay from injury to diagnosis6 months.

Background The purpose of this study was to review the literature to ascertain the functional outcomes, recurrence rates, and subsequent revision rates following revision arthroscopic Bankart repair. Methods Two independent reviewers performed a literature search based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines using the Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies in which arthroscopic Bankart repair was performed as a revision procedure were included. The clinical outcomes extracted and analyzed were functional outcomes, return to play, and recurrent instability. Results Fourteen studies with 433 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were male patients (63.7%); the average age was 26.1 years (range, 14-58 years), and the mean follow-up period was 37.6 months (range, 10-144 months). The mean Rowe score was 84.2, and 79.7% of patients had good to excellent outcomes. The rate of return to play was 78.5%, with 47.5% of patients returning to their preinjury level of play across 10 studies. The rate of recurrent instability was reported in 12 studies, with 328 shoulders demonstrating 86 instability events (26.2%). The rate of recurrent instability due to dislocation was reported in 7 studies (n = 176), with 19 events (10.8%), whereas the rate of subluxation was reported in 4 studies (n = 76), with 6 events (7.9%). Conclusions Revision arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability was shown to result in a high rate of recurrent shoulder instability. There was a relatively poor rate of return to sport among athletes, and only about half of the patients were able to return at or above their preoperative level of ability.

Background: The purpose of this study is to present surgical outcomes after humeral head allograft augmentation and glenoid-based procedures in patients with active, uncontrolled seizure activity and anterior shoulder instability. Methods: A retrospective review of a surgical database for patients with active seizure disorder and with recurrent shoulder instability managed with humeral head augmentation was performed. All patients underwent surgical intervention. Postoperative outcomes including Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire, and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) were recorded at a minimum of 2 years. We hypothesized that appropriate management of the bony defects in these bipolar injuries would result in low recurrence and satisfactory outcomes. Results: Ten patients including 8 males and 2 females (15 shoulders) with active seizure-related shoulder instability underwent surgical intervention including allograft bone grafting of the Hill-Sachs lesion for anterior shoulder instability. The average age was 27 years. All patients reported recurrent seizures postoperatively, but only one sustained a shoulder dislocation after surgery that was unrelated to seizure activity.Self-reported satisfaction was “much better” or “better” in 92% of shoulders. Average outcome scores were as follows: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score = 67 (33-100), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index = 32.5 (0-83), Simple Shoulder Test = 9.4 (5-12), SF-12 PCS = 44.1 (21-65), and SF-12 MCS = 50.6 (21-61). The average follow-up was 4.8 years. Conclusion: Management of bipolar shoulder injuries with humeral head allograft augmentation and glenoid based surgery leads to low recurrence rates and good clinical outcomes in patients with uncontrolled, seizure-related shoulder instability.

Four patients with shoulder problems that were traumatic in etiology presented to us with delays in seeking care ranging from 6 to 12 weeks due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown. The care of three cases (a 3-month-old neglected anterior shoulder dislocation with a greater tuberosity fracture in a 30-year old man, a 3-month-old neglected anterior shoulder dislocation in a 17-year old boy, and a 2-month-old neglected greater tuberosity fracture in a 31-year old man) was delayed due to the lockdown and the ensuing travel restrictions, while that of one case (a 6-week-old fracture–dislocation of the proximal humerus in a 55-year-old woman) was delayed because the patient was undergoing treatment for COVID-19 at the time of injury. This report intends to present the exceptional circumstances around these cases. The unique treatment challenges and their outcomes are also described to advise the surgeons of the nuances and difficulties in treating these injuries.

Здійснений аналіз 46 випадків незадовільного остеосинтезу різними фіксаторами при переломах шийки стегнової кістки. Аналізувався вплив гвинтів, традиційних і блокуючих фіксаторів на зрощення фрагментів. Запропонований пристрій для остеосинтезу переломів проксимального відділу стегна (пат. України № 22283). Фіксатор має деротаційний ефект, мінімально травмує відламки. В несприятливих випадках при псевдоартрозах у 19 пацієнтів проведена кісткова автопластика., Проведен анализ 46 случаев неудовлетворительного остеосинтеза различными фиксаторами при переломах шейки бедренной кости. Анализировалось влияние винтов, традиционных и блокирующих фиксаторов на сращение фрагментов. Предложено устройство для остеосинтеза переломов проксимального отдела бедра (пат. Украины № 22283). Фиксатор имеет деротационный эффект, минимально травмирует отломки. В неблагоприятных случаях при псевдоартрозах у 19 пациентов проведена костная аутопластика., Background. The most common shoulder injury is shoulder dislocation. Frequency of shoulder dislocation, according to the literature, is about 2 % of all types of injuries in the world. The incidence of terrible triad of the shoulder is 9–18 % of cases of anterior shoulder dislocation. The purpose of our work is to create an algorithm for terrible triad of the shoulder diagnosing, and to improve the results of the treatment of this pathology. Materials and methods. In the SI “Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics of the NAMS of Ukraine”, from 2000 to 2018, 492 patients with shoulder dislocation were treated, among them 28 were diagnosed with terrible triad of the shoulder. All patients were examined clinically, a manual assessment of the function of the deltoid muscle and the sensitivity of the epaulette area, radiography, computed tomography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and electroneuromyography were performed. Results. In case of anterior shoulder dislocation, we manually evaluate the function of the deltoid muscle, and sensitivity in the epaulette area. Under general anesthesia, we carry out reduction of dislocation. Then we control deltoid muscle function and sensitivity of epaulette area. In case of violation, we evaluate the function of the hand, perform ultrasound or MRI of the shoulder joint (and, if necessary, MRI of the brachial plexus). Visualization by ultrasound or MRI of rotator cuff tear combined with deltoid muscle dysfunction gives us reason to diagnose terrible triad of the shoulder. Conclusions. Terrible triad of the shoulder is a severe trauma of the shoulder joint leading to prolonged disability. The diagnosis of terrible triad of the shoulder in a period of more than 8 weeks from the moment of injury significantly impairs the results of further treatment. We have developed diagnostic algorithm for the terrible triad of the shoulder, which enables to diagnose it early after injury, and makes possible a more complete function restoration.

Актуальність. Найбільш часта травма плечового суглоба — це вивих плеча. Частота вивихів плеча, за даними літератури, становить 2 % від усіх видів травм населення світу. «Нещаслива тріада» плеча зустрічається в 9–18 % випадків серед передніх вивихів плеча. Мета роботи: створення алгоритму діагностики «нещасливої тріади» плеча для покращання результатів лікування цієї патології. Матеріали та методи. У ДУ «Інститут травматології та ортопедії НАМН України» в період із 2000 по 2018 рік було проведене лікування 492 пацієнтів із вивихом плеча, серед них у 28 була діагностована «нещаслива тріада» плеча. Усі пацієнти були оглянуті клінічно, виконана мануальна оцінка функції дельтоподібного м’яза й чутливості еполетної зони, рентгенографія, комп’ютерна томографія, ультразвукове дослідження (УЗД), магнітно-резонансна томографія (МРТ) і електронейроміографія. Результати. При підозрі на передній вивих плеча мануально оцінюємо функцію дельтоподібного м’яза й чутливість в еполетній зоні. Під загальним знеболюванням виконуємо вправлення вивиху. У подальшому проводимо контроль оцінки функції дельтоподібного м’яза й чутливості еполетної зони. У разі порушення — оцінюємо функцію кисті. Виконуємо УЗД або МРТ плечового суглоба (а за необхідності — МРТ плечового сплетення). Візуалізація на УЗД або МРТ розриву ротаторної манжети плеча в комбінації з порушенням функції дельтоподібного м’яза дає нам підстави до встановлення діагнозу «нещасливої тріади» плеча. Висновки. «Нещаслива тріада» плеча — тяжка травма плечового суглоба, що призводить до тривалої втрати працездатності, а в деяких випадках — і до інвалідизації хворих. Діагностика «нещасливої тріади» плеча пізніше від 8 тижнів із моменту травми значно погіршує результати подальшого лікування цієї патології. Розроблений нами алгоритм діагностики «нещасливої тріади» плеча дозволяє поставити діагноз у ранні терміни після травми, що дає можливість розраховувати на більш повне відновлення функції., Актуальность. Наиболее частая травма плечевого сустава — это вывих плеча. Частота вывихов плеча, по данным литературы, составляет 2 % от всех видов травм населения мира. «Несчастливая триада» плеча встречается в 9–18 % случаев среди передних вывихов плеча. Цель работы: создание алгоритма диагностики «несчастливой триады» плеча для улучшения результатов лечения этой патологии. Материалы и методы. В ГУ «Институт травматологии и ортопедии НАМН Украины» в период с 2000 по 2018 год было проведено лечение 492 пациентов с вывихом плеча, среди них у 28 была диагностирована «несчастливая триада» плеча. Все пациенты были осмотрены клинически, выполнена мануальная оценка функции дельтовидной мышцы и чувствительности эполетной зоны, рентгенография, компьютерная томография, ультразвуковое исследование (УЗИ), магнитно-резонансная томография (МРТ) и электронейромиография. Результаты. При подозрении на передний вывих плеча мануально оцениваем функцию дельтовидной мышцы и чувствительность в эполетной зоне. Под общим обезболиванием выполняем вправление вывиха. В дальнейшем проводим контроль оценки функции дельтовидной мышцы и чувствительности эполетной зоны. В случае нарушения — оцениваем функцию кисти. Выполняем УЗИ или МРТ плечевого сустава (а при необходимости — МРТ плечевого сплетения). Визуализация на УЗИ или МРТ разрыва ротаторной манжеты плеча в сочетании с нарушением функции дельтовидной мышцы дает нам основания для постановки диагноза «несчастливой триады» плеча. Выводы. «Несчастливая триада» плеча — тяжелая травма плечевого сустава, приводящая к длительной потере трудоспособности, а в ряде случаев — и к инвалидизации больных. Диагностика «несчастливой триады» плеча позже чем через 8 недель с момента травмы значительно ухудшает результаты дальнейшего лечения этой патологии. Разработанный нами алгоритм диагностики «несчастливой триады» плеча позволяет поставить диагноз в ранние сроки после травмы, что дает возможность рассчитывать на более полное восстановление функции., Background. The most common shoulder injury is shoulder dislocation. Frequency of shoulder dislocation, according to the literature, is about 2 % of all types of injuries in the world. The incidence of terrible triad of the shoulder is 9–18 % of cases of anterior shoulder dislocation. The purpose of our work is to create an algorithm for terrible triad of the shoulder diagnosing, and to improve the results of the treatment of this pathology. Materials and methods. In the SI “Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics of the NAMS of Ukraine”, from 2000 to 2018, 492 patients with shoulder dislocation were treated, among them 28 were diagnosed with terrible triad of the shoulder. All patients were examined clinically, a manual assessment of the function of the deltoid muscle and the sensitivity of the epaulette area, radiography, computed tomography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and electroneuromyography were performed. Results. In case of anterior shoulder dislocation, we manually evaluate the function of the deltoid muscle, and sensitivity in the epaulette area. Under general anesthesia, we carry out reduction of dislocation. Then we control deltoid muscle function and sensitivity of epaulette area. In case of violation, we evaluate the function of the hand, perform ultrasound or MRI of the shoulder joint (and, if necessary, MRI of the brachial plexus). Visualization by ultrasound or MRI of rotator cuff tear combined with deltoid muscle dysfunction gives us reason to diagnose terrible triad of the shoulder. Conclusions. Terrible triad of the shoulder is a severe trauma of the shoulder joint leading to prolonged disability. The diagnosis of terrible triad of the shoulder in a period of more than 8 weeks from the moment of injury significantly impairs the results of further treatment. We have developed diagnostic algorithm for the terrible triad of the shoulder, which enables to diagnose it early after injury, and makes possible a more complete function restoration.

CASE DESCRIPTION A 13-year-old 128-kg miniature donkey gelding was evaluated for right forelimb lameness of 7 weeks’ duration. CLINICAL FINDINGS Muscular atrophy of the infraspinatus and supraspinatus muscles over the right scapula with a palpable bony prominence over the point of the shoulder was evident. At the walk, the cranial phase of the stride was reduced with adduction of the distal aspect of the limb, dragging of the toe, and lameness (grade, 4/5). Lateral and craniocaudal radiographs of the right shoulder joint revealed lateral luxation of the humerus in relation to the scapula with bony proliferation and remodeling of the humeral head. TREATMENT AND OUTCOME Glenoid ostectomy was performed. Immediately after surgery, the donkey was able to intermittently stand squarely on the limb but maintained a reduced cranial phase of the stride at the walk. The donkey had no short-term complications and was discharged from the hospital 11 days after surgery. Following discharge, the donkey was confined to a box stall for 60 days, followed by a gradual increase in movement to full pasture turnout. The lameness continued to improve, and at 15 months after surgery the donkey was turned out in pasture and had mild lameness (grade, 3/5) at the trot. Mild muscular atrophy of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles was present with no signs of pain on palpation or manipulation of the limb. Shoulder joint radiography at 15 months after surgery revealed remodeling of the glenoid cavity of the scapula and humeral head with formation of a pseudoarthrosis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Glenoid ostectomy should be considered as an alternative to shoulder joint arthrodesis in small equids with shoulder joint luxation. Other indications for this procedure could include chronic osteoarthritis or fractures affecting the shoulder joint.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess recurrent instability of the shoulder following open Latarjet performed as the primary stabilization procedure or as a salvage procedure. Methods A retrospective, comparative cohort study was performed for a consecutive series of patients in the Military Health System who underwent open Latarjet from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2018. All patients were diagnosed with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and had a minimum of two years of postoperative follow-up. Patients were categorized as either having a primary Latarjet (PL) - defined as no prior shoulder stabilization procedure - or salvage Latarjet (SL) - defined as having at least one previous arthroscopic surgical stabilization procedure. Results A total of 234 Latarjet procedures were performed in 234 patients. The overall recurrent instability rate was 15.8% (37/234), the overall reoperation rate was 16.7% (36/234), and the overall complication rate was 14.2% (33/234) over a mean 5.0 years of follow-up. There were 99 primary Latarjet (PL) procedures and 135 salvage Latarjet (SL) procedures. The SL had significantly more recurrent instability than the PL group (PL 9/99, 9.1%; SL 28/135, 20.7%; p=0.0158). There was no difference in overall reoperation rates (PL 13/99, 13.1%; SL 26/135, 19.3%; p=0.2140) or complication rates (PL 13/99, 13.3%; SL 20/135, 14.8%; p=0.9101). Conclusion The rate of recurrent instability following the Latarjet procedure in an active, high-risk population 15.8%. Primary Latarjet was found to have lower rates of recurrence when compared to salvage Latarjet procedures (9.1% vs 20.7%). Level of Evidence Level III Evidence

Purpose We sought to qualitatively and quantitatively describe characteristics of Hill-Sachs lesions (HSL) in a cohort of anterior shoulder instability patients using advanced 3-dimensional (3-D) modeling software and assess the impact of various HSL parameters on the HSL volume, location, and orientation in patients with anterior shoulder instability. Methods A total of 100 recurrent anterior instability patients with evidence of HSL with a mean age of 27.2 years (range = 18 to 43 years) were evaluated. Three-dimensional models of unilateral proximal humeri were reconstructed from CT scans, and the volume, surface area (SA), width, and depth of identified HSLs were quantified along with their location (medial, superior, and inferior extent). Multiple angular orientation measures of HSLs were recorded, including Hill-Sachs rim (HSLr) angle in order to classify the level and location of potential humeral head engagement. Mann-Whitney U test assessed the relationship between measured parameters. Results By volume, larger HSL had greater humeral head surface area (HH SA) loss (P = .001), HSL width (P = .001), were more medial (P = .015), and more inferior (P = .001). Additionally, more medial lesions had greater HSLr angles (P = 0.001). The mean depth, width, and volume of HSLs were 3.3 mm (range = 1.2–7.1 mm), 16.0 mm (range = 6.2–30.4 mm) and 449.2 mm3 (range = 62.0–1365.6 mm3), respectively. The medial border of the HSL extended to 17.2 ± 4.4 (range = 9.3-28.3 mm) off the most medial edge of the HH cartilage margin (medialization). The mean HSLr was 29.3 ± 10.5°. Conclusion There was a statistically significant association between HSL medialization and HSL volume, position, and orientation. More medialized HSL have larger volume, greater width, more SA loss and higher lesion angles and are more inferior in the humeral head. As it has been established that more medialized lesions have poorer clinical outcomes, this study highlights that HS lesions have varying angles and medialization, which may portend eventual treatment and outcomes. Level of Evidence IV, case series.

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to describe the results of an arthroscopic Trillat procedure utilized to treat patients with symptomatic antero-inferior shoulder instability associated with hyperlaxity. METHODS A retrospective review was performed on 19 consecutive shoulders (17 patients, 2 bilateral) who underwent a Trillat procedure combined with anterio-inferior capsulolabral plasty from 2016 to 2019. Patients included in the study presented with shoulder instability combined with shoulder hyperlaxity and no glenoid or humeral bone loss. Clinical assessment included range of motion, apprehension, and instability tests. Outcome measures Constant-Murley score (CMS) scale, Walch-Duplay, ROWE, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Post-operatively, healing of the coracoid osteoclasy was evaluated by CT scan. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 24.8 months (range, 12-51). Post-operatively, none of the patients experienced a recurrent dislocation or subluxation and the anterior apprehension test was negative in all shoulders. Post-operative motion deficits of 22.1° ± 15.8 [p

Objective To evaluate the outcomes of locked posterior shoulder dislocation with reverse Hill–Sachs lesions in patients treated with anatomical reconstructions. Methods Patients who were treated at our institution between January 2016 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The demographics of the patients including gender, age, occupation, and dominant arm were recorded. Eleven cases from 10 patients qualified in this study. Nine males and one female were included. The mean age of the patients was 44.8 years (range, 33–54 years). Mechanism of injury, duration between injuries and definitive diagnosis, misdiagnosis, size of humeral head impaction, treatment maneuver, and details of operation performed were reviewed. Plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scan were taken to determine the size of defects preoperatively and fracture healing during follow‐up. During surgery, the deltopectoral approach was employed. Anatomical reconstruction procedure including reduction, disimpaction, bone grafting, and fixation were sequentially performed. Either cancellous autograft from iliac crest or allograft were used and the fractures were anatomically reduced and stabilized by screws or plates. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Constant–Murley score were recorded to determine the functional outcomes preoperatively, at 3 months and 6 months postoperatively, and at the last follow‐up. The range of motion in forward flexion was recorded at 6 months follow‐up postoperatively. Results Causes of injuries included epileptic seizure in four cases, fall in three cases, and road traffic accident in three cases. Misdiagnoses occurred in five out of 10 patients. The mean time between injury and definitive treatment among those misdiagnosed was 112 days. The mean size of the impacted reverse Hill–Sachs lesions was 33.95% (range, 19.1%–42.6%). All patients received surgical management with anatomical reconstruction approach, including open reduction, disimpaction, bone grafting, and internal fixation. The mean amount of bleeding during operation was 450 mL. The mean follow‐up period was 22.6 months. Fracture healing was observed by 8 weeks in all cases postoperatively and evidence of bone grafting could not be further detected on CT scan at 6 month during follow‐up. VAS was significantly lower at the last follow‐up (0.68 ± 0.21) in comparison to preoperative scores (4.96 ± 0.97) (P, Fracture healing after treatment of locked posterior shoulder dislocation with reverse Hill–Sachs lesion via anatomical reconstructions.

Rugby has the highest incidence of traumatic injuries of any sport, and glenohumeral injuries result in the lengthy delay in return to play. The purpose of this study is to survey surgeons from the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and the British Elbow and Shoulder Society (BESS) to evaluate the current state of management of anterior glenohumeral instability, and compare the differences in practices.A survey of surgeons from ASES and BESS was conducted. Treatment options were proposed in a variety of clinical scenarios of glenohumeral instability. The time of immobilization post-operatively, return to play, and attitudes on current contact regulations. Results were compared using the chi-square test or t-test.Ninety-seven surgeons responded to the survey. There was a significant difference in treatment between ASES and BESS surgeons in the setting of primary dislocation (p 0.05), but not recurrent dislocation (p 0.05). The period of immobilization following injury and surgery was different between both treating groups. There was a significant difference in return to play between ASES and BESS surgeons with arthroscopic stabilization and open Bankart repair (p 0.05), but not following conservative treatment or the Latarjet procedure (p 0.05).There remains wide variance on the management of glenohumeral instability in rugby union players among surgeons. While immobilization times post-operatively were similar, the BESS surgeons were more confident in allowing earlier return to play. There is also a significant concern that contact levels should be regulated to protect player safety.Level 4 (case series).

Importance The Instability Severity Index (ISI) score was developed to evaluate a patient’s risk of recurrent shoulder instability following arthroscopic Bankart repair. While patients with an ISI score of >6 were originally recommended to undergo an open procedure (ie, Latarjet) to minimise the risk of recurrence, recent literature has called into question the utility of the ISI score. Objective The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of the ISI score as a tool to predict postoperative recurrence among patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart procedures. Evidence review Articles were included if study participants underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability and reported postoperative recurrence by ISI score at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Methodological study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria. Pearson’s χ2 test was used to compare recurrence rates among patients above and below an ISI score of 4. Sensitivity, specificity, mean ISI scores and predictive value of individual factors of the ISI score were qualitatively reviewed. Findings Four studies concluded the ISI score was effective in predicting postoperative recurrence following arthroscopic Bankart repair; however, these studies found threshold values lower than the previously proposed score of >6 may be more predictive of recurrent instability. A pooled analysis of these studies found patients with an ISI score Conclusions and relevance The ISI score as constructed by Balg and Boileau may have clinical utility to help predict recurrent anterior shoulder instability following arthroscopic Bankart repair. However, this review found the threshold values published in their seminal article to be insufficient predictors of recurrent instability. Instead, a lower score threshold may provide as a better predictor of failure. The paucity of level I and II investigations limits the strength of these conclusions, suggesting a need for further large, prospective studies evaluating the predictive ability of the ISI score. Level of evidence IV.

Background: The treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability in professional Australian Football League (AFL) players is challenging, with an emphasis on early return to play and avoidance of instability recurrence. Purpose: To investigate return-to-sport (RTS) outcomes and complications after 2 different procedures for traumatic anterior shoulder instability in professional AFL players. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our surgical database for professional AFL players who underwent capsulolabral stabilization or open Latarjet procedure by a single surgeon between 2006 and 2017. Outcomes included RTS, on-field performance, and complications. Between-group analyses for RTS and complications were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Within-group analyses for on-field performance data were performed using paired t tests with significance set at .05. Results: A total of 58 capsulolabral stabilization procedures in 54 players and 32 Latarjet procedures in 29 players were included in the analysis; 93.1% of capsulolabral patients and 96.9% of Latarjet patients returned to professional AFL. The median RTS time was 6.8 months for the capsulolabral group and 7.3 months for the Latarjet group. There was no significant difference in RTS rates between the 2 groups ( P = .270). Of those undergoing surgery early in the season, 75% of the capsulolabral and 71% of Latarjet group were able to RTS within the same season, at a mean time of 16.9 weeks and 18.8 weeks, respectively. There was a significant difference in instability recurrence, with 19% for the capsulolabral group and no recurrence in the Latarjet group ( P = .017). There was no significant reduction in player on-field performance in either group ( P < .05). Conclusion: In this study, the median RTS in AFL players was approximately 7 months after capsulolabral and Latarjet surgery with no compromise to on-field performance. Instability-related complications occurred only in the capsulolabral group, and the incidence increased with time.

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of open Latarjet (OL) in competitive athletes with primary shoulder instability versus those with recurrent instability versus those undergoing OL for failed prior instability surgery.A retrospective review of patients who underwent OL with a minimum of 24-month follow-up was performed. Additionally, these were pair-matched in a 1:2:1 ratio for age, gender, sport, level of preoperative play, and follow-up length for primary instability, recurrent instability and failed prior instability surgery. Return to sport, the level of return and the timing of return were assessed. Additionally, recurrence, Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Rowe score, Shoulder Instability-Return to Sport after Injury (SIRSI) score, satisfaction, and whether they would undergo the same surgery again were compared.After pair-matching, a total of 200 patients were included, with a mean age of 22.7 years and a mean follow-up of 38.8 months. Overall, there was no significant difference in any of the clinical outcome scores (VAS, Rowe, SIRSI, SSV) used for the 3 groups (P0.05 for all). However, there was a significantly lower rate of return to play for those undergoing OL because of failed prior instability surgery (88% vs 91% vs 64%, P0.0001) and for return at the same or a higher level (66% vs 78% vs 56%, P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the rate of recurrent instability among the 3 groups (6% vs 5% vs 6%, P = 0.95).OL results in excellent clinical outcomes and low recurrence rates for those with primary shoulder instability, those with recurrent instability and those undergoing OL for failed prior instability surgery. However, in those undergoing OL for failed prior stabilization surgery, there was a lower rate of return to play.Level III: Retrospective Comparative Study.

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that arthroscopic Bankart repair with associated arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation (ASA) could be a valid surgical option in the treatment of anterior shoulder instability, in collision and contact sports athletes, affected by shoulder hyperlaxity.In total, 591 arthroscopic Bankart repairs plus ASA were performed in 6 shoulder centers from 2009 to 2017. Inclusion criteria were the following: collision and contact sports activities, recurrent anterior instability associated with hyperlaxity and glenoid bone loss (GBL)15%. Exclusion criteria were GBL15%, voluntary instability, multidirectional instability, pre-existing osteoarthritis and throwing athletes. The minimum follow-up was 24 months. Hyperlaxity was clinically evaluated according to Neer and Coudane-Walch tests. Before surgery, all patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scanning. Pico area method was used to assess the percentage of GBL. Patients were operated on by 6 surgeons, and their functional outcomes were evaluated by 2 independent observers. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Rowe, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were used to assess results.Overall, 397 patients with evidence of shoulder hyperlaxity (positive sulcus sign in ER1 position and Coudane-Walch test85°) met all inclusion criteria. The mean WOSI score was 321; the mean Rowe score rose from 68.5 to 92.5 (P = .037), and the ASES score rose from 71.5 to 97.4 (P = .041). Seven patients (1.6%) had atraumatic redislocation, and 9 patients (2.2%) had post-traumatic redislocation. At final follow-up the mean functional deficit of external rotation was 15° with the arm in adduction (ER1 position) and 10° in abduction (ER2 position).The Bankart repair plus ASA has been demonstrated to be safe and effective for restoring joint stability in patients practicing collision and contact sports or affected by chronic anterior shoulder instability associated with GBL (15%) and hyperlaxity, without compromising external rotation.Level IV, case series.

Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the short-term complication rate following the open and arthroscopic Latarjet procedures and to meta-analyze the studies comparing the 2 approaches. Methods PubMed was searched according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to find clinical and biomechanical studies comparing complication rates in open and arthroscopic Latarjet procedures. A literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed based on the PRISMA guidelines. Clinical studies reporting on the complications following the open or arthroscopic Latarjet were included. Meta-analysis was performed for comparative studies using Review Manager, version 5.3. A P value of Results Overall, 89 studies (Level of Evidence [LOE] I: 2, LOE II: 2, LOE III: 24, LOE IV: 61) met inclusion criteria, with 7175 shoulders. Following the open Latarjet procedure, the overall complication rate was 6.1%, with a 1.9% occurrence of graft-related complications, 1.1% hardware, 1.1% wound, 0.9% nerve, and 1.2% other complications. Following the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure, the overall complication rate was 6.8%, with a 3.2% occurrence of graft-related complications, 1.9% hardware, 0.5% wound, 0.7% nerve, and 0.5% other complications. Complications were reported in 7 studies comparing 379 patients treated with the open Latarjet and 531 treated with the arthroscopic Latarjet, with no statistically significant difference between the two (P = .81). Conclusion Our study established that the overall complication rate following the Latarjet procedure was 6%-7%, with the most common complication being graft-related. Furthermore, based on the current evidence, there is no significant difference in the complication rate between the open and arthroscopic Latarjet procedures.

Purpose The purpose of our study is to prove that the autologous scapular spine bone graft is an alternative for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability and the clinical and radiological results are promising. Method From July 2016 to August 2018, patients who were diagnosed as having anterior shoulder instability with subcritical (10%-15%) glenoid bone loss were treated by arthroscopic repair with autologous scapular spine bone graft. The inclusion criteria were (1) anterior shoulder instability underwent arthroscopic autologous scapular spine bone graft; (2) glenoid bone loss was within 10% to 15% (measured by Sugaya's method); (3) three complete sets of computed tomography (CT) scans (preoperative, 1 week after surgery, and 1 year after surgery) available; and (4) clinical follow-up time was at least 2 years. The exclusion criteria were (1) concomitant rotator cuff tear; (2) concomitant remplissage or SLAP repair; (3) previous surgery of the affected shoulder; (4) open surgery; and (5) incomplete radiological or clinical follow-up. The preoperative and postoperative Constant-Murley score, dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and range of motion (ROM) were recorded. CT scans with 3-dimensional reconstruction were obtained at the first week after operation and at 1 year after operation; the graft resorption rate was consequently calculated. Results Twenty-seven patients were qualified and enrolled in the study. No severe complication was recorded during follow-up. No redislocation or subluxation was found, and the apprehension tests were all negative. At the last follow-up, the mean Constant-Murley score was 89.74 ± 3.71, the mean DASH score was 9.77 ± 5.31, the mean VAS score was 0.74 ± 0.64, which are all improved significantly compared with preoperative scores (P = .00,.00,.00, respectively). At the last follow-up, the ROM including anterior flexion, external rotation by side, and the internal rotation were well restored without significant difference compared with the contralateral shoulder (P =.48, .08, .47, respectively). At 1 year after operation, the resorption rate of the bone graft was 19.4%. Conclusion This study found that anterior shoulder instability with subcritical (10%-15%) glenoid bone loss treated with arthroscopic autologous scapular spine bone graft with suture anchor fixation is safe and could achieve satisfactory result at short-term follow-up. Level of Evidence Therapeutic case series.

Background Anterior shoulder instability is a common complaint of young athletes. Posterior instability in this population is less well understood, and the standard of care has not been defined. The purpose of the study is to compare index frequency, treatment choice, and athlete disability following an incident of anterior or posterior shoulder instability in high school and collegiate athletes. Methods A total of 58 high school and collegiate athletes (n=30 athletes with anterior instability; n=28 athletes with posterior instability) were included. Athletes suffering from a traumatic sport-related shoulder instability episode during a team-sponsored practice or game were identified by their school athletic trainer. Athletes were referred to the sports medicine physician or orthopedic surgeon for diagnosis and initial treatment choice (operative vs. nonoperative). Athletes diagnosed with traumatic anterior or posterior instability who completed the full course of treatment and provided pre- and post-treatment patient-reported outcome measures were included in the study. The frequency of shoulder instability was compared by direction, mechanism of injury (MOI), and treatment choice through χ2 analyses. A repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare the functional outcomes by treatment type and direction of instability (α = 0.05). Results Athletes diagnosed with anterior instability were more likely to report a chief complaint of instability (70%), whereas those diagnosed with posterior instability reported a primary complaint of pain interfering with function (96%) (P = .001). The primary MOI classified as a contact event was similar between anterior and posterior instability groups (77% vs. 54%, P = .06) as well as the decision to proceed with surgery (60% vs. 72%, P = .31). In patients with nonoperative care, athletes with anterior instability had significantly more initial disability than those with posterior instability (32±6.1 vs. 58±8.1, P = .001). Pre- and post-treatment Penn Shoulder Scores for athletes treated with early surgery were similar (P > .05). There were no differences in functional outcomes at discharge in those treated nonoperatively regardless of direction of instability (P = .24); however, change in Penn score was significantly greater in those with anterior (61±18.7) than those with posterior (27 ± 25.2) instability (P = .002). Conclusion Athletes with anterior instability appear to have different mechanisms and complaints than those with posterior instability. Among those that receive nonoperative treatment, athletes with anterior instability have significantly greater initial disability and change in disability than those with posterior disability during course of care.

Background: Although critical bone loss for anterior instability is well defined, a clinically significant threshold of posterior bone loss has not been elucidated. Hypothesis: Patients with failed arthroscopic posterior shoulder capsulolabral repair will have increased posterior glenoid bone loss with a defined critical threshold. Study Design: Case control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Athletes older than 18 years with unidirectional posterior instability treated with arthroscopic repair were evaluated at 2-year minimum follow-up. Failure was defined as revision surgery, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score of 5. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements from 19 patients with failed arthroscopic posterior shoulder capsulolabral repair were compared with 56 patients whose surgery was successful. MRI measures included glenoid version, labral version, glenoid width, labral width, percentage bone loss using the circle technique, labral height, percent subluxation, and recently described measures of defect slope, bone loss angle, and defect length. The P value threshold was set at .05, and a multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for evaluation of risk of surgical failure. Results: Smaller glenoid width and greater percentage glenoid bone loss (25.5 ± 0.68 mm vs 28.8 ± 0.47 mm; P < .001; 6.8% ± 0.64% vs 4.6% ± 0.43%; P = .008) were seen in those patients with failed surgery. There was no difference in glenoid version or other measurements between the failures and nonfailures. A cutoff of 11% glenoid bone loss resulted in a 10.4 times statistically higher surgical failure rate, while a 15% bone loss resulted in a 24.4 times statistically higher failure rate. Six patients had >11% bone loss (range, 11.1 to 19.3) and 1 patient had >15% bone loss. Conclusion: Risk factors for failure of arthroscopic posterior shoulder capsulolabral repair include smaller glenoid bone width and greater percentage of glenoid bone loss. A threshold of 11% posterior glenoid bone loss implicated a 10 times higher surgical failure rate, while a threshold of 15% led to a 25 times higher surgical failure rate. Surgical failure of posterior capsulolabral repair, however, is relatively rare as it is an overall successful intervention.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to survey the members of North American and European shoulder surgery and sports medicine societies to evaluate their criteria for deciding when an athlete can safely return to play (RTP) following shoulder stabilization surgery. Methods A survey was sent to the members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), European Society for Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA), and European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and the Elbow (SECEC). Surgeons were asked which criteria they used to determine when an athlete can return to play following the arthroscopic Bankart repair and Latarjet procedures, with additional questions on how time from surgery and participation in collision sports affect return. Results Overall, 317 surgeons responded to the survey. Following arthroscopic Bankart repair, the most common criteria used were time (98.7%), strength (74.8%), and range of motion (70%). The most commonly reported time point was 4 months (43.8%), and the majority used an additional time period, most commonly 2 months (38.2%), before allowing a collision athlete to return to play (75.4%). Interestingly, the addition of a remplissage procedure did not affect decision making regarding RTP in most cases (92.1%). Following the Latarjet procedure, the most common criteria used were time (98.4%), strength (67.5%), and range of motion (65.9%). Less than half reported using imaging to assess for radiographic union before allowing patients to return to play (47%), and the most common modality was plain radiography (80%). The most common time point was 4 months (33.1%), and the majority reported waiting an additional period of time, most commonly by 2 months (25.9%), before allowing a collision athlete to return to play (59.6%). Conclusion Despite the absence of evidence-based guidelines on when athletes can safely return to play following shoulder stabilization surgery, there exists minimal variability in recommendations between North American and European shoulder surgeons. Further research is required to better define criteria for RTP after the arthroscopic Bankart repair and Latarjet procedures.

Background The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported and clinic outcomes between arthroscopic Bankart repair with (REMP) and without (NO REMP) arthroscopic infraspinatus remplissage in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a Hill-Sachs lesion and minimal glenoid bone loss. Methods Patients 14 years or older with a recurrent anterior shoulder instability with the presence of an engaging Hill-Sachs defect (of any size) confirmed on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were eligible to participate. Consented patients were randomized intraoperatively to NO REMP or REMP. Study visits were conducted preoperatively and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability score. Secondary outcomes included incidence of postoperative recurrent shoulder instability, Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, range of motion, complications, and revision surgery. To compare groups, a mixed-effects linear model was used for continuous variables and a χ2 or Fisher’s exact test for categorical data. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis assessed survival distribution between groups. Results One hundred and eight patients were randomized to Bankart repair with (n = 54) or without (n = 54) remplissage. The mean follow-up was 26.5 months (21-53 months) and 24.3 months (23-64 months) for the REMP and NO REMP groups, respectively. Rates of postoperative recurrent instability were higher (P = .027) in the NO REMP group with 9 of 50 (18%) vs. 2 of 52 (4%) postoperative dislocations in the REMP group. There were no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes between groups at any time point. Survival curve distributions were also significantly different favoring REMP (χ2 = 5.255, P = .022). There was a significant difference in rate of revision surgery between groups with 6 in the NO REMP and none in the REMP groups (P = .029). Post hoc, patients were noted to have a higher risk for re-dislocation if their Hill-Sachs lesion was ≥20 mm in width or ≥15% of humeral head diameter. One intraoperative complication was reported in the REMP group. Conclusions There is significantly greater risk of postoperative recurrent instability in patients who did not have a remplissage performed in conjunction with an arthroscopic Bankart repair for the treatment of traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability with Hill-Sachs lesions of any size and minimal glenoid bone loss (

Anterior glenohumeral instability is the most common form of shoulder instability. The systematic review summarizes the latest research on rehabilitation after Bankart repair. Inclusion criteria included postoperative rehabilitation and published in English between 2000 and 2019. Studies were excluded if they were addresses, comments, or editorials, or included other shoulder injuries or cadaver models. Two rounds of review using Rayyan QCRI software were performed for screening and full text search, and the articles were graded for levels of evidence. Of the 1982 articles, 14 articles were included with levels of evidence 1 through 4. Both arthroscopic and open Bankart repair have demonstrated improving functional outcomes and reducing recurrence rates of anterior shoulder instability. Accelerated postoperative rehabilitation may be comparable to a conventional protocol for arthroscopic repair, and the subscapularis musculature involvement during open repair can impact the timeframe. Strong evidence supports 4 phases of rehabilitation and future clinical trials are needed to compare different programs.

A 34-year-old man presented 2 weeks after sustaining posterior fracture dislocation of both shoulders due to a fall from a bicycle while riding downhill. Posterior fracture dislocation of both shoulders is typically caused due to seizures or electrocution. In our patient, the injury was caused by trauma, which is exceedingly rare. Owing to the late presentation, management of such injuries usually entails joint replacement; however, due to his young age, both shoulders were treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Bilateral posterior shoulder fracture dislocation is rarely encountered in clinical practice.

Therapeutic management of recurrent anterior shoulder instability with an anterior glenoid defect and a Hill-Sachs lesion requires a bone graft to restore the width of the glenoid. The Latarjet procedure is the most popular technique but an iliac crest bone graft is preferred when the coracoid process is dysplastic or too short or after failure of Latarjet or Bristow-Latarjet. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe a full arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette-guided technique with 2 cortical suture buttons for bone graft fixation. This procedure allows reconstruction of severe glenoid bone defects and treatment of concomitant capsulolabral lesions and humeral bone loss, while preserving the subscapularis muscle. In addition, the use of 2 cortical buttons for bone graft fixation simplify graft transport and positioning, provides good control of the rotation, improving healing of the iliac crest bone graft to the anterior glenoid rim.

Background: Many surgeons prefer bony stabilization including Bristow or Latarjet procedures for shoulder instability in collision athletes, even though several potential complications have been reported. There has been a limited number of studies on the midterm outcomes of arthroscopic soft tissue stabilization for anterior shoulder instability in competitive collision athletes. Purpose: To assess the outcomes of arthroscopic soft tissue stabilization in combination with selective augmentation procedures for collision athletes with traumatic anterior shoulder instability Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We retrospectively assessed rugby or American football players (Results: This study included 113 shoulders in 100 patients with a mean age of 20 years (range, 15-36 years) at surgery. Rotator interval closure was performed on 36 shoulders in addition to Bankart repair, and rotator interval closure and Hill-Sachs remplissage were performed on 77 shoulders. The mean follow-up period was 44 months (range, 24-72 months). Of the 113 shoulders, 4 (3.5%) experienced postoperative dislocation, but there were no complications. A total of 93 athletes (93%) attained complete or near complete preinjury sports activity levels. The mean Rowe score significantly improved from 36 (range, 10-75) at presurgery to 96 (range, 35-100; P = .003) at postsurgery. The mean Subjective Shoulder Value sports score significantly improved after surgery, from a mean preoperative score of 22 (range, 0-50) to a postoperative score of 92 (range, 64-100; P = .002). Conclusion: Our treatment strategy, where arthroscopic soft tissue stabilization was combined with selected augmentations, provided good clinical outcomes for competitive collision athletes in terms of low rates of recurrence and complication, a high rate of return to sports, and good shoulder function.

Purpose Surgical treatment of shoulder instability caused by anterior glenoid bone loss is based on a critical threshold of the defect size. Recent studies indicate that the glenoid concavity is essential for glenohumeral stability. However, biomechanical proof of this principle is lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether glenoid concavity allows a more precise assessment of glenohumeral stability than the defect size alone. Methods The stability ratio (SR) is a biomechanical estimate of glenohumeral stability. It is defined as the maximum dislocating force the joint can resist related to a medial compression force. This ratio was determined for 17 human cadaveric glenoids in a robotic test setup depending on osteochondral concavity and anterior defect size. Bony defects were created gradually, and a 3D measuring arm was used for morphometric measurements. The influence of defect size and concavity on the SR was examined using linear models. In addition, the morphometrical-based bony shoulder stability ratio (BSSR) was evaluated to prove its suitability for estimation of glenohumeral stability independent of defect size. Results Glenoid concavity is a significant predictor for the SR, while the defect size provides minor informative value. The linear model featured a high goodness of fit with a determination coefficient of R2 = 0.98, indicating that 98% of the SR is predictable by concavity and defect size. The low mean squared error (MSE) of 4.2% proved a precise estimation of the SR. Defect size as an exclusive predictor in the linear model reduced R2 to 0.9 and increased the MSE to 25.7%. Furthermore, the loss of SR with increasing defect size was shown to be significantly dependent on the initial concavity. The BSSR as a single predictor for glenohumeral stability led to highest precision with MSE = 3.4%. Conclusion Glenoid concavity is a crucial factor for the SR. Independent of the defect size, the computable BSSR is a precise biomechanical estimate of the measured SR. The inclusion of glenoid concavity has the potential to influence clinical decision-making for an improved and personalised treatment of glenohumeral instability with anterior glenoid bone loss.

Background: Recently, arthroscopic double-button Latarjet (AL) has provided an alternative to conventional open Latarjet (OL) in the treatment of anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss. Therefore, theoretically, the faster fusion is obtained, the sooner return to sports under safe conditions can occur. The emerging flexible fixation of the bone block has clearly offered a new approach to achieve bone fusion. However, the period required to achieve this goal remains controversial. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to compare computed tomography (CT) scan results of AL and OL in the early postoperative period. It was hypothesized that the bone block fusion with AL would require a longer time than that with OL. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: In a retrospective 1-year study, the authors compared 17 primary double-button AL to 22 primary 2-screw OL procedures indicated for anterior shoulder instability in patients with an Index Severity Instability Score >3 points. These patients were reviewed with a CT scan at 1 day, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. The characteristics for the 2 groups were comparable. CT scans aimed to analyze graft position, bone contact area with the scapula, and fusion at 3 and 6 months. Clinical assessment was based on the Walch-Duplay and Rowe scores. Results: The mean preoperative Index Severity Instability Score was 5.3 ± 1.9 points, with a mean anterior glenoid bone loss of 9.1% ± 4.6%. At 3 months, the rates of fusion were 41% and 100% for the AL and OL groups, respectively ( P < .001). This rate increased to 70% in the AL group at 6 months ( P = .006). In the axial and sagittal planes, there was no difference in graft position between the AL group and the OL group. The bone block was longer and there was a more extensive bone contact area in the OL group (AL, 131 mm2 vs OL, 223 mm2; P < .001). At 6 months of follow-up, no significant difference in clinical scores was noted between the groups: Walch-Duplay score, 93.0 ± 10.9 points versus 91.8 ± 12.5 points ( P = .867); and Rowe score, 99.0 ± 2.2 points versus 95.0 ± 8.4 points ( P = .307) for the AL and OL groups, respectively. Conclusion: AL required more time to achieve bone block fusion than OL. This finding should be taken into account when considering this procedure for patients in a hurry to return to sports involving the shoulder.

© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.Purpose: The primary aim of this study is to prove that reconstructing the anterior glenoid defect with iliac crest graft arthroscopically using double-barrelled cannula through the rotator interval is safe and prevents both recurrence of instability and the neurovascular injury because subscapularis muscle is not split and procedure is far away from important structures. Methods: Thirteen patients with anterior shoulder instability and engaging Hill-Sachs lesion were reviewed after arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior glenoid with iliac crest autogenous graft. Patient satisfaction and Western Ontario İnstability Score (WOSI) were evaluated on clinical examination. Computed tomography was used to analyse graft position on sagittal and axial planes. Results: The mean follow-up was 28.7 months (SD 7.1), and age at surgery was 31 years (21 to 64 years). Post-operatively there was only one dislocation due to trauma. There was statistically significant improvement of WOSI scores (p: 0.001). There was not any neurological injury. Graft position on the axial plane was described as flush in 5 cases (41%), lateral in 2 (16%), too lateral in one (8%) and medial in 4 of the cases (33%). Graft position could be accepted as high in only three patients (23%). Conclusion: Arthroscopic reconstruction of glenoid defect using autogenous iliac bone graft, through rotator interval, without splitting subscapularis is safe and effective without any neurological injury, producing substantial graft position and good functional outcomes in patients.

Background Significant bone defects are associated with poor clinical results after surgical stabilization in cases of glenohumeral instability. Although multiple factors are thought to adversely affect enlargement of bipolar bone loss and increased shoulder instability, these factors have not been sufficiently evaluated. The purpose of this study was to identify the factors related to greater bone defects and a higher number of instability episodes in patients with glenohumeral instability. Methods A total of 120 consecutive patients with symptomatic unilateral instability of the glenohumeral joint were retrospectively reviewed. Three-dimensional surface-rendered/registered models of bilateral glenoids and proximal humeri from computed tomography data were matched by software, and the volumes of bone defects identified in the glenoid and humeral head were assessed. After relationships between objective variables and explanatory variables were evaluated using bivariate analyses, factors related to large bone defects in the glenoid and humeral head and a high number of total instability episodes and self-irreducible dislocations greater than the respective 75th percentiles were evaluated using logistic regression analyses with significant variables on bivariate analyses. Results Larger humeral head defects (P < .001) and a higher number of total instability episodes (P = .032) were found to be factors related to large glenoid defects. On the other hand, male sex (P = .014), larger glenoid defects (P = .015), and larger number of self-irreducible dislocations (P = .027) were related to large humeral head bone defects. An increased number of total instability episodes was related to longer symptom duration (P = .001) and larger glenoid defects (P = .002), and an increased number of self-irreducible dislocations was related to larger humeral head defects (P = .007). Conclusions Whereas this study showed that bipolar lesions affect the amount of bone defects reciprocally, factors related to greater bone defects differed between the glenoid and the humeral head. Glenoid defects were related to the number of total instability episodes, whereas humeral head defects were related to the number of self-irreducible dislocations.

Static posterior subluxation of the humeral head is a pre-osteoarthritic deformity preceding posterior erosion in young patients. Its etiology remains unknown. The aim of this study was to analyze the differences in scapular morphology between young patients with pre-osteoarthritic static posterior subluxation of the humeral head and healthy controls with a centered humeral head.We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with pre-osteoarthritic static posterior subluxation of the humeral head who were treated in our institution between January 2018 and November 2019. Fourteen shoulders in 12 patients were included in this study and then matched according their age, sex, and affected side with controls. Computed tomography images of both groups were compared in the standardized axial imaging plane for differences in scapular morphology. The following parameters were measured: glenoid version relative to the Friedman line and scapular blade axis, scapulohumeral and glenohumeral subluxation index, and neck angle, as well as glenoid and humeral offset.The patients in the subluxation group showed significantly higher scapulohumeral and glenohumeral subluxation indexes than controls (0.76 vs. 0.55 [P.0001] and 0.58 vs. 0.51 [P = .016], respectively). The mean measurements of glenoid version according to the Friedman line and relative to the scapular blade axis were significantly higher in the subluxation group than in controls (19° vs. 4° [P.0001]and 14° vs. 2° [P = .0002], respectively). The glenoid vault was significantly more anteriorly positioned with respect to the scapular blade axis in the subluxation group than in controls (neck angle, 166° vs. 173° [P = .0003]; glenoid offset, 9.2 mm vs. 4.6 mm [P = .0005]). The midpoint of the humeral head showed a posterior offset with respect to the scapular blade axis in the subluxation group, whereas controls had an anteriorly placed midpoint of the humeral head (-2 mm vs. 3.1 mm, P = .01). A higher scapulohumeral subluxation index showed significant correlations with an increased anterior offset of the glenoid vault (increased glenoid offset: r = 0.493, P = .008 and decreased neck angle: r = -0.554, P = .002), a posterior humeral offset (r = -0.775, P.0001), and excessive glenoid retroversion measured by both methods (Friedman line: r = 0.852, P.0001; scapular blade axis: r = 0.803, P.0001). A higher glenohumeral subluxation index also correlated significantly with an increased anterior offset of the glenoid vault (increased glenoid offset: r = 0.403, P = .034; decreased neck angle: r = -0.406, P = .032) and posterior humeral offset (r = -0.502, P = .006).Young patients with pre-osteoarthritic static posterior subluxation of the humeral head have significant constitutional differences in scapular morphology in terms of an increased anterior glenoid offset, excessive glenoid retroversion, and increased posterior humeral offset in relation to the scapular blade compared with healthy matched controls.

Background: The risk of recurrence after the first episode of anterior shoulder dislocation is high with nonoperative treatment in younger patients. Purpose/Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to compare the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair and nonoperative treatment for shoulder dislocation in patients younger than 25 years, with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The hypothesis was that surgery would decrease the risk of recurrence. Study design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: We included patients aged between 18 and 25 years after a first episode of anterior shoulder dislocation and divided them into 2 groups. The first group was treated surgically with an arthroscopic Bankart repair within 2 weeks after the dislocation; the second group was treated nonoperatively. Both groups were immobilized for 3 weeks in internal rotation and followed the same physical therapy protocol. Standard radiography and computed tomography were performed immediately after reduction of the dislocation, and follow-up was performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The primary outcome measure was instability recurrence, defined as another anterior shoulder dislocation requiring closed reduction by another person (the patient was unable to reduce the dislocated joint themselves), a subluxation, or a positive apprehension test. Secondary outcome measures included range of motion, return to sport, and functional scores such as the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score the Walch-Duplay score, and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Results: A total of 20 patients were included in each group. The mean ± SD age was 21 ± 1.8 years, and there were 33 men (82.5%) and 7 women (17.5%) in the total sample. Recurrence of instability was significantly decreased in the surgical treatment group compared with the nonoperative group (2 [10%] vs 14 [70%], respectively; P = .0001). Fewer patients in the surgical treatment group versus the nonoperative group had another episode of dislocation (0 vs 6 [30%], respectively), subluxation (2 [10%] vs 13 [65%], respectively; P = .003), or a positive apprehension test (1 [5%] vs 11 [58%], respectively; P = .0005). The Walch-Duplay score (88.4 vs 70.3 points; P = .046) and WOSI (11.5 vs 17.7 points; P = .035) were significantly better in the surgical group versus the nonoperative group after a 2-year follow-up. Level of sport was the same or better in 89% of the surgical treatment group vs 53% of the nonoperative treatment group ( P = .012). No surgical complication was recorded. We did not find any significant difference in range of motion. Conclusion: In patients with first-time shoulder dislocations, arthroscopic labral repair (Bankart procedure) reduced the risk of secondary shoulder dislocation and improved functional outcome versus nonoperative treatment after a 2-year follow-up. Surgical treatment after a first episode of shoulder dislocation could be offered as a primary treatment option in a younger population if these results are confirmed by larger studies with a longer follow-up. Registration: NCT03315819 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier)

The optimal surgical approach for recurrent anterior shoulder instability remains controversial, particularly in the face of glenoid and/or humeral bone loss. The purpose of this study was to use a contingent-behavior questionnaire (CBQ) to determine which factors drive surgeons to perform bony procedures over soft tissue procedures to address recurrent anterior shoulder instability.A CBQ survey presented each respondent with 32 clinical vignettes of recurrent shoulder instability that contained 8 patient factors. The factors included (1) age, (2) sex, (3) hand dominance, (4) number of previous dislocations, (5) activity level, (6) generalized laxity, (7) glenoid bone loss, and (8) glenoid track. The survey was distributed to fellowship-trained surgeons in shoulder/elbow or sports medicine. Respondents were asked to recommend either a soft tissue or bone-based procedure, then specifically recommend a type of procedure. Responses were analyzed using a multinomial-logit regression model that quantified the relative importance of the patient characteristics in choosing bony procedures.Seventy orthopedic surgeons completed the survey, 33 were shoulder/elbow fellowship trained and 37 were sports medicine fellowship trained; 52% were in clinical practice ≥10 years and 48%10 years; and 95% reported that the shoulder surgery made up at least 25% of their practice. There were 53% from private practice, 33% from academic medicine, and 14% in government settings. Amount of glenoid bone loss was the single most important factor driving surgeons to perform bony procedures over soft tissue procedures, followed by the patient age (19-25 years) and the patient activity level. The number of prior dislocations and glenoid track status did not have a strong influence on respondents' decision making. Twenty-one percent glenoid bone loss was the threshold of bone loss that influenced decision toward a bony procedure. If surgeons performed 10 or more open procedures per year, they were more likely to perform a bony procedure.The factors that drove surgeons to choose bony procedures were the amount of glenoid bone loss with the threshold at 21%, patient age, and their activity demands. Surprisingly, glenoid track status and the number of previous dislocations did not strongly influence surgical treatment decisions. Ten open shoulder procedures a year seems to provide a level of comfort to recommend bony treatment for shoulder instability.

Purpose Systematic reviews report return to play (RTP) within 5.8 months (range, 3–8) following the Latarjet procedure, but the factors that influence RTP remain unknown. The present study aimed to report the rate and time of return to play (RTP) during the first 8 months following the Latarjet procedure, and to determine the influence of sport type or patient characteristics. Methods The authors retrospectively collected the records of patients that underwent Latarjet procedures for anterior shoulder instability between 2015 and 2017. Patients were excluded if they had any concomitant rotator cuff tendon lesions, or previous ipsilateral shoulder surgery. The authors retrieved patient demographics, time from injury to surgery, type of sport practiced (overhead/non-overhead, contact/non-contact), as well as pre- and postoperative Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index (WOSI), Shoulder Instability-Return to Sport After Injury index (SIRSI), and Rowe score. Results A total of 217 patients (217 shoulders) were eligible for inclusion, comprising 184 males and 33 females, aged 26.8 ± 7.3 years at index surgery. The main sport practiced prior to surgery involved overhead (n = 173, 80%) and/or contact (n = 152, 70%) activities. By 8 month follow-up, 158 patients (73%) resumed their main sport, at a mean of 5.1 ± 1.5 months. Multivariable analysis revealed that RTP was more likely in patients with higher preoperative Rowe score (OR, 1.02; p = 0.024) and SIRSI score (OR, 1.02; p = 0.008). Conclusions By 8 months following the Latarjet procedure, 73% of patients had resumed their main sport. The likelihood of RTP was significantly associated with preoperative Rowe and SIRSI scores, but not with sport type. Level of evidence IV.

Background Traumatic anterior shoulder instability is a common disease, especially in young athletes. The Latarjet and Bristow techniques are nonanatomical surgeries that involve the transfer of the coracoid process to the anterior border of the glenoid and are indicated in cases at a high risk for recurrence and in the presence of associated bone lesions. Studies have evaluated the recurrence and complications associated with these techniques, but they have important differences, and should not be considered synonymous. The objective of this study was to prospectively compare the Bristow and Latarjet techniques in high-demand athletes. Hypothesis: Bristow and Latarjet techniques lead to similar results. Patients and methods Thirty-seven athletes (41 shoulders; three athletes underwent bilateral surgery) with anterior recurrent dislocation of the shoulder that was surgically treated using the Bristow or Latarjet technique were prospectively analyzed. The follow-up time was 5 years. The mean age was 26.4 years (range: 16-46 years). In 17 cases (41.5%), the dominant side was not affected. Results Elevation and external rotation (passive and active) decreased in the early postoperative period and achieved values in the final follow-up similar to those found in the preoperative period. The mean postoperative scores at 5 years were as follows: ASES, 79.1 (range: 66-95); ASORS, 77.8 (range: 60-100); WOSI, 52.6 (range: 18-77); and VAS, 1.88 (range: 0-6). All of the results presented statistical significance. There was a complication rate of 9.75% in the follow-up period. There were no new dislocations after the surgery. Most (75%) of the athletes returned to the sport after the surgery, and there was no correlation between poor results and any of the variables studied. There was a statistically significant difference in passive external rotation in favor of the Latarjet technique four weeks after surgery (P = .01). We also found a statistically significant difference in passive elevation in favor of the Latarjet technique eight weeks after the surgery (P = .04). When we compared the Bristow and Latarjet techniques regarding the ASES, ASORS, and WOSI scores, we found no statistically significant difference. In the comparison regarding whether the athletes returned to sports, we found no statistically significant difference. Conclusion The Bristow and Latarjet techniques lead to good results in athletes with no new dislocation episodes and are suitable for treating patients with anterior recurrent dislocation of the shoulder. The Latarjet technique showed better results in some of the variables studied.

This classic discusses the original publication "Treatment of acromioclavicular injuries, especially complete acromioclavicular separation" by Weaver and Dunn, which collaborated to develop a technique for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction in 1972. Their surgical technique described resection of 2 cm of the distal clavicle and transfer of the acromial end of the coracoacromial ligament into the medullary canal of the distal clavicle. (modified) Weaver-Dunn procedures have been regarded as one of the most effective techniques to treat complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation for a long time. However, anatomic reconstructions have taken over this position since recent biomechanical studies have demonstrated superior results. Although the Weaver-Dunn procedure has fallen out of favour, it remains of historical significance. For this reason, this review will comprise the historical overview of the Weaver-Dunn procedure, the men behind the eponym and the clinical implication then and now.

To (1) determine the rate of surgical complications and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair, open Bankart repair, or Latarjet-Bristow; and (2) assess potential risk factors for surgical complications and VTE in patients undergoing shoulder stabilization procedures.The NSQIP database was used to identify patients undergoing isolated surgery for shoulder instability from 2005 to 2017. Demographic data were collected and compared. Logistic regression was used to assess the risk factors for developing a postoperative complication, and regression analyses were used to evaluate the odds of postoperative complications between types of surgery.We identified 7,233 patients for inclusion. Patients undergoing Latarjet-Bristow were more likely to be male and Black and to report current tobacco use. Overall, there was a low rate of surgical complications (0.4%) and VTE (0.2%). However, patients undergoing Latarjet-Bristow had nearly a 10-fold increase in the risk of surgical complications compared with an arthroscopic or open Bankart repair (1.9% versus 0.2%, P.001), including deep surgical site infections, return to operating room within 30 days, and symptomatic VTE (deep venous thrombosis rate: arthroscopic Bankart repair, 0.1%; Latarjet-Bristow, 0.8%; P.001). There were no differences in the odds of developing a surgical complication or VTE between patients undergoing arthroscopic or open Bankart repair.This study used a nationally representative, widely validated, peer-reviewed database to demonstrate that patients undergoing a Latarjet-Bristow procedure are at significantly higher risk for short-term postoperative complications, including deep surgical site infections, return to the operating room, and symptomatic VTE, than those undergoing Bankart repair. These findings should not discourage surgeons from proceeding with a coracoid transfer procedure when indicated for glenoid deficiencies, but should inform preoperative counseling and help guide perioperative care to optimize patient outcomes.III, retrospective comparative trial.

Purpose To evaluate the clinical, functional, and radiological midterm outcomes of the all-arthroscopic modified Eden-Hybinette procedure in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Methods A retrospective, single-center case series with prospectively collected data was conducted. The inclusion criterion was traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability with significant glenoid bone loss; patients with atraumatic or multidirectional instability were excluded. An all-arthroscopic modified Eden-Hybinette procedure using iliac crest autograft and double-pair button fixation was carried out. All patients were postoperatively assessed for recurrence and apprehension. Shoulder range of motion values and functional scores, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score, Oxford instability, Rowe instability, and Walch-Dupplay, were recorded. Graft positions, healing, and absorption were evaluated with computed tomography. Comparisons of values were performed with paired t tests for normally distributed differences and with nonparametric Wilcoxon’s signed rank test otherwise. Results The final study cohort included 28 patients, mean age 36 ± 10 years, and mean follow-up period 43 ± 6 months (range 36 to 53). Median glenoid bone loss was 12.4% (range 8% to 33%). No recurrence occurred, no subjective shoulder instability was reported, and no major complications were documented through the last follow-up. Postoperative shoulder range of motion had no significant differences compared with the healthy side. All final postoperative functional scores significantly increased to show excellent results compared with preoperative values. All grafts were positioned and healed optimally, and none was completely reabsorbed. Conclusions The all-arthroscopic modified Eden-Hybinette procedure is safe, leading to excellent clinical and radiological midterm outcomes in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. This technique restores glenoid bone defects and preserves the normal shoulder anatomy. Level of Evidence IV, therapeutic, retrospective case series

Background: There is a lack of evidence in the literature comparing outcomes between the arthroscopic Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure in competitive rugby players with glenohumeral instability and a glenoid bone loss Purpose: To compare return to sport, functional outcomes, and complications between the arthroscopic Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure in competitive rugby players with glenohumeral instability and a glenoid bone loss Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between June 2010 and February 2018, 130 competitive rugby players with anterior shoulder instability were operated on in our institution. The first 80 patients were operated on with the arthroscopic Bankart procedure and the other 50 with the open Latarjet procedure. Return to sport, range of motion (ROM), the Rowe score, and the Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS) were used to assess functional outcomes. Recurrences, reoperations, and complications were also evaluated. Results: In the total population, the mean follow-up was 40 months (range, 24-90 months) and the mean age was 24.2 years (range, 16-33 years). Ninety-two percent of patients were able to return to rugby, 88% at their preinjury level of play. Eighty-nine percent of patients in the Bankart group and 87% in the Latarjet group returned to compete at the same level ( P = .788). No significant difference in shoulder ROM was found between preoperative and postoperative results. The Rowe and ASOSS scores showed statistical improvement after operation ( P < .01). No significant difference in functional scores was found between the groups The Rowe score in the Bankart group increased from a preoperative mean (± SD) of 41 ± 13 points to 89.7 points postoperatively, and in the Latarjet group, from a preoperative mean of 42.5 ± 14 points to 88.4 points postoperatively ( P = .95). The ASOSS score in the Bankart group increased from a preoperative mean of 53.3 ± 3 points to 93.3 ± 6 points postoperatively, and in the Latarjet group, from a preoperative mean of 53.1 ± 3 points to 93.7 ± 4 points postoperatively ( P = .95). There were 18 recurrences (14%). The rate of recurrence was 20% in the Bankart group and 4% in the Latarjet group ( P = .01). There were 15 reoperations (12%). The rate of reoperation was 16% in the Bankart group and 4% in the Latarjet group ( P = .03). There were 6 complications (5%). The rate of complications was 4% in the Bankart group and 6% in the Latarjet group ( P = .55). The proportion of postoperative osteoarthritis was 10% in the Bankart group (8/80 patients) and 12% (6/50 patients) in the Latarjet group ( P = .55). Conclusion: In competitive rugby players with glenohumeral instability and a glenoid bone loss

Background: Cranial luxation of the scapulohumeral has been rarely reported in dogs and there is limited information available regarding surgical management of this condition, particularly with respect to long-term functional outcomes.Case Description: This report describes the successful resolution of a chronic traumatic cranial scapulohumeral joint luxation in a dog that was stabilized by cranial transposition of the biceps brachii tendon of origin. At surgery, an osteotomy of the greater tubercle was performed and a trough was made in the exposed bed of the osteotomy. The transverse humeral ligament was incised, and the bicipital tendon was levered into the trough and secured in that location by reattachment of the greater tubercle using multiple Kirschner wires and a figure-of-eight tension band wire. Postoperatively, the dog was maintained in a Spica splint for 2 weeks. Although surgical reduction was performed 4 months after the original injury, the luxation did not recur and the dog did not have appreciable lameness 14 months following the surgery.Conclusion: Although cranial transposition of the bicipital tendon is an invasive procedure, this dog’s scapulohumeral luxation did not recur and the procedure yielded an excellent long-term functional outcome.

In skeletally immature patients, the presence of growth plates and articular cartilage of the shoulder can create a predisposition for unique injuries not observed in adults. Furthermore, increasing participation in sports by children and adolescents appears to be leading to a corresponding increase in the number of sports-related injuries. The importance of radiologists being familiar with pediatric shoulder imaging and its associated injuries is therefore growing. In this article, we review the normal development and maturation pattern of ossification centers of the shoulder from the early gestational period through adolescence. Brachial plexus birth palsy, physeal injuries, shoulder dislocation, and internal impingement are discussed within the context of the child's age and the mechanism of injury to guide radiologists to a correct diagnosis.