Search

BACKGROUND Outcomes of left lateral segment (LLS) grafts in pediatric recipients were compared between living (LD-LLS) and deceased donor (DD-LLS) grafts. METHODS 195 LLS grafts (99DD-LLS-96LD-LLS) were analyzed with a median follow-up of 9.1years. The primary endpoints were overall patient/graft survival. RESULTS LD-LLS grafts were younger (0.9vs.1.4years, p = 0.039), more likely to have a fulminant liver failure (17.9%vs.5.3%,p = 0.002), less likely to have a metabolic disorder (6.3%vs.25.5%,p = 0.002), and less likely to be undergoing retransplantation (5.3% vs.16.2%,p = 0.015). There was a trend toward decreased hepatic artery thrombosis in LD-LLS grafts (6.6% vs. 15.5%,p = 0.054). No differences in the overall biliary complications occurred. The LD-LLS group had prolonged survival compared to the DD-LLS group with 10-year survival rates of 81%, and 74% (p = 0.005), respectively. LD-LLS grafts had longer graft survival compared to DD-LLS grafts (10-year graft survival 85%vs.67%,p = 0.005). Recipient age >1year (HR 2.39,p = 0.026), aortic reconstruction (HR 2.12,p = 0.046) and vascular complication (HR 3.12,p

OBJECTIVES The hepatic vasculature is a unique system due to a dual supply that includes the hepatic artery and portal vein, which interact when the liver vascular supply is decreased. Hepatic artery buffer response, an intrinsic regulatory mechanism that compensates for blood supply, maintains increased hepatic artery flow and caliber in response to portal vein failure. Previous studies revealed that portal vein flow showed no alterations to establish adequate blood supply in response to hepatic artery occlusion. Here, we analyzed portal vein flow changes in patients with hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS From December 1988 to October 2017, our center performed 580 liver transplant procedures. Those diagnosed with hepatic artery thrombosis (19 females, 24 males) by Doppler ultrasonography during postoperative week 1 were analyzed. Patients received either surgery or endovascular treatment for hepatic artery thrombosis, with patency confirmed by Doppler ultrasonography. We compared portal vein flow velocity and caliber before and after treatment using Wilcoxon signed rank and Mann Whitney U tests. RESULTS Mean patient age was 18.9 ± 21.4 years. Portal vein flow velocity pretreatment (median of 70 cm/ s) was significantly higher than posttreatment (median of 52 cm/ s) in all patients (P < .001). Median flow velocity decreased significantly after treatment when subgroups were compared, including age (adult vs child), transplant type (orthotopic transplant vs living donor), and treatment (surgery vs endovascular). However, portal vein flow velocity showed a significantly higher decrease in the surgery subgroup than in the endovascular treatment subgroup (P = .018). There was no significant relationship between portal vein calibers before and after treatment (P = .36). CONCLUSIONS The significant decrease in portal vein flow velocity after successful treatment of hepatic artery thrombosis may represent a compensatory flow change of the portal vein in response to diminished hepatic artery flow.

Biliary strictures affect 4%−12% of pediatric liver transplantations. Biliary strictures can contribute to graft loss if left untreated; however, there remains no consensus on the best course of treatment. Study objectives included analyses of outcomes associated with biliary stricture management strategies via percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), or surgery. We identified pediatric liver transplantation recipients (2011–2016) with biliary strictures from the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) registry and retrieved imaging, procedural, and operative reports from individual centers. Subanalyses were performed to specifically evaluate PTC and ERCP for “optimal biliary outcome” (OBO), defined as graft survival with stricture resolution and without recurrence or surgery. A total of 113 children with a median follow-up of 3.9 years had strictures diagnosed 100 days (interquartile range, 30–290) after liver transplantation; 81% were isolated anastomotic strictures. Stricture resolution was achieved in 92% within 101 days, more frequently with isolated anastomotic strictures (96%). 20% of strictures recurred, more commonly in association with hepatic artery thrombosis (32%). Patient and graft survival at 1 and 3 years were 99% and 98% and 94% and 92%, respectively. In a subgroup analysis of 79 patients with extrahepatic strictures managed by PTC/ERCP, 59% achieved OBO following a median of 4 PTC, and 75% following a median of 3 ERCP (P < 0.001). Among patients with OBO, those with ERCP had longer time intervals between successive procedures (41, 47, 54, 62, 71 days) than for PTC (27, 31, 36, 41, 48 days; P < 0.001). Allograft salvage was successful across all interventions. Stricture resolution was achieved in 92%, with 20% risk of recurrence. Resolution without recurrence was highest in patients with isolated anastomotic strictures and without hepatic artery thrombosis.

Introduction: T-tube placement during liver transplantation (LT) is still debated. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the usefulness of T-tube after LT in two cohorts differing in post-transplant risk. Methods: A total of 327 LTs performed between 2015 and 2018 were included in the analysis. LTs from donation after circulatory death and living donation, split-liver transplants, and LTs with hepaticojejunostomy were excluded. T-tube was reserved for marginal grafts, high-risk recipients, and bile duct size discrepancy. A balance of risk (BAR) score of ≤9 defined the low-risk cohort (232 patients, 68 with and 164 without T-tube), while a BAR score of &gt, 9 defined the high-risk cohort (95 patients, 43 with and 52 without T-tube). Postoperative complications were estimated with the comprehensive complication index (CCI). Postoperative biliary complications were classified in anastomotic stricture (AS), non-anastomotic stricture (NAS), and biliary leakage (BL). Results: In the low-risk cohort, LTs with and without T-tube had similar rates of NAS (0 vs. 2.9%, p = 0.36), AS (2.9 vs. 2.4%, p = 0.83), and BL (1.4 vs. 2.4%, p = 0.64). Analogous outcomes were found in the high-risk cohort: NAS (0 vs. 0), AS (0 vs. 5.7%, p = 0.11), and BL (0 vs. 1.3%, p = 0.27). There were more postoperative complications among patients with T-tube, in both the low-risk (CCI 29 vs. 21, p &lt, 0.001) and high-risk (CCI 51 vs. 29, p &lt, 0.001) cohort. No differences in primary non-function, hepatic artery thrombosis, and mortality were observed. Conclusions: T-tube placement did not influence postoperative biliary complications. Although the two cohorts were normalized for post-transplant risk, LT recipients with T-tube had a more complicated course.

Background Post-operative biliary complications have been reported to occur in 10-33% of pediatric liver transplantation (LTx) recipients. (2-10) Percutaneous intervention has become the primary treatment method for these complications; however, efficacy and outcomes of these patients have not been well studied. Methods Institutional pediatric LTx from 1998 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed to determine the patients referred for percutaneous treatment of post-LTx biliary strictures. Clinical parameters, percutaneous transhepatic biliary cholangiograms (PTC), biliary catheter placement, cholangioplasty, and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Results Of the 396 consecutive pediatric LTx recipients during our study period, 50 (12.6%) were diagnosed with biliary strictures on PTC. LTx biliary reconstruction was Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) in 28 (56%), choledochojejunostomy (CJ) in 11 (22%), and choledochocholedochostomy (CC) in 11 (22%). Median age at LTx was 23.2 months (IQR, 10.9-90.6) and 14 (28%) patients developed hepatic artery thrombosis. Forty-four (88%) patients were treated with internal/external biliary catheters, of whom 38 (76%) underwent balloon cholangioplasty. By 12 months, 84% of patients had complete stricture resolution and catheter removal. Median total duration of catheter drainage was 152 days (IQR, 76-308). Eight patients required additional surgery (biliary reconstruction or re-LTx) or died with drainage catheter in place from complications unrelated to PTC intervention. Amongst the six (12%) treated with unilateral external biliary drainage catheters, two had catheters removed for inadequate drainage but then had spontaneous biliary obstruction resolution, one underwent duct reconstruction, and three required long-term catheterization. Conclusions Biliary strictures following pediatric LTx can be successfully treated with internal/external biliary drainage catheters and cholangioplasty if the stricture can be crossed. However, patients with isolated strictured ducts may require long-term external catheter drainage until re-LTx or percutaneous obliteration of isolated ducts.

BACKGROUND Early hepatic artery thrombosis (E-HAT) is a serious complication after liver transplantation (LT), which often results in graft failure and can lead to patient deaths. Treatments such as re-transplantation and re-anastomosis are conventional therapeutic methods which are restricted by the shortage of donors and the patient’s postoperative intolerance to re-laparotomy. Due to the advances in interventional techniques and thrombolytics, endovascular treatments are increasingly being selected by more and more centers. This study reviews and reports our single-center experience with intra-arterial thrombolysis as the first choice therapy for E-HAT after deceased donor LT. AIM To evaluate the feasibility and reasonability of intra-arterial thrombolysis for E-HAT after deceased donor LT. METHODS A total of 147 patients who underwent deceased donor LT were retrospectively reviewed in our hospital between September 2011 and December 2016. Four patients were diagnosed with E-HAT. All of these patients underwent intra-arterial thrombolysis with alteplase as the first choice therapy after LT. The method of arterial anastomosis and details of the diagnosis and treatment of E-HAT were collated. The long-term prognosis of E-HAT patients was also recorded. The median follow-up period was 26 mo (range: 23 to 30 mo). RESULTS The incidence of E-HAT was 2.7% (4/147). E-HAT was considered when Doppler ultrasonography showed no blood flow signals and a definite diagnosis was confirmed by immediate hepatic arterial angiography when complete occlusion of the hepatic artery was observed. The patients were given temporary thrombolytics (mainly alteplase) via a 5-Fr catheter which was placed in the proximal part of the thrombosed hepatic artery followed by continuous alteplase using an infusion pump. Alteplase dose was adjusted according to activated clotting time. The recanalization rate of intra-arterial thrombolysis in our study was 100% (4/4) and no thrombolysis-related mortality was observed. During the follow-up period, patient survival rate was 75% (3/4), and biliary complications were present in 50% of patients (2/4). CONCLUSION Intra-arterial thrombolysis can be considered first-line treatment for E-HAT after deceased donor LT. Early diagnosis of E-HAT is important and follow-up is necessary even if recanalization is successful.

Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage liver disease or acute liver failure. However, vascular complications, such as hepatic artery stenosis and/or thrombosis, graft portal vein stenosis and biliodigestive strictures following liver transplantation are still common despite improvements and innovations in surgical techniques. These complications can lead to graft damage or even death, and they are caused by many factors. Although minimally invasive interventional radiology is an optional treatment for such post-liver transplant complications, there is little research on this method of treatment.

OBJECTIVES Liver transplant is the most effective treatment modality for patients with end-stage liver disease, metabolic disorders, hepatic malignancy, and acute liver failure. When a graft fails after primary liver transplant, retransplant of the liver remains the only option. Here, we report the past 12-year experience of the Shiraz Transplant Center regarding liver retransplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of a 12-year period (2004-2015) of the Shiraz Center in Iran. RESULTS Of the 3107 patients who had a liver transplant during the study period, 58 retransplants were performed (1.86%) in 57 patients. The leading cause of retransplant was primary nonfunction in 24 patients (41.4% of retransplant cases and 0.77% of all liver transplant cases). The second leading cause of retransplant was vascular complications in 25 patients (23 with hepatic artery thrombosis and 2 with portal vein thrombosis), accounting for 43.1% of retransplant cases and 0.80% of all liver transplant cases. In addition, 5 patients (8.6%) had retransplant for rejection, which accounted for 0.16% of all liver transplant cases. Four patients with retransplant (6.9%) had recurrence of primary disease, which accounted for 0.12% of all liver transplant cases. Most liver retransplants occurred early (≤ 30 days after primary transplant) at the Shiraz Transplant Center. Five-year survival rate after retransplant was 35%, and retransplant for hepatic artery thrombosis was more common in children. CONCLUSIONS Because most patients required retransplants in the early period after primary transplant, the decision for retransplant must be considered carefully with full multidisciplinary evaluation and only in skilled hands. Retransplant in subgroups of patients with little chance of a successful outcome should be avoided.

BACKGROUND: With the growing incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM), an increasing number of organ donors with DM can be expected. We sought to investigate the association between donor DM with early post-transplant outcomes.METHODS: From a national cohort of adult liver transplant recipients (1996-2016), all recipients transplanted with a liver from a DM donor (n=69) were matched 1:2 with recipients of livers from non-DM donors (n=138). The primary end-point included early post-transplant outcome, such as the incidence of primary non-function (PNF), hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT), and 90-day graft survival. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the impact of donor DM on graft failure.RESULTS: PNF was observed in 5.8% of grafts from DM donors versus 2.9% of non-DM donor grafts (p=0.31). Recipients of grafts derived from DM donors had a higher incidence of HAT (8.7% vs. 2.2%, p=0.03) and decreased 90-day graft survival (88.4% [70.9-91.1] vs. 96.4% [89.6-97.8], p=0.03) compared to recipients of grafts from non-DM donors. The adjusted hazard ratio for donor DM on graft survival was 2.21 (1.08-4.53, p=0.03).CONCLUSION: Donor DM is associated with diminished outcome early after liver transplantation. The increased incidence of HAT after transplantation of livers from DM donors requires further research.

Aim. To report a rare case of split liver transplantation in two urgent recipients treated in hospitals that are very far from each other. Material and methods. Partial liver grafts were obtained by controlled full-right/full-left in situ splitting. The left lobe was transplanted in a 7-year-old child with severe hepatic failure (PELD score 39) resulting, probably from an progressive intrahepatic familial cholestasis in Novosibirsk. The right lobe was used for re-transplantation in a 28-year-old patient with hepatic artery thrombosis (UNOS status 1A) after living donor right lobe liver transplantation in Moscow. Results. The course of the early post-operative period in recipient 1 was complicated by infected total pancreatonecrosis with the development of limited biliary leakage and the formation of a stricture, which required reconstructive cholangiojejunostomy 12 months after transplantation. Recipient 2 consistently underwent biliary leakage, arrosive arterial bleeding, graft artery thrombosis, all of which could become fatal. Complications were successfully eliminated by the consistent use of surgical and endovascular interventions. Conclusion. The presented observation is, firstly, an example of effective inter-center cooperation, and secondly, a demonstration of the existing problems of postmortem organ donation, which determine the need for such extreme surgery in critical situations.

BACKGROUND Thromboembolic complications are relatively common causes of increased morbidity and mortality in the perioperative period in liver transplant patients. Early postoperative portal vein thrombosis (PVT, incidence 2%-2.6%) and early hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT, incidence 3%-5%) have a poor prognosis in transplant patients, having impacts on graft and patient survival. In the present study, we attempted to identify the predictive factors of these complications for early detection and therefore monitor more closely the patients most at risk of thrombotic complications. AIM To investigate whether intraoperative thromboelastography (TEG) is useful in detecting the risk of early postoperative HAT and PVT in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). METHODS We retrospectively collected thromboelastographic traces, in addition to known risk factors (cold ischemic time, intraoperative requirement for red blood cells and fresh-frozen plasma transfusion, prolonged operating time), in 27 patients, selected among 530 patients (≥ 18 years old), who underwent their first LT from January 2002 to January 2015 at the Liver University Transplant Center and developed an early PVT or HAT (case group). Analyses of the TEG traces were performed before anesthesia and 120 min after reperfusion. We retrospectively compared these patients with the same number of nonconsecutive control patients who underwent LT in the same study period without developing these complications (1:1 match) (control group). The chosen matching parameters were: Patient graft and donor characteristics [age, sex, body mass index (BMI)], indication for transplantation, procedure details, United Network for Organ Sharing classification, BMI, warm ischemia time (WIT), cold ischemia time (CIT), the volume of blood products transfused, and conventional laboratory coagulation analysis. Normally distributed continuous data are reported as the mean ± SD and compared using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Non-normally distributed continuous data are reported as the median (interquartile range) and compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Categorical variables were analyzed with Chi-square tests with Yates correction or Fisher’s exact test depending on best applicability. IBM SPSS Statistics version 24 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States) was employed for statistical analysis. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS Postoperative thrombotic events were identified as early if they occurred within 21 d postoperatively. The incidence of early hepatic artery occlusion was 3.02%, whereas the incidence of PVT was 2.07%. A comparison between the case and control groups showed some differences in the duration of surgery, which was longer in the case group (P = 0.032), whereas transfusion of blood products, red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and platelets, was similar between the two study groups. Thromboelastographic parameters did not show any statistically significant difference between the two groups, except for the G value measured at basal and 120’ postreperfusion time. It was higher, although within the reference range, in the case group than in the control group (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). In addition, clot lysis at 60 min (LY60) measured at 120’ postreperfusion time was lower in the case group than in the control group (P = 0.035). This parameter is representative of a fibrinolysis shutdown (LY60 = 0%-0.80%) in 85% of patients who experienced a thrombotic complication, resulting in a statistical correlation with HAT and PVT. CONCLUSION The end of surgery LY60 and G value may identify those recipients at greater risk of developing early HAT or PVT, suggesting that they may benefit from intense surveillance and eventually anticoagulation prophylaxis in order to prevent these serious complications after LT.

Background The reconstruction of hepatic artery is a challenging part of the pediatric liver transplantation procedure. Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) and stenosis are complications which may result in ischemic biliary injury, causing early graft lost and even death. Methods Two hundred and fifty-nine patients underwent liver transplantation in 2017 in a single liver transplantation group. Among them, 225 patients were living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and 34 deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Results In LDLT all reconstructions of hepatic artery were microsurgical, while in DDLT either microsurgical reconstruction or traditional continuous suture technique was done depending on different conditions. There were five (1.9%) HATs: four (4/34, 11.8%) in DDLT (all whole liver grafts) and one (1/225, 0.4%) in LDLT (P = 0.001). Four HATs were managed conservatively using anticoagulation, and 1 accepted salvage surgery with re-anastomosis. Until now, 3 HAT patients remain in good condition, whereas two developed biliary complications. One of them needed to be re-transplanted, and the other patient died due to biliary complications. Conclusions Microsurgical technique significantly improves the reconstruction of hepatic artery in pediatric liver transplantation. The risk for arterial complications is higher in DDLT. Conservative therapy can achieve good outcome in selected HAT cases.

Background: Thrombosis after liver transplantation is a leading cause of graft loss, morbidity, and mortality. Several known recipient- and surgery-related characteristics have been associated with increased risk of thrombosis after transplantation. Potential donor-related risk factors, however, remain largely undefined. Objectives: We aimed to identify risk factors for early post-transplantation thrombosis ('90 days) and to determine the impact of early postoperative thrombosis on long-term graft and patient survival. Patients/Methods: A post hoc analysis was performed of an observational cohort study including all primary, adult liver transplantations performed between 1993 and 2018. Donor-, recipient-, and surgery-related characteristics were collected. Competing risk model analyses and multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for developing early post-transplant thrombosis and graft failure. Results: From a total of 748 adult liver transplantations, 58 recipients (7.8%) developed a thrombosis after a median of 7 days. Post-transplantation thrombotic events included 25 hepatic artery thromboses, 13 portal vein thromboses, and 22 other thrombotic complications. Donor history of smoking was independently associated with early postoperative thrombosis (odds ratio [OR] 2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-4.52). Development of early post-transplant thrombosis was independently associated with patient mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 3.61; 95% CI 1.54-8.46) and graft failure (HR 5.80, 95% CI 3.26-10.33), respectively. Conclusion: Donor history of smoking conveys a more than two-fold increased risk of thrombosis after liver transplantation, independent of other factors. Post-transplant thrombosis was independently associated with decreased patient and graft survival.

BACKGROUND The use of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for primary liver transplantation (LT) may quell concerns about allocating deceased donor organs if the need for retransplantation (re-LT) arises because the primary LT did not draw from the limited organ pool. However, outcomes of re-LT after LDLT are poorly studied. The purpose of this study was to analyze the Adult to Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Study (A2ALL) data to report outcomes of re-LT after LDLT, with a focus on long-term survival after re-LT. METHODS A retrospective review of A2ALL data collected between 1998 and 2014 was performed. Patients were excluded if they received a deceased donor LT. Demographic data, postoperative outcomes and complications, graft and patient survival, and predictors of re-LT and patient survival were assessed. RESULTS Of the 1065 patients who underwent LDLT during the study time period, 110 recipients (10.3%) required re-LT. In multivariable analyses, hepatitis C virus, longer length of stay at LDLT, hepatic artery thrombosis, biliary stricture, infection, and disease recurrence were associated with an increased risk of re-LT. Patient survival among re-LT patients was significantly inferior to those who underwent primary transplant only at 1 (86% versus 92%), 5 (64% versus 82%), and 10 years (44% versus 68%). CONCLUSIONS Approximately 10% of A2ALL patients who underwent primary LDLT required re-LT. Compared with patients who underwent primary LT, survival among re-LT recipients was worse at 1, 5, and 10 years after LT, and re-LT was associated with a significantly increased risk of death in multivariable modeling (hazard ratios, 2.29; P

Introduction Routinely, pediatric donor (PD) grafts are allocated to pediatric liver transplantation (LT) recipients; however, occasionally they can be allocated for adult recipients (ARs). Some authors reported decreased patient/graft survival and higher vascular complications, such as hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT), in LT in ARs using PDs. Methods It is a retrospective study enrolling 1202 ARs undergoing LT using whole liver grafts during the period of January 2002 to April 2019. The patients were categorized according to donor age in 2 groups: PDs and adult donors (ADs). The variables were collected from the database including the graft to recipient weight ratio (GWRW) and the incidence of HAT and graft primary nonfunction (PNF). Results The AD group had 1152 patients, and the PD group had 50 patients. PNF occurred in 68 (5.66%) patients, and the distribution between the 2 groups were similar: 65 (5.64%) in the AD group, and 3 (6%) in the PD group (P = .915). HAT was diagnosed in 30 (2.6%) patients in the AD group and in 6 (12%) patients in the PD group. HAT was significantly higher in the PD group (P = .001). In the PD group, the GWRWs among patients diagnosed with HAT were similar (P = .152). Conclusion HAT is higher in PDs, although it is a viable alternative with satisfactory results. Serial Doppler in the first week and early introduction of platelet antiaggregants and/or anticoagulants may be beneficial, albeit it is not clear if it could reduce the incidence of HAT.

We report this case of a 5-year-old child post combined liver and renal transplant for primary hyperoxaluria. Patient developed hepatic artery thrombosis on day 3 posttransplant that was managed by reexploration and reanastomosis of the hepatic artery. On day 4, the patient again developed hepatic artery thrombosis that failed to revascularize by surgical exploration and reanastomosis. Tissue plasminogen activator was injected into the hepatic artery intraoperatively to lyse any clot; however, no revascularization could be achieved. Subsequently, catheter angiogram confirmed no flow in the hepatic artery. A4 × 22 mm revive stent retriever was deployed across the site of occlusion and retrieved after 5 minutes of indwell time. Two such passes were made and complete recanalization of the hepatic artery was achieved. The hepatic artery remained patent as confirmed on serial Doppler images post intervention.

Liver transplantation presents unique challenges in patients who do not accept blood transfusions. The difficulty of balancing chemical augmentation and handling the technical difficulty of the surgery make transfusion-free liver transplantation an exception rather than the norm. However, at our center, we have performed 27 successful living donor liver transplants in transfusion-free patients. We describe a case of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) after living donor liver transplantation requiring retransplantation. This first report of safe retransplantation without blood products demonstrates that even graft-threatening complications can be safely managed in a transfusion-free setting. However, it remains unclear if the medical augmentation to meet hematologic and coagulation parameters before transfusion-free transplantation may increase the risk of postoperative HAT and other thrombotic complications. Although it is our center’s experience that the thrombosis rate is comparable with the published rate in standard transfusion-eligible living donor liver transplantations and this case demonstrates that HAT can be safely managed in this setting, further study on the risks and benefits of hematopoietic stimulants as pretransplant optimization is warranted.

Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) can cause hepatic parenchymal necrosis and ischemic cholangiopathy. This study investigates additional histologic features that may suggest HAT in post-OLT liver specimens. For 94 liver specimens (explanted allografts and biopsies) from patients with a clinical or pathologic diagnosis of HAT, we recorded length of time between OLT and procedure, categorizing cases into early HAT (;≤30 days since OLT) and late HAT (30 days since OLT). Common histologic findings in HAT included lobular necrosis (60 cases, 64%), portal inflammation (68 cases, 72%), ductular reaction (73 cases, 78%), lobular cholestasis (70 cases, 74%), and bile-tinged macrophages (40 cases, 43%). Ductular cholestasis was seen in 30 cases (32%); 10 of those patients were clinically septic. Bile in veins was seen in 16 (17%) cases and arteritis in 6 (6%) cases. Findings more common in resection than biopsy specimens included lobular necrosis (P .0001), hemorrhage (P = .0044), ductular cholestasis (P = .0003), and bile-tinged macrophages (P .0001). Lobular necrosis was more common in early HAT (P = .0002), and ductular reaction (P = .006) and bile in veins (P = .03) were more common in late HAT. Histologic changes in HAT vary based on specimen type and whether HAT is early or late. In late HAT, biliary injury might occur after a prolonged period of ischemia, with subsequent bile duct necrosis, bile in veins, and remodeling (eg, ductular reaction). Bile in veins is an unusual finding that may occur in HAT, although it can be seen in bile infarcts from other causes.

We report the case of a 38-year-old woman who underwent orthotopic ‘split’ liver transplant, complicated by hepatic artery thrombosis on the first postoperative day. The patient was successfully treated with an endovascular approach by mechanical thromboaspiration of the hepatic artery, using neurovascular devices, angioplasty and stenting at the site of the surgical anastomosis.

Background Split liver transplantation addresses donor shortages by facilitating the transplant of two recipients using one donor liver. Some still consider these grafts inferior due to prolonged cold ischaemia time and at times difficult vascular reconstruction. Techniques such as in-situ splitting, machine perfusion and interposition grafts may address these challenges and thereby address these concerns. The aim of this review is to assess these technical advances in split liver transplantation, their utility and outcomes. Methods A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Keywords included ‘split liver transplantation’, ‘arterial reconstruction’, and ‘machine perfusion’. Data found was synthesised into sections including: methods of splitting, full-left full-right splitting, donor cholangiography, machine perfusion and arterial reconstruction. Results A total of 78 articles met inclusion criteria after screening of 151 eligible articles. These were subdivided into the following categories: in-situ (25), ex-vivo (25), full-left full-right splitting (15), donor cholangiography (2), machine perfusion (6), and arterial reconstruction (5). The in-situ splitting technique reduces the cold ischaemia time compared to the ex-vivo technique which may improve graft quality and liver splitting during normothermic machine perfusion is a novel technique with the potential to incorporate the best aspects of both techniques. Interposition grafts are often required during split liver transplantation but have an increased risk of hepatic artery thrombosis. Conclusion Advancements in technique have allowed many of the unique challenges of split liver transplantation to be overcome. Overall, this supports the use of split liver transplantation in broader and riskier settings and we advocate for liver transplant surgeons to not hesitate in using these grafts liberally and expanding their recipient selection criteria.

Introduction: In pediatric liver transplantation (pLT), hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is associated with inferior transplant outcome. Hepatic artery reconstruction (HAR) using an operating microscope (OM) is considered to reduce the incidence of HAT. Methods: HAR using an OM was compared to a historic cohort using surgical loupes (SL) in pLT performed between 2009 and 2020. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of HAT. Secondary endpoints were 1-year patient and graft survival determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis and complications. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for HAT and adverse events. Results: A total of 79 pLTs were performed [30 (38.0%) living donations; 49 (62.0%) postmortem donations] divided into 23 (29.1%) segment 2/3, 32 (40.5%) left lobe, 4 (5.1%) extended right lobe, and 20 (25.3%) full-size grafts. One-year patient and graft survival were both 95.2% in the OM group versus 86.2% and 77.8% in the SL group (p = .276 and p = .077). HAT rate was 0% in the OM group versus 24.1% in the SL group (p = .013). One-year patient and graft survival were 64.3% and 35.7% in patient with HAT, compared to 93.9% and 92.8% in patients with no HAT (both p < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed HAR with SL (p = .022) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) (p = .014) as independent risk factors for HAT. The occurrence of HAT was independently associated with the need for retransplantation (p < .001) and biliary leakage (p = .045). Conclusion: In pLT, the use of an OM is significantly associated to reduce HAT rate, biliary complications, and graft loss and outweighs the disadvantages of delayed arterial perfusion and prolonged warm ischemia time (WIT).

Need for routine reconstruction of all arteries in grafts with multiple arterial inflows remains an unsettled debate. The aim of following article is to review an anatomical basis of a decision-making strategy to deal with multiple arteries in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). LDLT performed between August 2009–2019 were included. Grafts were classified into grafts with single artery (group 1); multiple arteries, all reconstructed (group 2); and multiple arteries, one reconstructed (group 3). Frequency of double arteries in relation to graft type, type of reconstruction, incidence of arterial and biliary complications and survival was compared. 1086 LDLT were analysed (adults: 750, paediatric: 336). 1007 grafts (92.2%) had single artery (group 1), and 79 (7.8%) grafts had multiple arteries. All arteries were reconstructed in 19 (24%) patients (group 2), while 60 grafts (75.9%) had only one artery reconstructed (group 3). Left lobe (18.8%) and left lateral segments (10.7%) grafts were more likely to have multiple arteries (p = 0.001). The likelihood of reconstructing multiple arteries was similar in all graft types, 27.3% in right and 25% and 21.4% in left lobe and left lateral segments, respectively (p > 0.05). There was no difference in biliary complications (p = 0.85), hepatic artery thrombosis (p = 0.82), and post-surgical hospital stay (p = 0.38) between the three groups. The presence of multiple arteries or their selective reconstruction did not affect survival (p = 0.73). Multiple arterial inflows are not an uncommon entity and demonstration of good hilar collateralization helps in avoiding unnecessary arterial reconstruction without adverse outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric LT are at particular risk of HAT, and its management still constitutes a matter of debate. Our purpose was to study predisposing factors and outcome of HAT post-LT, including the impact of surgical revisions on survival and biliary complications. METHODS: Among 882 primary pediatric LT performed between 1993 and 2015, 36 HAT were encountered (4.1%, 35 fully documented). Each HAT case was retrospectively paired with a LT recipient without HAT, according to diagnosis, age at LT, type of graft, and era. RESULTS: Five-year patient survivals were 77.0% versus 83.9% in HAT and non-HAT paired groups, respectively (P = .321). Corresponding graft survivals were 20.0% versus 80.5% (P < .001), and retransplantation rates 77.7% versus 10.7%, respectively (P < .001). One-year biliary complication-free survivals were 16.6% versus 83.8% in the HAT and non-HAT groups, respectively (P < .001). Regarding chronology of surgical re-exploration, only HAT cases that occurred within 14 days post-LT were re-operated, fourteen of them being explored within 7 days post-LT (revascularization rate: 6/14), versus two beyond 7 days (no revascularization). When revascularization was achieved, graft and biliary complication-free survival rates at 1 year were 33.3% and 22.2%, respectively, both rates being 0.0% in case of failure. CONCLUSIONS: The pejorative prognosis associated with HAT in terms of graft survival is confirmed, whereas patient survival could be preserved through retransplantation. Results suggest that HAT should be re-operated if occurring within 7 days post-LT, but not beyond.

The aim of the study was to assess the UK donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplant experience from donors ≥70 years. Nationwide UK DCD retrospective analysis was conducted between 2001 and 2015 (n = 1163). Recipients were divided into group 1 vs. group 2 (donors 70≥ vs.

Biliary strictures constitute a major source of morbidity and mortality following liver transplantation (LT). However, studies on the impact of nonanastomotic biliary strictures (NABS) on grafts after LT are limited. 649 patients who underwent LT between January 2013 and June 2017 at our center were retrospectively analyzed and 2.6% (n = 17) of the recipients developed NABS following LT. There were no differences between recipients with and without NABS in indication of LT, graft ischemia time, and type of biliary anastomosis. The incidence of post-LT hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) (odds ratio [OR]: 15.75, P < .001) and the use of livers from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors (OR: 8.292, P = .004) were identified as independent significant predictors of NABS by multivariate analysis. Graft survival in those with NABS was significantly worse than in patients without NABS (1-, 3-, and 5-years survival: 64.7%, 57.5%, 0%, vs. 89.8%, 84.0%, 76.4%, P < .001). In conclusion, while the incidence of NABS in our study was relatively low compared to previous reports, NABS was still found to be associated with poor graft survival. Special attention should be paid to NABS occurrence in grafts that develop HAT as well as those from DCD donors.

Intrahepatic recipient hepatic artery dissection caused by hepatic artery thrombosis is a lethal complication of living-liver donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We herein report a new surgical technique that avoids the ligation of the recipient hepatic arteries in LDLT. Patients undergoing LDLT between 2009 and 2019 were evaluated. In the second half of this period, a technique involving no ligation of the recipient hepatic artery was initiated and its impact on the incidence of intrahepatic recipient hepatic artery dissection was determined. The middle and left hepatic arteries were ligated in 195 cases (53.4%), and the no-ligation technique was used in 170 (46.6%). The incidence of intraoperative hepatic artery dissection was significantly lower in the no-ligation group (n = 0, 0.0%) than in the ligation group (n = 10, 5.1%) (p = 0.0021). After propensity score matching to evaluate the patient characteristics, the incidence of intraoperative hepatic artery dissection was also significantly lower in the no-ligation group (n = 0, 0.0%) than in the ligation group (n = 6, 4.5%) (p = 0.0295). As a result, this new surgical technique is highly recommended to avoid recipient hepatic artery ligation in LDLT.

Pediatric ALF is rare but life-threatening and may require urgent transplantation. In low and middle-income countries, access to transplantation is limited, deceased organ donation rates are low, and data on outcomes scarce. The Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, in Johannesburg, is one of only two centers in South Africa that perform pediatric liver transplant. We describe the etiology, clinical presentation, and outcomes of children undergoing liver transplant for ALF at our center over the past 14 years. We performed a retrospective chart review of all children undergoing liver transplantation for ALF from November 2005 to September 2019. Recipient data included demographics, clinical and biochemical characteristics pretransplant, post-operative complications, and survival. We conducted descriptive data analysis and used the Kaplan-Meier method for survival analysis. We performed 182 primary pediatric liver transplants. Of these, 27 (15%) were for ALF, mostly from acute hepatitis A infection (11/27;41%). Just over half of the grafts were from living donors (15/27;56%), and five grafts (5/27;19%) were ABO-incompatible. The most frequent post-transplant complications were biliary leaks (9/27;33%). There were two cases of hepatic artery thrombosis (2/27;7%), one of whom required re-transplantation. Unadjusted patient and graft survival at one and 3 years were the same, at 81% (95% CI 61%-92%) and 78% (95% CI 57%-89%), respectively. At WDGMC, our outcomes for children who undergo liver transplantation for ALF are excellent. We found workable solutions that effectively addressed our pervasive organ shortages without compromising patient outcomes.

Obtaining partial allografts and performing arterial reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is technically demanding. The risk of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) remains high in LDLT due to the small caliber of the arteries. The graft and the recipient hepatic artery (HA) cannot be directly anastomosed in certain cases due to narrow diameter or short graft HA.

Patient survival following orthotopic liver transplantation has greatly increased following improvements in surgical technique, anesthetic care, and immunosuppression. The critical care of the liver transplant recipient has paralleled these improvements, largely thanks to input from multidisciplinary teams and institution-specific protocols guiding management and care. This article provides an overview of the approach to critical care of the postoperative adult liver transplant recipient outlining common issues faced by the intensivist. Approaches to extubation and hemodynamic assessment are described. The provision of appropriate immunosuppression, infection prophylaxis, and nutrition is addressed. To aid prompt diagnosis and treatment, intensivists must be aware of postoperative complications of bleeding, primary nonfunction, delayed graft function, vascular thromboses, biliary complications, rejection, and organ dysfunction.

When the standard arterial reconstruction is not feasible during liver transplantation (LT), aorto-hepatic arterial reconstruction (AHAR) can be the only solution to save the graft. AHAR can be performed on the infrarenal (IR) or supraceliac (SC) tract of the aorta, but the possible effect on outcome of selecting SC versus IR reconstruction is still unclear. One hundred and twenty consecutive patients who underwent liver transplantation with AHAR in six European centres between January 2003 and December 2018 were retrospectively analysed to ascertain whether the incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) was influenced by the type of AHAR (IR-AHAR vs. SC-AHAR). In 56/120 (46.6%) cases, an IR anastomosis was performed, always using an interposition arterial conduit. In the other 64/120 (53.4%) cases, an SC anastomosis was performed; an arterial conduit was used in 45/64 (70.3%) cases. Incidence of early (

AIM To review current literature of thrombosis prophylaxis in pediatric liver transplantation (PLT) as thrombosis remains a critical complication. METHODS Studies were identified by electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases until March 2018. The search was supplemented by manually reviewing the references of included studies and the references of the main published systematic reviews on thrombosis and PLT. We excluded from this review case report, small case series, commentaries, conference abstracts, papers which describing less than 10 pediatric liver transplants/year and articles published before 1990. Two reviewers performed study selection independently, with disagreements solved through discussion and by the opinion of a third reviewer when necessary. RESULTS Nine retrospective studies were included in this review. The overall quality of studies was poor. A pooled analysis of results from studies was not possible due to the retrospective design and heterogeneity of included studies. We found an incidence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) ranging from 2% to 10% in pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and from 4% to 33% in pediatric deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) was observed mostly in mixed LDLT and DDLT pediatric population with an incidence ranging from 0% to 29%. In most of the studies Doppler ultrasonography was used as a first line diagnostic screening for thrombosis. Four different surgical techniques for portal vein anastomosis were reported with similar efficacy in terms of PVT reduction. Reduced size liver transplant was associated with a low risk of both PVT (incidence 4%) and HAT (incidence 0%, P < 0.05). Similarly, aortic arterial anastomosis without graft interposition and microsurgical hepatic arterial reconstruction were associated with a significant reduced HAT incidence (6% and 0%, respectively). According to our inclusion and exclusion criteria, we did not find eligible studies that evaluated pharmacological prevention of thrombosis. CONCLUSION Poor quality retrospective studies show the use of tailored surgical strategies might be useful to reduce HAT and PVT after PLT; prospective studies are urgently needed.

Objectives Liver retransplant is considered the only hope for patients with irreversible graft failure after primary transplant. In most Western centers, retransplantis done mainly from deceased donors; so far, only few published studies have reported on outcomes of liver retransplant with living donors. In this study, our aim was to analyze the outcomes of living-donor liver retransplant. Materials and methods Patients who underwent liver retransplant between February 2011 and February 2019 were included in the study. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were analyzed. Results from 2 patient groups were compared: liver retransplant with living donors and liver retransplant with deceased donors. Results Thirty-two patients underwent liver retransplant (21 adult and 11 pediatric patients). The most common indications for liver retransplant were hepatic artery thrombosis (28.5%) and primary graft nonfunction (23.8%) in adults and hepatic artery thrombosis (45.5%) and chronic rejection (36.4%) in pediatric patients. Seventeen retransplant patients (53.1%) required early retransplant (within 1 mo), mainly due to hepatic artery thrombosis (52.9%) and primary graft nonfunction (35.3%). Late retransplant was mainly due to chronic rejection (40%) and recurrence of primary disease (26.7%). Seventeen patients (53.1%) underwent living-donor retransplant, and 5 donors underwent robotic right hepatectomy. Graft and patient survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 81.3% for living-donor and 51.4% for deceased-donor liver retransplant recipients (P = .08). On multivariate analyses, we observed significant differences between both groups in pretransplant Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease scores (P = .05), preoperative international normalized ratio (P = .012), and cold ischemia time (P = .046). Conclusions The use of living donors for liver retransplant, despite its technical demand, was shown to be a safe and feasible option, especially when there is scarcity of deceased donors.

BACKGROUND: In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) > 0.8% is perceived as the critical graft size. This lower limit of GRWR (0.8%) has been challenged over the last decade owing to the surgical refinements, especially related to inflow and outflow modulation techniques. Our aim was to compare the recipient outcome in small-for-size (GRWR 0.8) and to determine the risk factors for mortality when small-for-size grafts (SFSG) were used. METHODS: Data of 200 transplant recipients and their donors were analyzed over a period of two years. Routine practice of harvesting middle hepatic vein (MHV) or reconstructing anterior sectoral veins into neo-MHV was followed during LDLT. Outcomes were compared in terms of mortality, hospital stay, ICU stay, and occurrence of various complications such as functional small-for-size syndrome (F-SFSS), hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT), early allograft dysfunction (EAD), portal vein thrombosis (PVT), and postoperative sepsis. A multivariate analysis was also done to determine the risk factors for mortality in both the groups. RESULTS: Recipient and donor characteristics, intraoperative variables, and demographical data were comparable in both the groups (GRWR 0.8. CONCLUSION: Graft survival after LDLT using a small-for-size right lobe graft (GRWR

Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation, occurring in 5% of cases (Piardi et al, 2016). HAT is the second main cause of graft loss after primary nonfunction, the leading cause of graft failure in the immediate postoperative period (

Background Early extubation immediately following liver transplantation is increasingly common in adult practice. Some pediatric institutions have begun to adopt this strategy. Careful patient selection is essential in minimizing risk. Methods This retrospective cohort study evaluated infants and children who underwent liver transplantation between July 2011 and December 2014. Our primary objective was to determine early extubation rate. Secondary objectives were to identify clinical factors associated with successful early extubation compared with delayed extubation and to examine significant postoperative complications, intensive care unit length of stay, and hospital length of stay. Results The early extubation rate was 57.8% (37/64, confidence interval [CI] 44.8%-70.1%) over this 3.5-year period, increasing from 42% in 2012 to 58% by the end of 2014. The patients in the early extubation group were more likely to be older than the delayed extubation group (mean [SD], 7 [5.3] years vs 3.5 [5.5] years, difference between the mean [95% CI], 3.5 [0.8, 6.2] years); were to have come from home on the day of surgery (78.4% vs 25.9%); and were less likely to be listed as United Network for Organ Sharing status 1A (2.7% vs 25.9%). The early extubation group received less packed red blood cell volume (mean [SD], 9 [13.2] mL/kg vs 40.6 [48.5] mL/kg, difference between the mean [95% CI], 31.6 [95% CI 14.9, 48.3] mL/kg) and fresh-frozen plasma (mean 2.7 [SD 9.5] vs 13.3 [SD15.1], difference between the mean [95% CI], 10.5 [4.4,16.7] mL/kg). None of the patients in the early extubation group required reintubation in the first 24 hours following transplant and none experienced hepatic artery thrombosis. The early extubation group had a shorter average postoperative PICU stay (mean 3.8 [SD 2.1] days vs 17.6 [SD 31.3] days, difference between the mean [95% CI], 9.5 [4.3, 14.7] days) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay overall (mean 10.7 [SD 4.3] days vs 29.7 [SD 43.1] days, difference between the mean [95% CI], 19.1 [8.6, 29.6] days). Conclusion More than half of our pediatric liver transplant patients were successfully extubated in the operating room immediately following surgery. We believe early extubation to be safe when employed in selected subpopulations of pediatric patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Highlights • Portal vein arterialization may be a bridging treatment for retransplantation. • This case demonstrates feasible of portal vein arterialization in sick patient. • Portal hypertension usually occurs after portal vein arterialization. • Calibration of fistula after recovery of liver allograft should be considered., Objective Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is one of the most serious complications of liver transplantation that can potentially lead to loss of the allograft. Retransplantation is the only option when revascularization can’t be performed but the donor may be not available in the short period of time. We report the technique of using portal vein arterialization (PVA) for bridging before retransplantation. There are few reports in living donor setting. Case description The recipient of the liver was a 59 year old male who received an extended right lobe graft from his son. Post operative day 41, HAT was diagnosed from angiogram and liver function got rapidly worse. We decided to re-anastomose the hepatic artery but this was not possible due to a thrombosis in the distal right hepatic artery. So PVA by anastomosis of the common hepatic artery to splenic vein was performed. During the early postoperative period liver function gradually improved. Unfortunately, he died from massive GI hemorrhage one month later. Discussion PVA has previously been reported as being useful when revascularization was not successful. The surgical technique is not complicated and can be performed in sick patient. Liver graft may be salvaged with oxygenated portal flow and recover afterwards. However, portal hypertension after PVA seem to be an inevitable complication. Conclusions PVA may be a bridging treatment for retransplantation in patients whom hepatic artery reconstruction is impossible after HAT. Regards to the high morbidity after procedure, retransplantation should be performed as definite treatment as soon as possible.

Key Clinical Message Hepatic artery thrombosis should always be considered on a liver graft recipient with mild and nonspecific symptoms, even after a decade of the transplantation.

Background: The graft used in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) sometimes has two hepatic arteries. This study aimed to introduce arterial-blood gas (ABG) test on the decision on whether to reconstruct a single or both arteries in LDLT. Methods: Patients with a right lobe graft with two hepatic arteries were enrolled from the prospectively maintained database of our institution. After anastomosis of one of two arteries, the back-bleeding from the second hepatic artery was taken for ABG test. Depending on the results, the second artery was anastomosed or ligated. Results: Between January 2012 and December 2017, a total of 372 patients underwent LDLT, and 21 living donors had two right hepatic arteries. Based on ABG test results, a single anastomosis was created in 15 recipients while double anastomoses were performed in the remaining 6 recipients. All the patients had an uneventful recovery and were discharged in good conditions. Neither hepatic artery thrombosis nor liver dysfunction was observed during the median follow-up of 26 months (range, 6–71 months). The overall incidence of biliary complications was 9.5% (2/21). Bile leakage arose in one patient with two hepatic artery reconstructions, and the patient subsequently developed biliary stricture. Biliary stricture occurred in another patient with one hepatic artery reconstruction. The biliary complications were successfully managed with endoscopic or percutaneous intervention. Conclusions: ABG test provides a good measure for deciding whether to reconstruct single or both arteries in LDLT.

We present the first cirrhotic patient who underwent liver transplantation (LT) and presented a hepatic artery thrombosis of the graft due to Aspergillus fumigatus, within the first month of LT. This culminated in graft loss, re-transplant with multiple biliary and infectious complications. To our knowledge, this is a case report of an early hepatic artery thrombosis due to Aspergillus fumigatus in an infection-free patient. Keywords: Aspergillus fumigatus, Hepatic artery thrombosis, Liver transplantation

Background. Split liver transplantation (SLT) addresses donor shortages by providing 2 partial grafts from a single donor liver. Arterial reconstruction using an interposition graft facilitates the use of split grafts with difficult recipient anatomy. Its use, however, remains controversial because of a reported increased risk of complications. Methods. A retrospective review of the prospectively maintained Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit database was performed. Donor, recipient, operative, and complications data for adults receiving an SLT between July 2002 and November 2019 were extracted. Results. Arterial reconstruction required an interposition graft in 46 of 155 patients. Overall graft and patient survival were not significantly different between the groups with 1-, 3-, and 5-y graft survivals of 82%, 77%, and 69% for those with interposition grafts and 86%, 79%, and 77% for those without interposition grafts, respectively (P = 0.499). There were more cut liver bile leaks in the interposition graft group (26% versus 9%, P = 0.004), but otherwise, no significant differences in the rate of biliary complications (39% versus 29% P = 0.200), hepatic artery thrombosis (7% versus 10%, P = 0.545), or hepatic artery stenosis (13% versus 10%, P = 0.518). Conclusions. Liberal use of interposition grafts for arterial reconstruction in SLT is safe and does not result in increased complications.

Introduction Post-transplant hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) can lead serious complications of are derived from long arterial ischemic time. However, there has been few reports regarding fate of intraoperative HAT during adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT). Methods From 2000 to 2019, 1,355 recipients underwent ALDLT in Seoul National University Hospital. All patients with no intraoperative arterial flow were managed by redoing hepatic artery anastomosis. Survival outcomes and the rates of biliary complication of patients with intraoperative HAT were compared with others without HAT and with postoperative HAT. Median follow-up period was 89 months. Results Intraoperative HAT was developed in 45 cases (3.3%). Hepatic artery reanastomosis was performed once in 33 cases (73.3%), for more than 2 times in 12 cases (26.6%). Among 45 patients with intraoperative HAT, postoperative HAT was detected in 6 cases (13.3%). All patients underwent redo arterial reconstruction, but technical success rate was 50.0%. Overall graft survival rates were lower in patients with intraoperative HAT (93.3%) than others without HAT (98.0%) (p = 0.026), but higher than in patients with postoperative HAT (88.9%) (p = 0.001). However, patient survival rates were similar among three groups (p = 0.269). There was no difference in biliary complication between patients with intraoperative HAT (33.3%) and the others without HAT (32.1%) (p = 0.945), lower than patients with postoperative HAT (55.5%, p = 0.011). Conclusions Intraoperative HAT after ALDLT did not affect biliary complication and patient survival, but is significantly associated with recurrent postoperative HAT and graft failure. Patients with intraoperative HAT in ALDLT should be intensively monitored for HAT and graft dysfunction.

Understanding of outcomes for patients relisted for ischemic cholangiopathy following a donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver transplant (LT) will help standardization of a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease exception scheme for retransplantation. Early relisting (E-RL) for DCD graft failure caused by primary nonfunction (PNF) or hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) was defined as relisting ≤14 days after DCD LT, and late relisting (L-RL) due to biliary complications was defined as relisting 14 days to 3 years after DCD LT. Of 3908 DCD LTs performed nationally between 2002 and 2016, 540 (13.8%) patients were relisted within 3 years of transplant (168 [4.3%] in the E-RL group, 372 [9.5%] in the L-RL group). The E-RL and L-RL groups had waitlist mortality rates of 15.4% and 10.5%, respectively, at 3 mo and 16.1% and 14.3%, respectively, at 1 year. Waitlist mortality in the L-RL group was higher than mortality and delisted rates for patients with exception points for both hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) at 3- to 12-mo time points (p < 0.001). Waitlist outcomes differed in patients with early DCD graft failure caused by PNF or HAT compared with those with late DCD graft failure attributed to biliary complications. In L-RL, higher rates of waitlist mortality were noted compared with patients listed with exception points for HCC or HPS.

Background: The reconstruction of hepatic artery (HA) is most complex step in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) due to smaller diameter of the artery and increased risk of HA related complications. Due to smaller diameter of the HA, many centres use microsurgical technique with interrupted sutures for arterial anastomosis. Aim of our study was to retrospectively investigate the outcomes after HA reconstruction performed under magnifying loupes using “parachute technique”. Materials and Methods: From August 2002 to 31st August 2016, LDLT was performed in 766 recipients. HA reconstruction for initial 25 LDLT surgeries was performed using microsurgery technique (Era I). From May 2007 till date, HA reconstruction was performed in 741 recipients by a “parachute technique” under surgical loupes (Era II). Results: HA reconstruction was performed using surgical loupes in 737 adults (Male:Female, 526:211) and 4 pediatric patients (Male:Female, 3:1). Average diameter of the donor graft HA was 2.8 mm (range,1 to 6.5 mm). The most notable factor in this era was quick HA anastomosis procedure with a mean time of 10 ± 5 minutes (range, 5-30 minutes). In Era II, nine patients (1.21%) developed hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) whereas 2 patients developed non-thrombotic HA related complications. Extra-anatomic HA reconstruction was performed in 14 patients due to either primary HA anastomosis failure or poor caliber recipient HA. Conclusions: Use of magnifying surgical loupes to perform HA reconstruction is safe, feasible, and yields low incidence of HA related complications. The “Parachute Technique” for HA reconstruction can achieve a speedy reconstruction without increasing risk of HAT. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The successful outcome in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is critically dependent on the uncompromised hepatic graft blood inflow. Arterial conduits represent a good solution in cases where conventional revascularisation is not possible. The purpose of this systematic review is to analyse the published evidence on the use of arterial conduits in adult OLT. After review of the Pubmed and EMBASE databases, 19 relevant studies were identified and analysed. Even though patient survival was comparable, most large studies reported worse 1-, 3- and 5-year graft survival rates compared to grafts with standard arterial revascularisation. Primary grafts were more commonly affected than re-grafts. Early and late hepatic artery thrombosis occurred more commonly, while the use of an arterial conduit was identified as an independent risk factor. The overall biliary complications were comparable, however, ischaemic cholangiopathy was encountered about 3 times more in patients with arterial conduits and strongly correlated with the occurrence of late HAT. In conclusion, the use of arterial conduit is a useful option in adult OLT in cases that the conventional revascularisation technique cannot be used or results in suboptimal arterial inflow. More studies directly addressing issues such as pre-operative evaluation regarding the need for arterial conduit, the types of vessels used, positioning of the conduit and post-operative management are required.