1. Separation of Control and Data Transmissions in 5G Networks May Not be Beneficial
- Author
-
Jamie Evans, Hazer Inaltekin, and Zainab R. Zaidi
- Subjects
Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI) ,FOS: Computer and information sciences ,Wireless network ,business.industry ,Computer science ,Energy management ,Applied Mathematics ,Legacy system ,Separation (aeronautics) ,Cellular traffic ,020206 networking & telecommunications ,02 engineering and technology ,Computer Science Applications ,Computer Science - Networking and Internet Architecture ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,Wireless ,Electrical and Electronic Engineering ,business ,5G ,Data transmission ,Computer network - Abstract
The logical separation of control signaling from data transmission in a mobile cellular network has been shown to have significant energy saving potential compared with the legacy systems. As a result, there has been a lot of focus in recent years on development and realization of separation architectures. Our study, however, shows that the energy savings of separation architecture remain under 16-17% when compared with legacy systems and this gain falls to a mere 7% when both architectures are realized under a CloudRAN (CRAN) setting. Moreover, when we strategically place some small base-stations (SBSs) to cover the area in a densely deployed scenario and allow all other base-stations (BSs) to be used only on-demand, the system consumes much less energy than the separation architecture. While we expected that most equipment would be shut down during nights, our study shows that around 70% of the small cells are required to be active to serve randomly distributed minimum data load, i.e., active mobile equipment. Contemporary mobile traffic is predominantly data which does not go to extremely low levels during nights. We discuss, in detail, the assumptions, their implications, and the effects of system parameter values on our conclusions.
- Published
- 2021