1. Effectiveness and healthcare costs of eribulin versus capecitabine among metastatic breast cancer patients in Taiwan
- Author
-
Chun Nan Kuo, Yu Ju Lin, and Yu Ko
- Subjects
Oncology ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,Health care ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Neoplasm Metastasis ,Claim database analysis ,RC254-282 ,Aged, 80 and over ,education.field_of_study ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,General Medicine ,Health Care Costs ,Real-world study ,Ketones ,Middle Aged ,Metastatic breast cancer ,Treatment period ,Treatment Outcome ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Female ,Original Article ,medicine.drug ,Eribulin ,Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Population ,Taiwan ,Antineoplastic Agents ,Breast Neoplasms ,Drug Costs ,Capecitabine ,03 medical and health sciences ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,education ,Furans ,Aged ,Chemotherapy ,business.industry ,medicine.disease ,Discontinuation ,chemistry ,Quality of Life ,Surgery ,business - Abstract
Objective To compare the real-world effectiveness and costs of eribulin to those of capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes. Methods This study extracted data from the Health and Welfare Database in Taiwan to identify MBC patients, and then eribulin and capecitabine users were matched at a 1:1 ratio by age, residential region, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and molecular subtype of BC cell. The overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) curves were plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method. Healthcare utilization and costs between the two groups were compared. Results A total of 24,550 MBC patients were identified, and 298 patients were enrolled in each group after matching. The median OS was 11.8 months for eribulin (95%CI: 11.5–13.5 months) and 15.2 months for capecitabine (95%CI: 15.3–17.9 months; HR = 1.7, p 4 prior chemotherapy agents (OS: HR 1.1, 95%CI 0.8–1.5; TTD: HR 1.2, 95%CI 0.9–1.7). The total healthcare costs per patient during the treatment period were NT$580,523.8 for eribulin versus NT$497,223.8 for capecitabine (p, Highlights • This study provides a better understanding of the effectiveness of eribulin in refractory MBC patients. • Despite the potential biases, our study results suggest that eribulin has shorter OS and TTD when compared to capecitabine. • The difference no longer exists when the drugs are both initiated as sixth- or later-lines of chemotherapy. • The rate of G-CSF use and the total medical and medication costs were found to be higher with eribulin treatment.
- Published
- 2021