1. Colchicine for Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- Author
-
Liao, Chunfeng, Liu, Ping, Zhou, Yun, Lu, Di, and Wu, Qi
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Coronary Disease ,General Medicine ,Odds ratio ,Cochrane Library ,Placebo ,medicine.disease ,Tubulin Modulators ,Confidence interval ,law.invention ,Treatment Outcome ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Meta-analysis ,Internal medicine ,Humans ,Medicine ,Surgery ,Myocardial infarction ,Colchicine ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Adverse effect ,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - Abstract
Background: The efficacy of colchicine administration for coronary heart disease remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of colchicine administration versus placebo on treatment efficacy for coronary heart disease. Methods: We have searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases through May 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of colchicine administration versus placebo in patients with coronary heart disease. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Results: Six RCTs involving 6,321 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control groups for coronary heart disease, colchicine intervention can significantly reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (odds ratio [OR] 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59 to 0.92; P = .006), but revealed no obvious impact on mortality (OR=0.93; 95% CI=0.63 to 1.36; P = .69), serious adverse events (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.31 to 1.61; P = .41), or restenosis (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.64; P = .95). Conclusions: Colchicine treatment may be effective to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease.
- Published
- 2021