1. Short-term Effects of Neurodynamic Techniques for Treating Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis
- Author
-
Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Iván Cavero-Redondo, Sergio Núñez de Arenas-Arroyo, Celia Álvarez-Bueno, Sara Reina-Gutiérrez, and Ana Torres-Costoso
- Subjects
Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Rehabilitation ,Hand Strength ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Symptom severity ,Pain ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ,Term (time) ,Nerve compression syndrome ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,Neural mobilization ,Meta-analysis ,Humans ,Medicine ,Functional status ,business ,Carpal tunnel syndrome ,Physical Therapy Modalities - Abstract
We aimed (1) to estimate the short-term effect (postintervention period) of neurodynamic techniques on pain, symptom severity, functional status, electrophysiological status, grip strength, and pinch strength in people with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS); and (2) to estimate the effect of neurodynamic techniques compared to other physical therapy modalities and surgical interventions.Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis.We searched the MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and Scopus databases from their inception to September 2020.We included randomized controlled trials reporting the effect of neurodynamic techniques on pain, symptom severity, function, distal motor latency, grip strength, and pinch strength in people with CTS.Using the DerSimonian-Laird method, we estimated pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to judge the certainty of the evidence of each pairwise comparison.There were 22 trials included (n = 1203 people with CTS; mean age, 26.0 to 57.9 years; mean symptom duration, 4.1 to 62.8 months). There was very low-certainty evidence of neurodynamic techniques improving pain (SMD, -0.54; 95% CI: -0.95, -0.13) and function (SMD, -0.35; 95% CI: -0.61, -0.09). There was no significant effect on symptom severity (very low certainty), distal motor latency (very low certainty), and grip and pinch strength (low certainty).Neurodynamic techniques were effective for improving pain and function in people with CTS, albeit with very low-certainty evidence.
- Published
- 2021