1. Responsiveness of afferent renal nerve units in renovascular hypertension in rats
- Author
-
Nada Cordasic, Karl F. Hilgers, Kristina Rodionova, Kerstin Amann, Roland E. Schmieder, Roland Veelken, Christian Ott, Johannes Doellner, Salman Rafii-Tabrizi, Mario Schiffer, Tilmann Ditting, Peter Linz, and Annalena Karl
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Physiology ,Clinical Biochemistry ,Stimulation ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Kidney ,Renovascular hypertension ,Rats, Sprague-Dawley ,03 medical and health sciences ,Glomerulonephritis ,0302 clinical medicine ,Dorsal root ganglion ,In vivo ,Ganglia, Spinal ,Physiology (medical) ,Internal medicine ,Current clamp ,Animals ,Medicine ,Tonic (music) ,ddc:610 ,Afferent Pathways ,business.industry ,medicine.disease ,Rats ,Electrophysiology ,Hypertension, Renovascular ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Endocrinology ,business ,Nephritis ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Previous data suggest that renal afferent nerve activity is increased in hypertension exerting sympathoexcitatory effects. Hence, we wanted to test the hypothesis that in renovascular hypertension, the activity of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons with afferent projections from the kidneys is augmented depending on the degree of intrarenal inflammation. For comparison, a nonhypertensive model of mesangioproliferative nephritis was investigated. Renovascular hypertension (2-kidney, 1-clip [2K1C]) was induced by unilateral clipping of the left renal artery and mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis (anti-Thy1.1) by IV injection of a 1.75-mg/kg BW OX-7 antibody. Neuronal labeling (dicarbocyanine dye [DiI]) in all rats allowed identification of renal afferent dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. A current clamp was used to characterize neurons as tonic (sustained action potential [AP] firing) or phasic (1–4 AP) upon stimulation by current injection. All kidneys were investigated using standard morphological techniques. DRG neurons exhibited less often tonic response if in vivo axonal input from clipped kidneys was received (30.4% vs. 61.2% control, p p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF