4 results on '"Sotiris Posporelis"'
Search Results
2. Inflammatory and blood gas markers of COVID-19 delirium compared to non-COVID-19 delirium: a cross-sectional study
- Author
-
Tae Hyun Oh, Jonathan Rogers, Megan Castro, Glyn Lewis, Aman Saini, Anthony S. David, Sotiris Posporelis, Matthew Butler, Dory Anthony Ghanem, and Chun Chiang Sin Fai Lam
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,Cross-sectional study ,Inflammation ,behavioral disciplines and activities ,pCO2 ,Internal medicine ,mental disorders ,medicine ,Humans ,In patient ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,COVID-19 ,Delirium ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,C-Reactive Protein ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Respiratory failure ,Arterial blood ,Geriatrics and Gerontology ,Pshychiatric Mental Health ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Gerontology ,Biomarkers - Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to find the association of inflammation and respiratory failure with delirium in COVID-19 patients. We compare the inflammatory and arterial blood gas markers between patients with COVID-19 delirium and delirium in other medical disorders. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used the CHART-DEL, a validated research tool, to screen patients for delirium retrospectively from clinical notes. Inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP) and white cell count (WBC), and the partial pressures of oxygen (PO2) and carbon dioxide (PCO2) were compared between patients with COVID-19 delirium and delirium in other medical disorders. RESULTS: In bivariate analysis, CRP (mg/L) was significantly higher in the COVID-19 group, (81.7 ± 80.0 vs. 58.8 ± 87.7, p = 0.04), and WBC (109/L) was significantly lower (7.44 ± 3.42 vs. 9.71 ± 5.45, p = 0.04). The geometric mean of CRP in the COVID-19 group was 140% higher in multiple linear regression (95% CI = 7-439%, p = 0.03) with age and sex as covariates. There were no significant differences in pO2 or pCO2 across groups. CONCLUSION: The association between higher CRP and COVID-19 in patients with delirium may suggest an inflammatory basis for delirium in COVID-19. Our findings may assist clinicians in establishing whether delirium is due to COVID-19, which may improve management and outcomes of infected patients.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Joint BAP NAPICU evidence-based consensus guidelines for the clinical management of acute disturbance: De-escalation and rapid tranquillisation
- Author
-
Kai G. Kahl, Carol Paton, Brodie Paterson, Julie C Haste, Bernard Fox, Marina Garriga, Sotiris Posporelis, David Taylor, Laura Woods, Birgit Völlm, Aileen O'Brien, Hamish McAllister-Williams, Roland Dix, Thomas R. E. Barnes, Caroline Parker, Faisil Sethi, Eduard Vieta, Anne Lingford-Hughes, Maxine X. Patel, Charlotte Wilson-Jones, and Luiz Dratcu
- Subjects
Olanzapine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Disturbance (geology) ,Evidence-based practice ,Time Factors ,020205 medical informatics ,Psychomotor agitation ,Psychological intervention ,02 engineering and technology ,Violence ,03 medical and health sciences ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,0302 clinical medicine ,Forensic psychiatry ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,medicine ,Humans ,Pharmacology (medical) ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Intensive care medicine ,Psychomotor Agitation ,Pharmacology ,Inpatient care ,business.industry ,Mental Disorders ,Lorazepam ,030227 psychiatry ,Aggression ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Anti-Anxiety Agents ,Acute Disease ,Joint (building) ,Pshychiatric Mental Health ,medicine.symptom ,business ,De-escalation ,medicine.drug ,Antipsychotic Agents - Abstract
The British Association for Psychopharmacology and the National Association of Psychiatric Intensive Care and Low Secure Units developed this joint evidence-based consensus guideline for the clinical management of acute disturbance. It includes recommendations for clinical practice and an algorithm to guide treatment by healthcare professionals with various options outlined according to their route of administration and category of evidence. Fundamental overarching principles are included and highlight the importance of treating the underlying disorder. There is a focus on three key interventions: de-escalation, pharmacological interventions pre-rapid tranquillisation and rapid tranquillisation (intramuscular and intravenous). Most of the evidence reviewed relates to emergency psychiatric care or acute psychiatric adult inpatient care, although we also sought evidence relevant to other common clinical settings including the general acute hospital and forensic psychiatry. We conclude that the variety of options available for the management of acute disturbance goes beyond the standard choices of lorazepam, haloperidol and promethazine and includes oral-inhaled loxapine, buccal midazolam, as well as a number of oral antipsychotics in addition to parenteral options of intramuscular aripiprazole, intramuscular droperidol and intramuscular olanzapine. Intravenous options, for settings where resuscitation equipment and trained staff are available to manage medical emergencies, are also included.
- Published
- 2018
4. Royal College examination fees surplus
- Author
-
Isabel McMullen, Brad Hillier, Surya Goudaman, Marcella Fok, William Lee, Aspasia Paspali, John Bainton, Simon Harrison, Rebecca Marriot, James Hecker, Jacek Donocik, Ricardo Sainz-Fuertes, Christoph Mueller, Adam Kasparek, Catia Acosta, Geraldine Lines, Catherine Polling, Ian McClelland, Anna Barnes, Wojtek Wojcik, Sarah Stringer, Daniel Hume, Tom Walker-Tilley, Valeria Mondelli, Catherine Louise Murphy, Gregory Shields, Sulagna Chakrabarti, Jonathan Huntley, Kathleen Levick, Alex B. Thomson, Angeliki Zoumpouli, Deirdre MacManus, Elizabeth Hunt, David Nelson, Sarah Dorrington, Timothy R Nicholson, Vishaal Goel, David Baird, Lauren Gavaghan, Katrina A. S. Davis, Lindsay Banham, Pratima Singh, Caroline Biddle, Jalon Quinn, Omar Murad, Mark Ashraph, Jemima Gregory, Muhammad Firdosi, Rosemary Humphreys, Tom Pollak, Duncan Harding, Muffazal Rawala, Christopher Garrett, Omer Moghaby, Vanessa Loftus, Lena Rane, Ben McNeillis, Areti Pavlidou, Sotiris Posporelis, Felicity Wood, Ben Goldacre, Annabel Price, Jenna Hathway, Tom Dixon, Nicolas Crossley Karmelic, Amritha Mishra, Tom Lavender, Ana Morelli, Alexander Tulloch, and Sarah Nyame
- Subjects
Finance ,03 medical and health sciences ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,0302 clinical medicine ,business.industry ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,business ,Profit (economics) ,030227 psychiatry - Abstract
At the current level of membership examination fees at the Royal College of Psychiatrists, a resident in psychiatry who passes every part first time pays a total of £2136.[1][1] These costs are intended to cover only expenses rather than to generate profit, a message which many of us have accepted
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.