1. Optimal number of needle punctures in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for gastric subepithelial lesions without rapid on-site evaluation
- Author
-
Kunihiro Hosono, Kenichi Kawana, Masato Suzuki, Atsushi Nakajima, Hajime Nagase, Kensuke Kubota, and Yusuke Sekino
- Subjects
Image-Guided Biopsy ,Endoscopic ultrasound ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Stomach ,Ultrasound ,Retrospective cohort study ,Punctures ,General Medicine ,Site evaluation ,digestive system diseases ,Confidence interval ,Fine needle biopsy ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Needles ,Biopsy ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Radiology ,business ,Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration ,Retrospective Studies - Abstract
The utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) has been reported. In this study, we examined the optimal number of needle punctures during EUS-FNB for gastric SELs without rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE). The factors that allowed for a single needle puncture to arrive at the correct diagnosis were also analyzed. We conducted a retrospective study of all patients who underwent EUS-FNB to evaluate gastric SELs between April 2015 and September 2020; 51 patients with 57 gastric SELs were enrolled. The optimal number of needle punctures was determined when additional needle passes did not increase diagnostic sensitivity by more than 10%. Factors allowing for only a single needle puncture to arrive at the correct diagnosis were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. EUS-FNB resulted in a definitive final diagnosis in 48 of 57 lesions (84%). Lesions in the gastric body (odds ratio [OR] 6.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.75–21.6; P
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF