1. Can a Multistakeholder Prioritization Structure Support Regulatory Decision Making? A Review of Pediatric Oncology Strategy Forums Reflecting on Challenges and Opportunities of this Concept
- Author
-
Pierre Demolis, Franca Ligas, G. Lesa, Maaike van Dartel, Pia Annunen, Dominik Karres, Koen Norga, Ralf Herold, Sara Galluzzo, Violeta Stoyanova-Beninska, and Olga Kholmanskikh van Criekingen
- Subjects
Value (ethics) ,Prioritization ,education ,Decision Making ,Antineoplastic Agents ,030226 pharmacology & pharmacy ,Risk Assessment ,Structure support ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Government Agencies ,Stakeholder Participation ,Agency (sociology) ,Pediatric oncology ,Humans ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Policy Making ,Drug Approval ,Pharmacology ,Health Services Needs and Demand ,business.industry ,Health Priorities ,Pharmacology. Therapy ,Age Factors ,Public relations ,Rare cancer ,Europe ,Drug development ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Patient Safety ,business ,Shared responsibility ,Needs Assessment - Abstract
Timely and successful drug development for rare cancer populations, such as pediatric oncology, requires consolidated efforts in the spirit of shared responsibility. In order to advance tailored development efforts, the concept of multistakeholder Strategy Forum involving industry, academia, patient organizations, and regulators has been developed. In this study, we review the first five pediatric oncology Strategy Forums co-organized by the European Medicines Agency between 2017 and 2020, reflecting on the outcomes and the evolution of the concept over time and providing an outline of how a "safe space" for multistakeholder engagement facilitated by regulators could be of potential value beyond pediatric oncology drug development.
- Published
- 2020