Search

Introduction In the 2-year CARE-MS trials (NCT00530348; NCT00548405) in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis, alemtuzumab showed superior efficacy versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a. Efficacy was maintained in two consecutive extensions (NCT00930553; NCT02255656). This post hoc analysis compared disability outcomes over 9 years among alemtuzumab-treated patients according to whether they experienced confirmed disability improvement (CDI) or worsening (CDW) or neither CDI nor CDW. Methods CARE-MS patients were randomized to receive two alemtuzumab courses (12 mg/day; 5 days at baseline; 3 days at 12 months), with additional as-needed 3-day courses in the extensions. CDI or CDW were defined as ≥ 1.0-point decrease or increase, respectively, in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score from core study baseline confirmed over 6 months, assessed in patients with baseline EDSS score ≥ 2.0. Improved or stable EDSS scores were defined as ≥ 1-point decrease or ≤ 0.5-point change (either direction), respectively, from core study baseline. Functional systems (FS) scores were also assessed. Results Of 511 eligible patients, 43% experienced CDI and 34% experienced CDW at any time through year 9 (patients experiencing both CDI and CDW were counted in each individual group); 29% experienced neither CDI nor CDW. At year 9, patients with CDI had a −0.58-point mean EDSS score change from baseline; 88% had stable or improved EDSS scores. Improvements occurred across all FS, primarily in sensory, pyramidal, and cerebellar domains. Patients with CDW had a +1.71-point mean EDSS score change; 16% had stable or improved EDSS scores. Patients with neither CDI nor CDW had a −0.10-point mean EDSS score change; 98% had stable or improved EDSS scores. Conclusion CDI achievement at any point during the CARE-MS studies was associated with improved disability at year 9, highlighting the potential of alemtuzumab to change the multiple sclerosis course. Conversely, CDW at any point was associated with worsened disability at year 9. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40120-021-00262-3.

Background: Relapses are common in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) even after the use of disease-modifying therapies. Repository corticotropin injection (RCI), plasmapheresis (PMP), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) may be utilized as alternative therapies in the management of MS relapse. There is a lack of health economic studies on these alternative therapies for the acute exacerbations of MS. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost per response of RCI compared with PMP or IVIg from the United States (US) commercial payer perspective. Methods: Costs and response rates were sourced from published peer-reviewed observational studies. The cost of care included MS-related inpatient, outpatient, and medication costs. Treatment response was defined as no evidence of additional relapse treatment or procedure claims within 30 days after treatment. The cost per response for each treatment was calculated by dividing the total annual cost of care by the proportion of patients with resolved relapse for each treatment. The incremental cost per response ratio was calculated by dividing the difference in costs and the proportion of responses for RCI versus PMP or IVIg. One-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA) was conducted for both costs and response rates. All included costs were inflated to the 2019 US dollars. Results: With a lower total annual cost of care and a higher response rate, RCI had a lower cost per response (US$141,970) compared with PMP or IVIg (US$253,331). RCI had a lower cost per response even when more stringent estimates for RCI were applied in the OWSA. The annual cost of care had a greater influence on the cost per response in the OWSA. Conclusions: Based on the estimates from the real-world evidence, our economic evaluation suggests that RCI may have real-world clinical and economic benefits for patients with MS relapse who fail on corticosteroid therapy.

Introduction In clinical trials of alemtuzumab, autoimmune thyroid adverse events (AEs) were frequent. Here, we assess the impact of thyroid AEs on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in alemtuzumab-treated patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods In phase 3 CARE-MS I (NCT00530348) and II (NCT00548405) trials, patients with RRMS were administered alemtuzumab 12 mg/day on 5 consecutive days at baseline and on 3 consecutive days 12 months later. Patients could participate in an extension study (NCT00930553) through year 6. HRQL was assessed at baseline and annually using the Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS), EuroQoL-5 Dimension Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS), and 36-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-36) questionnaires. Outcomes were analyzed in patients with or without thyroid AEs (nonserious or serious). A subset of patients with thyroid AEs was analyzed to assess HRQL before and during the onset of thyroid AEs. Results A total of 811 CARE-MS patients were treated with alemtuzumab. Of these, 342 (42%) patients experienced thyroid AEs over 6 years; serious thyroid AEs occurred in 44 (5%) patients. At year 6, HRQL outcomes generally remained slightly improved or similar to core study baseline in alemtuzumab-treated patients with or without thyroid AEs: FAMS (least-squares mean change from baseline without thyroid AEs, 0.7; with nonserious thyroid AEs, 5.1; with serious thyroid AEs, − 5.3), EQ-5D VAS (2.0; 3.0; − 6.8), SF-36 mental component summary (MCS [0.6; 1.6; − 2.8]), SF-36 physical component summary (PCS [0.8; 1.0; 1.1]). Over 6 years, 63–82% of patients in each group had improved/stable SF-36 MCS and PCS scores. Among patients with thyroid AE onset in year 3 (peak incidence), there were minimal differences between HRQL outcomes before onset (year 2) and after onset (year 3). Conclusion Autoimmune thyroid AEs (serious and nonserious) had minimal impact on HRQL in alemtuzumab-treated patients. These data may aid therapeutic decisions in patients with relapsing MS. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40120-020-00191-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users., Plain Language Summary This study looked at alemtuzumab, an approved treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS). People who receive alemtuzumab may develop thyroid problems. The researchers wanted to know whether people who developed thyroid problems with alemtuzumab had a worse quality of life compared with those who did not. The researchers measured quality of life using a questionnaire. The questionnaire looked at people’s physical, social, and psychological well-being over 6 years. A total of 811 people with MS treated with alemtuzumab took part in this study. Of these, 469 people (58%) did not develop thyroid problems and 342 people (42%) developed thyroid problems. The thyroid problems were serious in 44 people. The researchers observed that thyroid problems during alemtuzumab treatment did not make quality of life worse in most people. Some people with serious thyroid problems had worsened quality of life; this was mostly among people who required certain treatments for their thyroid problems. Quality of life did not change much in people while the thyroid problems were ongoing. This study shows that thyroid problems after alemtuzumab treatment for MS have little negative impact on quality of life for most people. These findings may help healthcare providers make decisions about MS treatment. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40120-020-00191-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Samuel F Hunter,1 Jas Bindra,2 Ishveen Chopra,3 John Niewoehner,4 Mary P Panaccio,4 George J Wan4 1Advanced Neurosciences Institute, Franklin, TN, USA; 2Falcon Research Group, North Potomac, MD, USA; 3Manticore Consultancy, Bethesda, MD, USA; 4Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Hampton, NJ, USACorrespondence: George J WanMallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, 53 I-78 Frontage Road, Hampton, NJ, 08827, USAEmail george.wan@mnk.comBackground: Relapses are common among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) despite treatment with disease-modifying therapies. Repository corticotropin injection (RCI, Acthar® Gel), plasmapheresis (PMP), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) are alternative therapies for MS relapse. There is a dearth of economic assessments of these therapies for the acute exacerbations of MS. This study estimated the cost-effectiveness of RCI compared to PMP or IVIg.Methods: A Markov state-transition model compared outcomes (costs, relapses, remission, and utilities) with RCI versus PMP or IVIg for the acute exacerbations in MS. The model was developed from the United States (US) payer and societal perspectives over one to three years. Patients initiated on alternative therapies were evaluated in one-day increments for the first 30 days during treatment. The model assumes the natural history of MS after treatment in the first month, adjusting for the effect of treatment. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The uncertainty in model parameters was evaluated in probabilistic sensitivity analyses.Results: In the base case, RCI has an ICER of USD 42,078 per QALY compared to PMP over one year from the payer perspective and is dominant over two and three years; RCI is dominant compared to PMP from the societal perspective over all three years. Compared to IVIg, RCI is a dominant strategy from both payer and societal perspectives over all three years. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis supports the base case findings, suggesting that RCI may be cost-effective versus PMP and IVIg for acute exacerbations in MS.Conclusion: RCI is a cost-effective alternative treatment for MS relapses compared to PMP and IVIg from the US payer and societal perspectives.Keywords: Acthar® Gel, cost-effectiveness analysis, acute exacerbation, multiple sclerosis, quality-adjusted life-year, repository corticotropin injection

Lysophospholipids are a class of bioactive lipid molecules that produce their effects through various G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) is perhaps the most studied lysophospholipid and has a role in a wide range of physiological and pathophysiological events, via signalling through five distinct GPCR subtypes, S1PR1 to S1PR5. Previous and continuing investigation of the S1P pathway has led to the approval of three S1PR modulators, fingolimod, siponimod and ozanimod, as medicines for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), as well as the identification of new S1PR modulators currently in clinical development, including ponesimod and etrasimod. S1PR modulators have complex effects on S1PRs, in some cases acting both as traditional agonists as well as agonists that produce functional antagonism. S1PR subtype specificity influences their downstream effects, including aspects of their benefit:risk profile. Some S1PR modulators are prodrugs, which require metabolic modification such as phosphorylation via sphingosine kinases, resulting in different pharmacokinetics and bioavailability, contrasting with others that are direct modulators of the receptors. The complex interplay of these characteristics dictates the clinical profile of S1PR modulators. This review focuses on the S1P pathway, the characteristics and S1PR binding profiles of S1PR modulators, the mechanisms of action of S1PR modulators with regard to immune cell trafficking and neuroprotection in MS, together with a summary of the clinical effectiveness of the S1PR modulators that are approved or in late-stage development for patients with MS. Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator therapy for multiple sclerosis: differential downstream receptor signalling and clinical profile effects (MP4 65540 kb) Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40265-020-01431-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background Alemtuzumab efficacy versus subcutaneous interferon-beta-1a (SC IFNB-1a) was demonstrated over 2 years in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, with continued efficacy over 7 additional years. Alemtuzumab is included as a recommended treatment for patients with highly active disease (HAD) by the American Academy of Neurology Practice Guidelines, and the label indication in Europe was recently restricted to the treatment of HAD patients. There is currently no consensus definition for HAD, and alemtuzumab efficacy across various HAD definitions has not been explored previously. Objectives In this post hoc analysis, we assess the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab in Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif(R)Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis (CARE-MS) trial patients who met criteria for at least one of four separate definitions of HAD (one primary and three alternatives). Over 2 years, alemtuzumab-treated HAD patients were compared with SC IFNB-1a-treated HAD patients, with additional 7-year follow-up in patients from the alemtuzumab arm. Methods Patients in the CARE-MS studies received either alemtuzumab (baseline: 5 days; 12 months later: 3 days) or SC IFNB-1a (3 times weekly). Alemtuzumab-treated patients who enrolled in the extensions could receive additional courses >= 12 months apart. Four definitions of HAD were applied to assess alemtuzumab efficacy: the pre-specified primary definition (two or more relapses in the year prior to baseline and at least one gadolinium [Gd]-enhancing lesion at baseline) and three alternative definitions that focused on relapse, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or prior treatment response criteria. Efficacy outcomes were annualized relapse rate, change in Expanded Disability Status Scale score, 6-month confirmed disability worsening, 6-month confirmed disability improvement, MRI disease activity, and brain volume change. Adverse events were summarized for HAD patients meeting the primary definition. Results In the pooled CARE-MS population, 208 alemtuzumab-treated patients met the primary HAD definition. Annualized relapse rate was 0.27 in years 0-2 and 0.16 in years 3-9. Over 9 years, 62% of patients were free of 6-month confirmed disability worsening, 50% had 6-month confirmed disability improvement, and median cumulative change in brain volume was - 2.15%. During year 9, 62% had no evidence of disease activity, and 69% were free of MRI disease activity. Similar efficacy outcomes were observed using an alternative relapse-driven HAD definition. For patients meeting alternative HAD definitions focused on either higher MRI lesion counts or disease activity while on prior therapy, reduced efficacy for some endpoints was seen. Safety was consistent with the overall CARE-MS population through year 9. Conclusions Over 9 years, alemtuzumab efficacy was maintained in CARE-MS HAD patients based on four HAD definitions. These results support intervention with alemtuzumab in patients with early indicators of HAD, including frequent relapse without high MRI activity. No safety signals were observed over 9 years that were unique to the HAD populations. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers NCT00530348; NCT00548405; NCT00930553; NCT02255656. The CARE-MS I, CARE-MS II, CAMMS03409, and TOPAZ studies were funded by Sanofi and Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals. Medical writing support was funded by Sanofi. Ziemssen, T (corresponding author), Univ Clin Carl Gustav Carus, Ctr Clin Neurosci, Fetscherstr 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany. Tjalf.Ziemssen@uniklinikum-dresden.de

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Evidence is needed to understand the effect of fingolimod on slowing down brain atrophy progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients in clinical practice. We investigated the effect of fingolimod on brain atrophy in MS patients with active disease (clinically and/or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) versus no evidence of active disease (NEAD). METHODS MS and clinical outcome and MRI in the United States (MS-MRIUS) is a multicenter, retrospective study that included 590 relapsing-remitting MS patients, who initiated fingolimod, and were followed for a median of 16 months. Patients with active disease at baseline (245, 41.5%) were defined as those who had one or more relapses in the year previous starting fingolimod, and/or displayed gadolinium enhancing lesions(s) at baseline MRI scan, whereas patients with NEAD at baseline (345, 58.5%) did not fulfill these criteria. Annualized percentage brain volume change (PBVC) and percentage lateral ventricle volume change (PLVVC) over the follow-up were analyzed in both groups. RESULTS Over the follow-up, the rate of PBVC was -.38% in active disease and -.25% in NEAD patients (P = .076), whereas PLLVC was 1.76% in active disease and .28% in NEAD patients (P = .046). No changes in timed 25-foot walk (P = .619) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (P = .275) scores or MRI lesion accumulation (P > 0.08) were detected, although the active disease group had a higher proportion of relapses during the follow-up period (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS The study provides real-world evidence that rate of brain atrophy in MS patients with underlying active disease and NEAD in fingolimod treated patients is below the established pathological cutoff for loss of whole brain volume (>-.4%) or expansion of lateral ventricles (> 3.5%).

Background Injectable disease-modifying therapies (iDMTs) are often used as first-line treatments for relapsing multiple sclerosis. Fingolimod is frequently used following treatment with iDMTs. Whether prior iDMT treatment impacts the effectiveness of subsequent fingolimod therapy is unclear. Here, we assessed switching from iDMTs to fingolimod, and the impact of treatment history on fingolimod escalation using data from the 12-month ‘Prospective, Randomized, active-controlled, open-label study to Evaluate patient retention on Fingolimod versus approved first-line disease-modifying thErapies in adults with Relapsing–remitting Multiple Sclerosis’ (PREFERMS). The study design and results at the end of randomized treatment (EoRT) in PREFERMS have been published. Methods Both treatment-naive patients and those who had previously received an iDMT were eligible for enrolment in PREFERMS, and one treatment switch was permitted on study. Pre-specified exploratory analyses compared outcomes in those randomized to fingolimod or to an iDMT at end of study (EoS), which included time spent on randomized and on switch treatment. Post hoc exploratory analyses (unadjusted for multiplicity owing to the large number of comparisons) among patients randomized to an iDMT who switched to fingolimod, compared outcomes longitudinally before (EoRT) and after (EoS) switching, and compared outcomes at EoRT and EoS among subgroups stratified by iDMT-treatment history. Outcomes included brain volume, various measures of gadolinium-enhancing [Gd+] lesion counts, annualized relapse rate (ARR), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) score, patient-reported treatment satisfaction using the Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) and adverse event (AE) rates. Results At EoS, 255 of 439 patients randomized to an iDMT had switched to fingolimod and 27 of 436 patients randomized to fingolimod had switched to an iDMT. By EoS, 44.2% of total treatment exposure in the iDMT group was to fingolimod and the mean time spent on fingolimod in this group was 220 days (approximately 7 months). Outcomes in the fingolimod group at EoS (brain volume, changes in Gd+ lesion counts, ARR, oral SDMT score and MSQ score) were similar to those seen at EoRT, but in the iDMT group these outcomes were more favorable at EoS than at EoRT and were similar to rates seen in the fingolimod group. Among patients who switched from iDMT to fingolimod, there were longitudinal improvements in ARR (EoRT, 0.3 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.2–0.4]; EoS, 0.2 [0.1–0.3]; odds ratio, 0.5 [0.3–0.9]) and in treatment satisfaction (proportion of patients with MSQ > 5; EoRT, 67.4%; EoS, 90.4%; odds ratio, 5.7 [95% CI, 3.4–9.4]) after fingolimod treatment, and changes in brain volume, Gd+ lesion count, and AEs or AEs causing discontinuation were also more favorable at EoS than at EoRT. In all patient groups stratified by iDMT-treatment history, differences in outcomes narrowed or disappeared after fingolimod treatment. Conclusion These analyses indicate that patients in PREFERMS had improved outcomes within months of switching to fingolimod from an iDMT and that improvements occurred irrespective of the number of iDMTs previously administered. These data provide a unique opportunity to explore clinical, radiological and safety outcomes associated with a range of clinically relevant treatment pathways.

Depression is common in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), may confound evaluation of therapeutic effectiveness and may be impacted by MS-specific treatments.First, to assess the impact on depressive symptoms of a switch to fingolimod versus remaining on an injectable disease-modifying therapy (iDMT) in a post-hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from the EPOC study. Secondly, to investigate the underlying Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) factor structure in patients with MS, and estimate treatment differences using the resulting subscales.EPOC was a 6-month, open-label study assessing patient-reported outcomes after switch from iDMT to oral fingolimod 0.5mg versus remaining on iDMT in 1053 patients with relapsing-remitting MS.At end of study (EOS), a greater proportion of patients on fingolimod versus iDMT no longer had BDI-II scores indicating depression (p0.001). Fewer mildly and moderately symptomatic patients developed severe depressive symptoms, and fewer severely symptomatic patients continued to have scores indicating severe depression at EOS on fingolimod versus iDMT (p=0.027, p=0.038, p=0.030, respectively). Two BDI-II subscales were identified and labelled Somatic and Affective; fingolimod demonstrated more reduction on both subscales at EOS versus iDMTs (p0.0001 and p=0.0001, respectively).A switch to fingolimod versus remaining on/switching to another iDMT was associated with an improvement in depressive symptoms in patients with relapsing-remitting MS.

Background The Evaluate Patient OutComes (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01216072) study was conducted in North America to assess patient- and physician-reported treatment satisfaction in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) who received oral fingolimod for 6 months after switching from an injectable disease-modifying therapy (iDMT), without an intervening washout. Methods In this open-label, multicenter study, patients were randomized 3:1 to once-daily fingolimod 0.5 mg or iDMT. The primary study objective was to evaluate differences in satisfaction measured using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication v1.4. Results Of 1053 patients randomized, 790 patients received fingolimod and 263 patients received iDMT. Treatment satisfaction improved significantly in patients who switched to fingolimod compared with those who continued iDMT. Patients also reported significant improvements in health-related quality of life, reduced depression, and reduced fatigue severity after a switch to fingolimod. No difference between the treatment groups was detected on the Patient Reported Indices for MS Activities scale. The safety profile of fingolimod was consistent with that reported in the pivotal phase 3 studies. The most commonly reported adverse events were more prevalent in patients who switched to fingolimod than in those who continued iDMT (headache: 12% vs 3%; fatigue: 12% vs 6%). No significant relationship between lymphocyte counts and infection rates was observed and there was no evidence of additive immune-system effects, which might be expected when switching to a different class of immunomodulatory therapy with no intervening washout. Conclusion Patients who switched from iDMT to fingolimod had significant improvements in most self-reported outcomes compared with those who continued iDMT.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects an estimated 300,000 individuals in the United States. No cure exists and although there is a lack of consensus on management, strategies to modify disease course are available. These strategies involve initiating disease-modifying therapies that have been found to slow disease progression and prevent disability symptoms, thereby improving function for MS patients. The overall goal of early disease management is to intervene prior to irreversible neuronal destruction in order to delay disability progression and improve quality of life. Maintaining a lower level of disability for a longer period of time postpones and ultimately attempts to prevent reaching a level of immobility and irreversible disability. However, due to the complex nature of disease and its unique, individual patient course, no patient can be treated alike and no patient responds to therapy similarly. Therefore, MS research is continuous in its evolution of therapeutic development, focusing on neuroprotective effects and agents with distinctive mechanisms of action allowing for unique safety and efficacy profiles. Investigations include novel oral agents and monoclonal antibodies. Many of the approved agents also are continually being investigated in order to evaluate comparative data, the most appropriate means of implementing subsequent therapy upon failure, responsiveness to therapeutic agent when switched, and long-term safety and efficacy. This multimedia webcast educational activity will cover the current state of MS science, current therapies in MS, emerging treatments in clinical trials for MS as well as differences between physicians in diagnosis and management of MS and their evolving practices.

In this article, we assess the roles and the efficacy of immunopharmacologic agents in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) and other demyelinating disease syndromes. The initial clinical manifestations of demyelinating disease, immunotherapeutic goals, efficacy of individual agents, and specific immunopharmacologic recommendations are discussed. MS and other idiopathic demyelinating disease syndromes can be effectively managed with immunotherapy. Exacerbations are treatable, and the frequency and severity of exacerbations can be reduced. Although some agents have a minor effect on progression of disability, current approaches have not proved to have a major influence on treatment of progressive MS. Immunotherapy for inflammatory demyelinating disease necessitates a high degree of clinical certainty about the diagnosis. Because all available therapeutic agents have limitations and significant toxic effects, careful consideration is necessary before use. Treatment should be individualized on the basis of the clinical course of the disease and the degree of patient disability.

Background Opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome and breast carcinoma were initially described as neurologic and oncologic accompaniments of antineuronal nuclear autoantibody type 2 (ANNA-2, also known as anti-Ri). However, the neurologic spectrum of ANNA-2 autoimmunity is broader, includes a syndrome of jaw dystonia and laryngospasm, and can be accompanied by lung carcinoma. Objective To describe clinically (with avideo) ANNA-2–associated jaw dystonia and laryngospasm, its pathologic correlates, and therapeutic outcomes. Design Retrospective case series with prospective clinical follow-up. Setting Mayo Clinic's Neuroimmunology Laboratory, Rochester, Minnesota. Patients Consecutive patients with ANNA-2 seropositivity identified since January 1, 1990. Main Outcome Methods Clinical (in 9 patients) and neuropathologic (in 2 patients) findings were reviewed. Results Of 48 patients with ANNA-2 seropositivity, 9 (19%) had multifocal neurologic manifestations that included jaw dystonia and laryngospasm. Among 6 patients with jaw dystonia, 5 had severely impaired nutrition, causing profound weight loss. Five patients had documented laryngospasm, which contributed to 1 patient's death. Neuropathologic examination revealed diffuse infiltration by CD8+T lymphocytes, with axonal loss and gliosis in brainstem and descending spinal cord tracts. Some patients improved symptomatically after immunosuppressant or cytotoxic therapies; 1 patient improved after treatment with botulinum toxin. One patient who underwent tracheostomy because of recurrent laryngospasm was alive and well longer than 3 years after symptom onset. Conclusions Jaw dystonia and laryngospasm are common accompaniments of ANNA-2 autoimmunity and are associated with significant morbidity. We propose that selective damage to antigen-containing inhibitory fibers innervating bulbar motor nuclei by CD8+T lymphocytes (histopathologically observed infiltrating brainstem reticular formation) is the proximal cause of this syndrome. Early and aggressive therapy offers the prospect of neurologic improvement or stabilization.

Objectives To quantify the coexistence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) and to characterize the diseases when they coexist. Patients and Methods In this retrospective study of medical records spanning 1950 through 1995, the diagnoses of Crohn disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), and MS were based on review of inpatient and outpatient records by a gastroenterologist and a neurologist. Results We identified 4 residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, with IBD (3 UC, 1 CD) who had concurrent, clinically definite MS; all had mild neurologic disease with little disability. These comprised 1% of the IBD and 1.8% of the MS cohort. The CD patient had undergone terminal ileal resection; of the UC patients, 2 had pancolitis, and 1 had proctosigmoiditis. The observed prevalence of MS at onset of IBD was 3.7 times the expected (95% confidence interval, 0.8-10.8). We also reviewed the records of 32 referral patients with both diagnoses. Disability from MS was moderate at median follow-up of 8.5 years. By 15 years, ambulation was impaired in most patients. Neurologic disability was similar between patients with CD and UC. Conclusions Concurrence of the 2 diseases was greater than expected. Although MS and IBD may share common predisposing factors, not enough information is available to speculate about possible mechanisms.

In this symposium, we will review our rationale and experience with pharmacologic strategies for the promotion of myelin repair in inflammatory demyelinating disease. The most common clinical form of these illnesses in humans is multiple sclerosis (MS). MS and most other forms of inflammatory demyelination consist of an idiopathic. inflammatory syndrome which affects predominantly the densely myelinated white matter of the central nervous system (CNS). The inflammatory response is associated with damage of oligodendrocytes (ODC) and myelin, resulting in loss of these tissue elements (reviewed in Hunter & Rodriguez, 1995). Similar diseases exist in animals of both idiopathic and viral origin. Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV), a naturally occurring, murine, picornaviral pathogen, produces inflammatory demyelinating lesions in spinal cord and brainstem with progressive neurologic disability in susceptible mouse strains.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common, disabling neurological syndrome of young adults. The etiology is idiopathic, yet most authorities agree that the immune system is crucial in the pathogenesis of the recurrent and chronic injury to the central nervous system (CNS). Nearly identical histopathological findings occur in MS and related clinical syndromes, designated as “demyelinating diseases.” Clinical presentation differentiates MS from the monophasic syndromes (optic neuritis, acute transverse myelitis, and Marburg disease) and the less-common relapsing syndromes (Devic’s disease, Balo’s concentric sclerosis). A chronic progressive variant of MS is also well recognized.

MS is an idiopathic, chronic inflammatory syndrome of CNS white matter. Cellular and humoral immune elements occur at zones of ongoing white matter destruction, although their prevalence varies.1 In this issue of Neurology , Wandinger et al.2 use sophisticated serologic and genetic methods to study an association between Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infections and the diagnosis and symptoms of MS. Can common pathogens trigger demyelination? If so, clarifying the etiology (etiologies) of the MS syndrome might lead to specific therapies. There have been two parallel hypotheses for the pathogenesis of MS: 1) autoimmune, with immune injury to an essentially normal CNS; and 2) infectious, with chronic or reactivated latent infection provoking the immune injury. Recently, these hypotheses have been fused into a third: a common pathogen drives or initiates autoimmunity, whether or not the pathogen resides in the CNS. Inflammatory diseases resembling MS can be autoimmune or infectious (or parainfectious). There are noninfectious experimental models of acute and chronic CNS demyelination, but these models rely on lymphocytes derived in a milieu similar to infection-powerful adjuvants and brain peptides. However, there are numerous naturally occurring mammalian diseases similar to MS, each caused by an interaction between a neurotropic virus …