F racking : A n I ndustry U nder P ressure B S J Jo Melville T hree miles beneath the surface of the earth and at pres- sures exceeding one thousand atmospheres, a complex concoc- tion of chemicals spurts, rupturing stone and cracking sheet rock through sheer force. As fractures creep out from the shattered bedrock, the fluid continues its destructive course, splitting millennia-old stone as if it were soft timber. As the pressure ebbs away further from the epicenter of the event and the initial pressure surge subsides, the wash of gushing liquid gives way to a tide of granular particles almost like a wave of quicksand. The particulate matter penetrates deep within the myriad ruptures, wedging them open so that the rocks themselves can release their precious bounty -- energy- rich shale gas trapped between layers of stratified rock. T he process that has just taken place is known as hy- draulic fracturing, but is far more ubiquitous under a differ- ent name -- fracking. Fracking has had its fair share of the media spotlight recently, with innumerable reports and studies showing that it taints everything from our atmosphere to our water tables while similar amounts of reports and studies declare it not only perfectly safe, but vital for the stability of the energy economy. Both sides have convincing evidence and plenty of scientific clout; it is very likely that neither side is completely right. Whatever the case, it is vitally important that we acknowledge the benefits and consequences of hydraulic fracturing. Because of its vital importance to the extraction of natural gas and oil, both central tenets of the energy indus- try, banning fracking could hugely destabilize energy prices. However, if fracking is polluting our air and water, allowing it to continue could be even worse. To fully understand the con- troversy behind fracking, it is necessary to understand what it is and how it works. H ydraulic fracturing is a method of treating wellbores to increase the production rate and efficiency of collection of resources. It is most commonly used to increase the yields of natural gas or oil mining operations, though adapted versions of the process see insignificant amounts of usage harvesting more exotic resources (Brown, 2007). True to its name, it works by pumping highly pressurized fluid into a borehole, causing ruptures in the side of the well through which gas or oil can seep in, which are often wedged open using a granu- lar “proppant” to facilitate flow through the fissures. While fracking has existed commercially since the 1960s, prototypi- cal forms of the process date back to over a hundred years before that (Montgomery & Smith, 2010). In its long lifespan, fracking has been fine-tuned dozens of times by hundreds of innovative new processes, chemicals, and instruments that allow it to drastically increase the yields of wells. While many regulatory agencies have and continue to consider fracking a safe process, some recent studies (and indeed, reported contamination incidents) make it seem ever more likely that fracking is far from the golden boy of the energy industry that it was once thought to be. Even now, several govern- ments around the world have passed legislation restricting or banning the use of fracking, and it is increasingly possible that we may see it phased out altogether. I t is almost laughable to compare fracking in its historic sense to the modern usage of the term -- indeed, the sheer scale of the growth of the process boggles the mind. While early fracking treatments in the 1950s used on the order of 750 gallons of fluid to rupture the rock and 400 pounds of sand to prop open the fractures, some of the largest modern fracking treatments can exceed 1,000,000 gallons of fluid and 5,000,000 pounds of proppant (Montgomery & Smith, 2010). While much of this vast increase in scale is due to increased demand for fuel and larger wells, a large extent of it is due to a clearer understanding of the mechanics of fracking, a gradual and unending perfection of the process, and a better sense for the maximum amount of fracking that is cost-efficient. It is easy to think of modern fracking as a science, and like all sciences, fracking evolved from highly disorganized roots through careful observation and improvement. I n 1865, Lieutenant-Colonel Edward Roberts, inspired by memories of artillery from the Civil War, christened his “Explosive Torpedo”, a gunpowder-filled iron shell with an explosive tip that would detonate upon a firm impact. By filling an oil well with water, then deploying and detonating a torpedo in the well, Roberts was able to utilize the power of the explosion to carve fissures into the rock well in a process he called “superincumbent fluid tamping” (Montgomery & Smith, 2010). In the years that followed, roughneck oil workers in New York, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia often employed nitroglycerine, a potent explosive, to increase the yields of shallow, hard oil wells. By disintegrating substantial portions of the oil-containing structures, the workers hoped to increase the flow of oil to the well and the total amount of 22 • B erkeley S cientific J ournal • S tress • F all 2013 • V olume 18 • I ssue 1 •