Search

Introduction Orthodontics is evolving with advances in 3D imaging, additive fabrication, digital scanning, and treatment planning. With digital tools, orthodontic treatment may become more predictable, efficient, and effective while reducing side-effects. These technologies are affecting patient care, but knowledge of their adoption patterns and influence is incomplete. We aimed to identify adoption decision makers, information sources, perspectives, incentives, and barriers. Methods Twenty-four privately practicing orthodontists were interviewed in a semistructured format following a topic guide. Interview transcripts were analyzed to identify factors in technology adoption and its perceived influence on practice. Thematic patterns were established through iterative systematic analysis, and qualitative validity was ensured with researcher triangulation. Results Qualitative interviews revealed that orthodontists make purchasing decisions independently from staff, after consulting other dentists and company representatives. Meetings, residency training, and continuing education courses are influential information sources, whereas research literature is not. Early and middle adopters are integrating digital imaging, planning, and fabrication technologies into practice and view enhanced ease of use, capabilities, performance, and procedural efficiency as primary incentives to adoption. Improving outcomes and patient comfort are not frequently cited as incentives, and all interviewees view cost as the largest barrier. Orthodontists positively perceive the influence of technology on their practices, but are concerned that further innovation and direct-to-consumer products will cause loss of market share. Conclusions CAD/CAM appliances, 3D imaging, and digital treatment planning are viewed as future standards of care and are increasingly being incorporated into the orthodontic office. Understanding the technology adoption process can guide innovation to improve treatment and ease the transition into a digital workflow.

Introduction Referrals from general dentists are a significant source of orthodontic patients, but our knowledge of factors guiding referral decisions predates recent marketplace trends of direct-to-consumer products and broad digitization. To provide orthodontists with current, nationwide data on referral values and communication preferences, a mixed-methods study was conducted. Methods Semistructured interviews were conducted with practicing general dentists (n = 23), and interviews were analyzed to identify factors important to communication and referrals. Qualitative data provided the foundation to develop and pretest a survey distributed nationally to American Dental Association general dentists through email (n = 373). Survey results were evaluated using bivariate and descriptive statistics. Results Although 42% of general dentists provide orthodontics, of those, 68% report insufficient orthodontic training in dental school, and 61% have increased orthodontic care in recent years. General dentists refer to orthodontists for complex cases and growing patients, with the orthodontist’s perceived skill and proximity to the patient being important for choosing a specific orthodontic practice. Phone (70%) and email (61%) are the most used interoffice communication methods, with email (40%) and then phone (30%) being the most preferred. The most important aspects of a working relationship were patient satisfaction and final occlusal outcome, whereas the best way to boost referrals was through improving communication. Conclusions Excellent care and patient satisfaction remain primary motivators for referrals from generalists to orthodontists. An improved orthodontic curriculum is needed for general dentists. Good communication with dentists is critical for growing referral streams and enhancing patient care.

Readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits after colorectal surgery (CRS) are common, burdensome, and costly. Effective strategies to reduce these unplanned postdischarge health care visits require a nuanced understanding of how and why patients make the decision to seek care. We used a purposefully stratified sample of 18 interview participants from a prospective cohort of adult CRS patients. Thirteen (72%) participants had an unplanned postdischarge health care visit. Participant decision-making was classified by methodology (algorithmic, guided, or impulsive), preexisting rationale, and emotional response to perceived health care needs. Participants voiced clear mental algorithms about when to visit an ED. In addition, participants identified facilitators and barriers to optimal health care use. They also identified tangible targets for health care utilization reduction efforts, such as improved care coordination with streamlined discharge instructions and improved communication with the surgical team. Efforts should be directed at improving postdischarge communication and care coordination to reduce CRS patients’ high-resource health care utilization.

Background Adult colorectal surgery patients continue to have high rates of readmissions, despite known risk factors for non-routine postdischarge care (emergency department (ED) visit or rehospitalization) and countless interventions to address these. It is unclear how the difficult-to-quantify patient perspective frames and modifies the impact of these quantifiable risk factors. Study design We identified consecutive adult inpatient colorectal surgery patients from 2017 to 2018. This mixed methods study merged data from electronic health records and in-depth patient interviews. Results We enrolled 258 participants, surveyed 167, and interviewed 18. Depressive symptoms represent one of many risk factors confirmed to increase non-routine healthcare utilization (RR 1.85, 95% CI 1.02–3.37), though the patient perspective explained why these symptoms seemed to greatly impact some patients more than others. Additionally, consistent with patient report, patients with non-routine postdischarge care (26%) were less likely to report communication with their surgical team (80% vs 97%, p Conclusion Patient perspectives add depth and understanding of the impact of risk factors on non-routine post-discharge care. This expanded knowledge explains why one patient is more likely to visit an ED close to home whereas another patient might prefer to visit their surgeon’s clinic directly. Effective strategies to reduce unplanned postdischarge care should be tailored.

Background: Adult colorectal surgery patients continue to have high rates of readmissions, despite known risk factors for non-routine postdischarge care (emergency department (ED) visit or rehospitalization) and countless interventions to address these. It is unclear how the patient perspective frames and modifies the impact of these risk factors. This study aimed to explain why individual risk-factors led a patient to seek non-routine postdischarge care. Methods: This single institution prospective cohort study identified consecutive adult inpatient colorectal surgery patients from 2017-2018. We used a convergent parallel design to integrate electronic health record data with brief phone surveys and in-depth interviews to generate a “what, why, and so what” summary of findings. Findings: We enrolled 258 participants, surveyed 167, and interviewed 18. Overall, 20% were readmitted, 3% had an ED visit, 2% had an observation stay, and 75% had routine postdischarge care. Undergoing open surgery (RR 2.25, 95% CI 1.31-3.87) and reporting depressive symptoms (RR 1.85, 95% CI 1.02-3.37) were associated with an increased non-routine healthcare utilization. Whereas, each 10 miles increasing travel distance (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98), private insurance (RR 0.61 , 95% CI 0.40-0.93), and proactively scheduled follow-up appointments (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.27-0.69) were protective factors. Patients with non-routine postdischarge care (26%) were less likely to report communication with their surgical team (80% vs 97%, p

The postdoctoral application and matching process in dental education is a high-stakes and resource-intensive process for all involved. While programs seek the most qualified candidates, applicants strive to be competitive to increase their likelihood of being accepted to a desirable program. There are limited data regarding either subjective or objective factors underlying the complex interplay between programs and applicants. This qualitative study sought to provide insight into the stakeholders' experiences and views on the matching process. Telephone and in-person interviews were conducted with ten pediatric dentistry program directors and ten recent applicants to pediatric dentistry programs in the United States in 2013-14. Participants were selected to represent the geographic (five districts of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry) and institutional (hospital- or university-based) diversity of pediatric dentistry programs. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Veracity and need for more information were the themes most often articulated by both groups. The program directors most valued teachability and self-motivation as desirable applicant characteristics. The applicants relied primarily on subjective sources to gather information about programs and prioritized location and financial factors as pivotal for their rankings. Both groups appreciated the uniformity of the current application process and highlighted several weaknesses and areas for improvement. These results shed light on the postdoctoral matching process in pediatric dentistry via a qualitative description of stakeholders' experiences and viewpoints. These insights can serve as a basis for improving and refining the matching process.

Aims No current clinical guidelines focus on weight management in youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Our aim was to characterize the patient-perceived experience and barriers to weight management in youth with T1DM. Methods Participants were recruited from the University of North Carolina (n = 16, 56% female, 60% White, 50% insulin pump users, mean age 14.8 years, mean HbA1c 8.5% (69 mmol/mol)) and the University of Colorado (n = 18, 50% female, 80% white, 53% pump users, mean age 15.3 years, mean HbA1c 9.3% (78 mmol/mol)). Focus groups were stratified by sex and weight status (BMI cutoff = 25). Discussions were guided by a standardized set of questions, audio-taped, transcribed, and analyzed thematically using inductive qualitative methods. Results Youth with T1DM expressed four interrelated themes of antagonism between type 1 diabetes and weight management: dysregulated appetite, disruption of blood glucose levels associated with changing diet/exercise, hypoglycemia as a barrier to weight loss, and the overwhelming nature of dual management of weight and glycemic control, and two interrelated themes of synergism: improvement in shared, underlying heath behaviors and exercise as a tool for weight and glycemic control. Variation in emphasis of specific thematic elements was greatest across sex. Youth identified five major components of a weight management program for T1DM: intensified glucose management, healthy diet with known carbohydrate content, exercise, individualization and flexibility, and psychosocial and peer support. Conclusions There is critical need for personalized, T1DM-specific weight recommendations to overcome disease-specific barriers to weight management in the context of T1DM.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Telephone calls after dis-charge from the emergency department (ED) are increasinglyused to reduce 30-day rates of return or readmission, buttheir effectiveness is not established. The objective was todetermine whether a scripted telephone intervention by regis-tered nurses from a hospital-based call center would decrease30-day rates of return to the ED or hospital or of death.DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial from 2013 to 2016.SETTING: Large, academic medical center in the south-east United States.PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 65 and older dis-charged from the ED were enrolled and randomized intointervention and control groups (N = 2,000).INTERVENTION: Intervention included a telephone callfrom a nurse using a scripted questionnaire to identifyobstacles to elements of successful care transitions: medica-tion acquisition, postdischarge instructions, and obtainingphysician follow-up. Control subjects received a satisfac-tion survey only.MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was return to theED, hospitalization, or death within 30 days of dischargefrom the ED.RESULTS: Rate of return to the ED or hospital or deathwithin 30 days was 15.5% (95% confidence interval(CI) = 13.2–17.8%) in the intervention group and 15.2%(95% CI = 12.9–17.5%) in the control group (P = .86).Death was uncommon (intervention group, 0; control group, 5 (0.51%), 95% CI = 0.06–0.96%); 12.2% ofintervention subjects (95% CI = 10.1–14.3%) and 12.5%of control subjects (95% CI = 10.4–14.6%) returned tothe ED, and 9% of intervention subjects (95% CI = 7.2–10.8%) and 7.4% of control subjects (95% CI = 5.8–9.0%) were hospitalized within 30 days.CONCLUSION: A scripted telephone call from a trainednurse to an older adult after discharge from the ED didnot reduce ED or hospital return rates or death within 30 days. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01893931z.

The health benefits of exercise are well established, yet individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) have a shorter life expectancy due in large part to physical health complications associated with poor diet and lack of exercise. There is a paucity of research examining exercise in this population with the majority of studies having examined interventions with limited feasibility and sustainability. Before developing an intervention, a thorough exploration of client and clinician perspectives on exercise and its associated barriers is warranted. Twelve clients and fourteen clinicians participated in focus groups aimed at examining exercise, barriers, incentives, and attitudes about walking groups. Results indicated that clients and clinicians identified walking as the primary form of exercise, yet barriers impeded consistent participation. Distinct themes arose between groups; however, both clients and clinicians reported interest in a combination group/pedometer based walking program for individuals with SMI. Future research should consider examining walking programs for this population.

Mexican immigrants to the U.S. are nearly three times more likely to be without health insurance than non-Hispanic native citizens. To inform strategies to increase the number of insured within this population, we elicited immigrants' understanding of health insurance and preferences for coverage. Nine focus groups with Mexican immigrants were conducted across the State of North Carolina. Qualitative, descriptive methods were used to assess people's understanding of health insurance, identify their perceived need for health insurance, describe perceived barriers to obtaining coverage, and prioritize the components of insurance that immigrants value most. Individuals have a basic understanding of health insurance and perceive it as necessary. Participants most valued insurance that would cover emergencies, make care affordable, and protect family members. Barriers to obtaining insurance included cost, concerns about immigration status discovery, and communication issues. Strategies that address immigrants' preferences for and barriers to insurance should be considered.

Background This study used focus groups to pilot and evaluate a new nutrition label format and refine the label design. Physical activity equivalent labels present calorie information in terms of the amount of physical activity that would be required to expend the calories in a specified food item. Methods Three focus groups with a total of twenty participants discussed food choices and nutrition labeling. They provided information on comprehension, usability and acceptability of the label. A systematic coding process was used to apply descriptive codes to the data and to identify emerging themes and attitudes. Results Participants in all three groups were able to comprehend the label format. Discussion about label format focused on issues including gender of the depicted figure, physical fitness of the figure, preference for walking or running labels, and preference for information in miles or minutes. Feedback from earlier focus groups was used to refine the labels in an iterative process. Conclusions In contrast to calorie labels, participants shown physical activity labels asked and answered, “How does this label apply to me?” This shift toward personalized understanding may indicate that physical activity labels offer an advantage over currently available nutrition labels.