Search

Currently, perioperative health care is undergoing transformative changes. One prospect for the specialty of anesthesiology is a reorientation of resident education to focus more on the entire spectrum of perioperative care as exemplified by the perioperative surgical home (PSH). To advance this novel paradigm for patients and anesthesiologists, one must also consider further incorporating the competencies fundamental to the PSH during residency training. As such, the purpose of this case report is to outline the successful implementation of a comprehensive PSH curriculum for anesthesiology residents.

BACKGROUND Scholarly activity is expected of program directors of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited residency training programs. Anesthesiology residency programs are cited more often than surgical programs for deficiencies in academic productivity. We hypothesized that this may in part reflect differences in scholarly activity between program directors of anesthesiology and surgical trainings programs. To test the hypothesis, we examined the career track record of current program directors of ACGME-accredited anesthesiology and surgical residency programs at the same institutions using PubMed citations and funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) as metrics of scholarly activity. METHODS Between November 1, 2011 and December 31, 2011, we obtained data from publicly available Web sites on program directors at 127 institutions that had ACGME-accredited programs in both anesthesiology and surgery. Information gathered on each individual included year of board certification, year first appointed program director, academic rank, history of NIH grant funding, and number of PubMed citations. We also calculated the h-index for a randomly selected subset of 25 institution-matched program directors. RESULTS There were no differences between the groups in number of years since board certification (P = 0.42), academic rank (P = 0.38), or years as a program director (P = 0.22). However, program directors in anesthesiology had less prior or current NIH funding (P = 0.002), fewer total and education-related PubMed citations (both P < 0.001), and a lower h-index (P = 0.001) than surgery program directors. Multivariate analysis revealed that the publication rate for anesthesiology program directors was 43% (95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.58) that of the corresponding program directors of surgical residency programs, holding other variables constant. CONCLUSIONS Program directors of anesthesiology residency programs have considerably less scholarly activity in terms of peer-reviewed publications and federal research funding than directors of surgical residency programs. As such, this study provides further evidence for a systemic weakness in the scholarly fabric of academic anesthesiology.

ObjectiveDetermine levels of agreement among intensive care unit patients and their family members, nurses, and physicians (proxies) regarding patients' symptoms and compare levels of mean intensity (i.e., the magnitude of a symptom sensation) and distress (i.e., the degree of emotionality that a symptom engenders) of symptoms among patients and proxy reporters.DesignProspective study of proxy reporters of symptoms in seriously ill patients.SettingsTwo intensive care units in a tertiary medical center in the Western United States.PatientsTwo hundred and forty-five intensive care unit patients, 243 family members, 103 nurses, and 92 physicians.InterventionsNone.Measurements and main resultsOn the basis of the magnitude of intraclass correlation coefficients, where coefficients from .35 to .78 are considered to be appropriately robust, correlation coefficients between patients' and family members' ratings met this criterion (≥.35) for intensity in six of ten symptoms. No intensity ratings between patients and nurses had intraclass correlation coefficients >.32. Three symptoms had intensity correlation coefficients of ≥.36 between patients' and physicians' ratings. Correlation coefficients between patients and family members were >.40 for five symptom-distress ratings. No symptoms had distress correlation coefficients of ≥.28 between patients' and nurses' ratings. Two symptoms had symptom-distress correlation coefficients between patients' and physicians' ratings at >.39. Family members, nurses, and physicians reported higher symptom-intensity scores than patients did for 80%, 60%, and 60% of the symptoms, respectively. Family members, nurses, and physicians reported higher symptom-distress scores than patients did for 90%, 70%, and 80% of the symptoms, respectively.ConclusionsPatient-family intraclass correlation coefficients were sufficiently close for us to consider using family members to help assess intensive care unit patients' symptoms. Relatively low intraclass correlation coefficients between intensive care unit clinicians' and patients' symptom ratings indicate that some proxy raters overestimate whereas others underestimate patients' symptoms. Proxy overestimation of patients' symptom scores warrants further study because this may influence decisions about treating patients' symptoms.

Hemoglobin values (Hb) can facilitate decisions regarding perioperative transfusion management. Currently, Hb can be determined invasively by analyzing blood via laboratory Co-Oximetry (tHb) or by point-of-care HemoCue (HCue). Recently, a new noninvasive, continuous spectrophotometric sensor (Masimo SpHb) was introduced into clinical practice. We compared the accuracy of the SpHb and HCue with tHb.Twenty patients, ages 40 to 80 years, were studied. They received general anesthesia and underwent spine surgery in the prone position. All blood samples were obtained from a radial artery catheter. SpHb, tHb, and HCue were determined immediately after induction of anesthesia, but before the start of surgery and approximately every hour thereafter. Primary outcomes were defined on the basis of the following differences between measures: SpHb - tHb or HCue - tHb. All patients had 3 to 5 observations taken on each measure. Differences and absolute differences were analyzed by several techniques to assess accuracy. We also investigated the relationship between observed differences and the following variables: tHb level, duration of surgery, age, weight, and perfusion index.Data consisted of 78 measurements of SpHb, tHb, and HCue made on the 20 patients. Absolute differences between SpHb and tHb were1.5 g/dL for 61% of observations, between 1.6 to 2.0 g/dL for 16% and2.0 g/dL for 22% of the observations. Observed differences displayed significant decreases with time and higher perfusion index values. No systematic relationships were observed with age or weight. Except for 1 value, all of the HCue values were1.0 g/dL of tHb.Although HCue was consistently accurate, our data confirm that SpHb often correlated well with tHb values. Yet our study indicates that SpHb may not be as accurate as clinically necessary in some patients. Improved refinement of continuous, noninvasive technology, such as SpHb, could address important clinical requirements.

In the Next Accreditation System, resident performance and progression assessed through educational Milestones will be used as 1 of a number of quality indicators to evaluate the educational effectiveness of residency programs. The Anesthesiology Milestones will be used to measure the success of individual anesthesiology residents in achieving expected goals of training, and the effectiveness of the residency program will in part be evaluated based on aggregated Milestone performance data. Box Members of the Anesthesiology Milestone Working Group Deborah J. Culley, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Chair Neal Cohen, MD, MPH, MS, University of California, San Francisco Steven Hall, MD, FAAP, Northwestern University Catherine Kuhn, MD, Duke University Loraine Lewis, EdD, RD, Executive Director, Anesthesiology RRC Linda Mason, MD, Loma Linda University Steven P. Nestler, PhD, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Consultant Rita M. Patel, MD, University of Pittsburgh Scott A. Schartel, DO, Temple University Brian Waldschmidt, MD, Resident Member, University of California, San Francisco Mark Warner, MD, Mayo Clinic Margaret Wood, MD, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons

Anesthesiology is at a crossroad, particularly in the USA. We explore the changing and future roles for anesthesiologists, including the implication of new models of care such as the perioperative surgical home, changes in payment methodology, and the impact other refinements in healthcare delivery will have on practice opportunities and training requirements for anesthesiologists.The advances in the practice of anesthesiology are having a significant impact on patient care, allowing a more diverse and complex patient population to benefit from the knowledge, skills and expertise of anesthesiologists. Expanded clinical opportunities, increased utilization of technology and expansion in telemedicine will provide the foundation to care for more patients in diverse settings and to better monitor patients remotely while ensuring immediate intervention as needed. Although the roles of anesthesiologists have been diverse, the scope of practice varies from one country to another. The changing healthcare needs in the USA in particular are creating new opportunities for American anesthesiologists to define expanded roles in healthcare delivery. To fulfill these evolving needs of patients and health systems, resident training, ongoing education and methods to ensure continued competency must incorporate new approaches of education and continued certification to ensure that each anesthesiologist has the full breadth and depth of clinical skills needed to support patient and health system needs.The scope of anesthesia practice has expanded globally, providing anesthesiologists, particularly those in the USA, with unique new opportunities to assume a broader role in perioperative care of surgical patients.

In this review, we discuss issues of privacy and personal choice in end-of-life decision-making and existing options for directing end-of-life care, and highlight important differences between living wills, advance directives and other forms of healthcare proxies.The events surrounding the death of Terri Schiavo raise many ethical, legal and moral issues that warrant discussion. In that context, we examine the implications associated with family disagreement over end-of-life care, the ramifications for healthcare providers and the role played by politicians, the courts and the media in galvanizing the debate. Groups promoting a variety of causes seized the opportunity to further their own agenda by using the internet and other methods to rapidly disseminate often false information, fueling arguments over misdiagnosis of persistent vegetative state and raising false hopes for neurological recovery.It is incumbent upon the medical community, political and religious leaders and the media to educate the public appropriately about options regarding end-of-life issues and to foster open discourse and encourage the execution of advance directives or healthcare proxies. Although the content of this article deals with a specific case and legal rulings pertaining to the USA, the issues and questions raised are pertinent to healthcare providers and individuals around the world.

In industry and academic anesthesia departments, incentives and bonus payments based on productivity are accounting for an increasing proportion of a total compensation. When incentives are primarily based on clinical productivity, the impact on the distribution of total compensation to the faculty is not known. We compared a pure salary-based compensation methodology based entirely on academic rank to salary plus incentives and/or clinical productivity compensation (i.e., billable hours). The change in compensation methodology resulted in two major findings. First, the productivity-based compensation resulted in a large increase in the variability of total compensation among faculty, especially at the Assistant Professor rank. Second, the mean difference in total compensation between Assistant and Full Professors decreased. The authors conclude that this particular incentive plan, primarily directed toward clinical productivity, dramatically changed the distribution of total compensation in favor of junior faculty. Although not analytically investigated, the potential impact of these changes on faculty morale and distribution of faculty activities is discussed.

Critical care medicine trainees and faculty must acquire and maintain the skills necessary to provide state-of-the art clinical care to critically ill patients, to improve patient outcomes, optimize intensive care unit utilization, and continue to advance the theory and practice of critical care medicine. This should be accomplished in an environment dedicated to compassionate and ethical care.A multidisciplinary panel of professionals with expertise in critical care education and the practice of critical care medicine under the direction of the American College of Critical Care Medicine.Physician education in critical care medicine in the United States should encompass all disciplines that provide care in the intensive care unit and all levels of training: from medical students through all levels of postgraduate training and continuing medical education for all providers of clinical critical care. The scope of this guideline includes physician education in the United States from residency through ongoing practice after subspecialization.Relevant literature was accessed via a systematic Medline search as well as by requesting references from all panel members. Subsequently, the bibliographies of obtained literature were reviewed for additional references. In addition, a search of organization-based published material was conducted via the Internet. This included but was not limited to material published by the American College of Critical Care Medicine, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education, and other primary and specialty organizations. Collaboratively and iteratively, the task force met, by conference call and in person, to construct the tenets and ultimately the substance of this guideline.Guidelines for the continuum of education in critical care medicine from residency through specialty training and ongoing throughout practice will facilitate standardization of physician education in critical care medicine.

To describe antimicrobial prescribing practices and patient outcomes associated with the treatment of aerobic gram-negative rod bacteremia at two university-affiliated medical centers.All adult patients with gram-negative bacteremia (N = 326) who were at Stanford and University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Hospitals from September 1, 1996 through August 31, 1997 were evaluated via retrospective review of medical records.Most patient characteristics were similar between institutions; however, patients at Stanford were more likely to have had a diagnosis of bone marrow transplantation, liver failure, or poor nutritional status, while more patients at UCSF had solid organ transplant, diabetes, pulmonary disease, or hypotension. The bacteriology was similar at both sites, with Escherichia coli the predominant pathogen (139 [43%] of 326). The majority of episodes were community acquired (67% [218/326]). Patients at Stanford were more likely to have been treated empirically with aminoglycosides (28% vs. 7%, P0.001) and noncephalosporin beta-lactams (31% vs. 11%, P0.001), while patients at UCSF were more likely to have received cephalosporins (62% vs. 29%, P0.001) and fluoroquinolones (21% vs. 11%, P = 0.02). These patterns continued for definitive therapy. Overall mortality was 60 (19%) of 326. Several risk factors were associated with 14-day mortality, including severity of illness, neutropenia, diabetes mellitus, use of vasopressors, and empiric use of a noncephalosporin beta-lactam.Prescribing practices for the treatment of gram-negative bacteremia differed significantly in the two institutions despite similar patients and pathogens.

BACKGROUND Blood hemoglobin can be monitored continuously and noninvasively with a noninvasive spectrophotometric sensor (Masimo SpHb). The perfusion index (PI) of the finger is directly related to the clinical accuracy of SpHb. We evaluated those variables that influence PI without the influences of surgery and anesthesia. METHODS Based on our past studies, 12 awake adult volunteers were studied. A SpHb sensor was attached to the same finger of each hand. The temperature of each finger was measured via a skin surface probe. A digital nerve block (DNB) was performed with 1% lidocaine on one finger and 0.25% bupivacaine on the other finger of the opposite hand. SpHb, PI, and finger temperature were monitored continuously 30 minutes before and 3 to 4 hours after placement of the DNB. A random effects spline regression was used to flexibly model the outcomes before and after the DNB and to compare the effects of lidocaine and bupivacaine. RESULTS The DNBs increased the PI for both lidocaine and bupivacaine (P < 0.0001) and finger temperature from both lidocaine (P < 0.0001) and bupivacaine (P = 0.02). The duration of action of bupivacaine was markedly longer than that of lidocaine (P < 0.0001). Between 45 and 75 minutes after insertion of the DNB, the PI with bupivacaine was substantially higher than that of lidocaine. The PI was directly related to changes in finger temperature and SpHb. During this time interval, 11 of the 12 volunteers receiving bupivacaine descriptively had increases in finger temperature ranging from no change to 6.1°C. In contrast, only 6 of the 12 lidocaine volunteers had increases in finger temperature ranging from no change to 4°C. Changes in PI were directly correlated with SpHb values (correlation coefficient = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS A DNB increases PI and finger temperature. These increases lasted 2 to 3 hours longer with bupivacaine than lidocaine. The increases in PI were associated with slightly higher SpHb values. We conclude that the DNB induces increases in PI and temperature of the finger. Because of the close relationship between finger temperature, PI, and SpHb, consistently increasing finger temperature and PI could increase the accuracy of SpHb.

Objectives : To determine the clinical variables that affect the prognosis of critically ill patients with sustained unexplained hypotension. A further goal was to develop a prognostic scoring system based on clinical data available at the onset of hypotension. Design : Prospective cohort study. Setting : The intensive care units (ICUs) of an academic medical center. Patients : One hundred one adult ICU patients with sustained (>60 mins) unexplained hypotension. Using the initial 50 patients (derivation set), a prognostic score was developed that was then tested in the next 51 patients (validation set). Interventions : None. Measurements and Main Results : The main outcome variable was death or hospital discharge. The overall hospital mortality in the combined sets was 58%. Using a multivariable model we identified three independent (p

Summary A variety of methods is available to monitor the patient who requires mechanical ventilation. The monitoring techniques include clinical assessment, monitors of gas exchange and a variety of methods to evaluate pulmonary mechanical function. The selection of the most appropriate monitors for each patient depends upon an understanding of the clinical situation, the available monitoring techniques and the information each monitor provides, as well as their limitations. The challenge for the physician is to identify and appropriately use those monitoring techniques that provide the optimum of cost-effective clinical management with minimal morbidity and mortality.

Evaluation and interpretation of energy needs of critically ill patients require the expertise of clinical dietitians: Dietitians must be knowledgeable about the methods available to quantify energy needs and able to communicate effectively with physicians and nurses regarding nutritional requirements. Several prediction equations are available for calculating energy needs of critically ill patients. Indirect calorimetry is also used frequently to measure energy requirements in this patient population. This article defines when energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry may provide clinically useful information. Data obtained by indirect calorimetry must be interpreted carefully. Indirect calorimetry is based on the equations for oxidation of carbohydrate, protein, and fat. Errors in interpretation can be made when metabolic pathways other than oxidation dominate or when clinical conditions exist that affect carbon dioxide excretion from the lungs. Before incorporating data obtained from indirect calorimetry into a nutrition care plan, the clinical dietitian should carefully evaluate the following factors for a patient: clinical conditions when the measurement was made, desired weight loss or gain, tolerance to food or nutrition support, relationship between protein intake and energy need, and need for anabolism or growth. This article provides clinical examples illustrating how measured values compare with calculated values and recommendations for how to incorporate measured values into nutrition care plans.

Objectives.This study sought to determine the prognostic yield and utility of transesophageal echocardiography in critically ill patients with unexplained hypotension.Background.Transesophageal echocardiography is increasingly utilized in the intensive care setting and is particularly suited for the evaluation of hypotension; however, the prognostic yield of transesophageal echocardiography in these patients is unknown.Methods.We prospectively studied 61 adult patients in the intensive care unit with sustained (>60 min) unexplained hypotension. Both transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography were performed, and results were immediately disclosed to the primary physician, who reported any resulting changes in management. Patients were classified on the basis of transesophageal echocardiographic findings into one of three prognostic groups: 1) nonventricular (valvular, pericardial) cardiac limitation to cardiac output; 2) ventricular failure; and 3) noncardiac systemic disease (hypovolemia or low systemic vascular resistance, or both). Primary end points were death or discharge from the intensive care unit.Results.A transesophageal echocardiographic diagnosis of nonventricular limitation to cardiac output was associated with improved survival to discharge from the intensive care unit (81%) versus a diagnosis of ventricular disease (41%) or hypovolemia/ low systemic vascular resistance (44%, p = 0.03). Twenty-nine (64%) of 45 transthoracic echocardiographic studies were inadequate compared with 2 (3%) of 61 transesophageal echocardiographic studies (p < 0.001). Transesophageal echocardiography contributed new clinically significant diagnoses (not seen with transthoracic echocardiography) in 17 patients (28%), leading to operation in 12 (20%).Conclusions.Transesophageal echocardiography makes a clinically important contribution to the diagnosis and management of unexplained hypotension and predicts prognosis in the critical care setting.

Previous reports have described prolonged paralysis after the administration of muscle relaxants in critically ill patients. The purpose of this study was to examine possible pathophysiologic causes for this paralysis by measuring muscle-type, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor number in necropsy muscle specimens from patients who had received muscle relaxants to facilitate mechanical ventilation before death.Prospective laboratory study of human muscle collected at autopsy.Medical and surgical intensive care units (ICUs) at a university hospital and a research laboratory.Fourteen critically ill patients, with a variety of diagnoses, all of whom required mechanical ventilatory support before their deaths in the ICU and who underwent post mortem examination. Patients were arbitrarily divided into three groups, according to their total vecuronium dose and number of days mechanically ventilated before death. Three patients were in the control group (defined as dying within 72 hrs of initiation of ventilatory support and receiving a total dose of5 mg of vecuronium). Six patients were in the low-dose group (defined as requiring ventilatory support for3 days before death and receiving a total vecuronium dose ofor = 200 mg). Five patients were in the high-dose group (defined as requiring ventilatory support for3 days before death and receiving a total vecuronium dose of200 mg).None.Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor numbers as measured by specific 125I-alpha-bungarotoxin binding to human rectus abdominis muscle obtained at autopsy were determined. In general, receptor number reflected the clinical requirements for the muscle relaxants of each patient. Patients who had increasing requirements for muscle relaxants before death had increases in receptor number, as compared with control values.The increase in nicotinic acetylcholine receptor number in muscle from patients with an increasing requirement for muscle relaxants before death suggests that nicotinic acetylcholine receptor up-regulation may underlie the increased requirements for muscle relaxants seen in some patients. Furthermore, these findings suggest that muscle relaxant-induced, denervation-like changes may at least be partially responsible for prolonged muscle paralysis after the long-term administration of muscle relaxants. This study may provide the first information into the molecular mechanisms underlying prolonged paralysis.

Background Hospitalized patients outside of the operating room frequently require emergency airway management. This study investigates complications of emergency airway management in critically ill adults, including: (1) the incidence of difficult and failed intubation; (2) the frequency of esophageal intubation; (3) the incidence of pneumothorax and pulmonary aspiration; (4) the hemodynamic consequences of emergent intubation, including death, during and immediately following intubation; and (5) the relationship, if any, between the occurrence of complications and supervision of the intubation by an attending physician. Methods Data were collected on consecutive tracheal intubations carried out by the intensive care unit team over a 10-month period. Non-anesthesia residents were supervised by anesthesia residents, critical care attending physicians, or anesthesia attending physicians. Results Two hundred ninety-seven consecutive intubations were carried out in 238 adult patients. Translaryngeal tracheal intubation was accomplished in all patients. Intubation was difficult in 8% of cases (requiring more than two attempts at laryngoscopy by a physician skilled in airway management). Esophageal intubation occurred in 25 (8%) of the attempts but all were recognized before any adverse sequelae resulted. New infiltrates suggestive of pulmonary aspiration were present on chest radiography after 4% of intubations. Seven patients (3%) died during or within 30 min of the procedure. Five of the seven patients had systemic hypotension (systolic blood pressure < or = 90 mmHg), and four of the five were receiving vasopressors to support systolic blood pressure. Patients with systolic hypotension were more likely to die after intubation than were normotensive patients (P < 0.001). There was no relationship between supervision by an attending physician and the occurrence of complications. Conclusions In critically ill patients, emergency tracheal intubation is associated with a significant frequency of major complications. In this study, complications were not increased when intubations were accomplished without the supervision of an attending physician as long as the intubation was carried out or supervised by an individual skilled in airway management. Mortality associated with emergent tracheal intubation is highest in patients who are hemodynamically unstable and receiving vasopressor therapy before intubation.

The question of whether Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders should be sustained in the operating room was brought to our ethics committee by a pulmonologist and involved one of his patients for whom he serves as a primary care physician. His patient, a woman with chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) was electing, for comfort purposes, to have a hip pinning following a fracture. At the same time, she wished to have a DNR order covering her entire hospital stay. The anesthesiologist described her direction as “improper” and refused to participate in surgical procedures if DNR orders extended to the operating room. The patient refused to rescind the order during surgery. As a result, the surgery was canceled to the great chagrin of the patient.

Blood hemoglobin (Hb) can be continuously monitored utilizing noninvasive spectrophotometric finger sensors (Masimo SpHb). SpHb is not a consistently accurate guide to transfusion decisions when compared with laboratory Co-Oximetry (tHb). We evaluated whether a finger digital nerve block (DNB) would increase perfusion and, thereby, improve the accuracy of SpHb.Twenty adult patients undergoing spinal surgery received a DNB with lidocaine to the finger used for the monitoring of SpHb. SpHb-tHb differences were determined immediately following the DNB and approximately every hour thereafter. These differences were compared with those in our previously reported patients (N = 20) with no DNB. The SpHb-tHb difference was defined as "very accurate" if 0.5 g/dL and "inaccurate" if 2.0 g/dL. Perfusion index (PI) values at the time of each SpHb-tHb measurement were compared.There were 57 and 78 data points in this and our previous study, respectively. The presence of a DNB resulted in 37 % of measurements having SpHb values in the "very accurate group" versus 12 % in patients without a DNB. When the PI value was 2.0, only 1 of 57 DNB values was in the "inaccurate" group. The PI values were both higher and less variable in the patients who received a DNB.A DNB significantly increased the number of "very accurate" SpHb values and decreased the number of "inaccurate" values. We conclude that a DNB may facilitate the use of SpHb as a guide to transfusion decisions, particularly when the PI is 2.0.

To provide a focused, detailed assessment of the symptom experiences of intensive care unit patients at high risk of dying and to evaluate the relationship between delirium and patients' symptom reports.Prospective, observational study of patients' symptoms.Two intensive care units in a tertiary medical center in the western United States.One hundred seventy-one intensive care unit patients at high risk of dying.None.Patients were interviewed every other day for up to 14 days. Patients rated the presence, intensity (1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe), and distress (1 = not very distressing; 2 = moderately distressing; 3 = very distressing) of ten symptoms (that is, pain, tired, short of breath, restless, anxious, sad, hungry, scared, thirsty, confused). The Confusion Assessment Method-Intensive Care Unit was used to ascertain the presence of delirium. A total of 405 symptom assessments were completed by 171 patients. Patients' average age was 58 ± 15 yrs; 64% were males. Patients were mechanically ventilated during 34% of the 405 assessments, and 22% died in the hospital. Symptom prevalence ranged from 75% (tired) to 27% (confused). Thirst was moderately intense, and shortness of breath, scared, confusion, and pain were moderately distressful. Delirium was found in 34.2% of the 152 patients who could be evaluated. Delirious patients were more acutely ill and received significantly higher doses of opioids. Delirious patients were significantly more likely to report feeling confused (43% vs. 22%, p = .004) and sad (46% vs. 31%, p = .04) and less likely to report being tired (57% vs. 77%, p = .006) than nondelirious patients.Study findings suggest that unrelieved and distressing symptoms are present for the majority of intensive care unit patients, including those with delirium. Symptom assessment in high-risk intensive care unit patients may lead to more focused interventions to avoid or minimize unnecessary suffering.

Open innovation networks between academia and industry: an imperative for breakthrough therapies

Pulse oximetry has made a significant contribution to noninvasive monitoring in a wide variety of clinical situations. It allows for continuous reliable measurements of oxygen saturation while avoiding the discomfort and risks of arterial puncture. As the extent of hypoxic episodes during various procedures and clinical settings is better appreciated, the role of continuous noninvasive monitoring will undoubtedly expand. An understanding of the principles and technology of pulse oximetry will allow physicians to obtain maximal clinical benefit from its use.