Search

There is a growing need for brief screening measures for HIV Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND). We compared two commonly used measures (the Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA] and the International HIV Dementia Scale [IHDS]) in their ability to identify asymptomatic HAND (i.e., asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment [ANI]). Participants included 74 Thai PLWH: 38 met Frascati criteria for ANI and 36 were cognitively normal (CN). Participants completed Thai language versions of the MoCA (MoCA-T) and IHDS, and a validated neurocognitive battery. We examined between-group differences for MoCA-T and IHDS total scores, and scale subcomponents. We also conducted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to determine the ability of the MoCA-T and IHDS to discriminate between CN and ANI groups, and compared their area under the curve (AUC) values. Results revealed lower MoCA-T total score, as well as the Visuospatial/Executive and Delayed Recall subtask scores, in the ANI relative to CN group. Groups did not differ on the IHDS. For ROC analyses, the MoCA-T, but not the IHDS, significantly differentiated the ANI from CN group, and there was a significant difference in AUC values between the MoCA-T (AUC = .71) and IHDS (AUC = .56). Sensitivity and specificity statistics were poor for both screening measures. These data indicate while the MoCA-T functions better than the IHDS in detecting Thai PLWH with ANI, the mildest form of HAND, neither cognitive screener, showed strong utility. Our findings reflect the limited efficacy of common screening measures in detecting subtler cognitive deficits among Thai PLWH, and highlight the need for better screening tools.

Mismatch between whole-brain death criteria embedded in statutes and accepted tests physicians use to diagnose brain death have clinical and ethical implications that could undermine public trust in death pronouncements. We consider merits and drawbacks of 4 ways to address this problem.

OBJECTIVES HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) remain prevalent in people living with HIV (PLWH) despite widespread use of combined antiretroviral therapy (ART). Vascular disease contributes to the pathogenesis of HAND, but traditional vascular risk factors do not fully explain the relation between vascular disease and HAND. A more direct measure of vascular dysfunction is needed. This cross-sectional study tested whether the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), a novel method to assess arterial stiffness, is associated with HAND among PLWH. METHODS Participants included 75 non-diabetic adults with well-controlled HIV from an outpatient HIV clinic. We assessed the relation between CAVI and neurocognitive impairment (NCI). The latter was primarily characterized by the Frascati criteria and secondarily (post hoc) using the Global Deficit Score (GDS). Logistic regression models tested whether high CAVI (≥ 8) was independently associated with NCI when controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS Participants (Mage = 45.6 ± 8.3 years; 30.1% male) had few traditional cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (hypertension, n = 7; dyslipidaemia, n = 34; body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2 , n = 12; smoking history, n = 13; 2.2% mean 10-year risk of CVD or stroke). Twelve (16%) participants had high CAVI, which was independently associated with meeting Frascati criteria for NCI [n = 39, odds ratio (OR) = 7.6, p = 0.04], accounting for age, education, gender, income, CD4 nadir, recent CD4 and traditional CVD risk factors. High CAVI was also associated with NCI as reflected by higher GDS (OR = 17.4, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Cardio-ankle vascular index is a promising measure of vascular dysfunction that may be independently associated with NCI in relatively healthy PLWH. Larger studies should test the utility of CAVI in predicting NCI/decline in PLWH.

Some causes of spastic paraplegia are treatable and many are not. Diagnostic work-up to determine the etiology can be costly and invasive. Here we report the case of a man with slowly progressive spastic paraparesis. Using a multigene next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel, we identified a novel variant in the consensus splice site of the SPAST gene (exon 13, c.1536G>A, heterozygous), affecting codon 512 of the SPAST mRNA. The observed variant segregated with the disease in four tested family members. In this case, genetic confirmation obviated the need for additional testing such as MRI and lumbar puncture and helped the patient and his family understand his condition and prognosis. We conclude with a brief discussion of the SPG4/SPAST gene and the role of multigene panels in the diagnosis and management of hereditary spastic paraplegia.

ObjectiveTo detail the scope and nature of financial conflicts of interest (COIs) between neurologists and the pharmaceutical and medical device industries (Industry) using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments (OP) database, with a focus on trends from 2013 to 2016.MethodsPayments from Industry to US neurologists were categorized into research payments, general (nonresearch) payments, and value of ownership in Industry. We performed descriptive analyses to detail the scope and nature of these relationships and trends over time.ResultsAt least 9,505 neurologists received at least one payment from Industry each year. From 2013 to 2016, 1.6 million payments totaled $354 million, of which 99.5% of payments and 85.6% of payment value were for general/nonresearch-related payments. Most neurologists (between 65% and 80%) received less than $1,000 per year, but over 200 neurologists each received more than $100,000 during some years. Several received over $1 million. General payments are increasing, research payments are steady, and neurologists' ownership and investments are decreasing.ConclusionsNeurologists have extensive financial relationships with Industry, though this is driven by a well-paid minority. As a profession, we must work to establish firm rules to manage these potential COIs, ensuring that relationships with Industry yield synergistic advances while minimizing bias and maintaining public trust.

ObjectiveTo detail the scope, nature, and disclosure of financial conflicts of interest (COI) between the pharmaceutical and medical device industries (Industry) and authors in high-impact clinical neurology journals.MethodsUsing the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments Database (OPD), we retrieved information on payments from Industry to 2,000 authors from randomly selected 2016 articles in 5 journals. We categorized payments by type (research, general, and associated research/institutional), sponsoring entity, and year (from 2013 to 2016). Each author's self-disclosures were compared to OPD-listed Industry relationships to measure discordance. Payments were manually reviewed to identify those from manufacturers of products that were directly tested or discussed in the article. We also quantified the prevalence and value of these nondisclosed, relevant COI.ResultsTwo hundred authors from 158 articles had at least 1 OPD payment. Median/mean annual payments per author were $4,229/$19,586 (general); $1,702/$5,966 (research); and $67,512/$362,102 (associated research). Most neurologists received 10% of authors) received more than $10,000 per year, and several received over $1 million. Of 3,013 payments deemed directly relevant to the article, 50.9% were not self-disclosed by the authors, totaling $5,782,197 ($1,665,603 general; $25,532 research; $4,091,062 associated research).ConclusionIndustry-related financial relationships are prevalent among United States–based physicians publishing in major neurology journals, and incomplete self-disclosure is common. As a profession, academic and other neurologists must work to establish firm rules to ensure and manage disclosure of financial COI.

Organ donation after the circulatory determination of death (DCDD) accounts for a growing percentage of deceased organ donations. Although hospital DCDD protocols stipulate donor death determination, some do not adhere to national guidelines that require mechanical, not electrical, asystole. Surrogate decisions to withdraw life-sustaining therapy should be separated from decisions to donate organs. Donor families should be given sufficient information about the DCDD protocol and its impact on the dying process to provide informed consent, and donors should be given proper palliative care during dying. An unresolved ethical question is whether and how donor consent should be seen as authorizing manipulation of a living donor during the dying process solely for to benefit of the organ recipient.

Background Minorities have historically been underrepresented in clinical research trials despite having comparatively poor health indicators. Recognizing the dual inequalities of increased disease burden and decreased research participation, the National Institute of Health (NIH) Revitalization Act of 1993 mandated the inclusion and reporting of women and minorities in NIH-funded research. While progress has been made in the subsequent decades, this underrepresentation of minorities in research trials persists and has been documented in multiple disciplines. However, the extent of adequate representation and reporting of minority inclusion in clinical trials for migraine remains unknown. Objectives In this systematic review and study, we review the literature examining the representation of women and minorities in migraine clinical research trials Methods First we searched PubMed for pertinent articles examining the inclusion of women and minorities in migraine clinical research trials. Second, we identified controlled-trials for migraine published since 2011 in major neurology, headache, and general medicine journals using the terms “migraine randomized controlled trial.” We then reviewed the results manually and excluded pilot studies and those with fewer than 50 participants. We next determined (a) how frequently representation of minorities and women were reported in these major trials; (b) what factors correlated with reporting; and (c) whether women and minority inclusion comprised their ratios in the general population. Results We identified 128 relevant clinical trials, of which 36 met our inclusion criteria. All 36 trials (100%) reported gender frequency, and 25 of 36 (69.4%) reported ethnicity or race. Among all studies, women and Whites represented 84.2 and 82.9% of participants (mean), respectively. Studies conducted in the United States and funded by a private company were more likely to report race than studies conducted exclusively outside of the U.S. or with a public sponsor. No studies stratified efficacy or safety by ethnicity or gender. Men and non-Whites in the U.S. were statistically underrepresented. Conclusions Most recent headache studies comply with the NIH mandate to include women and minorities in research trials, particularly U.S.-based and industry-funded studies. Whites are overrepresented compared to both the general population and the population of migraineurs. Future studies should strive to increase minority participation and investigate race-based differences in migraine expression, treatment response, and medication toxicity.

Drs. Ahlawat and Narayanaswami1 detailed the extent of industry-related financial interests among neurologists captured in the Open Payments (OP) database. Industry-related conflicts of interests (COIs) widely influence neurologic education, research, and clinical practice.2 Industry-funded trials often reach different conclusions than non-industry-funded trials,3 and even small gifts to physicians can influence their prescribing practices.4 Despite the OP database's shortcomings,5 it is an important step for 2 reasons. First, disclosure only mitigates COI if the disclosed information is widely and publicly available. Patients are generally not aware of their doctors' financial relationships.6 We hope OP will improve transparency. Second, the resulting social pressure from this transparency could lead to divestment from financial COI. Full disclosure is an important step towards mitigating COI, but does not redress subconscious biases that nearly invariably accompany financial relationships2; COI avoidance is often preferable. To investigate OP's effects on divestiture, we reviewed all neurologists in OP from 2013 to 2016. Of 9,505 neurologists in 2013 (OP's first year), 13 (0.07%) had ownership or investment interests totaling $26,610,645 (mean $2,800; median $65,975; maximum $24,949,811. In 2016, 16 of 11,105 neurologists had ownership and investment interest (0.09%) totaling $2,103,947 (mean $191; median $41,497; maximum $700,521). Perhaps OP is having an effect, but more research is required.

Objectives To compare outcomes between two models of acute ischemic stroke care. Namely 1) “drip-and-stay”, i.e. IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administered at a spoke hospital in a telestroke network, with the patient remaining at the spoke, versus 2) “drip-and-ship”, i.e. tPA administered at a spoke hospital with subsequent patient transfer to a hub hospital, and 3) “hub”, i.e. tPA and subsequent treatment at a hub hospital. Materials and Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane from inception-October 2019 included randomized control trials and observational cohort studies comparing the drip-and-stay model to hub and drip-and-ship models. Outcomes of interest were functional independence (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 1), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), mortality, and length of stay. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using a fixed-effects meta-analysis and random-effects Bayesian meta-analysis. Non-inferiority was calculated using a fixed-margin method. Results Of 2806 unique records identified, 10 studies, totaling 4,164 patients, fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis found no significant difference in functional outcomes (mRS0-1) (6 studies, RR=1.09, 95%CI 0.98–1.22, p=0.123), sICH (8 studies, RR=0.98, 95%CI 0.64–1.51, p=0.942), or 90-day mortality (5 studies, RR=0.98, 95%CI 0.73–1.32, p=0.911, respectively) between patients treated in a drip-and-stay model compared to patients treated in drip-and-ship or hub models. There was no significant heterogeneity in these outcomes. Drip-and-stay outcomes (mRS 0–1, sICH) were non-inferior when compared to the combined group. Conclusions Our findings indicate that drip-and-stay is non-inferior to current models of drip-and-ship or hub stroke care, and may be as safe and as effective as either.

Objective: To determine the safety of domperidone in the treatment of nausea associated with dihydroergotamine (DHE) infusion and headache. Methods: We audited our use of domperidone for the inpatient management of nausea, focusing on known safety concerns, particularly potential cardiac arrhythmias. Results: We reviewed 103 consecutive admissions of 90 patients admitted for IV DHE by infusion. Most admissions were to treat chronic migraine with (n = 53) or without (n = 46) aura. Domperidone was administered in 85 of 103 encounters and was well-tolerated at doses up to 80 mg/d. A significant side effect, akathisia, was observed in one patient. Baseline ECG with corrected QT interval (QTc) was obtained on all patients. Repeat ECG after domperidone was obtained in 21 patients, whose baseline characteristics did not differ from the group as a whole. ECG was interpreted blindly by a cardiac electrophysiologist. QTc did not differ before and after domperidone administration (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, median [interquartile range] 435.0 [410.5–453.0] at admission and 427.0 [399.0–452.5] after domperidone; p = 0.15). In combination with other antiemetics, domperidone was effective in treating nausea such that no patients had refractory nausea severe enough to limit DHE dose. Conclusions: This retrospective audit demonstrates that domperidone is safe in the treatment of nausea associated with inpatient DHE infusion and headache. While larger prospective trials are necessary to confirm these results and assess efficacy, current evidence and clinical experience suggests that domperidone is safe and useful for nausea and headache management. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with headache undergoing DHE infusion, domperidone is safe and effective in the treatment of nausea.

Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) is an important tool to detect abnormalities of peripheral nerves. This pictorial review demonstrates the MRN features of a variety of neuropathies affecting the lumbosacral plexus (LSP) and lower extremity nerves, drawn from over 1200 MRNs from our institution and supplemented by the literature. Abnormalities can be due to spinal compression, extraspinal compression, malignancy, musculoskeletal disease, iatrogenesis, inflammation, infection, and idiopathic disorders. We discuss indications and limitations of MRN in diagnosing LSP neuropathies. As MRN becomes more widely used, physicians must become familiar with the differential diagnosis of abnormalities detectable with MRN of the LSP.

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are relatively common, accounting for 5-40% of visits to tertiary epilepsy centers. Inpatient video-electroencephalogram (vEEG) monitoring is the gold standard for diagnosis, but additional positive predictive tools are necessary given vEEG's relatively scarce availability. In this study, we investigated if the number of patient-reported allergies distinguishes between PNES and epilepsy. Excessive allergy-reporting, like PNES, may reflect somatization. Using electronic medical records, ICD-9 codes, and text-identification algorithms to search EEG reports, we identified 905 cases of confirmed PNES and 5187 controls with epilepsy but no PNES. Patients with PNES averaged more self-reported allergies than patients with epilepsy alone (1.93 vs. 1.00, p

A conflict of interest (COI) exists when a physician's professional responsibilities are compromised by personal or financial relationships. COIs between physicians and the pharmaceutical or medical device industry (Industry) are common. Collaborations with Industry have many potential benefits, but also raise potential ethical pitfalls. Industry-related COIs have widespread influence on medical education, research, and clinical practice, and therefore have profound implications for the integrity of the field of medicine. Full disclosure is an important step toward mitigating COI but does not redress subconscious accompanying biases. I review the spectrum of potential COI faced by physicians, with a focus on the ethics surrounding the relationship between neurologists and Industry. Other financial and nonfinancial COIs that influence neurologists and nonindividual entities, such as academic institutions, medical journals, and professional societies, are also discussed. Solutions ranging from disclosure to avoidance and recusal are briefly considered.

Background HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) remain problematic even in the antiretroviral therapy (ART) era. Efavirenz (EFV) is well known for neuropsychiatric side effects and has been associated with worsening neurocognitive performance (NC). We hypothesized that switching from an ART regimen with EFV to one with rilpivirine (RPV) would improve NC. Methods This single-center, open-label, superiority, randomized controlled trial was conducted at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital June 2018 to March 2019. HIV- infected adults (≥18 years), virologically suppressed on an EFV-containing regimen for at least 12 months, who met Frascati’s criteria of asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI), were randomized to a switching arm (RPV-containing regimen) vs. a control arm (EFV-containing regimen). The primary objective was to compare the improvement of NC at month 6 (M6) after switching. Secondary outcomes were individual NC domains, tolerability, and safety after switching regimens. Results 20 ANI participants (10 per group) completed the study. 11 participants showed NC improvement at M6: 6 in the switching arm and 5 in the control arm. Global neuro deficit scores (GDS), figure learning, and figure memory at M6 significantly improved in both arms (P < 0.05). Verbal memory and speed of information processing improved over time in the switching arm only (0.6 (0.1–1.0); P = 0.02, and 0.7 (0.1–1.2); P = 0.03, respectively). However, no significant differences between the two groups were observed. Male gender, age < 50 and initiation of ART within 5 years after diagnosis all trended toward an association with improved NC. No tolerability issues or clinical significant adverse events were reported. Conclusion Despite some positive trends, switching from an EFV-containing regimen did not significantly improve NC. This finding was consistent with previous reports. A larger study with longer follow-up may be warranted. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

In the article “BOLD cerebrovascular reactivity as a novel marker for crossed cerebellar diaschisis,” Sebok et al. reported similar sensitivity of blood oxygen level–dependent cerebrovascular reactivity (BOLD-CVR) in detecting crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) as compared to (15O)-H2O-PET in 25 participants with symptomatic unilateral cerebrovascular steno-occlusive disease and reported that those with CCD had poorer baseline neurologic performance and 3-month neurologic outcome. In response, Reidler et al. question whether CCD was the cause of consequence of poor outcomes, noting that it may be an epiphenomenon of large-volume supratentorial strokes and citing conflicting evidence in the literature about independent association of CCD with post-stroke outcomes. They suggest accounting for lesion volume and distribution in the analyses. In their reply, Niftrik et al. agree that their finding of worse outcome in those with CCD should be cautiously interpreted and investigated in follow-up studies, but argue that supratentorial stroke volume is an inexact measurement, although stroke location would be helpful to examine. They clarify their finding of impaired supratentorial BOLD-CVR in the group with CCD and opine that hemodynamic changes may cause CCD rather than just functional disruption.

Reduced delivery of glucose and oxygen during brain ischemia can cause energy failure (ATP depletion), which can in turn trigger processes leading to cell death. Glucose can support glycolytic ATP production even in the absence of oxygen, and it would seem to follow that increased glucose in the residual blood flow to ischemic brain should increase cell survival. This was tested experimentally in a rat model of ischemia/reperfusion by Pulsinelli et al1 several decades ago. Glucose had a striking effect, but in the direction opposite to what might be expected: rats in which circulating blood glucose was increased by intravenous infusion had far more extensive brain injury and mortality compared with normoglycemic rats. This experiment has subsequently been revisited dozens of times, using different animal species, stroke models, glucose concentrations, timing of glucose elevations, and permutations of these factors. The net result is one of the most robust in all of stroke research: hyperglycemia almost always exacerbates brain injury.2,3 Clinical experience mirrors the animal literature in these respects, because both retrospective studies and patient registries show a striking correlation between elevated admission glucose concentrations and poor outcomes.4 Hyperglycemia is similarly associated with increased hemorrhage formation and poor outcome in patients treated with tissue plasminogen activator.5–7 Random blood glucose levels are ≈4.4 to 6.1 mmol/L in both humans and rodents, with rodents being the species most commonly used for experimental stroke. The definition of hyperglycemia varies somewhat in stroke studies, ranging from 6.1 to >10 mmol/L glucose. Using these definitions, hyperglycemia is found at presentation in 30% to 60% of all patients with stroke.8,9 Some of these patients are diabetic, but acute, poststroke hyperglycemia is a sympathomimetic stress response in most. Despite the frequency of hyperglycemia in stroke and >30 …

I applaud the Brain Death Working Group for working toward uniform standards for determination of brain death.1

OBJECTIVE To determine if better antiretroviral (ARV) central nervous system (CNS) penetration is associated with reduced rates of chronic pain in people living with HIV (PLWH). BACKGROUND Chronic pain remains prevalent in PLWH despite widespread ARV use. Mechanisms underlying this prevalence remain unknown, though neuroinflammation from persistent CNS HIV infection and maladaptive plastic changes in the CNS have been implicated. Here we hypothesize that better CNS ARV penetration, measured using the CNS Penetration-Effectiveness (CPE) score, would decrease rates of chronic pain. METHODS We interviewed 254 consecutive adults from an HIV clinic in Chiang Mai, Thailand. We collected data on demographics, HIV history, ARV use, and pain characteristics. Patients were evaluated for depression using a Thai two question Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2). Modified CPE score was calculated using established methods and grouped a priori into "low CPE" (≤7, poor penetration) and "high CPE" (≥8, good penetration). CPE score was compared with chronic pain scores in SPSS using appropriate statistical tests. A relationship between CPE score and a positive depression screen was tested further using multivariable binary logistic models. RESULTS 245 of 254 subjects were on ARVs. Complete ARV data was available for 235 patients. 137 of these 235 patients (58.3%) had a CPE score ≤7, and 98 (41.7%) had a score ≥8. 49 patients had chronic pain, and 9 had neuropathic pain. Low CPE score was not associated with chronic pain (p=0.64), neuropathic pain (p=0.56), or frequent pain (p=0.80), nor was it associated with the severity of reported "worst pain" or "average pain" in the last 24 hours (p=0.18 and 0.48, respectively). Post-hoc analysis revealed that higher CPE score was a significant independent risk factor for depression measured by a positive PHQ-2 screen [OR (95% CI) = 1.29 (1.04-1.61), p=0.02]. This relationship was mediated primarily by exposure to zidovudine. CONCLUSIONS CPE score is not associated with chronic pain in PLWH. Post-hoc analysis demonstrated that CPE score, and zidovudine exposure in particular, predicts a positive depression screen. Given the substantial morbidity associated with chronic pain and mood disorders in PLWH, additional studies to determine preventable and treatable factors are imperative.

I read with interest the article by Hocker et al.1 I took care of a 45-year-old man several years ago with neurotropic squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (T2N0M0). His brother and paternal uncle had testicular cancer, and his mother had breast cancer. Three months after his initial resection, he developed neuropathic pain of the tongue, and MRI showed tumor recurrence. Two weeks later, he developed classic Miller-Fisher syndrome with mild ophthalmoparesis, ataxia, areflexia, elevated CSF protein, and an elevated anti-Gq1b. He was treated with IV immunoglobulin and did well. Two weeks later, he underwent repeat surgery. In the days following this, he developed neuropathic pain in the right shoulder that persisted for a month and was followed by atrophy and weakness in several right arm muscles. Clinical and electrodiagnostic testing confirmed a diagnosis of brachial neuritis.

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare neuropathy that is often treatable with immunomodulatory therapy if diagnosed early. However, accurate diagnosis is difficult due to a significant overlap of symptoms with other neurological conditions, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Evidence of immunoglobulin M (IgM) anti-ganglioside GM1 antibodies and electrodiagnostic findings of conduction block are useful diagnostic criteria for MMN but are not universal findings. This review explores the differential diagnosis of MMN and ALS and discusses three cases of MMN initially diagnosed as ALS, in which the correct diagnosis allowed effective treatment. These cases highlight the need for greater awareness of MMN among physicians.

Objective:The mechanism of hypoglycorrhachia—low CSF glucose—in meningitis remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the relative contribution of CSF inflammation vs microorganisms (bacteria and fungi) in lowering CSF glucose levels.Methods:We retrospectively categorized CSF profiles into microbial and aseptic meningitis and analyzed CSF leukocyte count, glucose, and protein concentrations. We assessed the relationship between these markers using multivariate and stratified linear regression analysis for initial and repeated CSF sampling. We also calculated the receiver operating characteristics of CSF glucose and CSF-to-serum glucose ratios to presumptively diagnose microbial meningitis.Results:We found that increasing levels of CSF inflammation were associated with decreased CSF glucose levels in the microbial but not aseptic category. Moreover, elevated CSF protein levels correlated more strongly than the leukocyte count with low CSF glucose levels on initial (R2= 36%,p< 0.001) and repeated CSF sampling (R2= 46%,p< 0.001). Hypoglycorrhachia (Conclusions:The main driver of hypoglycorrhachia appears to be a combination of microbial meningitis with moderate to high degrees of CSF inflammation and proteins, suggesting that the presence of microorganisms capable of catabolizing glucose is a determinant of hypoglycorrhachia in meningitis. A major notable exception is neurosarcoidosis. Low CSF glucose and CSF-to-serum glucose ratios are useful markers for the diagnosis of microbial meningitis.

Context Chronic pain remains prevalent in HIV+ adults despite widespread antiretroviral use. Pain continues to be underrecognized and undertreated in this population. In Thailand, similar to the West, HIV care is transitioning toward chronic disease management. Despite the importance of pain management in chronic HIV, the prevalence of pain and adequacy of pain management is unknown in HIV+ adults in Thailand. Objectives This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the prevalence of chronic pain, the burden of inadequate analgesia, and risk factors for chronic pain in HIV+ adults in Thailand. Methods A total of 254 HIV+ adults were recruited from an outpatient clinic in Thailand. Interviewers obtained information on demographics, clinical data, and pain characteristics. The burden of inadequate analgesia was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory. Risk factors were identified with logistic regression analysis. Results Frequent pain was reported by 27% of participants; 22% reported chronic pain. Pain was significantly associated with education less than primary school, a positive depression screen, and the number of years on combined antiretroviral therapy. Eighty-six percent of patients with frequent pain were inadequately treated. Of 34 patients with moderate or severe pain, none received adequate analgesia. Inadequate analgesia was a significant risk factor for poorer quality of life. Conclusion Despite widespread antiretroviral use, pain remains common and undertreated in HIV+ adults in Thailand. Undertreated pain negatively impacts quality of life. It is imperative that policy makers and HIV caregivers address this treatment gap to advance the care of people living with HIV in Thailand.

Background Legionella pneumophila is a common cause of community-acquired pneumonia. Central nervous system dysfunction is common, and diagnosis in the absence of pulmonary symptoms can be challenging. Here we describe an atypical clinical presentation of Legionella infection in a patient with HIV who was found to have an unusual neuroradiologic lesion that further served to obscure the diagnosis. This is the first such description in a patient with Legionellosis and HIV coinfection. Case presentation A 43 year-old HIV positive man presented to our hospital with dysarthria, fevers, headache, and altered mental status. Initial work-up revealed pneumonia and a lesion of the splenium of the corpus callosum on magnetic resonance imaging. He was subsequently diagnosed with Legionella pneumonia and treated with complete symptom resolution. Conclusions Neurologic abnormalities are frequent in Legionellosis, but the diagnosis may be difficult in the absence of overt respiratory symptoms and in the presence of HIV coinfection. A high index of suspicion and early initiation of empiric antibiotics is imperative since early treatment may help prevent long-term sequelae. Neuroimaging abnormalities, though rare, can help the physician narrow down the diagnosis and avoid unnecessary invasive testing. Future studies should aim to elucidate the as yet unknown role of neuroimaging in the diagnoses and prognostication of Legionellosis, as well as the interaction between Legionella infection and HIV.