1. Is there a benefit for adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy in early cervical cancer? Results from a population-based study
- Author
-
Michael Anapolski, Elisabeth C. Inwald, Atanas Ignatov, Thomas Papathemelis, Sophia Scharl, Anton Scharl, Michael Gerken, Olaf Ortmann, Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke, Oliver Kölbl, and Cornelia Becher
- Subjects
Adult ,Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Multivariate analysis ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Population ,Uterine Cervical Neoplasms ,Antineoplastic Agents ,Kaplan-Meier Estimate ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Adjuvant therapy ,Humans ,education ,Aged ,Neoplasm Staging ,Aged, 80 and over ,Cervical cancer ,education.field_of_study ,030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine ,business.industry ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Radiotherapy Dosage ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Combined Modality Therapy ,Survival Rate ,Radiation therapy ,Treatment Outcome ,Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Cohort ,Female ,Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ,business ,Adjuvant - Abstract
Due to insufficient and conflicting prospective evidence, the recommendations on when to apply adjuvant radiochemotherapy in early-stage cervical cancer vary between international guidelines. In this population-based study, we evaluated the outcome of patients with early-stage cervical cancer based on risk factors and the adjuvant therapy they received. The effect of primary therapy (surgery and radiochemotherapy RCT, surgery and radiotherapy RT, and surgery alone) on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated in the complete cohort of 442 patients and in subgroups according to risk profile and nodal status. In low-risk patients, there was no difference in OS (p = 0.276) depending on whether patients received adjuvant therapy or not. Concerning RFS, patients with RT (including one patient with RCT) exhibited a significantly worse outcome compared to the group with surgery alone (p = 0.015). In intermediate-risk patients, the administration of adjuvant RT significantly benefited RFS when compared to surgery only in multivariate analysis (p = 0.031). Concerning OS, no significant influence for adjuvant treatment could be seen (p = 0.354). Though trends towards better OS and RFS could be observed in patients of the high-risk group—both in RCT and RT groups compared to surgery alone—the effects did not prove to be significant. Our study reaffirms the evidence against the use of adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy in low-risk early-stage cervical cancer. In intermediate-, and less pronounced in high-risk patients, however, it seems to be beneficial. The role of adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy in early cervical cancer should be further investigated in prospective randomized trials.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF