1. Screening for symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients treated with renal replacement therapy: utility of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised
- Author
-
Nathaniel Edwards, Susan J. Bartlett, Evan Tang, Marta Novak, Heather Ford, Sara Macanovic, Doris Howell, Madeline Li, Istvan Mucsi, and Sumaya Dano
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Symptom assessment ,Anxiety ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Renal Dialysis ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,In patient ,Renal replacement therapy ,10. No inequality ,Depression (differential diagnoses) ,Dialysis ,Receiver operating characteristic ,Depression ,business.industry ,030503 health policy & services ,Public health ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Anxiety Disorders ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Quality of Life ,Female ,Symptom Assessment ,medicine.symptom ,0305 other medical science ,business - Abstract
The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESASr) is widely used in clinical oncology to screen for physical and emotional symptoms. The performance of the anxiety and depression items (ESASr-A and ESASr-D, respectively) as screening tools have not been evaluated in patients treated with renal replacement therapy. Kidney transplant recipients and patients on dialysis were recruited in Toronto. Patients were classified as having moderate/severe depression and anxiety symptoms using the established cut-off score of ≥ 10 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) questionnaires. This study included 931 participants; 62% male, mean age (SD) 55(16), and 52% White. All participants completed ESASr, however only 748 participants completed PHQ-9 and 769 participants completed GAD-7. Correlation between ESASr item scores and legacy scores were moderately strong (ESASr-D/PHQ-9: 0.61; ESASr-A/GAD-7: 0.64). We found good discrimination for moderate/severe depression and anxiety [area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (95% CI) ESASr-D 0.82(0.78–0.86); ESASr-A 0.87 (0.82, 0.92)]. The cut-off ≥ 2 for ESASr-D [Sensitivity = 0.76; Specificity = 0.77; Likelihood Ratio (LR) + = 3.29; LR − = 0.31] and ≥ 4 for ESASr-A (Sensitivity = 0.75; Specificity = 0.87; LR + = 5.76; LR − = 0.29) had the best combination of measurement characteristics. The identified ESASr-D and ESASr-A cut-off scores may be used to rule out patients without emotional distress with few false negatives. However, the low sensitivity identified in our analysis suggests that neither ESASr-D or ESASr-A are acceptable as standalone screening tools.
- Published
- 2021