1. Technical recommendations for clinical translation of renal MRI: a consensus project of the Cooperation in Science and Technology Action PARENCHIMA
- Author
-
Pim Pullens, Ilona A. Dekkers, Sean B. Fain, Anneloes de Boer, Christoffer Laustsen, Andreas Pohlmann, Charlotte Buchanan, Fabio Nery, Pottumarthi V. Prasad, Susan T. Francis, Ivan Pedrosa, Octavia Bane, Aghogho Odudu, Anita A. Harteveld, María A. Fernández-Seara, Kanishka Sharma, Alexandra Ljimani, Iosif Mendichovszky, Anna Caroli, Steven Sourbron, David C. Alsop, Eric E. Sigmund, Xavier Golay, and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Technology and Engineering ,Consensus ,Delphi Technique ,Computer science ,Process (engineering) ,SEGMENTATION ,030232 urology & nephrology ,Biophysics ,Delphi method ,Context (language use) ,Kidney ,Health informatics ,VALIDATION ,Article ,Imaging ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Translational Research, Biomedical ,GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Medicine and Health Sciences ,Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ,medicine ,FIBROSIS ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Medical physics ,Expert Testimony ,BLOOD-FLOW ,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology ,Ongoing review ,Task force ,business.industry ,Reference Standards ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,United States ,Europe ,MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ELASTOGRAPHY ,Action (philosophy) ,Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases ,Nephrology ,Standardisation ,Technology Platforms ,business ,Biomarkers ,Research Article - Abstract
Purpose The potential of renal MRI biomarkers has been increasingly recognised, but clinical translation requires more standardisation. The PARENCHIMA consensus project aims to develop and apply a process for generating technical recommendations on renal MRI. Methods A task force was formed in July 2018 focused on five methods. A draft process for attaining consensus was distributed publicly for consultation and finalised at an open meeting (Prague, October 2018). Four expert panels completed surveys between October 2018 and March 2019, discussed results and refined the surveys at a face-to-face meeting (Aarhus, March 2019) and completed a second round (May 2019). Results A seven-stage process was defined: (1) formation of expert panels; (2) definition of the context of use; (3) literature review; (4) collection and comparison of MRI protocols; (5) consensus generation by an approximate Delphi method; (6) reporting of results in vendor-neutral and vendor-specific terms; (7) ongoing review and updating. Application of the process resulted in 166 consensus statements. Conclusion The process generated meaningful technical recommendations across very different MRI methods, while allowing for improvement and refinement as open issues are resolved. The results are likely to be widely supported by the renal MRI community and thereby promote more harmonisation.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF