1. Apps and gaps in bipolar disorder: A systematic review on electronic monitoring for episode prediction
- Author
-
Zafiris J. Daskalakis, M. Ishrat Husain, Abigail Ortiz, Benoit H. Mulsant, and Marta M. Maslej
- Subjects
Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Bipolar Disorder ,Web of science ,business.industry ,MEDLINE ,PsycINFO ,medicine.disease ,Affect ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Clinical Psychology ,Systematic review ,Mood ,medicine ,Humans ,Smartphone ,Bipolar disorder ,Electronics ,Intensive care medicine ,business ,Software - Abstract
Background Long-term clinical monitoring in bipolar disorder (BD) is an important therapeutic tool. The availability of smartphones and wearables has sparked the development of automated applications to remotely monitor patients. This systematic review focus on the current state of electronic (e-) monitoring for episode prediction in BD. Methods We systematically reviewed the literature on e-monitoring for episode prediction in adult BD patients. The systematic review was done according to the guidelines for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and was registered in PROSPERO on April 29, 2020 (CRD42020155795). We conducted a search of Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO (all 2000–2020) databases. We identified and extracted data from 17 published reports on 15 relevant studies. Results Studies were heterogeneous and most had substantial methodological and technical limitations. Models varied widely in their performance. Published metrics were too heterogeneous to lend themselves to a meta-analysis. Four studies reported sensitivity (range: 0.21 - 0.95); and two reported specificity for prediction of mood episodes (range: 0.36 - 0.99). Two studies reported accuracy (range: 0.64 - 0.88) and four reported area under the curve (AUC; range: 0.52-0.95). Overall, models were better in predicting manic or hypomanic episodes, but their performance depended on feature type. Limitations Our conclusions are tempered by the lack of appropriate information impeding our ability to synthesize the available evidence. Conclusions Given the clinical variability in BD, predicting mood episodes remains a challenging task. Emerging e-monitoring technology for episode prediction in BD requires more development before it can be adopted clinically.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF