1. Clinical Utility of Home versus Hospital Spirometry in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease: Evaluation after INJUSTIS Interim Analysis
- Author
-
Gauri Saini, Toby M. Maher, Fasihul Khan, Glenn Hearson, Lucy Howard, Chris Barber, Gisli Jenkins, Colin Edwards, Andrew M. Wilson, Iain A. Stewart, and Steve Jones
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Spirometry ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Interstitial lung disease ,Disease ,medicine.disease ,Interim analysis ,Hospitals ,Interim ,Emergency medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Lung Diseases, Interstitial ,business ,Lung - Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic identified an urgent need to re-evaluate the provision of spirometry for clinical monitoring. Home spirometry offers the opportunity for real-time disease evaluation without risk of nosocomial infection. To determine the utility of home spirometry in interstitial lung disease (ILD), interim data from the ongoing INJUSTIS study was evaluated. High correlation was observed between home and hospital spirometry at baseline(r=0.89) and three-months(r=0.82). Over 90% of home spirometry values were within Bland-Altman agreement limits at both time points, although frequently underestimated hospital values. Home spirometry is feasible in people with fibrotic ILD.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF