Search

Introduction Inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII occur in about 30% of previously untreated patients (PUPs) and are the most serious complication of haemophilia A. It is unclear why some patients develop inhibitors and others do not. Aims The Early Prophylaxis Immunologic Challenge (EPIC) study was designed to test the hypothesis that inhibitor incidence in PUPs with severe or moderately severe haemophilia A could be reduced when a once-weekly FVIII prophylaxis starts with 25 IU kg−1 rAHF-PFM before 1 year of age and immunological danger signals are minimized. Methods These signals were minimized by avoiding: surgery; the first FVIII infusion during severe bleeding or an infection; central venous access devices and administering vaccinations intramuscularly 3–4 days before or after FVIII. Results Eight of the 19 treated subjects (42.1%) developed confirmed inhibitors. Eleven of the 19 treated subjects were PUPs without any prior exposure to FVIII. Three of them (27.3%) developed a confirmed inhibitor together with FVIII-binding antibodies. The study was stopped because the likelihood to reach the primary objective was minimal, a decision endorsed by the data safety monitoring board. Conclusion Because of early termination, the EPIC study hypothesis could not be corroborated. Nonetheless, our data analyses indicate that the current definition of an inhibitor only based on plasma inhibitor activity ≥0.6 BU mL−1 may not always reflect the presence of FVIII-neutralizing antibodies. The findings of this study teach us that low-level inhibitor activity results need in addition a confirmatory test and/or the assessment of the therapeutic response.

A successful vaccine development strategy for areas with clustered H5N1 events requires conduct of vaccine trials in potentially non-naive subjects and evaluation of post-vaccination responsiveness. An open-label, randomized, phase I/II study therefore assessed the immunogenicity and safety of two different dose levels of an inactivated, non-adjuvanted, whole virus clade 2.1 (A/Indonesia/05/2005) H5N1 Vero cell-derived influenza vaccine in healthy adults (21-45 years) from a region where the virus has been circulating (Hong Kong) as well as Singapore. Subjects (N=110) were randomized 1:1 to receive two vaccinations with either 3.75 μg or 7.5 μg H5N1 haemagglutinin antigen 21 days apart. Safety, immunogenicity (microneutralization [MN] and single radial haemolysis [SRH] at baseline and post-vaccination) and cross-reactivity against a heterologous clade 1 strain (A/Vietnam/1203/2004) of the vaccine were assessed. Pre-existing immunity to the vaccine strain was 14% which is higher than previously reported for these regions. Two vaccinations with either vaccine formulation induced high seroprotection rates (MN titre ≥ 1:20) against the vaccine strain A/Indonesia/05/2005: 82.7% and 86.5% in the 3.75 μg and 7.5 μg dose groups. Seroconversion rates and fold increase exceeded the CPMP criterion of >40% and >2.5 for MN and SRH in both dose groups after the second vaccination, while the seroprotection rate in the 7.5 μg dose group determined by SRH was only marginally lower (69.2%) than the CPMP criterion of >70%. Thus, 11 of 12 CHMP criteria were fulfilled. A cross-reactive antibody response against the heterologous A/Vietnam/1203/2004 strain was demonstrated after the second vaccination (>21% by MN and ≥ 25% by SRH). Persistence of antibodies against the vaccine strain was also demonstrated 6 months after the first vaccination, indicating that a booster vaccination would be effective in those who have received two priming doses. No serious adverse events were reported. The H5N1 influenza vaccine against clade 2.1 strain A/Indonesia/05/2005 was well tolerated and immunogenic after two vaccinations, and induced a cross-neutralizing antibody response, with no dose effect.

A clinical study was carried out to evaluate the persistence of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) antibodies 2 and 3 years after a primary vaccination series (three-dose regimen), and to assess the antibody response to a booster vaccination with FSME-IMMUN. Volunteers (N = 347, 18-67 years) who had received two doses of either FSME-IMMUN or Encepur adults and a third vaccination with FSME-IMMUN were enrolled. Seropositivity rates were assessed by ELISA and neutralization test (NT). After the primary series, seropositivity rates were 99.1% as determined by ELISA and 100% by NT, decreasing to 85% and 96.8% in the first two years and to 88.7% and 95.4% after 3 years. Following booster vaccination, 100% of subjects were seropositive. Age was the only variable with a significant influence on the probability of remaining TBE seropositive 2 or 3 years after the third vaccination. In subjects aged 18-50 years, the pre-booster seropositivity rate was higher (88.7% and 92.3% after 2 and 3 years, respectively) than in those aged 51-67 years (65.5% and 70.9% after 2 and 3 years, respectively). Adverse events after booster vaccination occurred with a low frequency and were predominantly mild. An annual TBE antibody decline rate of 0.58 (based on NT) was estimated to lead to antibody titer decrease from e.g., 260 to 45.6 after 3 years. To conclude, a booster vaccination with FSME-IMMUN, administered 3 years after primary vaccination, is well tolerated and induces a

Two clinical studies were conducted to identify the optimal dose of a modified tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccine (FSME-IMMUN "new") in adults. A prospective, randomised, phase II, double-blind dose-finding study with the FSME-IMMUN "new" vaccine was performed in volunteers aged 16-65 years (n=405) to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of two vaccinations with three vaccine doses (0.6, 1.2 and 2.4microg antigen). The safety and immunogenicity of the third vaccination were investigated in a follow-up study on the same study population. Antibody response to vaccination was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and, after the third vaccination, by neutralisation test (NT). Seroconversion rates (ELISA) in the different dose groups (0.6, 1.2 and 2.4 microg) were 85.1, 96.2 and 97.0%, respectively, after the second vaccination, which 73% of the volunteers received only 21 days after the first vaccination. Seroconversion rates after the third vaccination were 96, 99.2 and 100% (ELISA) as well as 77, 93 and 96.6% (NT) with the 0.6, 1.2 and 2.4 microg doses, respectively. No unexpected AEs or vaccine-related serious adverse events (SAE) were observed during either study. Local and systemic reactions were mainly mild and not dose-dependent, with an overall fever rate of

A new, highly purified, inactivated tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccine FSME-IMMUN "NEW" has been developed by Baxter using a production virus seed derived from chick embryo cells instead of mouse brain. In clinical trials, the vaccine was shown to be highly immunogenic and well tolerated in adults and children. Following licensure in 2001, the tolerability of half the adult dose of FSME-IMMUN "NEW" (1.2 microg antigen/0.25 ml) was investigated in a post-marketing surveillance in 1899 children aged 6 months to 12 years. Rectal body temperature was measured daily for 3 days after the first vaccination. An overall fever rate of 20.3% (95% CI=18.5; 22%) was observed, which was mostly mild in nature (38.0 toor=39.0 degrees C) with only 0.3% (95% CI=0.1; 0.6%) severe cases reported. The highest fever rates were reported in February and March (when febrile illnesses are common) and in the 1-3 years age group (63% of the total surveillance population). These results demonstrated that, in routine medical practice, FSME-IMMUN "NEW" vaccine at a dose of 1.2 microg antigen/0.25 ml is safe for the first vaccination in children.

Background Immune responses to novel pandemic influenza vaccines may be influenced by previous exposure to antigenically similar seasonal strains. Methods An open-label, randomized, phase I/II study was conducted to assess the immunogenicity and safety of a non-adjuvanted, inactivated whole-virus H1N1 A/California/07/2009 vaccine. 408 subjects were stratified by age (18–59 and >60 years) and randomized 1:1 to receive two vaccinations with either 3.75 or 7.5 μg hemagglutinin antigen 21 days apart. Safety, immunogenicity and the influence of seasonal influenza vaccination and antibody cross-reactivity with a seasonal H1N1 strain was assessed. Results A single vaccination with either dose induced substantial increases in H1N1 A/California/07/2009 hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and neutralizing (MN) antibody titers in both adult and elderly subjects. A single 7.5 μg dose induced seroprotection rates of 86.9% in adults and 75.2% in elderly subjects. Two 7.5 μg vaccinations induced seroprotection rates in adult and elderly subjects of 90.9% and 89.1%, respectively. The robust immune response to vaccination was confirmed by analyses of neutralizing antibody titers. Both HI and MN antibodies persisted for ≥6 months post-vaccination. Between 34% and 49% of subjects had seroprotective levels of H1N1 A/California/07/2009 antibodies at baseline. Higher baseline HI titers were associated with receipt of the 2008–09 or 2009–10 seasonal influenza vaccine. High baseline A/California/07/2009 neutralizing antibody titers were also associated with high baseline titers against A/New Caledonia/20/99, a seasonal H1N1 strain which circulated and was included in the seasonal vaccine from 2000–01 to 2006–07. Pre-adsorption with A/H1N1/New Caledonia/20/99 antigen reduced A/H1N1/California/07/2009 baseline titers in 55% of tested sera. The vaccine was well tolerated with low rates of fever. Conclusions A whole-virus H1N1 A/California/07/2009 vaccine was safe and well tolerated and a single dose induced substantial immune responses similar to seasonal influenza vaccines, probably due to immunological priming by previous seasonal influenza vaccines or infections.

The need for highly effective tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccines has increased globally due to a variety of factors including climate, social, economic and demographic changes, which are thought to have promoted the expansion of the endemic region of TBE viruses. The first TBE vaccine, FSME-IMMUN Inject, was introduced in the 1970s and has been continually improved since then to enhance both its safety and immunogenicity. The current formulation was established in 2001 and is marketed as FSME-IMMUN. This review summarizes findings of the clinical development programme since 2001 regarding determination of the optimal dose, conventional and rapid vaccination schedules, vaccination in adults, the elderly and special patient populations, safety, immunogenicity, and immunopersistence in adults and children, comparison of FSME-IMMUN with another commercially available TBE vaccine as well as post-marketing vaccination outcome. This successful research programme demonstrated the strong immunogenicity and continued safety of the FSME-IMMUN vaccine, which is further confirmed by the performance reported under field conditions.

Introduction: Prevention of bleeding represents the standard of care for patients with hemophilia without inhibitors. However, standard prophylactic dosing regimens with FVIII are currently based on body weight alone and do not take into account considerable inter-individual variability in FVIII PK profiles. In order to facilitate personalization of prophylaxis to individual needs and individual PK response we have developed a device that allows PK guided dosing in routine clinical care. In fact, the major barrier of PK-guided dosing in clinical practice is the necessity of multiple blood samples (6 to 11 over 48 hours) associated with a single infusion and the lack of easy-to-use statistical software to generate classical PK profiles. Leveraging the vast rAHF-PFM clinical database with more than 150 classical PK assessments, a Population PK model for children and adults was combined with a Bayesian algorithm to create a user friendly medical device. This methodology allows the use of only a few samples after different infusions to estimate individual PK parameters and help to calculate dosing regimens. Methods: In order to carry on an external validation of the Bayesian population PK model of the device, individual 10 point PK assessment data from an unrelated source, i.e. not included in the base population PK model, (rAHF-PFM prophylaxis study, Valentino et al 2012) was utilized to validate the accuracy of the calculation. First, we compared predicted post infusion FVIII levels with observed FVIII levels using all the available post infusion samples. In a second step we compared individually estimated PK parameters as obtained by using 10 post infusion samples with a progressively reduced number of post infusion samples. Results: The external validation study indicated a good agreement between the observed and predicted FVIII levels (Figure) and PK parameters. Furthermore it showed that the rAHF-PFM medical device had a good predictive performance even when using only 2 sampling time-points. Figure 1 Figure 1. Conclusion: An easy-to-use medical device that can estimate PK parameters and thus assists in designing prophylactic dosing regimens based on individual- PK characteristics represents a groundbreaking innovation. This literally shifts the treatment paradigm from one-size-fits-all prophylaxis towards a more personalized therapy in hemophilia A and allows further optimization of dosing in patients in order to improve outcome in a sustainable fashion. Disclosures Steinitz: Baxter: Employment. Spotts:Baxter Healthcare Corporation: Employment. Loew-Baselli:Baxter Innovations GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership. Oh:Baxter Healthcare Corporation: Employment. Penny:Baxter Healthcare Limited: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gringeri:Baxter Innovations GmbH: Employment. Reininger:Baxter Innovations GmBH: Employment, Equity Ownership.

A prospective, randomised, multicentre, single-blind phase 3 study was performed to assess the safety of a vaccination schedule consisting of two vaccinations (21-35 days apart) with the tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccine FSME-IMMUN "adults" (five consecutive lots) in comparison to another licensed TBE vaccine (Encepur), with polygeline) (two lots) in healthy volunteers (n=3966) aged 16-65 years. The safety of the third vaccination with FSME-IMMUN "adults" (6 months after the first vaccination) was investigated in a follow-up study on the same population (n=3705) and TBE antibody titres were analysed pre- and post-vaccination in a subgroup of volunteers (n=564). Following the first vaccination, the overall incidence of fever (> or =38.0 degrees C) was 0.8% in the FSME-IMMUN "adults" study group and 5.6% in the comparator study group; fever was mainly mild. The fever rate after the second vaccination was 0.6% and 0.5% in the two study groups, respectively. Local and systemic reactions after the first vaccination occurred with a lower frequency in the FSME-IMMUN "adults" study group than in the comparator group. Upon analysing the tolerability of the third vaccination with FSME-IMMUN "adults", similar results were determined in both study groups of volunteers previously vaccinated with FSME-IMMUN "adults" or with the comparator vaccine. The immunogenicity results demonstrated similar seroconversion rates (as determined by ELISA or neutralization test) before and after the third vaccination in the FSME-IMMUN "adults" group and in the comparator group respectively. The results of both studies demonstrate that: (1) FSME-IMMUN "adults" is safe and highly immunogenic, (2) all five production lots of FSME-IMMUN "adults" were consistent with respect to a low rate of adverse events, (3) FSME-IMMUN "adults" induces considerably lower adverse reaction rates than the comparator vaccine after the first vaccination, and (4) two vaccinations with the comparator vaccine can be successfully followed by a third vaccination with FSME-IMMUN "adults".