Search

Background In the Twin Birth Study, women at 320/7–386/7 weeks of gestation, in whom the first twin was in cephalic presentation, were randomized to planned vaginal delivery or cesarean section. The study found no significant differences in neonatal or maternal outcomes in the two planned mode of delivery groups. We aimed to compare neonatal and maternal outcomes of twin gestations without spontaneous onset of labor, who underwent induction of labor or pre-labor cesarean section as the intervention of induction may affect outcomes. Methods In this secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study we compared those who had an induction of labor with those who had a pre-labor cesarean section. The primary outcome was a composite of fetal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity. Secondary outcome was a composite of maternal morbidity and mortality. Trial Registration: NCT00187369. Results Of the 2804 women included in the Twin Birth Study, a total of 1347 (48%) women required a delivery before a spontaneous onset of labor occurred: 568 (42%) in the planned vaginal delivery arm and 779 (58%) in the planned cesarean arm. Induction of labor was attempted in 409 (30%), and 938 (70%) had a pre-labor cesarean section. The rate of intrapartum cesarean section in the induction of labor group was 41.3%. The rate of the primary outcome was comparable between the pre-labor cesarean section group and induction of labor group (1.65% vs. 1.97%; p = 0.61; OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.43–1.62). The maternal composite outcome was found to be lower with pre-labor cesarean section compared to induction of labor (7.25% vs. 11.25%; p = 0.01; OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.41–0.91). Conclusion In women with twin gestation between 320/7–386/7 weeks of gestation, induction of labor and pre-labor cesarean section have similar neonatal outcomes. Pre-labor cesarean section is associated with favorable maternal outcomes which differs from the overall Twin Birth Study results. These data may be used to better counsel women with twin gestation who are faced with the decision of interventional delivery.

To compare the use of simulator-based and patient-based obstetric ultrasound training.This was a prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial. Eighteen consenting obstetric trainees with minimal previous ultrasound exposure were recruited. Enrolled patients were also fully consenting. Mid-trimester fetal brain anatomy in the standard planes (i.e., biparietal diameter and head circumference, cavum septum pellucidum, posterior fossa, and lateral ventricle) was chosen as a surrogate for all fetal anatomy ultrasound training. Trainees were randomized into two groups according to training method: simulator group (n = 9) or patient group (n = 9). All participating trainees went through the following sequence: a didactic session regarding the required planes; a "real" patient 15-minute pretest; a 45-minute training session with a dedicated ultrasound educator, using either a simulator or a "real" patient (according to the randomized group assignment); and a 15-minute post-test to obtain and label the standard four planes on a "real" patient. All images were stored and then scored by two blinded Maternal Fetal Medicine staff, according to 3 set criteria: image quality, landmarks, and measurements. Each criterion was scored 0 to 15 for a total score of 0 to 60.Pretest competence was similar between the two groups. For each of the two groups there was a significant score improvement following training: real patient (mean score pretest 13.3 vs. post-test 24.6; P0.04) and simulator group (mean score pretest 15.9 vs. post-test 28.9; P0.05). All trainees demonstrated significant overall score improvements (mean score pretest 14.6 vs. post-test 26.6; P0.04) regardless of training method. Trainees were further divided by their initial level of confidence (pretest score ≤5: very unconfident; pretest5: unconfident). The improvement was similar for both groups, but "very unconfident" trainees' performance improved more in the simulator group (mean pretest vs. post-test score 3.5 to 35) compared with the patient group (mean pretest vs. post-test score 2.3 to 25.6) CONCLUSION: Simulator-based obstetric ultrasound training performed as well as real patient training and was found to be especially beneficial for beginner trainees. Simulator-based ultrasound training has a high rate of acceptance by trainees, does not require investment of patient or clinic resources, and warrants consideration as an educational tool for the safe and effective teaching of obstetric ultrasound.

Worldwide, about 150 000 infants are born with spina bifida yearly, making this condition one of the most common fetal central nervous system anomalies compatible with life. Over the last decade, major changes have been introduced in the prenatal diagnosis and management of spina bifida. In this review, we provide a brief summary of the current management of fetal spina bifida and present essential information that should be provided to expecting parents when their fetus has been diagnosed with spina bifida. This information is focused around common parental questions, as encountered in our typical clinical practice, to facilitate knowledge translation.

Events contributing to restenosis after coronary interventions include platelet aggregation, inflammatory cell infiltration, growth factor release, and accumulation of smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and extracellular matrix (ECM). The ECM is composed of various collagen subtypes and proteoglycans and over time constitutes the major component of the mature restenotic plaque. The pathophysiology of collagen accumulation in the ECM during arterial restenosis is reviewed. Factors regulating collagen synthesis and degradation, including various cytokines and growth factors involved in the process, may be targets for therapies aimed at prevention of in-stent restenosis.