1. Addressing the MSICS learning curve: identification of instrument-holding techniques used by experienced surgeons
- Author
-
Ravilla D. Ravindran, Samuel Yiu, Shameema Sikder, Alexandra J. Berges, Zervin R Baam, Angela Zhu, and Kunal S. Parikh
- Subjects
genetic structures ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Thumb ,Hand position ,manual small incision cataract surgery ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Clinical Research ,medicine ,Capsulorhexis ,instrument holding ,Surgeon hand ,training ,business.industry ,Index finger ,Cataract surgery ,RE1-994 ,eye diseases ,Identification (information) ,Ophthalmology ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,learning curve ,Small incision ,cataract ,030221 ophthalmology & optometry ,Optometry ,sense organs ,business - Abstract
AIM: To identify instrument holding archetypes used by experienced surgeons in order to develop a universal language and set of validated techniques that can be utilized in manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) curricula. METHODS: Experienced cataract surgeons performed five MSICS steps (scleral incision, scleral tunnel, side port, corneal tunnel, and capsulorhexis) in a wet lab to record surgeon hand positions. Images and videos were taken during each step to identify validated hand position archetypes. RESULTS: For each MSICS step, one or two major archetypes and key modifying variables were observed, including tripod for scleral incision, tripod-thumb bottom for scleral tunnel, underhand-index to thumb grip for side port, index-contact tripod for corneal entry, and tripod-forceps for capsulorhexis. Key differences were noted in thumb placement and number of fingers supporting the instrument, and modifying variables included index finger curvature and amount of flexion. CONCLUSION: Identification of optimal hand positions and development of a formal nomenclature has the potential to help trainees adopt hand positions in an informed manner, influence instrument design, and improve surgical outcomes.
- Published
- 2021