Search

Objectives To determine s.c. tocilizumab (s.c.-TCZ) dosing regimens for systemic JIA (sJIA) and polyarticular JIA (pJIA). Methods In two 52-week phase 1 b trials, s.c.-TCZ (162 mg/dose) was administered to sJIA patients every week or every 2 weeks (every 10 days before interim analysis) and to pJIA patients every 2 weeks or every 3 weeks with body weight ≥30 kg or Results Study participants were 51 sJIA patients and 52 pJIA patients aged 1–17 years who received s.c.-TCZ. Steady-state minimum TCZ concentration (Ctrough) >5th percentile of that achieved with i.v.-TCZ was achieved by 49 (96%) sJIA and 52 (100%) pJIA patients. In both populations, pharmacodynamic markers of disease were similar between body weight groups. Improvements in Juvenile Arthritis DAS-71 were comparable between s.c.-TCZ and i.v.-TCZ. By week 52, 53% of sJIA patients and 31% of pJIA patients achieved clinical remission on treatment. Safety was consistent with that of i.v.-TCZ except for injection site reactions, reported by 41.2% and 28.8% of sJIA and pJIA patients, respectively. Infections were reported in 78.4% and 69.2% of patients, respectively. Two sJIA patients died; both deaths were considered to be related to TCZ. Conclusion s.c.-TCZ provides exposure and risk/benefit profiles similar to those of i.v.-TCZ. S.c. administration provides an alternative administration route that is more convenient for patients and caregivers and that has potential for in-home use. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01904292 and NCT01904279

This is a case of an 11-year-old female who was admitted with respiratory failure, requiring intubation while testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. During her recovery, she had new onset fevers and uptrending inflammatory markers. After an evaluation of infectious causes, the diagnosis of MIS-C was made approximately 1 month after her initial symptoms.

Background Prior studies have demonstrated abnormalities in the composition of the gastrointestinal microbiota in pediatric and adult patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). In particular, diminished fecal abundance of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and abnormalities in both directions in the abundance of the Bacteroides genus have been identified. Methods We obtained fecal specimens from 30 children with treatment-naïve enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) and 19 healthy controls, as well as specimens from 11 adult patients with longstanding SpA and 10 adult healthy controls. All of the samples underwent sequencing of the 16S ribosomal DNA. A subset of the pediatric fecal samples was subjected to shotgun metagenomics sequencing. Results ERA patients had decreased abundance of the anti-inflammatory F. prausnitzii A2-165 strain (41 ± 28% versus 54 ± 20% of all sequences matching F. prausnitzii, p = 0.084) and an increased abundance of the control F. prausnitzii L2/6 strain (28 ± 28% versus 15 ± 15%, p = 0.038). Similar trends were observed in adults with longstanding SpA (n = 11) and controls (n = 10). In contrast, the fecal abundance of Bacteroides fragilis was increased in ERA subjects (2.0 ± 4.0% versus 0.45 ± 0.7% of all sequences, p = 0.045), yet was diminished in adult subjects (0.2 ± % versus 1.0 ± % of all sequences, p = 0.106). Shotgun metagenomics sequencing of the fecal DNA in the pediatric subjects revealed diminished coverage of the butanoate pathway (abundance normalized to controls of 1 ± 0.48 versus 0.72 ± 0.33 in ERA, p = 0.037). Conclusions The anti-inflammatory F. prausnitzii A2-165 strain appears to be depleted in both pediatric and adult SpA. In contrast, B. fragilis may be depleted in adult disease yet abundant in pediatric SpA, suggesting developmental effects on the immune system. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-018-1510-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background To describe the demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics of youth diagnosed with juvenile primary fibromyalgia syndrome (JPFS) who are seen in pediatric rheumatology clinics. Methods Information on demographics, symptoms, functioning, and treatments recommended and tried were obtained on patients with JPFS as part of a multi-site patient registry (the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Legacy Registry). Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. In a subset of patients completing registry follow-up visits, changes in symptoms, pain, and functioning were evaluated using growth modeling. Results Of the 201 patients with JPFS enrolled in the registry, most were Caucasian/White (85%), non-Hispanic (83%), and female (84%). Ages ranged from 9 to 20 years (M = 15.4 + 2.2). The most common symptoms reported were widespread musculoskeletal pain (91%), fatigue (84%), disordered sleep (82%), and headaches (68%). Pain intensity was rated as moderate to severe (M = 6.3 + 2.4/10). Scores on measures of functioning indicated mild to moderate impairment, with males observed to report significantly greater impairments. For the 37% of the initial cohort having follow-up data available, indicators of function and well-being were found to either worsen over time or remain relatively unchanged. Conclusions The symptoms of JPFS remained persistent and disabling for many patients treated by pediatric rheumatologists. Further study appears warranted to elucidate gender differences in the impact of JPFS symptoms. Work also is needed to identify accessible and effective outpatient treatment options for JPFS that can be routinely recommended or implemented by pediatric rheumatology providers.

Background Clinical remission is widely accepted as the primary target outcome for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). PR-COIN is a quality improvement collaborative that serves as a sample of pediatric rheumatology centers in North America. By measuring disease activity in practice using the ACR provisional criteria for Clinical Inactive Disease (CID), variation in patient outcomes has been previously observed between centers. Objectives The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in patient-level factors that may be driving center-level variation in JIA outcomes. Methods This study used cross-sectional data provided by PR-COIN that was collected by PR-COIN centers from March 2015 to May 2016. For each patient, sociodemographic, clinical, patient-reported, disease activity, and medication variables were extracted from the most recent encounter. Patients with disease duration less than 9 months were excluded. Patients were grouped by CID status (inactive vs active disease) and then compared using descriptive statistics, chi-square for categorical variables, and independent t-tests for continuous variables. Missing data were excluded with each analysis. Analyses were performed using R software. Results There were 2751 patients eligible for analysis from 14 centers, with 33 to 394 patients per center. We identified 1249 patients with inactive disease (47%) and 1428 patients with active disease (53%). Patients with inactive disease were younger (12 vs 13 years), more likely to have persistent oligoarticular subtype (33% vs 23%), and less likely to have enthesitis related arthritis (9% vs 14%). Patients with active disease had higher patient-reported measures of global assessment of disease activity, pain, and functional disability, as well as disease activity measures per definition. More medication usage was observed in patients with active disease compared to inactive disease across multiple categories, including both non-biologic DMARDs (45% vs. 32%) and biologic DMARDs (48% vs 35%). Conclusion This study demonstrates differences in sociodemographic, clinical, and medication factors between patients with inactive and active JIA. Further analysis is needed to adjust center-level measures of JIA disease activity using the observed differences in patient case-mix. By using population data to identify predictors of inactive disease in JIA, there is potential to develop and implement targeted clinical interventions to directly impact care and improve outcomes. Disclosure of Interests: Emily A. Smitherman: None declared, Bin Huang: None declared, Ronald Laxer Consultant for: Eli Lilly Canada, Alexion, Sanofi, C. April Bingham: None declared, Cagri Yildirim-Toruner: None declared, Beth Gottlieb: None declared, Jennifer E. Weiss: None declared, Tzielan Lee: None declared, Sheetal Vora: None declared, Jon (Sandy) Burnham: None declared, Julia G. Harris: None declared, Judyann C. Olson: None declared, Mileka Gilbert: None declared, Michelle Batthish Speakers bureau: Novartis, Abbvie, Michael Shishov: None declared, Dustin Fleck: None declared, Esi Morgan: None declared

Background: Tocilizumab (TCZ) administered intravenously (IV) was effective for the treatment of polyarticular (p)JIA and systemic (s)JIA.1,2 Objectives: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) TCZ in patients (pts) with pJIA or sJIA enrolled in a long-term extension (LTE) phase of two 52-week, open-label studies. Methods: Pts aged 1-17 years received body weight (BW)–based TCZ SC: pJIA pts who failed/could not tolerate MTX received TCZ 162 mg every 3 weeks for BW Results: Most pJIA (n=44) and sJIA (n=38) pts were female (72.7% and 55.3%) and white (88.6% and 84.2%); median (range) age was 9.0 (2-18) years. AE rates (Table) were similar regardless of BW. Most AEs were grade 1 or 2; grade ≥3 AEs were reported by 10/44 (20.8%) pJIA pts and 4/38 (10.5%) sJIA pts, most commonly nasopharyngitis (pJIA, 17/44 [38.6%]; sJIA, 11/38 [28.9%]). Other AEs reported in ≥15% of pts included arthralgia, gastroenteritis, cough, vomiting, diarrhea, pyrexia, headache, and oropharyngeal pain (pJIA) and upper respiratory tract infection, cough, pyrexia, arthralgia, and rash (sJIA). No opportunistic infections developed. Neutropenia AEs were reported by 6/44 (13.6%) pJIA pts and 7/38 (18.4%) sJIA pts. SAEs occurred in 5/44 (11.4%) pJIA pts (furuncle, appendicitis, pneumonia, eye pain/headache, infectious mononucleosis) and 2/38 (5.3%) sJIA pts (pneumonia, craniocerebral injury from a fall); only pneumonia (pJIA) was considered treatment related. Neutralizing anti-TCZ antibodies developed in 2 (4.7%) pJIA pts and no sJIA patients. No deaths were reported in the LTE study. Conclusion: In this LTE study in children with pJIA or sJIA, SC TCZ continues to have an acceptable tolerability profile with no new safety concerns. References: [1] Brunner HI et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:1110-1117. [2] 2. De Benedetti F et al. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2385-2395. Disclosure of Interests: Fabrizio De Benedetti Grant/research support from: Abbvie, SOBI, Novimmune, Roche, Novartis, Sanofi, Pfizer, Nicolino Ruperto Grant/research support from: The Gaslini Hospital, where NR works as full-time public employee, has received contributions (> 10.000 USD each) from the following industries in the last 3 years: BMS, Eli-Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sobi. This funding has been reinvested for the research activities of the hospital in a fully independent manner, without any commitment with third parties., Consultant for: Received honoraria for consultancies or speaker bureaus (

Objective To uniquely classify children with microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), to describe their demographic characteristics, presenting clinical features, and initial treatments in comparison to patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's) (GPA). Methods The European Medicines Agency (EMA) classification algorithm was applied by computation to categorical data from patients recruited to the ARChiVe (A Registry for Childhood Vasculitis: e-entry) cohort, with the data censored to November 2015. The EMA algorithm was used to uniquely distinguish children with MPA from children with GPA, whose diagnoses had been classified according to both adult- and pediatric-specific criteria. Descriptive statistics were used for comparisons. Results In total, 231 of 440 patients (64% female) fulfilled the classification criteria for either MPA (n = 48) or GPA (n = 183). The median time to diagnosis was 1.6 months in the MPA group and 2.1 months in the GPA group (ranging to 39 and 73 months, respectively). Patients with MPA were significantly younger than those with GPA (median age 11 years versus 14 years). Constitutional features were equally common between the groups. In patients with MPA compared to those with GPA, pulmonary manifestations were less frequent (44% versus 74%) and less severe (primarily, hemorrhage, requirement for supplemental oxygen, and pulmonary failure). Renal pathologic features were frequently found in both groups (75% of patients with MPA versus 83% of patients with GPA) but tended toward greater severity in those with MPA (primarily, nephrotic-range proteinuria, requirement for dialysis, and end-stage renal disease). Airway/eye involvement was absent among patients with MPA, because these GPA-defining features preclude a diagnosis of MPA within the EMA algorithm. Similar proportions of patients with MPA and those with GPA received combination therapy with corticosteroids plus cyclophosphamide (69% and 78%, respectively) or both drugs in combination with plasmapheresis (19% and 22%, respectively). Other treatments administered, ranging in decreasing frequency from 13% to 3%, were rituximab, methotrexate, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil. Conclusion Younger age at disease onset and, perhaps, both gastrointestinal manifestations and more severe kidney disease seem to characterize the clinical profile in children with MPA compared to those with GPA. Delay in diagnosis suggests that recognition of these systemic vasculitides is suboptimal. Compared with adults, initial treatment regimens in children were comparable, but the complete reversal of female-to-male disease prevalence ratios is a provocative finding.

Severe pain and impairments in functioning are commonly reported for youth with juvenile fibromyalgia. The prevalence and impact of pain in other diseases commonly managed in pediatric rheumatology comparatively have been rarely systematically studied. The objective of the current study was to determine the extent to which high levels of pain and functional limitations, and the strength of their association, are unique to youth with juvenile primary fibromyalgia syndrome/JPFS) relative to other pediatric rheumatic diseases.Using data from 7753 patients enrolled in the multinational Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Legacy Registry, we compared the levels and association of pain and functional limitations between youth with JPFS and those with other rheumatic diseases.Pain levels were rated highest among youth with JPFS (M = 6.4/10, SD = 2.4) and lowest for juvenile dermatomyositis (M = 1.7/10, SD = 2.2), with pain significantly higher in the JPFS group than any other pediatric rheumatic disease (effect sizes = .22 to 1.05). Ratings on measures of functioning and well-being also were significantly worse for patients with JPFS than patients with any other rheumatic disease (effect sizes = .62 to 1.06). The magnitude of association between pain intensity and functional disability, however, generally was higher in other rheumatic diseases than in JPFS. Pain was most strongly associated with functional limitations in juvenile dermatomyositis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and mixed connective tissue disease.JPFS is unique among conditions seen in pediatric rheumatology with regard to ratings of pain and disability. However, pain appears to be comparably or more highly associated with level of functional impairment in other pediatric rheumatic diseases. Pain in childhood rheumatic disease thus would benefit from increased prioritization for research and treatment.

Objective Few data are available regarding the rates of serious adverse events (SAEs) and important medical events (IMEs) outside of product-based registries and clinical trials for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The Enhanced Drug Safety Surveillance Project (EDSSP) was developed to pilot a novel system to collect SAEs/IMEs in children with JIA. This analysis reports the results from this 4-year (2008–2012) EDSSP. Methods Participating physicians were surveyed monthly to ascertain whether their JIA patients experienced an SAE or IME. Sites were surveyed every 6 months to determine the number of unique JIA patients seen at each site during that 6-month period. Reporting rates were calculated per 100 person-years and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated based on a Poisson distribution. Results Thirty-seven Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance sites with 115 physicians participated. The mean response rate to the monthly surveys was 65%. There were 147 total SAEs and 145 total IMEs. The largest proportion of SAEs and IMEs occurred in children with polyarticular JIA (39% and 37%, respectively). The majority of SAEs and IMEs were reported for patients receiving therapy with biologic agents (76% and 69%, respectively). The total event rate for SAEs and IMEs combined was 1.07 events per 100 person-years (95% CI 0.95–1.19). The rates for SAEs and IMEs were 0.54 per 100 person-years (95% CI 0.45–0.63) and 0.53 per 100 person-years (95% CI 0.49–0.62), respectively. Conclusion The EDSSP provided a simple tool for SAE/IME reporting within an established research network and resulted in a similar range of reported events as captured by a traditional product-based registry.

OBJECTIVE To determine the relationship between serum levels of S100A8/A9 and S100A12 and the maintenance of clinically inactive disease during anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy and the occurrence of disease flare following withdrawal of anti-TNF therapy in patients with polyarticular forms of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS In this prospective, multicenter study, 137 patients with polyarticular-course JIA whose disease was clinically inactive while receiving anti-TNF therapy were enrolled. Patients were observed for an initial 6-month phase during which anti-TNF treatment was continued. For those patients who maintained clinically inactive disease over the 6 months, anti-TNF was withdrawn and they were followed up for 8 months to assess for the occurrence of flare. Serum S100 levels were measured at baseline and at the time of anti-TNF withdrawal. Spearman's rank correlation test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to assess the relationship between serum S100 levels and maintenance of clinically inactive disease and occurrence of disease flare after anti-TNF withdrawal. RESULTS Over the 6-month initial phase with anti-TNF therapy, the disease state reverted from clinically inactive to clinically active in 24 (18%) of the 130 evaluable patients with polyarticular-course JIA; following anti-TNF withdrawal, 39 (37%) of the 106 evaluable patients experienced a flare. Serum levels of S100A8/A9 and S100A12 were elevated in up to 45% of patients. Results of the ROC analysis revealed that serum S100 levels did not predict maintenance of clinically inactive disease during anti-TNF therapy nor did they predict disease flare after treatment withdrawal. Elevated levels of S100A8/A9 were not predictive of the occurrence of a disease flare within 30 days, 60 days, 90 days, or 8 months following anti-TNF withdrawal, and elevated S100A12 levels had a modest predictive ability for determining the risk of flare within 30, 60, and 90 days after treatment withdrawal. Serum S100A12 levels at the time of anti-TNF withdrawal were inversely correlated with the time to disease flare (r = -0.36). CONCLUSION Serum S100 levels did not predict maintenance of clinically inactive disease or occurrence of disease flare in patients with polyarticular-course JIA, and S100A12 levels were only moderately, and inversely, correlated with the time to disease flare.

OBJECTIVE To determine the frequency, time to flare, and predictors of disease flare upon withdrawal of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy in children with polyarticular forms of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who demonstrated ≥6 months of continuous clinically inactive disease. METHODS In 16 centers 137 patients with clinically inactive JIA who were receiving anti-TNF therapy (42% of whom were also receiving methotrexate [MTX]) were prospectively followed up. If the disease remained clinically inactive for the initial 6 months of the study, anti-TNF was stopped and patients were assessed for flare at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 months. Life-table analysis, t-tests, chi-square test, and Cox regression analysis were used to identify independent variables that could significantly predict flare by 8 months or time to flare. RESULTS Of 137 patients, 106 (77%) maintained clinically inactive disease while receiving anti-TNF therapy for the initial 6 months and were included in the phase of the study in which anti-TNF therapy was stopped. Stopping anti-TNF resulted in disease flare in 39 (37%) of 106 patients by 8 months. The mean/median ± SEM time to flare was 212/250 ± 9.77 days. Patients with shorter disease duration at enrollment, older age at onset and diagnosis, shorter disease duration prior to experiencing clinically inactive disease, and shorter time from onset of clinically inactive disease to enrollment were found to have significantly lower hazard ratios for likelihood of flare by 8 months (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Over one-third of patients with polyarticular JIA with sustained clinically inactive disease will experience a flare by 8 months after discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy. Several predictors of lower likelihood of flare were identified.

Objectives To assess the feasibility of studying the comparative effectiveness of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) consensus treatment plans (CTPs) for systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) using an observational registry. Methods Untreated systemic JIA patients enrolled in the CARRA Registry were begun on one of 4 CTPs chosen by the treating physician and patient/family (glucocorticoid [GC] alone; methotrexate [MTX] ± GC; IL1 inhibitor [IL1i] ± GC; IL6 inhibitor [IL6i] ± GC). The primary outcome of clinical inactive disease (CID) without current GC use was assessed at 9 months. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT01697254; first registered 9/28/12 (retrospectively enrolled). Results Thirty patients were enrolled at 13 sites; eight patients were started on a non-biologic CTP (2 GC, 6 MTX) and 22 patients on a biologic CTP (12 IL1i, 10 IL6i) at disease onset. Demographic and disease features were similar between CTP groups. CTP choice appeared to segregate by site preference. CID off GC was achieved by 37% (11 of 30) including 11/22 (50%) starting a biologic CTP compared to 0/8 starting a non-biologic CTP (p = 0.014). There were four serious adverse events: two infections, one appendicitis and one macrophage activation syndrome. Conclusions The CARRA systemic JIA CTP pilot study demonstrated successful implementation of CTPs using the CARRA registry infrastructure. Having demonstrated feasibility, a larger study using CTP response to better determine the relative effectiveness of treatments for new-onset systemic JIA is now underway. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12969-017-0157-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a diagnostic score that assists in discriminating primary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (pHLH) from macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) related to systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. STUDY DESIGN: The clinical, laboratory, and histopathologic features of 362 patients with MAS and 258 patients with pHLH were collected in a multinational collaborative study. Eighty percent of the population was assessed to develop the score and the remaining 20% constituted the validation sample. Variables that entered the best fitted model of logistic regression were assigned a score, based on their statistical weight. The MAS/HLH (MH) score was made up with the individual scores of selected variables. The cutoff in the MH score that discriminated pHLH from MAS best was calculated by means of receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Score performance was examined in both developmental and validation samples. RESULTS: Six variables composed the MH score: age at onset, neutrophil count, fibrinogen, splenomegaly, platelet count, and hemoglobin. The MH score ranged from 0 to 123, and its median value was 97 (1st-3rd quartile 75-123) and 12 (1st-3rd quartile 11-34) in pHLH and MAS, respectively. The probability of a diagnosis of pHLH ranged from 99% for a score of =123. A cutoff value of =60 revealed the best performance in discriminating pHLH from MAS. CONCLUSION: The MH score is a powerful tool that may aid practitioners to identify patients who are more likely to have pHLH and, thus, could be prioritized for functional and genetic testing.

Objective To compare the capacity of the 2004 diagnostic guidelines for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH-2004) with the capacity of the preliminary diagnostic guidelines for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)–associated macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) to discriminate MAS complicating systemic JIA from 2 potentially confusable conditions, represented by active systemic JIA without MAS and systemic infection. Methods International pediatric rheumatologists and hemato-oncologists were asked to retrospectively collect clinical information from patients with systemic JIA–associated MAS and confusable conditions. The ability of the guidelines to differentiate MAS from the control diseases was evaluated by calculating the sensitivity and specificity of each set of guidelines and the kappa statistics for concordance with the physician's diagnosis. Owing to the fact that not all patients were assessed for hemophagocytosis on bone marrow aspirates and given the lack of data on natural killer cell activity and soluble CD25 levels, the HLH-2004 guidelines were adapted to enable the diagnosis of MAS when 3 of 5 of the remaining items (3/5-adapted) or 4 of 5 of the remaining items (4/5-adapted) were present. Results The study sample included 362 patients with systemic JIA and MAS, 404 patients with active systemic JIA without MAS, and 345 patients with systemic infection. The best capacity to differentiate MAS from systemic JIA without MAS was found when the preliminary MAS guidelines were applied. The 3/5-adapted HLH-2004 guidelines performed better than the 4/5-adapted guidelines in distinguishing MAS from active systemic JIA without MAS. The 3/5-adapted HLH-2004 guidelines and the preliminary MAS guidelines with the addition of ferritin levels ≥500 ng/ml discriminated best between MAS and systemic infections. Conclusion The preliminary MAS guidelines showed the strongest ability to identify MAS in systemic JIA. The addition of hyperferritinemia enhanced their capacity to differentiate MAS from systemic infections. The HLH-2004 guidelines are likely not appropriate for identification of MAS in children with systemic JIA.

Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) is a distinct category of JIA which is characterized by arthritis accompanied by characteristic systemic features (mainly quotidian fevers and evanescent rash, often also organomegaly, lymphadenopathy and serositis). In addition to these features, sJIA patients often have highly abnormal acute phase reactants, anemia and hyperferritinemia. The ILAR criteria are most widely accepted [1] for children under the age of 16. SJIA patients are susceptible to a potentially fatal complication called macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), which is characterized by unremitting fever, pancytopenia, coagulopathy and organ dysfunction, commonly of the liver and central nervous system [2–4]. Tissue biopsies often show foamy macrophages and active phagocytosis of blood elements (hemophagocytosis). MAS is thought to be an acquired form of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) [2, 3, 5–7]. Many sJIA patients with active systemic features are thought to have “sub-clinical” MAS [2–4, 8]. One study of bone marrow biopsies of sJIA patients at disease diagnosis showed the presence of hemophagocytosis even when overt clinical features of MAS were absent [9]. In addition to increased morbidity and poor functional outcomes compared to other forms of JIA [10, 11], sJIA patients have an increased risk of death, with a mortality hazard ratio which can be almost double that of other JIA categories mostly because of complications such as MAS and serious infections [2, 4, 12]. Recently, advances in the understanding of sJIA and the discovery of its excellent response to IL1 and IL6 inhibitors have resulted in an improved prognosis for many patients with this difficult to treat disease [13–19]. About 4 years ago, spontaneous reports emerged on an international pediatric rheumatology electronic listserv of unusual pulmonary complications in sJIA patients which were often fatal, especially pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH) [20]. Although pleuritis, along with pericarditis, is a commonly recognized feature of sJIA [11, 21], other pulmonary complications, such as PAH, interstitial lung disease (ILD) and alveolar proteinosis (AP) or lipoid pneumonia, are extremely rare. Only scattered single case reports of PAH, AP, ILD and illnesses that may represent one of these conditions in sJIA and Still’s disease existed in the literature prior to 2008 [22–27], prompting speculation about a possible association between exposure to biologic medications such as IL1 inhibitors and the development of these complications in some patients, because the use of IL1 inhibitors became much more common in sJIA at around this time, when reports of its efficacy in this disease emerged [16, 17]. In this study, we sought to identify and describe sJIA patients with these complications and analyze disease features which might identify characteristics that are specific to these patients.

Objective.Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is the most common form of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy in children. While outcomes are generally thought to be good, persistence of skin rash is a common problem. The goal of this study was to describe the development of clinical treatment plans (CTP) for children with JDM characterized by persistent skin rash despite complete resolution of muscle involvement.Methods.The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance, a North American consortium of pediatric rheumatologists and other healthcare providers, used a combination of Delphi surveys and nominal group consensus meetings to develop CTP that reflected consensus on typical treatments for patients with JDM with persistent skin rash.Results.Consensus was reached on patient characteristics and outcome assessment. Patients should have previously received corticosteroids and methotrexate (MTX). Three consensus treatment plans were developed. Plan A added intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) if it was not already being used. Plan B added mycophenolate mofetil, while Plan C added cyclosporine. Continuation of previous treatments, including corticosteroids, MTX, and IVIG, was permitted in plans B and C.Conclusion.Three consensus CTP were developed for use in children with JDM and persistent skin rash despite complete resolution of muscle disease. These CTP reflect typical treatment approaches and are not to be considered treatment recommendations or standard of care. Using prospective data collection and statistical methods to account for nonrandom treatment assignment, it is expected that these CTP will be used to allow treatment comparisons, and ultimately determine the best treatment for these patients.

To determine the relationships among race, income, and disease outcomes in children with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM).Data from 438 subjects with JDM enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Legacy Registry were analyzed. Demographic data included age, sex, race, annual family income, and insurance status. Clinical outcomes included muscle strength, presence of rash, calcinosis, weakness, physical function, and quality of life measures. Disease outcomes were compared based on race and income.Minority subjects were significantly more likely to have low annual family income and significantly worse scores on measures of physical function, disease activity, and quality of life measures. Subjects with lower annual family income had worse scores on measures of physical function, disease activity, and quality of life scores, as well as weakness. Black subjects were more likely to have calcinosis. Despite these differences in outcome measures, there were no significant differences among the racial groups in time to diagnosis or duration of disease. Using calcinosis as a marker of disease morbidity, black race, annual family income$50 000 per year, negative antinuclear antibody, and delay in diagnosis12 months were associated with calcinosis.Minority race and lower family income are associated with worse morbidity and outcomes in subjects with JDM. Calcinosis was more common in black subjects. Further studies are needed to examine these associations in more detail, to support efforts to address health disparities in subjects with JDM and improve disease outcomes.

Author(s): Fotis, Lampros; Shaikh, Nur; Baszis, Kevin; French, Anthony; Tarr, Phillip; Grevich, Sriharsha; Lee, Peggy; Ringold, Sarah; Leroux, Brian; Leahey, Hannah; Yuasa, Megan; Foster, Jessica; Sokolove, Jeremy; Lahey, Lauren; Robinson, William; Newsom, Joshua; Stevens, Anne; Karasawa, Rie; Tamaki, Mayumi; Tanaka, Megumi; Sato, Toshiko; Yudoh, Kazuo; Jarvis, James N; Moncrieffe, Halima; Bennett, Mark F; Tsoras, Monica; Luyrink, Lorie; Xu, Huan; Prahalad, Sampath; Morris, Paula; Dare, Jason; Nigrovic, Peter A; Rosenkranz, Margalit; Becker, Mara; O’Neil, Kathleen M; Griffin, Thomas; Lovell, Daniel J; Grom, Alexei A; Medvedovic, Mario; Thompson, Susan D; Zhu, Lisha; Jiang, Kaiyu; Wong, Laiping; Buck, Michael J; Chen, Yanmin; Moncrieffe, Halima; Brungs, Laura; Liu, Tao; Wang, Ting; Jarvis, James N; Alsaeid, Khaled; Alfailakawi, Jasim; Alenezi, Hamid; Alsaeed, Hazim; Beukelman, Tim; Natter, Marc; Ilowite, Norm; Mieszkalski, Kelly; Burrell, Grendel; Best, Brian; Bristow, Helen; Carr, Shannon; Dennos, Anne; Kaufmann, Rachel; Kimura, Yukiko; Schanberg, Laura; Blier, Peter R; Boneparth, Alexis; Wenderfer, Scott E; Moorthy, L Nandini; Radhakrishna, Suhas M; Sagcal-Gironella, Anna Carmela P; von Scheven, Emily; Gedik, Kader Cetin; Siddique, Salma; Aguiar, Cassyanne L; Erkan, Doruk; Cohen, Ezra; Lee, Yvonne; Dossett, Michelle; Mehta, Darshan; Davis, Roger; Gilbert, Mileka; Goilav, Beatrice; Meidan, Esra

Objective To evaluate the construct validity of 2 proposed measures (the Ultrasound Disease Activity [U-DA] and the Tissue Thickness Score [TTS]) for evaluating sonographic differences in juvenile localized scleroderma skin lesions. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of juvenile localized scleroderma patients who had ultrasound scans of their skin lesions between October 2005 and February 2009. Imaged lesions were classified as active or inactive based upon clinical assessment. Lesions had to have been imaged within 1 month of a clinic visit or have the same clinical assessment during both the visit before and the visit after the scan. Two physicians scored the scans using the U-DA, which scores for differences in lesion echogenicity and vascularity compared with normal tissue. Tissue thickness differences were evaluated by percent differences and by using the TTS. Wilcoxon's rank sum test was performed to assess differences. Results We studied 52 scans from 21 patients, 32 scans of active skin lesions and 20 scans of inactive skin lesions. Features reported by clinicians as indicative of active disease included erythema, warmth, violaceous color, new lesion, expansion of lesion, and induration. The U-DA was significantly different between active and inactive skin lesions (P = 0.0010) with significant differences found for the parameters of total echogenicity, hypodermis echogenicity, and deep tissue layer vascularity (P = 0.0014, P = 0.0023, and P = 0.0374, respectively). No significant differences were found for tissue layer thickness or TTS. Conclusion The U-DA may be a useful tool in the identification of localized scleroderma activity. Further study is needed to prospectively evaluate the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of this potential monitoring tool.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic rheumatic disease in childhood. Persistent pain is the most common and distressing symptom of JIA, and pain in childhood arthritis is multifactorial. Children and adolescents with persistent pain due to JIA experience significantly more problems with physical, emotional, social, and school functioning than healthy individuals. Assessment of pain at each office visit is the cornerstone of effective pain management and should include an evaluation of pain intensity, interference, and coping. Following the biopsychosocial model of pain management, a multi-modal approach is recommended for pain control in children with arthritis. Pharmacologic strategies for the treatment of pain in JIA include aggressive treatment of the underlying disease as well as the use of acetaminophen and systemic and topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for persistent mild pain. Opioids can be considered in the case of moderate to severe persistent pain. Physical therapies and psychological interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy are also key components of pain management in JIA.

This study aimed to assess long-term safety and developmental data on juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients treated in routine clinical practice with celecoxib or nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (nsNSAIDs). Children aged ≥2 to

Based on strong research evidence and consensus, the most common disease manifestations at diagnosis of pSLE are constitutional symptoms, arthritis, and malar rash. Based on some research evidence and consensus, patients with pSLE tend to have major organ system involvement (renal/central nervous system) and a greater disease burden compared with adults. Despite these findings, mortality is low. Based on some research evidence and consensus, the diagnosis of pSLE is unlikely if the ANA is negative, and most patients with SLE have a positive ANA at a titer ≥1:160. Based on strong research evidence, both MMF and cyclophosphamide can be used for induction therapy in class III and IV lupus nephritis. Based on strong research evidence, patients with SLE and anticardiolipin antibodies or LA have a two and six times greater risk of venous thrombosis, respectively, compared with patients with SLE without antiphospholipid antibodies. Based on strong research evidence, patients with pSLE have a higher risk for subclinical atherosclerosis when there is weight-adjusted prednisone use, azathioprine use, increasing age, male gender, high BMI, abnormal creatinine clearance, and elevated lipoprotein(a) levels.

Objective There is wide variation in therapeutic approaches to systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) among North American rheumatologists. Understanding the comparative effectiveness of the diverse therapeutic options available for treatment of systemic JIA can result in better health outcomes. The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) developed consensus treatment plans and standardized assessment schedules for use in clinical practice to facilitate such studies. Methods Case-based surveys were administered to CARRA members to identify prevailing treatments for new-onset systemic JIA. A 2-day consensus conference in April 2010 employed modified nominal group technique to formulate preliminary treatment plans and determine important data elements for collection. Followup surveys were employed to refine the plans and assess clinical acceptability. Results The initial case-based survey identified significant variability among current treatment approaches for new-onset systemic JIA, underscoring the utility of standardized plans to evaluate comparative effectiveness. We developed 4 consensus treatment plans for the first 9 months of therapy, as well as case definitions and clinical and laboratory monitoring schedules. The 4 treatment regimens included glucocorticoids only, or therapy with methotrexate, anakinra, or tocilizumab, with or without glucocorticoids. This approach was approved by >78% of the CARRA membership. Conclusion Four standardized treatment plans were developed for new-onset systemic JIA. Coupled with data collection at defined intervals, use of these treatment plans will create the opportunity to evaluate comparative effectiveness in an observational setting to optimize initial management of systemic JIA.

Background/Purpose: The Pediatric Rheumatology Care and Outcomes Improvement Network (PR-COIN) is a multi-center, quality-improvement-focused learning network with a mission of improving outcomes for children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). PR-COIN has developed a population management tool which facilitates pro-active, coordinated health care communications and interventions that can be used in managing JIA patient populations. Methods: The population management tool was developed with information technology expertise to link seamlessly to the PR-COIN longitudinal registry. Within the population management tool, on demand reports can be generated using participating site or aggregate, network level data according to demographics, clinical features, disease activity levels, patient reported outcomes (functional ability/CHAQ score, arthritis related pain), medication use, and quality indicators. Drill down capability enables identification of patients. Results: Currently, data from 8 sites, 1161 patients, and 5334 clinical encounters are included in the population management tool (Table 1). Individual site usage of the population management tool is variable ranging from infrequent use to regular use at monthly population management meetings. The PR-COIN network is currently developing strategies to promote consistent usage of the tool at sites. Clinicians routinely using information provided through this tool report satisfaction with its functionality and ease of use; furthermore they report enhanced ability to proactively identify and address specific patient needs prior to and during clinic visits, optimizing care. Table 1. Aggregate patient data report from PR-COIN population management tool Characteristic N = 1146 a Per Wallace criteria; b PGA scale 0–10 c CHAQ = 0; d per Hellinghaus guidelines Age (years) < 2 4 (0.3%) 2–4 84 (7.6%) 5–7 148 (12.9%) 8–12 324 (28.3%) > 12 583 (50.9%) JIA subtype Oligoarticular persistent 236 (20.6%) Oligoarticular extended 132 (11.5%) Polyarticular, RF negative 396 (34.5%) Polyarticular, RF positive 99 (8.6%) Enthesitis related arthritis 63 (5.5%) Systemic 75 (6.5%) Undifferentiated 25 (2.2%) Disease status Clinically inactive disease on medicationsa 264 (35.9%) Active uveitis 71 (6.2%) Prior history of uveitis, currently inactive 100 (8.7%) Physician global assessment (PGA) = 0–3b 991 (86.4%) Optimal physical functionc 507 (57.1%) Pain score = 0 482 (42%) Other measures Compliant with uveitis screening 351 (30.6%) On biologic medication 418 (36.4%) Conclusion: The population management tool allows real-time feedback to sites regarding overall JIA population and individual patient status. Customized, “on demand” population measurement and quality improvement reports generated by the network and participating sites and can be used to identify gaps in patient care and at-risk subpopulations that may benefit from more intensive or between-visit care. Current efforts include developing a care stratification scores that can assist in identifying at risk JIA subpopulations and provision of individual patient reports that can be used to assist in pre-visit planning. Future goals include providing feedback to individual patients about their disease status compared to local and network aggregate data, and customized educational and interventional tools that can be provided to JIA patients and families. Thus, the PR-COIN JIA population management tool can be leveraged to improve JIA network and site performance and individual patient care.

Background/Purpose: Joint pain is one of the most common reasons for referral to pediatric rheumatology clinics throughout the world. Typically, these patients ultimately fall into one of three categories of diagnosis: (1) Inflammatory, (2) Non-Inflammatory, or (3) mechanical, with each category requiring different subspecialty care and follow-up. Our objective was to determine what factors on clinical history best predict the final etiology of the joint pain in three major categories, inflammatory, non-inflammatory, and mechanical. Methods: Patients between ages of 2 and 22 seen by the pediatric rheumatology clinic at Hackensack University Medical Center between the dates of 1/1/2005 and 6/30/2006 reporting joint pain were included in our retrospective chart review. Data was collected regarding demographics, symptom history, physician assessment, and patient assessment. Final diagnosis as determined by the treating physician was categorized as one of the three previously stated categories. A category logistic analysis for nominal data was performed using the mechanical/overuse category in the response as the reference category. Results: 621 patients were included in the analysis, with a median age of 11.5 years. 63.9% of the patients included were female. 54.1% were diagnosed with an inflammatory cause, 25.8% with a mechanical cause, and 20.1% with a non-inflammatory cause. Patients with inflammatory causes were more likely to be younger than those with non-inflammatory causes (OR 1.171, p 3 months) were less likely to have an inflammatory cause for their pain (OR 0.105, p < 0.0001). Those with inflammatory etiology were more likely to have a fever (OR 13.107, p < 0.0119), swelling (OR 5.865, p < 0.0001) and limp (OR 1.827, p < 0.0024) than those with mechanical or non-inflammatory causes of their pain, but overall had lower reported pain scores than patients with non-inflammatory causes (OR 1.342, p < 0.0001). Patients with non-inflammatory causes of joint pain were significantly more likely to be home schooled than those with either mechanical causes or inflammatory causes (OR 4.858, p < 0.0102). On multivariate analysis association of the diagnosis with potential risk factors revealed significant differences in final diagnostic category based on gender, age and patient visual analogue score. Those diagnosed with non-inflammatory causes were more likely to be female (OR 18.714, p < 0.0089), older (OR 1.480, p < 0.0038) and to report higher visual analogue scores (OR 1.653, p < 0.0088). Conclusion: The most significant predictors of final diagnosis category were gender, age and patient reported VAS. However, there were multiple other factors that appear important in predicting final diagnosis. Patients with inflammatory joint pain such as JIA tend be younger at presentation, have a shorter duration of symptoms and are less likely to complain of pain. These symptoms, along with signs of arthritis on exam should prompt quick referral to a pediatric rheumatologist. Patients with non-inflammatory pain that is so debilitating that patients can't attend school should also be evaluated by a rheumatologist as they may have fibromyalgia.

Background/Purpose: Pediatric Rheumatology Care and Outcomes Improvement Network (PR-COIN) is a multi-site learning network designed to improve outcomes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) care. Teams collect point of care data on measures of process of care and outcomes of care for the purposes of analysis to guide improvement activities. Eleven North American pediatric rheumatology centers participate. This report illustrates our improvement in several JIA process quality measures (QMs). Methods: Process of care QMs targeted for improvement include measurement of: arthritis-related pain, physician global assessment, joint count, health-related quality of life, physical function, as well as screening for uveitis, medication toxicity, and tuberculosis per guidelines. Outcome measures for JIA include clinical inactive disease, clinical remission on and off medications, no or mild pain level, and optimal physical functioning. Network goals were determined for each process and outcome measure. Data are collected with IRB approval and informed consent, and the shared registry for data entry is the ACR's Rheumatology Clinical Registry. Site-specific and aggregate data are analyzed and displayed monthly via statistical process control charts allowing PR-COIN to track performance over time. Individual centers use established quality improvement methodology to reach and exceed pre-determined goals. Results: Data from 5112 encounters for 1134 JIA patients have been collected since April 2011. QMs with performance meeting or exceeding initial goals include documentation of complete joint count and measurement of arthritis-related pain. For PR-COIN network as a collective unit, QMs improved in six processes—measurement of functional ability, completion of ongoing medication toxicity labs, documentation of complete joint count, medication counseling for newly prescribed DMARDs, documentation of annual medication counseling, and measurement of health-related quality of life. All of these measures had a shift above the baseline mean, demonstrating special cause. In addition, five sites have demonstrated individual improvement in at least one process QM. Conclusion: PR-COIN sites are collectively and individually demonstrating significant improvements in JIA process of care QMs. Quality improvement efforts in PR-COIN are ongoing with the goal of improving the outcome for patients with JIA.

Background/Purpose: There are limited data describing longitudinal trends of symptoms and outcomes among children seeking treatment for Juvenile Primary Fibromyalgia Syndrome (JPFS). Pediatric rheumatologists often are the first point of subspecialty contact for children and adolescents with JPFS and typically evaluate the outcome of their initial treatment recommendations over one or more follow-up visits. Using baseline and follow-up data entered into the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) registry for patients with JPFS, we sought to determine the extent to which symptoms, function, and treatment recommendations change over time in this patient population. Methods: Deidentified information on symptoms, treatments, and function (CHAQ scores, subjective well-being numerical rating scale, and 5-point HRQOL rating scale) were extracted from the CARRA registry for all baseline and follow-up entries between May 2010 and September 2013. Data were analyzed for 66 patients (38% of the baseline cohort) having at least one follow-up visit recorded in the registry; the follow-up period ranged from 0.25 to 2.5 years from baseline (M = .88 years +/− .51 years). The analyzed cohort was 82% female and ranged in age (at baseline) from 9–21 years (M = 15.0 +/− 2.28 years). Multilevel growth models were used to determine time-related trends in symptoms, function, and treatments since completion of baseline evaluation; logistic growth models were used for models with binary outcome variables. Results: Pain scores were in the moderate to severe range at baseline (M = 6.00/10, SD = 2.74) and significantly worsened over time (b = .43 ± .19, t(91) = 2.17, p = .03). Similarly, indicators of function and well-being either worsened over time (for CHAQ: b = .10 ± .05, t(111) = 2.05, p = .04; for subjective well-being: b = .67 ± .21, t(91) = 3.28, p

Background/Purpose: Children and adolescents with juvenile primary fibromyalgia syndrome (JPFS) often present to pediatric rheumatologists for evaluation. Limited data are available on the characteristics of and treatments used for JPFS, particularly in males. Methods: We evaluated deidentified data from baseline visits of JPFS patients entered in the Childhood Arthritis & Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) registry between May 2010 and September 2013. Data regarding demographics, symptoms, functional measures and treatment are compared as a function of gender. Results: There were 172 patients (27 males), ages 8–21 years (Mean (M) = 15.4 +/− 2.3). Patients were symptomatic for a mean of 1.7 +/− 2.2 years prior to their first visit, with no significant difference between males and females (M = 2.2 vs. 1.6 respectively, t(169) = 1.19, p = .2). Widespread pain (89%), fatigue (83%), disordered sleep (77%), headaches (61%), and extremity numbness/tingling (32%) were the most commonly reported symptoms. Females had more numbness and tingling (35% vs. 13% respectively, χ2 = 4.4, p = 0.04). Table 1 lists treatments used. Males were significantly more likely to have used gabapentin (26% vs. 8%, χ2 = 7.6, p

Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted of all JIA patients who received IACI from 6/05 to 3/10, and had at least six months of follow-up. Data collected included demographic information, JIA subtype, date of injection and arthritis flare, type of joint injected and concomitant medications. Any joint that did not flare by the study end date in 9/10 was censored. Time to flare of arthritis was calculated based on the Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator. Two-sided log-rank test was conducted to compare the time to flare within each characteristic group: joints, diagnosis, medications. All analysis in this study was performed using SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).

Objective To determine the methods of anesthesia currently being used by pediatric rheumatologists when performing intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACI). Study design A questionnaire was emailed to all members of the Childhood Arthritis & Rheumatology Research Alliance, a pediatric rheumatology research network in North America. The questionnaire consisted of 11 questions ranging from procedure technique, treatments prescribed for topical anesthesia and oral analgesia, and factors that might affect procedural pain. Results Seventy-four of 161 physicians (46%) responded to the questionnaire. On average, each physician injected 33 children (median 25, range 1-160) and 43 joints (median 30, range 1-150) yearly. Local anesthesia was used in children on average ≥ 8 years (range 2-16 years), with general anesthesia being more frequently used for younger children. All respondents used local anesthesia. The most commonly used methods of local anesthesia were EMLA® cream plus subcutaneous lidocaine (58.8%), ethyl chloride spray only (39.7%), EMLA® cream only (33.8%), subcutaneous lidocaine only (25%), and lidocaine iontophoresis only (11.8%). Buffering of the lidocaine was routinely done only 7.4% of the time. Conclusion Although pediatric rheumatologists in North America perform IACI on a large number of patients each year, a wide variety of methods are used to deliver local anesthesia with no accepted standard of care. More studies are needed to determine the optimal method of local anesthesia delivery to minimize pain associated with IACI.

Background Intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACI) are routinely used by pediatric rheumatologists in the treatment of chronic arthritis. Frequently, topical anesthetics are used to control procedural pain, but their relative efficacy has not been reported. In this study, we evaluated the level of pain associated with different anesthetic methods, Numby® 900 Iontophoretic Drug Delivery System, or EMLA® cream, with or without subcutaneous buffered lidocaine (SQBL), during IACI of the knee in children with arthritis. Methods We conducted a prospective study of patients, ages 4 to 21 years old, followed at three pediatric rheumatology centers who were undergoing IACI of a knee joint. Patients were randomized into two treatment groups: 1) topical anesthetic only (EMLA® or Numby® (E/N)), or 2) topical anesthetic (E/N) and SQBL. Pain was assessed at baseline, during topical anesthetic placement, and following the IACI (post-procedure). The Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R), the Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) behavioral scale and the parental global assessment (PGA) (0 = best experience, 10 = worst experience) were determined. Results Sixty-three patients (44 females) with a median [IQR] age of 10.8 [IQR = (8.2–14.4)] years (range 4.7–20 years) with active knee arthritis were consented. FPS-R post-procedure (P = 0.03), FLACC (P = 0.02) and PGA (P = 0.01) scores were significantly lower in females treated with E/N plus SQBL compared to patients treated with E/N only. Females in the E/N only group had a significant worsening of their baseline pain (p