1. Neighbourhood maternal socioeconomic status indicators and risk of congenital heart disease
- Author
-
Jane Lougheed, Jessica Reszel, Qun Miao, Carolina Lavin Venegas, Shi Wu Wen, Sandra Dunn, and Mark Walker
- Subjects
Adult ,Heart Defects, Congenital ,Male ,Population ,Mothers ,Logistic regression ,lcsh:Gynecology and obstetrics ,Odds ,Young Adult ,Residence Characteristics ,Risk Factors ,Immigrants ,medicine ,Humans ,education ,Poverty ,Socioeconomic status ,Neighbourhood (mathematics) ,lcsh:RG1-991 ,Retrospective Studies ,Congenital heart disease ,Minorities ,Ontario ,education.field_of_study ,Pregnancy ,business.industry ,Infant, Newborn ,Infant ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Health Status Disparities ,medicine.disease ,The Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database (CIHI-DAD) ,Socioeconomic Factors ,Child, Preschool ,The Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) database ,Household income ,Female ,business ,Research Article ,Demography - Abstract
Background This study aimed to examine the relationships between various maternal socioeconomic status (SES) indicators and the risk of congenital heart disease (CHD). Methods This was a population-based retrospective cohort study, including all singleton stillbirths and live births in Ontario hospitals from April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2018. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed to examine the relationships between maternal neighbourhood household income, poverty, education level, employment and unemployment status, immigration and minority status, and population density and the risk of CHD. All SES variables were estimated at a dissemination area level and categorized into quintiles. Adjustments were made for maternal age at birth, assisted reproductive technology, obesity, pre-existing maternal health conditions, substance use during pregnancy, rural or urban residence, and infant’s sex. Results Of 804,292 singletons, 9731 (1.21%) infants with CHD were identified. Compared to infants whose mothers lived in the highest income neighbourhoods, infants whose mothers lived in the lowest income neighbourhoods had higher likelihood of developing CHD (adjusted OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.20–1.38). Compared to infants whose mothers lived in the neighbourhoods with the highest percentage of people with a university or higher degree, infants whose mothers lived in the neighbourhoods with the lowest percentage of people with university or higher degree had higher chance of CHD (adjusted OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.24–1.44). Compared to infants whose mothers lived in the neighbourhoods with the highest employment rate, the odds of infants whose mothers resided in areas with the lowest employment having CHD was 18% higher (adjusted OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.10–1.26). Compared to infants whose mothers lived in the neighbourhoods with the lowest proportion of immigrants or minorities, infants whose mothers resided in areas with the highest proportions of immigrants or minorities had 18% lower odds (adjusted OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.77–0.88) and 16% lower odds (adjusted OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.78–0.91) of CHD, respectively. Conclusion Lower maternal neighbourhood household income, poverty, lower educational level and unemployment status had positive associations with CHD, highlighting a significant social inequity in Ontario. The findings of lower CHD risk in immigrant and minority neighbourhoods require further investigation.
- Published
- 2021