1. Systematic scoping review of interactions between analgesic drug therapy and mindfulness-based interventions for chronic pain in adults: current evidence and future directions
- Author
-
Mohammed Mohiuddin, Rex Park, Tim V. Salomons, Howard J. Nathan, Ian Gilron, Chris Haley, Robert R. Edwards, and Patricia A. Poulin
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,General Section ,Mindfulness ,Psychological intervention ,MEDLINE ,Chronic pain ,Review ,02 engineering and technology ,PsycINFO ,01 natural sciences ,law.invention ,Analgesic therapy ,lcsh:RD78.3-87.3 ,Clinical trials ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,0103 physical sciences ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,medicine ,010306 general physics ,Adverse effect ,business.industry ,medicine.disease ,Clinical trial ,Meditation ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,lcsh:Anesthesiology ,Systematic review ,Physical therapy ,020201 artificial intelligence & image processing ,business - Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. None of the mindfulness-based clinical trials for chronic pain included in this review analyzed the interaction effects between mindfulness interventions and concomitant analgesic drug therapies., Most patients with chronic pain do not find adequate pain relief with a single treatment, and accumulating evidence points to the added benefits of rational combinations of different treatments. Given that psychological therapies, such as mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs), are often delivered in conjunction with concomitant analgesic drug therapies (CADTs), this systematic scoping review examines the evidence for any interactions between MBIs and CADTs. The protocol for this review has been published and registered. MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases were searched until July 2019. We included randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy of MBIs for the treatment of chronic pain. A total of 40 randomized controlled trials (2978 participants) were included. Thirty-nine of 40 (97.5%) included mindfulness-based clinical trials allowed the use of CADTs. However, only 6 of these 39 (15.4%) trials provided adequate details of what these CADTs were, and only 4 (10.3%) trials controlled for CADTs. Of great relevance to this review, none of the included trials analyzed the interactions between MBIs and the CADTs to determine whether they have an additive, synergistic, or antagonistic effect on chronic pain. Adverse events were inconsistently reported, and no judgment could be made about safety. Future trials assessing the interactions between MBIs and CADTs, with better harms reporting, are needed to better define the role of MBIs in the management of chronic pain.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF