1. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic NOSE for sigmoid and rectal cancer
- Author
-
Shu Xu, Xi Chen, Kuijie Liu, and Hongliang Yao
- Subjects
Laparoscopic surgery ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Colorectal cancer ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Operative Time ,030230 surgery ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Colon, Sigmoid ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Nose ,Rectal Neoplasms ,business.industry ,Perioperative ,Length of Stay ,Hepatology ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Treatment Outcome ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Meta-analysis ,Defecation ,Laparoscopy ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,business ,Abdominal surgery - Abstract
Laparoscopic surgery with natural orifice specimen extraction (La-NOSE) is being performed more frequently for the minimally invasive management of sigmoid and rectal cancer. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical and oncological safety and efficacy of La-NOSE versus conventional laparoscopy (CL). A search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed for studies that compared clinical or oncological outcomes of conventional laparoscopic resection using NOSE with conventional laparoscopic resection for sigmoid and rectal cancer. Compared with CL group, the length of hospital stay and the pain score on the first day were shorter in the La-Nose group. The La-NOSE group had a lower incidence of total perioperative complications (OR 0.46; 95% CI [0.32 to 0.66]; I2 = 0%; P
- Published
- 2021