1. Improving working equine welfare in 'hard-win' situations, where gains are difficult, expensive or marginal
- Author
-
JC Pritchard, Tamsin Hirson, and Melissa M. Upjohn
- Subjects
Economics ,Psychological intervention ,Social Sciences ,lcsh:Medicine ,Social Welfare ,Geographical Locations ,0403 veterinary science ,Sociology ,Welfare (Social Security) ,lcsh:Science ,Asses ,Animal Management ,media_common ,Mammals ,education.field_of_study ,Multidisciplinary ,Eukaryota ,Agriculture ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,Public relations ,Vertebrates ,Research Article ,Asia ,040301 veterinary sciences ,Political Science ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Equines ,Population ,India ,Public Policy ,Animal Welfare ,Welfare Economics ,Social issues ,Animal welfare ,Animals ,Horses ,education ,Behavior ,business.industry ,lcsh:R ,Organisms ,0402 animal and dairy science ,Biology and Life Sciences ,Global strategy ,040201 dairy & animal science ,Amniotes ,People and Places ,Organizational structure ,lcsh:Q ,Business ,Welfare - Abstract
Purpose Brooke is a non-government organisation with working equine welfare programmes across Africa, Asia and Latin America. In 2014, staff from ten country programmes were asked to identify ‘no-win’ situations (subsequently reframed as ‘hard-wins’)—where improving equine welfare is proving difficult, expensive and/or marginal—in order to inform strategic decisions on how to approach, manage and mitigate for such situations. Methods The Delphi-type consultation process had three phases. Round 1 posed five questions in the form of a workshop, survey and semi-structured interviews. Round 2 re-presented key themes and sense-checked initial conclusions. Round 3 reviewed the nature and prevalence of hard-win situations at an international meeting of all participants. Results Reasons given for hard-win situations included: no economic or social benefit from caring for working animals; poor resource availability; lack of empathy for working equids or their owners among wider stakeholders; deep-seated social issues, such as addiction or illegal working; areas with a high animal turnover or migratory human population; lack of community cooperation or cohesion; unsafe areas where welfare interventions cannot be adequately supported. Participants estimated the prevalence of hard-win situations as 40–70% of their work. They suggested some current ways of working that may be contributing to the problem, and opportunities to tackle hard-wins more effectively. Conclusion and animal welfare implications Respondents agreed that if equine welfare improvements are to span generations of animals, interventions cannot rely on relatively simple, technical knowledge-transfer strategies and quick-wins alone. Programmes need to be more flexible and iterative and less risk-averse in their approaches to embedding good equine welfare practices in all relevant actors. Consultation recommendations informed development of Brooke’s new global strategy, a revised organisational structure and redefinition of roles and responsibilities to streamline ways to approach hard-wins in the complex environments and socio-economic contexts in which working equids are found.
- Published
- 2018