1. Comparison of Outcomes between Robot‐Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single‐Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
- Author
-
Xiaoguang Han, Wei Tian, Yonggang Xing, Qi Zhang, Da He, Guo‐qing Tang, and Xiao Han
- Subjects
musculoskeletal diseases ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Robot ,Mis‐TLIF ,Single level ,Disability Evaluation ,Lumbar ,Robotic Surgical Procedures ,Lumbar interbody fusion ,Pedicle Screws ,medicine ,Mis tlif ,Humans ,Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Minimally invasive ,Lumbar spondylolisthesis ,Pain Measurement ,Retrospective Studies ,Orthopedic surgery ,Clinical Article ,Lumbar Vertebrae ,business.industry ,Middle Aged ,Degenerative spondylolisthesis ,medicine.disease ,Spondylolisthesis ,Surgery ,Spinal Fusion ,OLIF ,Patient Satisfaction ,Clinical Articles ,Female ,business ,RD701-811 - Abstract
Objective To compare the safety and effectiveness of robot‐assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Mis‐TLIF) and oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) for the treatment of single‐level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS). Methods This is a retrospective study. Between April 2018 and April 2020, a total of 61 patients with single‐level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and treated with robot‐assisted OLIF (28 cases, 16 females, 12 males, mean age 50.4 years) or robot‐assisted Mis‐TLIF (33 cases, 18 females, 15 males, mean age 53.6 years) were enrolled and evaluated. All the pedicle screws were implanted percutaneously assisted by the TiRobot system. Surgical data included the operation time, blood loss, and length of postoperative hospital stay. The clinical and functional outcomes included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog scores (VAS) for back and leg pain, complication, and patient's satisfaction. Radiographic outcomes include pedicle screw accuracy, fusion status, and disc height. These data were collected before surgery, at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Results There were no significantly different results in preoperative measurement between the two groups. There was significantly less blood loss (142.4 ± 89.4 vs 291.5 ± 72.3 mL, P, Robot‐assisted OLIF and Mis‐TLIF both have similar good clinical outcomes, but OLIF has the additional benefits of less blood loss, less hospital stays, higher disc height, and higher fusion rates. Robots can improve the safety of the minimally invasive spine surgery.
- Published
- 2021