Search

PURPOSE Immunochemotherapy with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) has become standard of care for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This randomized trial assessed whether rituximab intensification during the first 4 cycles of R-CHOP could improve the outcome of these patients compared with standard R-CHOP. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 574 patients with DLBCL age 18 to 80 years were randomly assigned to induction therapy with 6 or 8 cycles of R-CHOP-14 with (RR-CHOP-14) or without (R-CHOP-14) intensification of rituximab in the first 4 cycles. The primary end point was complete remission (CR) on induction. Analyses were performed by intention to treat. RESULTS CR was achieved in 254 (89%) of 286 patients in the R-CHOP-14 arm and 249 (86%) of 288 patients in the RR-CHOP-14 arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.36; P = .44). After a median follow-up of 92 months (range, 1-131 months), 3-year failure-free survival was 74% (95% CI, 68% to 78%) in the R-CHOP-14 arm versus 69% (95% CI, 63% to 74%) in the RR-CHOP-14 arm (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.61; P = .07). Progression-free survival at 3 years was 74% (95% CI, 69% to 79%) in the R-CHOP-14 arm versus 71% (95% CI, 66% to 76%) in the RR-CHOP-14 arm (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.55; P = .15). Overall survival at 3 years was 81% (95% CI, 76% to 85%) in the R-CHOP-14 arm versus 76% (95% CI, 70% to 80%) in the RR-CHOP-14 arm (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.67; P = .09). Patients between ages 66 and 80 years experienced significantly more toxicity during the first 4 cycles in the RR-CHOP-14 arm, especially neutropenia and infections. CONCLUSION Early rituximab intensification during R-CHOP-14 does not improve outcome in patients with untreated DLBCL.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with an aggressive clinical course. To investigate the potential of immune-checkpoint therapy, we retrospectively studied the tumor microenvironment (TME) using high-plex immunohistochemistry in 22 PCNSL and compared to 7 secondary CNS lymphomas (SCNSL) and 7 "other" CNSL lymphomas with the presence of the Epstein-Barr virus and/or compromised immunity. The TME in PCNSL was predominantly composed of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells and CD163+ phagocytes. Despite molecular differences between PCNSL and SCNSL, the cellular composition and the functional spectrum of cytotoxic T cells were similar. But cytotoxic T cell activation was significantly influenced by pre-biopsy corticosteroids intake, tumor expression of PD-L1 and the presence of EBV. The presence of low numbers of CD8+ T cells and geographic-type necrosis each predicted inferior outcome in PCNSL. Both M1-like (CD68 + CD163low) and M2-like (CD68 + CD163high) phagocytes were identified, and an increased ratio of M1-like/M2-like phagocytes was associated with a better survival. PD-L1 was expressed in lymphoma cells in 28% of cases, while PD1 was expressed in only 0.4% of all CD8+ T cells. TIM-3, a marker for T cell exhaustion, was significantly more expressed in CD8posPD-1pos T cells compared to CD8posPD-1neg T cells, and a similar increased expression was observed in M2-like pro-tumoral phagocytes. In conclusion, the clinical impact of TME composition supports the use of immune-checkpoint therapies in PCNSL. Based on observed differences in immune-checkpoint expression, combinations that boost cytotoxic T cell activation (by blocking TIM-3 or TGFBR1) prior to the administration of PD-L1 inhibition could be of interest.

Background Relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is associated with a poor prognosis despite the availability of multiple treatment options. Preliminary evidence suggests that DLBCL may be responsive to programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed death 1 inhibitors. Objective The JAVELIN DLBCL study was conducted to assess whether a combination of agents could augment and sustain the antitumor immunity of avelumab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, in R/R DLBCL. Methods This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm study with a phase Ib and a phase III component. Reported here are the results from the phase Ib study, wherein 29 adult patients with DLBCL were randomized 1:1:1 to receive avelumab in combination with utomilumab (an immunoglobulin G2 4-1BB agonist) and rituximab (arm A), avelumab in combination with utomilumab and azacitidine (arm B), or avelumab in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (arm C). The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities and objective response as assessed by the investigator per Lugano Response Classification criteria. Results Of the seven patients in arm A, one (14.3%) experienced two grade 3 dose-limiting toxicities (herpes zoster and ophthalmic herpes zoster); no dose-limiting toxicities were reported in arms B or C. No new safety concerns emerged for avelumab. One partial response was reported in arm A, three complete responses in arm C, and no responses in arm B. Given the insufficient antitumor activity in arms A and B and the infeasibility of expanding arm C, the study was discontinued before initiation of the phase III component. Conclusions The low level of clinical activity suggests that PD-L1 inhibitor activity may be limited in R/R DLBCL. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02951156. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11523-021-00849-8.

Hydroxyurea (HU) resistance or intolerance occurs in 15 to 24% of patients with polycythemia vera (PV). Resistance to HU is associated with a shortened life expectancy, intolerance has no prognostic value. We assessed the occurrence of HU resistance or intolerance comparing the original (ELNo) versus the modified European Leukemia Net (ELNm) criteria as applied in recent large clinical trials including PV patients. We retrospectively analyzed 106 patients with PV treated with HU at the University Hospitals of Leuven between 1990 and 2016 for occurrence of HU resistance/intolerance when using both ELNo as ELNm. After a mean duration of treatment of 5.1 years, when applying the ELNo 20.7% of patients had shown resistance or intolerance to HU in comparison to 39.6% when using the ELNm. When using the ELNo 4.7% of patients were resistant to HU versus 23.6% when applying the ELNm. In total, 16.0% of patients were HU intolerant. This rate was identical when using both ELNo and ELNm. 20.7% of PV patients were considered as HU-resistant or intolerant when using the original ELN criteria. However, when applying the modified ELN criteria 39.6% of PV patients were resistant or intolerant to HU. In our hands, no patient received a minimum dose of 2 g HU a day, as such the ELNm seem better adapted for daily clinical use. However, the prognostic value of HU-resistance in PV, when defined by the ELNm, still needs to be confirmed. ispartof: ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY vol:98 issue:6 pages:1421-1426 ispartof: location:Germany status: published

Peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas with poor prognosis. Up to 30% of PTCL lack distinctive features and are classified as PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS). To further improve our understanding of the genetic landscape and biology of PTCL-NOS, we performed RNA-sequencing of 18 cases and validated results in an independent cohort of 37 PTCL cases. We identified FYN-TRAF3IP2, KHDRBS1-LCK and SIN3A-FOXO1 as new in-frame fusion transcripts, with FYN-TRAF3IP2 as a recurrent fusion detected in 8 of 55 cases. Using ex vivo and in vivo experiments, we demonstrate that FYN-TRAF3IP2 and KHDRBS1-LCK activate signaling pathways downstream of the T cell receptor (TCR) complex and confer therapeutic vulnerability to clinically available drugs.

The phase 2 portion of this open-label phase 2/3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab as second salvage for aggressive relapsed or refractory (r/r) aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) following platinum-based first salvage chemotherapy. Forty-one patients with aggressive disease (32% relapsed; 68% refractory) enrolled and received stepwise blinatumomab (9-28-112 μg/day) in a 70-day cycle 1 and an optional 28-day cycle 2; 19 (46%) completed cycle 1 and 3 (7%) completed cycle 2. The overall response rate after 12 weeks was 37%, including 9 (22%) complete metabolic responses. Eight (20%) patients (all responders) subsequently received stem cell transplants. Grade ≥3 adverse events were reported in 29 (71%) patients. Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome occurred in one patient. Grade 3 neurologic events occurred in 10 (24%) patients; all resolved. Blinatumomab monotherapy appears effective as second salvage therapy in patients with r/r aggressive B-NHL. Trial registration: NCT02910063. ispartof: LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA vol:61 issue:9 pages:2103-2112 ispartof: location:United States status: published

Patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have adverse outcomes. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor copanlisib in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL and assessed the relationship between efficacy and DLBCL cell of origin (COO; activated B-cell like [ABC] and germinal center B-cell like [GCB]) and other biomarkers. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in DLBCL COO subgroups (ABC, GCB, and unclassifiable) and by CD79B mutational status (NCT02391116). Sixty-seven patients received copanlisib (ABC DLBCL, n = 19; GCB DLBCL, n = 30; unclassifiable, n = 3; missing, n = 15). The ORR was 19.4%; 31.6% and 13.3% in ABC and GCB DLBCL patients, respectively. ORR was 22.2%/20.0% for patients with/without CD79B mutations (wild type, n = 45; mutant, n = 9; missing, n = 13). Overall median progression-free survival and duration of response were 1.8 and 4.3 months, respectively. Adverse events included hypertension (40.3%), diarrhea (37.3%), and hyperglycemia (32.8%). Aberrations were detected in 338 genes, including BCL2 (53.7%) and MLL2 (53.7%). A 16-gene signature separating responders from nonresponders was identified. Copanlisib treatment demonstrated a manageable safety profile in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL and a numerically higher response rate in ABC vs. GCB DLBCL patients.

Summary Background In the LYM-3002 study, the efficacy and safety of frontline bortezomib plus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (VR-CAP) and rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) were compared in transplant-ineligible patients with untreated, newly diagnosed, mantle cell lymphoma. We report the final overall survival and safety outcomes for patients in the long-term follow-up phase after the primary progression-free-survival endpoint was met. Methods LYM-3002 was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study done at 128 clinical centres in 28 countries in Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. Adult patients with confirmed stage II–IV previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or less, who were ineligible for bone marrow transplantation, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive six or eight 21-day cycles of VR-CAP (intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and bortezomib 1·3 mg/m2, plus oral prednisone 100 mg/m2) or R-CHOP (intravenous vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 [2 mg maximum], rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, plus oral prednisone 100 mg/m2). Randomisation was done according to a computer-generated randomisation schedule prepared by the sponsor; permuted blocks central randomisation was used (block size of 4), and was stratified by International Prognostic Index score and disease stage at diagnosis. The primary endpoint of this final analysis was overall survival, which was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00722137 , and is closed to new participants with follow-up completed. Findings Between May 22, 2008, and Dec 5, 2011, 487 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. 268 patients (140 in the VR-CAP group and 128 in the R-CHOP group) were included in the follow-up analysis, which included patients with data available after the primary analysis clinical cutoff date of Dec 2, 2013. After median follow-up of 82·0 months (IQR 74·1–94·2), median overall survival was significantly longer in the VR-CAP group than in the R-CHOP group (90·7 months [95% CI 71·4 to not estimable] vs 55·7 months [47·2 to 68·9]; hazard ratio 0·66 [95% CI 0·51–0·85]; p=0·001). Three new adverse events were reported since the primary analysis cutoff (one each of grade 4 lung adenocarcinoma and grade 4 gastric cancer in the VR-CAP group, and one case of grade 2 pneumonia in the R-CHOP group). 103 (42%) of 243 patients in the VR-CAP group, and 138 (57%) of 244 in the R-CHOP group died; the most common cause of death was progressive disease. Interpretations Compared with R-CHOP, VR-CAP was associated with significantly longer survival, and had a manageable and expected safety profile. Our results support further assessment of VR-CAP in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma. Funding Janssen Research & Development.

International audience; JAK2 constitutive activation/overexpression is common in classical Hodgkin lymphoma, and several cytokines stimulate Hodgkin lymphoma cells by recognizing JAK1-/JAK2-bound receptors. JAK blockade may thus be therapeutically beneficial in Hodgkin lymphoma. In this phase II study we assessed the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib, an oral JAK1/2 inhibitor, in patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. The primary objective was overall response rate according to the International Harmonization Project 2007 criteria. Thirty-three patients with advanced disease (median number of prior lines of treatment: 5; refractory: 82%) were included; nine (27.3%) received at least six cycles of ruxolitinib and six (18.2%) received more than six cycles. The overall response rate after six cycles was 9.4% (3/32 patients). All three responders had partial responses; another 11 patients had transient stable disease. Best overall response rate was 18.8% (6/32 patients). Rapid alleviation of B-symptoms was common. The median duration of response was 7.7 months, median progression-free survival 3.5 months (95% CI: 1.9-4.6), and the median overall survival 27.1 months (95% CI: 14.4-27.1). Forty adverse events were reported in 14/33 patients (42.4%). One event led to treatment discontinuation, while 87.5% of patients recovered without sequelae. Twenty-five adverse events were grade 3 or higher. These events were mostly anemia (n=11), all considered related to ruxolitinib. Other main causes of grade 3 or higher adverse events included lymphopenia and infections. Of note, no cases of grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia were observed. Ruxolitinib shows signs of activity, albeit short-lived, beyond a simple anti-inflammatory effect. Its limited toxicity suggests that it has the potential to be combined with other therapeutic modalities. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01877005.

Introduction : Vodobatinib is a novel third generation TKI effective against wild-type and mutated BCR-ABL1 (except T315I) with limited off-target activity. We present updated results from the Phase 1 dose-escalation (DEs) and expansion (DEx) study in CML and Ph+ALL patients (pts) failing ≥ 3 prior TKIs (< 3 prior TKIs if approved TKI is not clinically advised or available); patients with T315I are not eligible (NCT02629692). Methods: This is an open-label, phase 1, multicentre, 3+3 study evaluating maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety and efficacy of vodobatinib administered once daily in 28 day cycles (dose range: 12 to 240 mg). MTD was established at 204 mg. DEx study enrolled chronic phase CML (CP-CML) patients at 174 mg dose of vodobatinib. Treatment continued until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, consent withdrawal or death. Adverse events were assessed using NCI-CTCAE v4.03. Results: As of 15 Jul 2021, 52 pts are enrolled in DEs and DEx cohorts. Forty one of these pts received doses from 12 to 240 mg in the DEs cohort;32 chronic phase (CP-CML), 3 accelerated phase CML (AP-CML), 4 blast phase CML (BP-CML), 2 Ph+ ALL. Eleven CP-CML pts were enrolled in DEx cohort at 174 mg dose. The baseline demographics and disease history are represented in Table 1. Efficacy : Of the 32 CP-CML pts enrolled in DEs: At baseline, 21 (65%) pts had no cytogenetic response, 4 (12.5%) were in PCyR, 7 (22%) were in CCyR. On vodobatinib therapy, 11(34%) pts achieved CCyR, 3 (9%) achieved PCyR and 7 (22%) maintained baseline CCyR. Baseline major molecular response (MMR) was present in 1 (3%) pt; and 14 pts (44%) achieved MMR on study. Of the remaining 11 pts, 5 (16%) had haematologically stable disease (no CyR and molecular response) and 6 (19%) had disease progression (cytogenetic or hematological) as their best response (Table 2 and 3). Seventeen CP-CML pts had prior ponatinib treatment, of which 11 (65%) had MCyR (4 achieved CCyR, 4 maintained CCyR, 3 achieved PCyR); while 8 (47%) achieved MMR. In the remaining 15 pts ponatinib naïve CP-CML: 10 (66%) had CCyR (7 achieved CCyR, 3 maintained CCyR); with 7 (47%) with MMR (6 achieved, 1 maintained). Two of the 3, AP-CML pts had baseline hematological response (CHR) with absence of cytogenetic and molecular response. The 3 pts further deepened their responses with 1 pt achieving CCyR with MMR and 2 pts in PCyR. Of the 4 BP-CML pts, 2 achieved CHR and 2 patients had disease progression as their best response; Of the 2 Ph+ ALL pts, 1 pt maintained CCyR and MMR while the other reported disease progression as the best response. Median duration of treatment overall was 23 (0.5-51) months [CP-CML 23 (0.5-51); AP-CML 36 (9-40); BP-CML 3 (0.5-18) and Ph+ ALL 4 (0.7-7.3) months]. Twenty one pts continue in study. In the DEx cohort, 1 of the 11 CP-CML pts was in PCyR at baseline. No pts had molecular response. Of the 11 patients, 6 (54 %) pts achieved CCyR, 1(10%) pt achieved PCyR. MMR was achieved by 1 pt (10%). Data is maturing for 1 pt. Median duration of treatment is 16 (0.3-19) months and 10 pts continue in study. Safety : Forty nine of 52 pts reported at least 1 TEAE. Most common any grade TEAEs included thrombocytopenia (33%), cough (19%), anaemia & diarrhoea (17% each). Thirty one pts (60%) reported Grade 3 and 4 treatment emergent AEs: most common were thrombocytopenia (15%), neutropenia and anaemia (12%), increased amylase and lipase (8% each). Ten (19%) pts reported cardiovascular TEAEs (Grade 1: angina pectoris, palpitations, ventricular extra-systoles, arteriosclerosis, hot flush, hypotension, intermittent claudication; Grade 2: hypertension, hypotension; Grade 3: cardiac failure congestive, hypertension); with a Grade 2 hypertension being vodobatinib related. Nineteen pts (37%) reported SAEs; vodobatinib related SAEs were reported in 3 pts (fatal intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), Grade 2 back pain and Grade 3 amnesia reported in 1 pt each). There were 5 deaths on study: 1 was related to use of vodobatinib (1 ICH, confounded by disease progression to blast phase that included extra- medullary sites) and the remaining unrelated (1 sudden death, 1 disease progression, 1 pneumonia fungal, 1 suspected COVID-19). Conclusion: Vodobatinib continues to be associated with favourable long term safety and efficacy in heavily pre-treated CML failing ≥ 3 prior TKIs, including ponatinib. Phase 2 study evaluating vodobatinib in pts failing at least 3 prior lines of therapy, including ponatinib, is ongoing. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Cortes: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, BioPath Holdings, Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bio-Path Holdings, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sun Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kim: Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; ILYANG: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Alvarado: MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Sun Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; CytomX Therapeutics: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; BerGenBio: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; FibroGen: Research Funding. Nicolini: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria; Sun Pharma Ltd.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kartos Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Apperley: Incyte, Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Deininger: Fusion Pharma, Medscape, DisperSol: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; SPARC, DisperSol, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Part of a Study Management Committee, Research Funding; Sangamo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Part of a Study Management Committee, Research Funding. de Lavallade: Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Charbonnier: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gambacorti-Passerini: Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Mauro: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sun Pharma / SPARC: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Vandenberghe: Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy; Miltenyi Biotec: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Other: Travel support. Radhakrishnan: Intas Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Emcure Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Dr Reddy's Laboratories: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen India: Honoraria; Cipla Pharmaceuticals India: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers-Squibb India: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Aurigene: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca India: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; NATCO Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis India: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche India: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Yao: Sun Pharma: Current Employment. Inamdar: Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company: Current Employment. Sreenivasan: Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company: Current Employment. Dillu: Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company: Current Employment. Chimote: Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company: Current Employment.

The pivotal LYM-3002 study compared frontline rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) with bortezomib, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (VR-CAP) in newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients for whom stem cell transplantation was not an option. This post hoc subanalysis of the VR-CAP data from LYM-3002 evaluated the effect of bortezomib dose intensity on OS in patients who completed ≥6 cycles of treatment. From the end of cycle 6, patients receiving ≥4.6 mg/m2/cycle of bortezomib had significantly longer OS (but not PFS) compared with those receiving

Introduction: In an open-label phase 2 study, blinatumomab demonstrated efficacy with a manageable safety profile as second salvage in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (R/R B-NHL) following platinum-based salvage regimens (Coyle et al. Leukemia & Lymphoma. 2020: 1-10). Blinatumomab is a BiTE® (bispecific T-cell engager) immuno-oncology therapy that activates endogenous cytotoxic T cells to kill target B cells. Here, findings from the updated analysis are reported (NCT02910063). Methods: Patients aged >18 years with biopsy-confirmed B-NHL without prior complete response or complete metabolic response (CMR) following first-line treatment with anthracycline- based chemotherapy and anti-CD20 therapy, had progressive metabolic disease (PMD), no metabolic response (NMR), or partial metabolic response (PMR; Lugano Classification) after ≥2 cycles of platinum-based S1 therapy were eligible. Blinatumomab was given by continuous intravenous infusion for a single 70-day cycle 1 (9 µg/day for 7 days, 28 µg /day for 7 days, and 112 µg /day for 42 days, followed by a 14-day treatment free interval) and an optional 28-day second cycle (9 µg /day for 7 days, 28 µg /day for 7 days and 112 µg / day for 14 days) at the investigator's discretion. Primary endpoint was CMR by central PET. Additional endpoints included objective response rate (ORR; CMR plus PMR), overall survival (OS), progression- free survival (PFS), duration of response, post-response HSCT rate, and the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). Results: As of the data cut date (June 3, 2020) for this updated analysis, 41 patients were enrolled between 23 January 2017 and 15 January 2018; 28 (68%) patients were refractory and 13 (32%) relapsed to first-line therapy, 66% had progressive disease following first salvage (S1), and 9 (22%) had double or triple hit status at baseline (Figure 1). ORR was 37% (15/41; 95% CI, 22-53) after 12 weeks of treatment, including 9 (22%) patients who achieved CMR and 6 (15%) achieved PMR. Of the 41 patients enrolled, 17 (42%) were double refractory; of which, 3 (7%) achieved CMR, and 3 (7%) achieved PMR. Of the 41 patients who received blinatumomab, median OS (95% CI) was 11.2 (5.9-NE) months with median follow-up time of 27.9 months. Among the 9 patients who achieved CMR, median OS (95% CI) was NE (7.0, NE) and median PFS (95% CI) was 8.4 (4.9-11.6) months with median follow of time of 4.7 months; of which, 3 patients had disease progression and 0 died. Of the 13 patients who achieved HSCT, median OS (95% CI) was NE (13.1-NE) with 69% of patients alive at 30 months and median PFS (95% CI) was 8.4 (5.3-13.9) months with 21% of patients alive at 12 months (Figure 2 and 3). In total, 29 (71%) patients had grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs, including included infections (n=8; 20%), neutropenia (n=4; 10%), pulmonary embolism (n=1; 2%), and acute pancreatitis (n=1; 2%). Consistent with previous blinatumomab reports, neurologic events (NEs) were reported in 23 (56%) patients, including 10 (24%) with grade 3 NEs and 3 (7%) with NEs leading to treatment discontinuation. Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome was reported in only 1 patient. 7 (17%) patients discontinued treatment due to AEs and 7 (17%) had fatal AEs of which were related to disease progression. Conclusions: In conclusion, durable complete remissions can be achieved with a manageable safety profile using blinatumomab as second salvage in patients with aggressive R/R B-NHL following platinum based first salvage regimens Figure 1 Disclosures Coyle: Amgen: Other: Travel support. Morley:Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Fees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Fees; Roche: Other: travel support; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Fees, travel support. Rambaldi:Sanofi: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Omeros: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support from Gilead.; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Advisory board and speaker fees from Pfizer.; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Research grant from Amgen Inc.; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Astellas: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support. Received travel support., Research Funding; University of Milan: Current Employment. Furness:Amgen: Other: Travel Support. Desai:IQVIA: Current Employment. Mergen:Amgen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. OffLabel Disclosure: Durable complete remissions can be achieved with a manageable safety profile using blinatumomab as second salvage in patients with aggressive R/R B-NHL following platinum based first salvage regimens

Treatment options for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are limited, with no standard of care; prognosis is poor, with 4- to 6-month median survival. Avadomide (CC-122) is a cereblon-modulating agent with immunomodulatory and direct antitumor activities. This phase 1 dose-expansion study assessed safety and clinical activity of avadomide monotherapy in patients with de novo R/R DLBCL and transformed lymphoma. Additionally, a novel gene expression classifier, which identifies tumors with a high immune cell infiltration, was shown to enrich for response to avadomide in R/R DLBCL. Ninety-seven patients with R/R DLBCL, including 12 patients with transformed lymphoma, received 3 to 5 mg avadomide administered on continuous or intermittent schedules until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal. Eighty-two patients (85%) experienced ≥1 grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), most commonly neutropenia (51%), infections (24%), anemia (12%), and febrile neutropenia (10%). Discontinuations because of AEs occurred in 10% of patients. Introduction of an intermittent 5/7-day schedule improved tolerability and reduced frequency and severity of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and infections. Among 84 patients with de novo R/R DLBCL, overall response rate (ORR) was 29%, including 11% complete response (CR). Responses were cell-of-origin independent. Classifier-positive DLBCL patients (de novo) had an ORR of 44%, median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 6 months, and 16% CR vs an ORR of 19%, mPFS of 1.5 months, and 5% CR in classifier-negative patients (P = .0096). Avadomide is being evaluated in combination with other antilymphoma agents. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01421524.

Up to 10 % of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients present with aggressive secondary B-cell lymphoma (most frequently diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, DLBCL) which may be clonally related to the CLL (i.e., Richter transformation, RT, 80 % of the cases) or de novo (20 % of the cases). Several genetic lesions associated with RT have already been identified, but the potential role of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has been largely overlooked. In this study, we describe six CLL patients who developed a secondary EBV-positive (EBV+) B-cell lymphoma (five DLBCL, one Hodgkin lymphoma) and compare their clinicopathological characteristics to ten CLL patients with EBV-negative (EBV−) secondary B-cell lymphomas (all DLBCL). All 16 patients had a history of iatrogenic immunosuppression or chemotherapy. Eighty percent had received fludarabine as part of the CLL treatment. Most secondary lymphomas were clonally related to the previous CLL (3/4 EBV+, 7/7 EBV− cases tested). Notably EBV+ RT was associated with a trend for older age at onset (median 72 vs. 63 years, p value >0.05), longer interval between CLL and RT diagnosis (median 4.2 vs. 2.9 years, p value >0.05), and shorter overall survival (median 4 vs. 10 months, p value >0.05). These differences were not significant, probably due to small sample size. Immunohistochemical profiling suggested more frequent overexpression of TP53 and MYC in EBV− compared to EBV+ secondary lymphoma. Based on this small retrospective single center series, we hypothesize that EBV+ RT may constitute a separate subgroup of RT. Larger series are required to validate this suggestion. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12308-016-0273-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background: Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) has an established and central role in diagnosis, staging and response evaluation of lymphoproliferative diseases. It has shown a high sensitivity and specificity at diagnosis in posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs). However, little is known about the performance of interim and end of treatment (EOT) PET in PTLD patients with regards to response assessment, relapse prediction and outcome. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective study in which we analyzed consecutive patients diagnosed with CD20-positive PTLD after solid organ transplantation between 2008 and 2017, who all received risk-stratified sequential treatment according to the PTLD-1 phase II trial. Interim and EOT PET studies were scored according to the Deauville criteria. Results: Forty-one patients were included with median follow-up of 41.5 months (range 1-108). Positive and negative predictive values for disease recurrence were 13% and 85% for interim and 33% and 87% for EOT PET, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall survival, progression-free survival nor time to progression between negative versus positive patients on interim and EOT scans. Conclusions: Negative interim and/or negative end of treatment PET identify PTLD patients with low risk of disease recurrence. ispartof: ACTA ONCOLOGICA vol:58 issue:7 pages:1041-1047 ispartof: location:England status: published

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) changes at whole-body diffusion-weighted (WB-DW) MRI after one treatment cycle for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) compared with response assessment at interim and end-of-treatment fluorine 18 ((18)F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01231269) in which participants with aggressive NHL were recruited between March 2011 and April 2015 and underwent WB-DW MRI before and after one cycle of immunochemotherapy. Volunteers were recruited for test-retest WB-DW MRI (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01231282) to assess ADC measurement repeatability. Response assessment was based on ADC change after one treatment cycle at WB-DW MRI and Deauville criteria at (18)F-FDG PET/CT. To evaluate prognostic factors of disease-free survival (DFS), Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and univariable and multivariable Cox regression were performed; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and mean difference with limits of agreement were calculated to determine inter- and intraobserver repeatability of ADC measurements. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (mean age, 58 years ± 17 [standard deviation]; 31 men) and nine volunteers (mean age, 22 years ± 3; seven men) were enrolled. Median DFS was 48 months (range, 2–48 months). Outcome prediction accuracy was 86.7% (39 of 45), 71.4% (30 of 42), and 73.8% (31 of 42) for WB-DW MRI and interim and end-of-treatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT, respectively. WB-DW MRI (hazard ratio [HR], 17.8; P < .001) and interim (HR, 5; P = .008) and end-of-treatment (HR, 4.3; P = .017) (18)F-FDG PET/CT were prognostic of DFS. After multivariable analysis, WB-DW MRI remained an independent predictor of outcome (HR, 26.8; P = .002). Intra- and interobserver agreement for ADC measurements were excellent (ICC = 0.85–0.99). CONCLUSION: Quantitative WB-DW MRI after only one cycle of immunochemotherapy predicts DFS in aggressive NHL and is noninferior to routinely performed interim and end-of-treatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Keywords: MR-Diffusion Weighted Imaging, Lymphoma, Oncology, Tumor Response, Whole-Body Imaging Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021

Heavy chain diseases are rare variants of B-cell lymphomas that produce one of three classes of immunoglobulin heavy chains, without corresponding light chains. We describe two patients with asymptomatic heavy chain monoclonal gammopathy. The first patient is a 51-year-old woman with alpha paraprotein on serum immunofixation. The second case is a 46-year-old woman with gamma paraprotein on urine immunofixation. Neither patient had corresponding monoclonal light chains. Workup for multiple myeloma and lymphoma was negative in both patients. These two cases illustrate that heavy chain monoclonal gammopathy can exist in the absence of clinically apparent malignancy. Only a few reports of "heavy chain MGUS" have been described before. In the absence of specialized guidelines, we suggest a similar follow-up as for MGUS, while taking into account the higher probability of progression to lymphoma than to myeloma. ispartof: Case Reports in Oncological Medicine vol:2016 pages:1-4 ispartof: location:United States status: published

METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of immunosuppression, patient baseline characteristics, and relapse risk measured as landmark time to progression (TTP) starting 1 year after start of therapy in 159 patients with B cell PTLD after solid organ transplantation treated in the prospective, international, multicenter PTLD-1 trials with either sequential treatment (rituximab followed by cyclophosphamide (CHOP-21 chemotherapy) 750 mg/m intravenously [IV] day (d) 1, doxorubicin 50 mg/m IV d1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m (maximum, 2 mg) IV d1, and prednisone 50 mg/m PO d1-5, every 21 days) or risk-stratified sequential treatment (rituximab followed by rituximab or rituximab (R-CHOP-21 immunochemotherapy) 375 mg/m IV day (d) 1, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m IV d1, doxorubicin 50 mg/m IV d1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m (max. 2 mg) IV d1, and prednisone 50 mg/m PO d1-5, every 21 days).BACKGROUND: Current guideline recommendations for immunosuppression reduction after diagnosis of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) include stopping antimetabolites, reducing calcineurin inhibitors, and maintaining corticosteroids. However, the effect of immunosuppression on PTLD relapse risk after up-to-date therapy is unclear.RESULTS: Patient baseline characteristics at diagnosis of PTLD differed significantly depending on immunosuppression before diagnosis. Compared with immunosuppression before diagnosis, significantly fewer patients received an antimetabolite or a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) after diagnosis of PTLD. Relapse risk measured as landmark TTP was significantly higher for patients on corticosteroids compared to all others (P = 0.010) as well as for patients on ciclosporin compared with those on tacrolimus (P = 0.002), but similar for those on antimetabolites compared with all others (P = 0.912). In a Cox regression analysis of landmark TTP, corticosteroid-containing immunosuppression after diagnosis of PTLD (P = 0.002; hazard ratio, 11.195) and age (P = 0.001; hazard ratio, 1.076/year) were identified as independent, significant risk factors for PTLD relapse.CONCLUSIONS: In the prospective PTLD-1 trials, corticosteroid use after diagnosis of PTLD is associated with an increased risk of relapse, whereas the use of antimetabolites is not. These findings require prospective validation.

Objectives: To assess interruptions/discontinuations of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment in Belgian patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Methods: This retrospective study included patients with TKI interruptions/discontinuations of ≥4 continuous weeks (no clinical trial context) between May 2013 and May 2016. Data collection took place between October 2016 and February 2017. Results: All 60 participants (69 interruptions/discontinuations) had chronic-phase CML and 75% had at least a major molecular response (≥MMR) at interruption/discontinuation. Most interruptions/discontinuations occurred while on imatinib (36/69; 49%) and dasatinib (20/69; 29%). Most interruptions/discontinuations occurred due to side effects/intolerance (46/69; 67%); other reasons included a wish to conceive (6/69; 9%) and attempts to achieve treatment-free remission (TFR) (6/69; 9%). Interruptions due to side effects occurred later for imatinib- or dasatinib-treated patients than for those on nilotinib or ponatinib. Treatment was re-initiated in 62% (43/69) of cases. Most interruptions caused by side effects/intolerance were followed by treatment changes. All 4 patients with ≥MR 4.5 at interruption/discontinuation and ≥11-month follow-up who had not restarted treatment maintained the response. Conclusion: Although TKIs are used for long-term CML treatment, physicians sometimes recommend interruptions/discontinuations. In this study, interruptions/discontinuations were mainly caused by side effects or intolerance, rather than TFR attempts.

As diagnosing therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) is often challenging, we reviewed clinicopathological features of t-MN patients. Medical records of 138 patients, diagnosed with t-MN between 1995 and 2017, were reviewed. Of 138 patients, 80 had t-MDS, 53 t-AML, and 5 t-MDS/MPN (age, 22–88 years; median 64 years; male/female ratio, 0.8). The median latency time was 6 years and 5 months. Of 115 patients, 56 patients received cytotoxic-/radiotherapy for a solid tumor, 56 for hematological malignancy, and 3 for an auto-immune disorder, respectively. Another 21 patients had a combination of 2 disorders. Moreover, 2 patients had 3 previous malignancies. Breast cancer was the most prevalent tumor, followed by low-grade B non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Immunophenotyping and immunohistochemistry showed aberrant expression of B-, T-, or NK-cell markers in 21% and 6%, respectively. In 90% of the patients, dysplasia in ≥ 1 lineage was found. KMT2A fusion gene transcripts were seen in 5%. Cytogenetic analysis showed complex karyotypes (31%) and chromosome 5 and/or 7 abnormalities (40%). Almost 82% of the patients died and the median overall survival was about 1 year. Our study confirms that previous therapy for breast cancer is the most important cause of t-MN. KMT2A fusion genes are prevalent and complex karyotypes and/or chromosomes 5 and/or 7 abnormalities are common.

Ongoing development of new drugs, as well as novel indications in the treatment of autoimmune diseases leads to the increasing use of immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive drugs. Immunomodulatory agent-related lymphoproliferative disorders are a known and potentially life threatening complication of chronic administration of these drugs, but are less well characterized compared with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders. The heterogeneous drug targets, various underlying disease indications, different drug combinations used and relatively low incidence render data collection and interpretation difficult. In this retrospective paper, we describe the clinicopathological characteristics of a larger single-center series of 72 immunomodulatory agent-related lymphoproliferative disorder cases. We divided the cases according to the therapy, administered in the year preceding diagnosis of a lymphoproliferative disorder, in an immunosuppressive drug, an immunomodulatory drug and a combination of immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory drugs group. We observed differences in "time to lymphoproliferative disorder development" with a shorter time for all the immunomodulatory drug-related cases combined (immunomodulatory and immunomodulatory + immunosuppressive = immunomodulatory-all) vs immunosuppressive-only (p = 0.0031). The proportion of malignant cases in patients receiving immunomodulatory therapy was, however, also significantly lower when compared with the immunosuppressive treated cases (43 vs 88%; p = 0.0184). The immunomodulatory/suppressive agent-related lymphoproliferative disorders were less often associated with the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) (31 vs 66%; p = 1.829e-05) and the lymphoproliferative disorders incidence in the first year after immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive therapy initiation was lower (18 vs 41%; p = 0.04151)-compared with a published series of 140 post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder cases from the same center. However, a similar histopathological spectrum from nondestructive, to polymorphic and monomorphic lesions as in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders is observed. With increasing use of immunosuppressive and especially immunomodulatory therapy, a higher incidence of immunomodulatory/suppressive agent-related lymphoproliferative disorders is to be expected. Life-long awareness for development of immunomodulatory/suppressive agent-related lymphoproliferative disorders with clinical follow-up and timely biopsies of suspicious lesions is required since these lymphoproliferative disorders arise both early after therapy initiation and many years later. Histopathological confirmation and correct classification is necessary to guide therapy and EBV ISH should be a part of routine pathological diagnostics. ispartof: MODERN PATHOLOGY vol:31 issue:9 pages:1457-1469 ispartof: location:United States status: published

This phase II, single-arm, multicenter study examined the efficacy and safety of coltuximab ravtansine (an anti-CD19 antibody drug conjugate) in 61 patients with histologically documented (de novo or transformed) relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who had previously received rituximab-containing immuno-chemotherapy. Patients had received a median of 2.0 (range 0-9) prior treatment regimens for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and almost half (45.9%) had bulky disease (≥1 lesion >5 cm) at trial entry. Patients received coltuximab ravtansine (55 mg/m2) in 4 weekly and 4 biweekly administrations until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Forty-one patients were eligible for inclusion in the per protocol population. Overall response rate (International Working Group criteria) in the per protocol population, the primary end point, was 18/41 [43.9%; 90% confidence interval (CI:) 30.6-57.9%]. Median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival (all treated patients) were 4.7 (range 0.0-8.8) months, 4.4 (90%CI: 3.02-5.78) months, and 9.2 (90%CI: 6.57-12.09) months, respectively. Common non-hematologic adverse events included asthenia/fatigue (30%), nausea (23%), and diarrhea (20%). Grade 3-4 adverse events were reported in 23 patients (38%), the most frequent being hepatotoxicity (3%) and abdominal pain (3%). Eye disorders occurred in 15 patients (25%); all were grade 1-2 and none required a dose modification. Coltuximab ravtansine monotherapy was well tolerated and resulted in moderate clinical responses in pre-treated patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. (Registered at: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01472887). ispartof: HAEMATOLOGICA vol:103 issue:8 pages:1351-1358 ispartof: location:Italy status: published

e19038 Background: Parsaclisib, a potent, highly selective, next-generation PI3Kδ inhibitor, showed preliminary efficacy as monotherapy for relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including DLBCL (Abstract 410, ASH 2017), in a phase 1/2 study. This phase 2 study further assessed parsaclisib in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory DLBCL (NCT02998476). Methods: Pts enrolled into 2 groups (A, Bruton tyrosine kinase [BTK] inhibitor naïve; B, BTK inhibitor experienced) and received oral parsaclisib 20 mg QD for 8 wks, then 20 mg QW. In a planned interim futility analysis conducted in the first 40 pts treated in Group A, if ≤13 (≤32.5%) responded by IRC assessment, Group A was to be terminated. Results: At data cutoff (22 Jun 2018), 60 pts (Group A, n = 55; Group B, n = 5) were treated (median age, 71 y [range, 36—94]; men, 63.3%; ≥3 prior systemic therapies, 60%). At the planned interim analysis in Group A, ORR (by PET) was 25% (10/40 pts; 5 CMR, 5 PMR); the futility boundary was crossed. At data cutoff, ORR in Group A was 25.5% (14/55 pts; 8 CMR, 6 PMR); median PFS was 2.2 mo (95% CI: 2.0‒4.1); median DOR was 4.5 mo (95% CI: 2.1‒5.1). ORs were observed in germinal center B-cell (GCB) and non-GCB subtypes. ORR in Group B was 20% (1/5 pts; 1 CMR). The most common non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurring in > 10% of all pts (all grade [Gr]; Gr 3/4) were rash events (21.7%; 1.7%), colitis/diarrhea events (16.7%; 5%), nausea (16.7%; 0%), cough (15%; 0%), and pyrexia (15%; 8.3%). Gr 3/4 AST and ALT elevations occurred in 5% and 1.7% of pts, respectively; Gr 3/4 neutropenia and anemia occurred in 5% of pts each. The most frequent ( > 5%) serious TEAEs were pyrexia (8.3%), general physical health deterioration (6.7%), and hypercalcemia (6.7%). TEAEs led to therapy discontinuation in 7 pts (2 treatment-related), dose interruption in 20 pts (10 treatment-related), and dose reduction in 3 pts (all treatment-related). Median duration of therapy was 57.5 d (range, 11–318). Conclusions: Parsaclisib monotherapy using a QD followed by QW dosing regimen was well tolerated with no new safety signals reported. Further evaluation of parsaclisib in all subtypes of DLBCL is ongoing in a combination study Clinical trial information: NCT02998476.

Summary Background Hodgkin's lymphoma is one of the most common lymphoid neoplasms in young adults, but the low abundance of neoplastic Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg cells in the tumour hampers the elucidation of its pathogenesis, biology, and diversity. After an incidental observation that genomic aberrations known to occur in Hodgkin's lymphoma were detectable in circulating cell-free DNA, this study was undertaken to investigate whether circulating cell-free DNA can be informative about genomic imbalances in Hodgkin's lymphoma. Methods We applied massive parallel sequencing to circulating cell-free DNA in a prospective study of patients with biopsy proven nodular sclerosis Hodgkin's lymphoma. Genomic imbalances in Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg cells were investigated by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) on tumour specimens. Findings By non-invasive prenatal testing, we observed several genomic imbalances in circulating cell-free DNA of a pregnant woman, who was subsequently diagnosed with early-stage nodular sclerosis Hodgkin's lymphoma stage IIA during gestation. FISH on tumour tissue confirmed corresponding genomic imbalances in Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg cells. We prospectively studied circulating cell-free DNA of nine nodular sclerosis Hodgkin's lymphoma cases: eight at first diagnosis and one at first relapse. Seven patients had stage IIA disease and two had stage IVB disease. In eight, genomic imbalances were detected, including, among others, gain of chromosomes 2p and 9p, known to occur in Hodgkin's lymphoma. These gains and losses in circulating cell-free DNA were extensively validated by FISH on Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg cells in biopsy samples. Initiation of chemotherapy induced normalisation of circulating cell-free DNA profiles within 2–6 weeks. The cell cycle indicator Ki67 and cleaved caspase-3 were detected in Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg cells by immunohistochemistry, suggesting high turnover of Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg cells. Interpretation In early and advanced stage nodular sclerosis Hodgkin's lymphoma, genomic imbalances in Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg cells can be identified by massive parallel sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA at diagnosis. The rapid normalisation of circulating cell-free DNA profiles on therapy initiation suggests a potential role for circulating cell-free DNA profiling in early response monitoring. This finding creates several new possibilities for exploring the diversity of Hodgkin's lymphoma, and has potential implications for the future clinical development of biomarkers and precision therapy for this malignancy. Funding KU Leuven-University of Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven.

Purpose The Sequential Treatment of CD20-Positive Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD-1) trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01458548) established sequential treatment with four cycles of rituximab followed by four cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy as a standard in the management of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) and identified response to rituximab induction as a prognostic factor for overall survival. We hypothesized that rituximab consolidation might be sufficient treatment for patients with a complete response after rituximab induction. Patients and Methods In this prospective, international, multicenter phase II trial, 152 treatment-naive adult solid organ transplant recipients, with CD20+ PTLD unresponsive to immunosuppression reduction, were treated with four weekly doses of rituximab induction. After restaging, complete responders continued with four courses of rituximab consolidation every 21 days; all others received four courses of rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy every 21 days. The primary end point was treatment efficacy measured as the response rate in patients who completed therapy and the response duration in those who completed therapy and responded. Secondary end points were frequency of infections, treatment-related mortality, and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Results One hundred eleven of 126 patients had a complete or partial response (88%; 95% CI, 81% to 93%), of whom 88 had a complete response (70%; 95% CI, 61% to 77%). Median response duration was not reached. The 3-year estimate was 82% (95% CI, 74% to 90%). Median overall survival was 6.6 years (95% CI, 5.5 to 7.6 years). The frequency of grade 3 or 4 infections and of treatment-related mortality was 34% (95% CI, 27% to 42%) and 8% (95% CI, 5% to 14%), respectively. Response to rituximab induction remained a prognostic factor for overall survival despite treatment stratification. Conclusion In B-cell PTLD, treatment stratification into rituximab or rituximab plus CHOP consolidation on the basis of response to rituximab induction is feasible, safe, and effective.

Introduction: Mantle cell lymphoma is a B-cell non-Hodgkins lymphoma characterized by a t(11;14), resulting in overexpression of cyclin D1. Conventional chemotherapy obtains frequent (but short) remissions, leading to a poor median overall survival (OS) of 35 years. To obtain more information about the prevalence and current treatment of Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in Belgium, we collected data in a Belgian registry of MCL. Materials and methods: All Belgian MCL patients, t(11;14) and/or cyclin D1 positive, seen in hematology departments over a one-year period (April 2013March 2014) were included. Data about patient characteristics, histology, treatment lines, and response were compiled and retrospectively analyzed. Results: Four hundred and four patients were included with a median age at diagnosis of 64 years (range 2396 years) and a male predominance (72%). For 2013, we calculated a prevalence of at least 36.2 per million and an incidence of at least 7.0 per million in the Belgian population. Characteristics at diagnosis involved lymphadenopathy (82%), splenomegaly (44%), B-symptoms (39%), and hepatomegaly (10%). Bone marrow invasion was present at diagnosis in 77%. Stage at diagnosis was advanced in the majority of cases. The median number of treatment lines was 1. Type of first line treatment included a combination of anthracyclin and cytarabinebased regimen (34%), anthracyclin (39%), and other. Rituximab was used in 88% of first line treatments. In 44% first line treatment was followed by autologous stem cell transplantation. Conclusion: The analysis of this Belgian MCL registry provides insight in the epidemiology, demographics, and current treatment of our Belgian MCL population.

Monitoring of single cell signal transduction in leukemic cellular subsets has been proposed to provide deeper understanding of disease biology and prognosis, but has so far not been tested in a clinical trial of targeted therapy. We developed a complete mass cytometry analysis pipeline for characterization of intracellular signal transduction patterns in the major leukocyte subsets of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Changes in phosphorylated Bcr-Abl1 and the signaling pathways involved were readily identifiable in peripheral blood single cells already within three hours of the patient receiving oral nilotinib. The signal transduction profiles of healthy donors were clearly distinct from those of the patients at diagnosis. Furthermore, using principal component analysis, we could show that phosphorylated transcription factors STAT3 (Y705) and CREB (S133) within seven days reflected BCR-ABL1IS at three and six months. Analyses of peripheral blood cells longitudinally collected from patients in the ENEST1st clinical trial showed that single cell mass cytometry appears to be highly suitable for future investigations addressing tyrosine kinase inhibitor dosing and effect. ©2017 Ferrata Storti Foundation Material published in Haematologica is covered by copyright. All rights are reserved to the Ferrata Storti Foundation. Use of published material is allowed under the following terms and conditions: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode. Copies of published material are allowed for personal or internal use. Sharing published material for non-commercial purposes is subject to the following conditions: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode, sect. 3. Reproducing and sharing published material for commercial purposes is not allowed without permission in writing from the publisher.

Background: Copanlisib is a pan-class I phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor with predominant activity against the α- and δ-isoforms. Patients and methods: This phase II study evaluated the response rate of copanlisib administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, in patients with indolent or aggressive malignant lymphoma. Archival tumor tissues were used for immunohistochemistry, gene-expression profiling, and mutation analysis. Results: Thirty-three patients with indolent lymphoma and 51 with aggressive lymphoma received copanlisib. Follicular lymphoma (48.5%) and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (33.3%) were the most common histologic subtypes. Most patients (78.6%) had received prior rituximab and 54.8% were rituximab-refractory. Median duration of treatment was 23 and 8 weeks in the indolent and aggressive cohorts, respectively (overall range 2-138). Eighty patients were evaluated for efficacy. The objective response rate was 43.7% (14/32) in the indolent cohort and 27.1% (13/48) in the aggressive cohort; median progression-free survival was 294 days (range 0-874) and 70 days (range 0-897), respectively; median duration of response was 390 days (range 0-825) and 166 days (range 0-786), respectively. Common adverse events included hyperglycemia (57.1%; grade ≥3, 23.8%), hypertension (54.8%; grade ≥3, 40.5%), and diarrhea (40.5%; grade ≥3, 4.8%), all generally manageable. Neutropenia occurred in 28.6% of patients (grade 4, 11.9%). Molecular analyses showed enhanced antitumor activity in tumors with upregulated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway gene expression. Conclusion: Intravenous copanlisib demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable toxicity in heavily pretreated patients with various subtypes of indolent and aggressive malignant lymphoma. Subtype-specific studies of copanlisib in patients with follicular, peripheral T-cell, and mantle cell lymphomas are ongoing., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is a rare B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma often associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. To gain insight in this aggressive lymphoma subtype, the clinicopathologic characteristics of 25 unpublished single-center PBLs (2 in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients, 11 in immunocompetent individuals [IC-PBL], 12 in transplant recipients [PT-PBL]) and of 277 reported PBLs were summarized. In the reported series, PBL patients were predominantly male (77%) with a median age at diagnosis of 46 years (range, 1.2 to 87 y). The majority of the biopsies (66%) was EBV positive. Extranodal presentation was most frequent (88%, of which 35% were oral, 18% gastrointestinal, 12% cutaneous). PBL was diagnosed in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients (50%), immunocompetent individuals (35%), and transplant recipients (14%). These subgroups differed in age at diagnosis (median: 41, 64, 47 y, respectively), primary localization (oral, oral, cutaneous, respectively), EBV positivity (75%, 50%, 67%, respectively), CD45 expression (31%, 33%, 70%, respectively), and C-MYC aberrations (78%, 44%, 38%, respectively). Ann Arbor stage I, EBV positivity, CD45 expression, and lack of C-MYC aberrations were associated with better outcome (P

Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) combined with intermittent dexamethasone (the RD regimen) is one of the current standards for treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, since the disease in the majority of patients will become resistant to RD, or treatment with RD needs to be discontinued due to side effects, we evaluated the combination lenalidomide, low-dose oral cyclophosphamide, with prednisone (REP) in patients with relapsed/refractory MM previously exposed to RD. For this purpose, we performed a single centre retrospective study of the efficacy of REP in 19 patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Overall response rate (partial response or better) with REP was 68% compared with 83% with RD, but with a shorter time to response with the triplet REP. Time to progression after REP was 6 months. Overall the REP regimen was better tolerated compared to RD. We conclude that the REP regimen is an effective treatment regimen for patients with relapsed/refractory MM with good tolerance, warranting further exploration in prospective randomized trials.

Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a distinct subtype of lymphoma with a wide variation of clinical course. Based on randomized trials of our network, current standard of care is a cytarabine-containing immunochemotherapy induction (Hermine, Lancet 2016) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT; Zöllner, ICML 2019) and rituximab maintenance for 3 years (Le Gouill, NEJM 2018). In relapsed MCL the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib achieves high response rates and ongoing remissions (Wang, NEJM 2013; Dreyling, Lancet 2016). This approach achieved especially longer remission durations in earlier treatment lines (Rule, Hamatologica 2019). We aim to clarify whether ibrutinib added to induction and as maintenance with or without autologous stem cell transplantation might improve outcome. Study design and methods: In this international, randomized three-arm phase III trial (EudraCT-no. 2014-001363-12) young, fit patients ( up to 65 years) with histologically confirmed, untreated mantle cell lymphoma advanced stage II-IV qualify for 1:1:1 randomization after written informed consent according to ICH/EU GCP. In the control arm A, patients receive an alternating R-CHOP/R-DHAP induction followed by myeloablative consolidation (either BEAM or THAM: TBI, high dose Ara-C and melphalan). In arm A+I Ibrutinib is added to the R-CHOP cycles (560 mg day 1-19) and applied as maintenance (continuous dosing) for 2 years. In arm I the same induction and maintenance is applied but high dose consolidation and autologous SCT is skipped. A rituximab maintenance (single doses every 2 months up to 3 years) may be added in all study arms according to national clinical routine. The primary study aim is to show superiority of one of three study arms as future standard of care based on the comparison of the investigator-assessed failure-free survival (FFS), i.e. to investigate if the addition of ibrutinib improves the efficacy of standard 1st line treatment, and can even challenge the use of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous SCT. Secondary study aims include the efficacy of the three treatment arms and the safety and tolerability of ibrutinib during induction immuno-chemotherapy and maintenance. Accordingly, overall and complete response rates, progression-free and overall survival will be determined as well as adverse events during induction immuno-chemotherapy and follow-up including the cumulative incidence rates of SPMs. In addition, minimal residual disease is regularly determined based on patient-specific PCR assay according to the standardized Biomed-2 procedure. Results: As of July 30th, 511 of up to 870 patients have been randomized from 12 different European countries. In a meanwhile completed safety run-in of the initial 50 patients, feasibility of the two experimental arms was confirmed with no major differences in hematological and other toxicities and no major delays during induction. Disclosures Dreyling: Acerta: Other: Scientific advisory board; Novartis: Other: Scientific advisory board; Mundipharma: Other: Scientific advisory board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Other: Scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Other: Scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Other: Scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Other: Scientific advisory board; Roche: Other: Scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ladetto:Roche: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; J&J: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria. Doorduijn:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Gine:Janssen: Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Gilead: Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Roche: Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding. Jerkeman:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mey:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hutchings:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Kolstad:Merck: Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Trneny:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gomes da Silva:AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead Siences: Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Klapper:Roche, Takeda, Amgen, Regeneron: Honoraria, Research Funding. Unterhalt:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding. Hoster:Janssen: Research Funding; Roche Pharma AG: Other: Travel Support.

Introduction: Despite availability of several BCR-ABL1 TKIs for treatment of CML, some patients (pts) fail ≥3 TKIs and/or have co-morbidities that limit use of 2nd generation TKIs (2GTKI: Nilotinib, Dasatinib and Ponatinib). K0706 is a novel third generation TKI effective against wild-type and mutated BCR-ABL1 isoforms with significantly less off-target activity compared to existing TKIs. We report Phase I results of K0706 in pts who were resistant and/or intolerant to ≥3 prior TKIs or who had co-morbidities precluding the use of 2GTKI (NCT02629692). Methods: This was a multicentre, open-label, dose-escalation and expansion study of K0706 to evaluate the safety and anti-leukemic activity of K0706, and determine the MTD. Patients with CML or Ph+ ALL resistant and/or intolerant to ≥3 prior TKIs received escalating doses of K0706 capsules (single daily dose) in 28 day cycles. Treatment continued until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, consent withdrawal or death. Results: At data cut-off of 30 June 2019, 35pts (19 male) have been treated with K0706 at doses of 12mg (n=1), 24mg (n=1), 48mg (n=6), 66mg (n=7), 90mg (n=3), 126mg (n=5), 174mg (n=5), 204mg (n=4), and 240mg (n=3); median age 61.6 (range 23.5-85.6) years; median time from diagnosis 10.13 (range 0.7-22.9) years. Diagnoses included 27 chronic phase [CP], 3 accelerated phase [AP], 4 blast phase [BP] CML and 1 Ph+ ALL. Eleven and 19pts received ≥3 prior TKIs and ≥4 prior TKIs respectively (intolerant, n=11; resistant and intolerant, n=24). 13pts had BCR-ABL mutations detectable at study entry (F317L, n=2; E255V/K, n=2; T315I, n=2; 1pt each had: Y253H, Y253F, V299L, Q252H and G250E respectively; 1pt each had 2BCR-ABL mutations: E255V, F317L and F359V, E255V respectively). At a median follow-up of 6.9 months (range 0.5-26 months), 68.6% of pts remained on K0706 and 31.5% completed ≥12 months of therapy. 11pts (31.4%) discontinued [10 due to disease progression (with 2 deaths) and 1 with a possibly related AE of CNS bleed confounded by disease progression]. The most common K0706-related AEs included transient mild to moderate gastrointestinal disturbances (18.5%), general disorders [i.e.: myalgia, fatigue, asthenia] (15.7%), neutropenia (12%) and thrombocytopenia (10%). At 240mg, 2 of 3pts had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of ≥25% of doses missed in Cycle 1 because of toxicity (dyspnoea (1x grade 2, 1x grade 3) and non-cardiac chest pain (1x grade 2) DLTs were reversible and pts resolved at 174 mg without recurrence. Of 27 CML CP pts, 7pts achieved a complete cytogenetic remission (CCyR) and 4 maintained CCyR. 1pt achieved partial CyR (PCyR), 1pt had disease progression in Cycle 1 and 5pts are yet to complete post baseline assessments. Of the 12 CML CP cytogenetic responders, 11 remain on treatment [mean duration 6.9 (range 2.9 -26) months in major cytogenetic response (MCyR) while 1pt had disease progression at 9.5 months]. Cytogenetic responses were observed in 2 of 11 CML-CP pts with mutations [CCyR in 1 of 2 pts with F317L and in 1pt with G250E]. Pts with T315I mutations had disease progression in Cycle 1. Following this, protocol was amended to enrol subjects with T315I mutations only when target plasma concentrations required preclinically to inhibit T315I clone are achieved. Five of 27 pts achieved major molecular response (MMR), 2 pts in MR 4.5. Of 8 pts with CML AP (n=3), BP (n=4) or Ph+ ALL (n=1), 4 achieved confirmed MaHR; 2 entered the study in MaHR; 3 had MCyR [2 had CCyR and 1 had PCyR] and 2 had disease progression. 1pt in CML BP had a confirmed MaHR for 12 months. 1pt in AP with chromosome 3 inversion, had CCyR at 3 months and maintaining for 13 months. Conclusion:K0706 has acceptable safety profile with activity in heavily pre-treated patients who had failed at least ≥3 prior lines of TKIs. The study provides early proof of principle for the effectiveness of K0706 in a setting with few available treatment options. Disclosures Cortes: Sun Pharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merus: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BiolineRx: Consultancy; Biopath Holdings: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Immunogen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kim:Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Il-Yang co.: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Charbonnier:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Apperley:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Deininger:Blueprint: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Fusion Pharma: Consultancy; TRM: Consultancy; Sangoma: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Sangamo: Consultancy; Incyte: Honoraria; Adelphi: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Humana: Honoraria. De Lavallade:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Whiteley:Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Jazz pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau. Mauro:Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Gambacorti-Passerini:Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Lucchesi:Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Yao:Sun Pharma Advance Research Company: Employment. Kothekar:Sun Pharma Advance Research Company: Employment. Chimote:Sun Pharma Advance Research Company: Employment.

7507 Background: This randomized phase III trial assessed whether intensification of rituximab (R) during the first 4 cycles of R-CHOP can improve outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients compared with standard R-CHOP. Patients in complete remission (CR) after induction treatment were randomized between rituximab maintenance and observation. Intensification of rituximab was not more effective than standard R-CHOP, showing same CR-rates and progression free survival after induction (ASCO 2016 # 7504). Here, we report the results of the second randomization for rituximab maintenance therapy. Methods: Patients in CR after R-CHOP were randomized between 24 months of rituximab maintenance 375 mg/m2 intravenous every 8 weeks (n = 199 ) or observation (n = 199). CT scans were performed at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months in both arms. The primary endpoint was disease free survival (DFS) from maintenance randomization. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). ( www.trialregister.nl NTR1014). Results: Median age was 65 years (range 31-80), 48% were 66 years or older and 49% were male. The majority of patients (54%) had a high-intermediate or high aa-IPI score. After a median follow-up of 79.9 months (maximum 125.7 months), the 5-year DFS rate was 79% for rituximab maintenance versus 74% for observation. This difference was not statistically significant, with a hazard ratio of 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.57-1.19, p= 0.31, adjusted for age and aa-IPI). The secondary endpoint OS was also not significantly different (85% versus 83% at 5 years). No clinical subgroup benefited from rituximab maintenance. Toxicity was mild. Among patients who received rituximab maintenance CTCAE grade 3 and 4 AEs were reported in 17% and 6% of patients, respectively. Infection was the most frequent AE, a grade 3 infection occurred in 6% of patients. Neutropenia was seen in 1% (grade 3) and 3% (grade 4) of patients. Conclusions: Rituximab maintenance therapy provides no additional benefit for DLBCL patients in first CR after R-CHOP. Clinical trial information: www.trialregister.nl NTR1014.

Background: Physical activity has a protective effect on some types of cancer. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to explore the literature on the association between physical activity and risk of lymphoma. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted for cohort and case–control studies examining the association between self-reported physical activity and risk of lymphoma. Depending on statistical heterogeneity, a random or fixed effects model was used to estimate the summary OR and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Seven case–control studies and 5 cohort studies were included. When data from both study designs were combined, no significant influence of physical activity on risk of lymphoma was found (pooled OR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.79–1.02; P = 0.10). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant protective influence of physical activity on risk of lymphoma in case–control studies (pooled OR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.68–0.96; P = 0.02). In contrast, cohort studies, which have a higher level of evidence than case–control studies, confirm the results of the primary meta-analysis (pooled OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.88–1.19; P = 0.76). A subsequent subgroup analysis found no significant differences between results for Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (χ2 = 0.16; P = 0.69), nor between results for recreational and occupational activities (χ2 = 1.01; P = 0.31). Conclusions: Epidemiologic research indicates no significant influence of physical activity on risk of lymphoma. Impact: Future research should examine the association between sedentary behavior and risk of lymphoma and investigate the dose–response and timing effect of physical activity on risk of lymphoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 22(7); 1173–84. ©2013 AACR.

Hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients diagnosed with biopsy-confirmed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) at our institution from 1989 to 2010 were identified. Patient-, transplant- and disease-related characteristics, prognostic factors and outcome were collected and analyzed. One hundred and forty biopsy-proven cases of PTLD were included. Overall incidence in the transplant population was 2.12%, with heart transplant recipients carrying the highest risk. Most PTLDs were monomorphic (82%), with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma being the most frequent subtype. The majority of cases (70.7%) occurred > 1 year posttransplant, and 66% were Epstein-Barr virus positive. Following initial therapy the overall response rate was 68.5%. Three-year relapse-free and overall survivals were 59% and 49%, respectively. At last follow-up, 44% of the patients were alive. Multivariable analysis identified several classical lymphoma-specific poor prognostic factors for the different outcome measures. The value of the International Prognostic Index was confirmed in our analysis. ispartof: LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA vol:54 issue:11 pages:2433-2440 ispartof: location:United States status: published

T-cell or natural killer (NK)-cell posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (T-PTLD) is a rare but severe complication after transplant. Here we present the clinicopathological features of a single-center series of nine cases. Additionally, we summarize the clinicopathological findings of 147 cases of T/NK-cell PTLD reported in the literature in an attempt to define subtype-specific characteristics. T/NK-cell PTLD occurs in patients of all ages, usually extranodally, and most frequently after kidney transplant. Organ specific incidence, however, is highest following heart transplant. Approximately one-third of T-cell PTLDs are Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-related, with peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL, NOS) being the most prevalent EBV-associated T-cell PTLD. A male predominance is observed, which is most striking in the EBV(+) group, particularly in PTCL, NOS. With a median posttransplant interval of 72 months, T-cell PTLDs are among the late-occurring PTLDs. Of the most common T-cell PTLDs, anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) has the best prognosis, whereas PTCL, NOS and hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (HSTCL) have the worst prognosis. EBV(+) cases seem to have a longer survival than EBV(-) cases, suggesting a different pathogenetic mechanism.

Fatigue is one of the most common and most distressing problems in lymphoma patients. A vicious circle is presumed between fatigue, physical activity and physical fitness. It is plausible that an exercise training program would be effective in reducing fatigue, by breaking this vicious circle. The purposes of this review are to provide an overview of the literature on physical activity and physical fitness in lymphoma patients before, during and after anticancer treatment, and to summarise the literature on exercise training interventions in lymphoma patients. We conducted a search for studies reporting on physical activity, physical fitness or the effect of exercise training in lymphoma patients. A total of 13 articles were selected. Due to a small number of articles and methodological issues, it was not possible to make final conclusions. The results indicated that 21 % to 29 % of lymphoma survivors meet the American College of Sports Medicine public health guidelines for physical activity. Maximal exercise capacity was decreased before treatment, especially in patients with advanced disease, and was close to normal during and/or after treatment. Lower levels of physical activity as well as lower physical fitness seemed to be associated with more symptoms of fatigue. Aerobic exercise training interventions seemed to be feasible and safe and had positive effects on cardiorespiratory fitness, fatigue and self-reported physical functioning. Further research is needed to examine physical activity and physical fitness in a longitudinal, objective way in large samples and to examine the effect of exercise training in lymphoma patients.

IMPACT NHL was a multicenter, observational study in adults with non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) chemotherapy with or without rituximab. Erythropoietin-stimulating agent treatment was given according to routine clinical practice and physician preference. In a subanalysis, outcomes were evaluated in 207 patients who received darbepoetin alfa (DA). The most common reason (81%) for initiating DA was low/declining hemoglobin (Hb) concentration. Mean (±standard deviation) duration of DA exposure was 8.8 ± 6.9 weeks (mean number of doses, 5.1 ± 4.6). Overall, 23% of patients had chemotherapy and DA treatment synchronized more than 75% of the time. At the time of DA initiation, 67% of patients had Hb concentrations in the guideline-recommended range (9-11 g/dl). Of 89 patients with Hb concentrations10 g/dl at DA initiation and still receiving DA 5 weeks later, 92% (Kaplan-Meier) achieved Hb concentrations 10-12 g/dl between week 5 and at the end of treatment.

Item does not contain fulltext Despite the revolutionary change in the prognosis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients with the introduction of imatinib, patients with resistant disease still pose a considerable problem. In this multicenter, randomized phase III trial, we investigate whether the combination of high-dose imatinib and intermediate-dose cytarabine compared to high-dose imatinib alone, improves the rate of major molecular response (MMR) in newly diagnosed CML patients. This study was closed prematurely because of declining inclusion due to the introduction of second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors and only one third of the initially required patients were accrued. One hundred nine patients aged 18-65 years were randomly assigned to either imatinib 800 mg (n = 55) or to imatinib 800 mg in combination with two successive cycles of cytarabine 200 mg/m(2) for 7 days (n = 54). After a median follow-up of 41 months, 67 % of patients were still on protocol treatment. The MMR rate at 12 months was 56 % in the imatinib arm and 48 % in the combination arm (p = 0.39). Progression-free survival was 96 % after 1 year and 89 % after 4 years. Four-year overall survival was 97 %. Adverse events grades 3 and 4 were more common in the combination arm. The addition of intermediate-dose of cytarabine to imatinib did not improve the MMR rate at 12 months. However, the underpowering of the study precludes any definitive conclusions. This trial is registered at www.trialregister.nl (NTR674). 01 augustus 2013

A patient was admitted to the medical emergency department by his family physician. His complaints were weakness and fatigue for more than one week. Four days before admission, he went to his general practitioner for these complaints and also for painful elbows. His physician prescribed diclofenac and esomeprazole. Upon presentation, he had high systolic/diastolic blood pressure (180/90 mm Hg, measured repeatedly), and otherwise normal parameters. He had gained 6.5 kg in body weight. Clinical examination was normal, except for very mild bilateral malleolar edema. Routine blood tests showed a strongly elevated serum creatinine, hyperkalemia, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase. Haptoglobin levels were normal. Urinalysis showed a normal sediment, urine and blood cultures remained sterile. Ophthalmoscopy was completely normal, as was a routine chest X-ray. Renal ultrasound demonstrated kidneys with a diameter of 13 cm. Due to uncontrollable hypertension, our patient was hospitalized at the intensive care department where intravenous nifedipine was started, with good instantaneous control of blood pressure. Because of increasing potassium levels acute hemodialysis was started within 24 h after admission. Differential diagnosis consisted of diclofenac- or esomeprazole-induced interstitial nephritis or rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. A renal biopsy was performed within 72 h after admission. The kidney biopsy showed an overwhelming inflammatory cell infiltrate consisting of a monoclonal lymphocytic cell population. However, the numerous mitotic figures, polyploidy, and prominent nucleoli present, were indicative of a lymphoma. Additional stainings confirmed a non-Hodgkin diffuse large-cell B-cell lymphoma. Treatment with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicine, vincristine, and prednisolone) was initiated with very good clinical and biochemical response, yet only mild recovery of kidney function. Occasionally the kidney is involved as an extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) localization. However, a primary presentation of acute kidney failure due to lymphoma localization is extremely rare. Our case demonstrates that early renal biopsy is indispensable for fast and adequate diagnosis and treatment.

Detecting bone marrow involvement (BMI) in lymphoma is important as it adversely affects stage. Bone marrow biopsy (BMB) remains the standard to detect BMI but is prone to sampling error. We retrospectively investigated whether (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET/CT) could identify BMI in patients with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) with sufficient accuracy in comparison with staging BMB. Twenty-five patients diagnosed with PTLD who underwent (18)F-FDG-PET/CT and BMB within one month were evaluated. Based on our criteria, six patients (24%) were considered positive for BMI on (18)F-FDG-PET/CT compared to one by BMB. Although we cannot completely exclude false positive results on (18)F-FDG-PET/CT, our data indicate a significantly higher sensitivity of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT compared to BMB (100% vs 17%) but similar specificity. These data confirm the high diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for detecting BMI, but prospective studies are needed to determine whether (18)F-FDG-PET/CT could indeed replace staging BMB in PTLD.

Development of secondary malignancies is a well-known complication of solid organ transplant, with skin cancer and lymphoproliferative disorders being most frequently observed. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders, caused by diminished immune surveillance, represent a broad spectrum of pathological and clinical disorders, ranging from benign conditions to very aggressive lymphomas. Here we review treatment options for adult patients experiencing posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders following solid organ transplant.

Autoimmune hematological disorders encompass a broad group of hematological conditions characterized by the loss of self-tolerance to a variety of antigens. Despite good response to first-line therapy in the majority of patients, relapses are common, necessitating new and safe therapeutic options. The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has led to substantial improvement in the treatment of malignant and immune-mediated disorders involving B cells. Although experience with rituximab in immune-mediated hematological disorders is rarely supported by randomized trials, there is now substantial experience with rituximab suggesting that anti-CD20 therapy is an effective and well-tolerated alternative to immunosuppressive therapy in these disorders. However, caution is needed based on recent reports describing—sometimes severe—rituximab-related complications. Am. J. Hematol. 2011. © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Introduction. For decades, the study of genomic alterations in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has been hampered by the low abundance of the malignant Hodgkin Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells in HL lymph node biopsies. Laser microdissection or flow cytometric cell sorting allow the study of purified HRS cells, but the use of these applications is restricted to specialized research centers. We have recently demonstrated proof-of-principle that copy number aberrations (CNA) in HRS cells can be retrieved in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of HL patients (Vandenberghe et al., Lancet Haematol. 2015). Taking advantage of the presence of HRS cell-derived DNA (ctDNA) in plasma, the aim of this study was to catalogue CNA in HL in a large series of prospectively recruited HL patients. Methods. We analyzed plasma collected from 177 patients (median age 29, range 3-86) with newly diagnosed HL. 60 cases were diagnosed at our institution, including all disease subtypes and stages, with a majority of nodular sclerosis. 118 patients were recruited in the context of the BREACH study, a multicentric Phase 2B study for unfavorable early classical HL (NCT02292979). After cfDNA extraction, samples were low-pass sequenced (0.1x coverage) and analyzed using ichorCNA, an algorithm that produces read depth-based log2 CNA profiles and quantifies the cfDNA tumor content. Results. At diagnosis, 86 % (152/177) of patients showed obvious genomic imbalances in cfDNA, in early-stage (85 % (131/155)) as well as in advanced cases (95 % (21/22)). Among the abnormal profiles, gains encompassing 2p16, 5p15, 9p24, 12q13 and 19q13 were the most frequent aberrations, occurring in 79 %, 53 %, 57 %, 63 % and 80 % respectively. Losses most frequently affected regions 4q34, 6q23, 11q22 and 13q13, in 53 %, 63 %, 49 % and 59 % of abnormal profiles respectively (fig. 1A). All these CNAs have been previously described with varying frequencies in smaller series of 10-53 patients, using arrayCGH or whole exome sequencing on microdissected HRS cells or even HRS cell-derived cell lines as input material. The observed pattern of CNAs is distinct from the pattern we observed in cfDNA obtained from other hematological malignances, e.g. multiple myeloma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (fig. 1B, C). Analysis of follow-up cfDNA samples revealed that the majority of patients rapidly clear their profiles during the first two treatment cycles. Of 123 samples analysed at d15 of cycle 1, 89 samples (72 %) showed a normal profile without CNAs.This suggests a relationship between the fraction of ctDNA in cfDNA and the disease burden. However, we could not find a correlation between the ctDNA fraction as calculated by ichorCNA and the metabolic tumor volume as computed from PET/CT scans. This could be due to several factors, e.g. the small fraction of HRS cells in the metabolic tumor volume. We are currently investigating whether a correlation does exist between the HRS content in the lymph node biopsy and the ctDNA load. Conclusions. In this largest study of CNA in HL to date, we provide a comprehensive catalogue of the types of CNAs, as well as their frequencies and patterns in HL. In this series of 177 patients, gains affecting 2p, 12q and 19q and loss of 6q and 13q emerge as the most commonly recurrent CNAs in HL, across all HL subtypes and stages. The data confirm and extend our previous findings that the majority of HL patients, including those with early-stage disease, have detectable CNAs in their cfDNA at diagnosis. We demonstrate a broad spectrum of aberrations, gains and losses, some of which recur at higher frequencies than gains of 9p24, harboring PD-L1. This warrants further studies on how these CNAs are implicated in the pathogenesis of HL. It further endorses the use of ctDNA as an alternative gateway to the genome of HRS cells, and as a substrate for the evaluation of early disease response. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background : Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) typically have poor treatment outcomes, especially patients who are ineligible for stem cell transplantation (SCT). Ibrutinib, a first-in-class, once-daily inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, is approved in the US for various B-cell malignancies. Preclinical data suggest potential synergy when combining ibrutinib with lenalidomide, a thalidomide analogue that disrupts signaling downstream of B-cell receptor and MYD88. An open-label, multicenter, phase 1b/2 study (NCT02077166) was initiated to evaluate the iR2 regimen of ibrutinib, lenalidomide, and rituximab in R/R DLBCL. Results from the ongoing phase 2 portion of the study evaluating the safety and activity of the iR2 regimen in SCT-ineligible adults aged ≥18 y with R/R non-germinal center B-cell-like (non-GCB) DLBCL per Hans method are presented here. Methods : The iR2 regimen was administered at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of once-daily 560 mg PO ibrutinib with 20 mg PO lenalidomide on Days 1-21 and 375 mg/m2 IV rituximab on Day 1 of Cycles 1-6 in 28-day cycles (additional 25-mg cohort ongoing). The primary phase 2 efficacy endpoint was ORR; the null hypothesis of an ORR of 40% will be tested against the alternative hypothesis of an ORR >60%. Secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) rate, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Response was based on investigator assessments and performed using CT or MRI scans after every 3 treatment cycles for the first 24 mo and every 6 mo thereafter. For rash and neutropenia, if clinically indicated, study medication was withheld until resolution or improvement to grade 1, and treatment with oral corticosteroids and antihistamines (for rash) or hematopoietic growth factors (for neutropenia) was initiated. Results : A total of 55 patients were enrolled and treated at the RP2D with 20 mg PO lenalidomide in phase 2. The median age was 63 y; 58% were male; 64% had stage IV disease; 24% had primary refractory disease; 53% were refractory to the last therapy. Patients had received a median of 2 (range: 1-5) prior systemic therapies for DLBCL; the most common regimens were R-CHOP (71%), RICE (29%), and R-DHAP (16%). Among the 44 response-evaluable patients with follow-up imaging, the ORR was 55% (95% CI: 39%-70%; n=24) and included CR in 30% (n=13) and PR in 25% (n=11); 5 patients (11%) had stable disease. The median DOR was 9 mo for all responders and 10 mo for those who achieved a CR. The median maximum percent change from baseline in the size of the target lesion(s) was −61%. Among all 55 treated patients, the median duration of iR2 treatment was 4 mo (range: 0-13), and almost half (45%) of patients were still receiving iR2 treatment at the time of analysis (Figure 1A). Progressive disease was the most common reason for treatment discontinuation (45%). Median PFS was 5 mo (95% CI: 3-12; Figure 1B), with 6-mo and 12-mo PFS rates of 44% and 28%, respectively. Median OS was 17 mo (95% CI: 8-17), with 6-mo and 12-mo OS rates of 85% and 58%, respectively. For the 24 responders, median PFS was 12 mo (95% CI: 6-12), and median OS was 17 mo (95% CI: not evaluable). The majority (85%) of patients experienced a grade 3-4 TEAE; events reported in ≥5% of patients included neutropenia (33%), maculopapular rash (15%), anemia (11%), diarrhea, dyspnea, fatigue, and hypokalemia (5% each). Neutropenia, maculopapular rash, and anemia were the only grade 3-4 TEAEs in >2 patients considered related to either ibrutinib or lenalidomide. Of the 8 patients with grade 3/4 maculopapular rash, 7 received concomitant corticosteroids. Grade 5 TEAEs were experienced by 6 patients and included worsening of DLBCL (n=3), pneumonia (n=2), and sepsis (n=1). Doses of study treatment were temporarily interrupted or reduced due to TEAEs in 62% and 29% of patients, respectively. Discontinuation due to TEAEs occurred in 11% of patients (worsening of DLBCL [5%], pneumonia [4%], and sepsis [2%]). No cases of febrile neutropenia were reported. Conclusions : The iR2 combination regimen of 560 mg ibrutinib, 20 mg lenalidomide, and 375 mg/m2 rituximab demonstrated promising activity with a manageable safety profile in these difficult-to-treat R/R non-GCB DLBCL patients ineligible for SCT. Evaluation of the iR2 regimen using a dose of 25 mg lenalidomide and biomarker analyses, including GEP, are ongoing. Disclosures Ramchandren: Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Johnson:Genmab: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Travel, accommodations, expenses; Zenyaku Kogyo: Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Boeringher Ingelheim: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Eisai: Research Funding. Ghosh:Forty seven Inc: Research Funding; SGN: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Juno: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; PCYC: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics, an Abbvie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding. Ardeshna:ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Johnson:Takeda Pharma: Other: Funded an educational place for me to attend the Lugano Lymphoma conference in June 2017. Cunningham:Roche pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Kassam:AbbVie: Equity Ownership. Radford:Pfizer: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Equity Ownership; GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Bailly:Abbvie: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Roche: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Takeda: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Munoz:Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Juno: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics LLC, an ABBVIE Company: Consultancy. Ping:Pharmacyclics, an Abbvie company: Employment; Abbvie: Equity Ownership. Co:Abbvie: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Neuenburg:Pharmacyclics, an Abbvie company: Employment.