Search

Subcutaneous nodules are a rare adverse event following immunization (AEFI). We aimed to describe nodules at the injection site reported to SAEFVIC (Surveillance of Adverse Events Following Vaccination in the Community) using the Brighton Collaboration Case Definition (BCCD), management and recurrence following subsequent immunizations.We assessed 58 cases (18 years of age) of 'nodule at injection site' reported to SAEFVIC, Melbourne, Australia, between May 2007 and June 2016. Case details were analyzed from records and phone interview follow-up. The Australian Immunization Registry was reviewed for immunization status.71% (41/58 reported cases) were consistent with the BCCD for subcutaneous nodule, 14% (8 cases) were 'possible subcutaneous nodules', 10% (6 cases) were nodules associated with BCG immunization and 5% (3 cases) were attributable to an alternative diagnosis. The median age at immunization was 12 months, (range 1 month-12 years); 54% male (22/41 cases). 17% (7 cases) had multiple nodules. Nodules were associated with immunizations containing aluminum (74%, 36/49 nodules), no aluminum (8%, 4 nodules) and unknown (18%, 9 nodules). Most cases developed symptoms within 3 days post-immunization (59%, 24 cases) and in the thigh (59%, 29 nodules). Pruritus was associated in 41% (17 cases). Around 1/3 (34%) of nodules resolved 6 months post immunization, 2/3 (68%) by 12 months, however 1/4 (24%) remained persistent for 24 months. 5 cases had prior nodules and 1 case had recurrence with subsequent immunization. 83% (34 cases) were fully immunized for age at follow-up.Subcutaneous nodules at the injection site may occur following a wide range of vaccines, including vaccines without aluminum. All cases require careful review and where possible, specialist management and to support subsequent immunizations.

Surveillance of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) is an essential component of vaccine safety monitoring. The most commonly utilized passive surveillance systems rely predominantly on reporting by health care providers (HCP). We reviewed adverse event reports received in Victoria, Australia since surveillance commencement in July 2007, to June 2013 (6 years) to ascertain the contribution of consumer (vaccinee or their parent/guardian) reporting to vaccine safety monitoring and to inform future surveillance system development directions. Categorical data included were: reporter type; serious and non-serious AEFI category; and, vaccinee age group. Chi-square test and 2-sample test of proportions were used to compare categories; trend changes were assessed using linear regression. Consumer reporting increased over the 6 years, reaching 21% of reports received in 2013 (P

Surveillance of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) is an essential component of vaccine safety monitoring. The most commonly utilized passive surveillance systems rely predominantly on reporting by health care providers (HCP). We reviewed adverse event reports received in Victoria, Australia since surveillance commencement in July 2007, to June 2013 (6 years) to ascertain the contribution of consumer (vaccinee or their parent/guardian) reporting to vaccine safety monitoring and to inform future surveillance system development directions. Categorical data included were: reporter type; serious and non-serious AEFI category; and, vaccinee age group. Chi-square test and 2-sample test of proportions were used to compare categories; trend changes were assessed using linear regression. Consumer reporting increased over the 6 years, reaching 21% of reports received in 2013 (P0.001), most commonly for children aged less than 7 years. Consumer reports were 5% more likely to describe serious AEFI than HCP (P=0.018) and 10% more likely to result in specialist clinic attendance (P0.001). Although online reporting increased to 32% of all report since its introduction in 2010, 85% of consumers continued to report by phone. Consumer reporting of AEFI is a valuable component of vaccine safety surveillance in addition to HCP reporting. Changes are required to AEFI reporting systems to implement efficient consumer AEFI reporting, but may be justified for their potential impact on signal detection sensitivity.

Comprehensive surveillance of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) is required to detect potential serious adverse events that may not be identified in prelicensure vaccine trials. Surveillance systems have traditionally been passive, relying upon spontaneous reporting, but increasingly active surveillance and supplemental strategies are being incorporated into vaccine safety programs. These include active screening for targeted conditions of interest (e.g., hospitalization), monitoring of new data sources and real-time methodologies to detect changes in vaccine safety data in these sources. The role of improved causality assessment in AEFI surveillance is discussed, with its important role in determining whether a temporal association may have occurred by chance alone. Strong local vaccine safety networks are required to support national immunization programs, with recent progress in developing a framework for low- and middle-income countries. Global collaboration is increasingly required to address challenges in active AEFI surveillance, particularly for rare serious adverse events.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence, transmission, carriage, and risk factors for group A streptococcal pharyngitis in school-aged children and their families. METHODS. A 16-month, prospective, family-based cohort study was undertaken from August 2001 through December 2002 in Melbourne, Australia. A total of 202 families (853 people) with at least 1 child aged 3 to 12 years were randomly selected from 3 primary care practices across suburban Melbourne to collect surveillance data for acute group A streptococcal pharyngitis, including serology for index and secondary cases and intermittent carriage data. Cohort retention was 97% for 16 months. RESULTS. The incidence of acute sore throat, group A streptococcal swab–positive pharyngitis, and serologically confirmed group A streptococcal pharyngitis was 33, 13, and 8 per 100 child-years, respectively, for school-aged children (5–12 years) and 60, 20, and 15 per 100 family-years, respectively. Sore throat was less common in adults than children, but adults with sore throat were as likely as children to have group A streptococcal culture–positive or serologically proven pharyngitis. In families who had a primary case, 43% had at least 1 secondary case, and in family members who were at risk, 13% contracted a secondary case. The spring, summer, and winter carriage rates for children were 13%, 8%, and 16%, respectively, and for adults the rate was 2% across all seasons. CONCLUSIONS. Group A streptococcal pharyngitis is still common, and the peak incidence occurs in school-aged children. However, the incidence in adults is higher than expected, and the number of secondary cases in families may be an important factor when considering the potential benefits of treatment.