Search

BACKGROUND: As the landscape of medical education evolves with emerging technologies and the COVID-19 pandemic, e-learning platforms continue to gain popularity. Orthopaedic podcasts, a burgeoning e-learning platform, continue to gain traction; however, there is a paucity of information regarding their coverage of topics and their distribution over time. Therefore, our analysis sought to (1) characterize podcast content related to orthopaedic surgery, and (2) evaluate the changes in the prevalence of orthopaedic podcasts over the past 15 years. METHODS: Three common podcasting platforms (Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, and Spotify) were queried using the key terms "orthopaedic," "orthopedic," and "ortho" in order to identify a list of podcasts that are related to orthopaedic surgery. For each unique orthopaedic podcast, the title, the show description, the number of episodes, the date of the first episode, the date of the most recent episode, and episode frequency were collected. Podcasts were then classified based on a predetermined list of podcast domains. The number of existing active (released within the last 3 months) orthopaedic podcasts was then trended on a monthly basis from 2011 to 2020. RESULTS: Ninety-four unique podcasts met inclusion criteria, 62 of which remained active as of October 25, 2020. The most common podcast domains were "general" (38 [40.4%]) and "clinical knowledge" (20 [21.3%]). Among the assessed podcasts, 90 (95.7%) utilized an exclusively audio format. The majority of podcasts were based in the United States (89.4%), included introductory music (72.3%), and included interviews (63.8%). Most podcast hosts were practicing orthopaedic surgeons (52.1%). Between January 2016 and October 2020, the number of active orthopaedic surgery podcasts grew more than twelvefold (1,240%) at an average rate of roughly 1 new podcast each month (average, 1.0 podcast; standard deviation, 1.8). DISCUSSION: The past decade has seen sizable growth in the number of readily available podcasts related to orthopaedic surgery. Additional research is required to independently assess the quality of these resources and their implications for remote trainee education.

In this paper, I explore male youth sport coaches’ use of humour in relation to the reconstruction of masculinities, contributing to an emergent body of literature on the role of humour in coaching. Three creative non-fiction stories developed from my own coaching experiences in a competitive youth football (soccer) academy are used to examine: (1) coaches’ reconstruction of hegemonic/esteemed masculinities; (2) coaches’ use of humour to encourage re-alignment with hegemonic masculinities, and; (3) coaches’ use of (counter-)humour to disrupt hegemonic representations of masculinities. The stories offer sport coaches and educators with a resource to reflect on masculinities, gender relations, and the everyday use of humour within their own contexts.

The free messaging services offered by WhatsApp, spurred the onset of spam messages. These spam messages are plaguing the storage space and considered prosaic. Jio’s breakneck growth owing to the free 4-G services offered influenced the usage of WhatsApp in India. In this research paper, we aim to gauge the psychology behind sharing spam messages and analyze the indifference of people towards such messages. Dataset was collected for 18 parameters over varied age groups. Most of the data gathered are raw and anonymous which has further made the process of examining and analyzing the human behavior more vivid and deep. Data was garnered over various messaging apps like WhatsApp and social media platforms like Facebook.

Jean Rhys, Virginia Woolf and Vita Sackville-West break with tradition in re-envisioning the aging woman. No longer content with representing the forlorn dowager or the redundant females of Gaskell...

Dear Readers, I recently browsed through numerous web pages for kids on cbc.ca and much to my delight I came across an article titled “5 Books You Probably Didn’t Know Were Written by Kids.” I discovered that Alec Greven published a successful book called How to Talk to Girls when he was only nine years old. The book was published back in 2008, so Graven would be close to twenty today, but the lessons on the back cover remain relevant for today: “Comb your hair and don’t wear sweats / Control your hyperness (cut down on the sugar if you have to) / Don’t act desperate.” Graven was interviewed on several popular television shows soon after the book was published, including The Ellen DeGeneres Show, the Today show, and Good Morning America, among others, and his publication became a media sensation. Graven’s accomplishment is certainly very impressive, but I was even more astounded to read about a four-year-old named Dorothy Straight, who, according to CBC, “holds the world record for being the youngest published author.” Her book titled Who Made the World? was published in 1964 and it included her own illustrations to depict her ideas about the possibility of Creation. These extraordinary stories of kids who write and publish books make inspiring reading, which is why I mention them here in my editorial, with the hope that you will encourage the children in your life to write, not necessarily for publication, but to help them read and understand stories written by other writers. There are lots of resources available to encourage children to write, including apps, websites, writers’ groups, blogs, magazines, books, and courses, so please consider doing an online search for writing materials or visit your local library to ask for help finding free writing resources for kids. Happy reading! Robert Desmarais, Managing Editor

I gave an introduction to our team on rounds, “Liliana* is a 9-year-old female who presented with fevers and status epilepticus due to influenza encephalitis, now working on oral intolerance.” I paused. “Actually, before we go in, I believe Liliana would feel overwhelmed with all of us in the room. Would it be possible for only the essential personnel to come in?” “Of course,” responded Dr Agrawal, the attending pediatrician, “How is she doing?” “She is still not eating or interacting much. But, I finally got her in contact with her mom in Honduras last night. It almost broke my heart.” Dr Agrawal, the upper level resident, and I then put on the personal protective equipment of gowns, face masks, and gloves before proceeding into the room. Liliana was a thin, withdrawn girl lying in bed with a nasogastric tube in place and her “sitter” from the shelter at the bedside. The upper level resident stated in Spanish, “Liliana, good morning. How are you feeling?” No answer. She looked at us with a blank stare. “Are you hungry?” Silence. “Does anything hurt?” She turned her back to us in bed. The upper level resident noticed the doll … Address correspondence to Neeraj Agrawal, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hospital Medicine, Texas Children’s Hospital, 1102 Bates Ave, FC 1860, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail: nagrawal{at}bcm.edu

Social networking sites are important platforms for visual self-presentation online. This article investigates how content producers present their gender identities on the social networking site, Instagram. We draw upon and develop Goffman’s analytic framework to understand the self-presentation techniques and styles users employ online. Conducting a visual content analysis of clean eating–related top posts, we examine how users deploy clean eating hashtags and how the architecture of Instagram constrains and enables certain identities around shared lifestyles and commercial interests. Our findings reveal the symbolic significance of hashtags for group membership and the degree to which gender identities on Instagram are configured around platform interfaces.

Good morning, and thank you all for being here today. It’s a true honor to address this esteemed group and to follow in the footsteps of so many outstanding leaders in academic medicine who have delivered this address over the past 130 years. Before I begin, I wanted to note how privileged I have felt over the years to work with so many outstanding people in our field. I sometimes worry we lose sight of the talent and commitment of those around us. There are few, if any, other fields that we would be surrounded by those whose lives are committed to improving the lives of the world around us and are willing to work countless hours to achieve this goal. In planning today’s talk, I took some time to listen to past AAP presidential speeches and found them informative and refreshingly varied. The talks that I found most engrossing were those that took a somewhat narrow theme — the practice of humanistic medicine or communicating about science to the public — and really delved into the nuances of the issue with telling data points and smart insights. Well, today I am going to do the opposite of that. No, I don’t mean that the talk will be insight-free, although I can’t make any promises! Instead of carving out a focused, manageable theme, I’ve decided to tackle the “big picture.” The stated purpose of the AAP is “the advancement of scientific and practical medicine” (1). So I thought, why not assess “the advancement of scientific and practical medicine” — both in terms of how far we’ve come and where we may be going in the future. It seemed a tad ambitious to start at the very beginning of modern medicine, so instead, I’ll go back to the early days of my own career. I’ll start by touching on a few of the major triumphs I’ve had the pleasure of witnessing over the past 40 years of biomedical science — areas where discovery has revolutionized clinical practice. Then, I’ll spotlight some of the current advances being driven by academic medical centers around the country in our collective quest to eradicate disease and help people around the globe lead longer, healthier lives. Finally, I’ll look ahead to the next 10–20 years. Today’s scientists are making staggering progress in many disease areas, but I’m going to focus on just a handful of conditions that are being dramatically changed through new technologies, new discoveries, and emerging treatment options — areas where I truly believe we will be able to offer new hope for patients over the next decade or two. For this portion of the talk, I asked all of my department chairs at Johns Hopkins Medicine to weigh in, so the predictions reflect their views as well as my own. Finally, when it comes to the pursuit of cures, we are in the midst of an era of unprecedented opportunities in science, but we’re also butting up against unprecedented challenges in the environment for doing science. I’ll spend a little time addressing these barriers to innovation and what we can do to overcome them.

Good morning! I want to thank you, NACADA, for giving me the opportunity to talk with you today about a subject that I think is critically important and central to all constituents in higher education: college student success. Everyone is talking about student success nowadays. The Association of American Colleges and Universities (AACU for too many reasons and too many years, the rising costs of college have fallen on the shoulders of students and families. CHEE advocates that the costs of higher education should be shared by all those who benefit from it, including students and families, but also state and local governments, industry, and the larger society. In terms of engagement, research (some undertaken by CHEE) shows that students who are engaged in their educational experience perform better, exhibit greater learning gains, and achieve higher levels of success. So like others in initiatives across the nation, CHEE uses that information to promote student engagement in high-impact practices in college. As a research center, CHEE works to engage its partners both on and off campus in efforts around student success. Finally, CHEE’s ultimate goal is to ensure excellence in the higher education enterprise, and those dedicated to CHEE pay close attention to #WhatWorks—the name of the Center’s most recent report series—not what does not work. CHEE is driven to change lives by changing education and ensuring student success. After all, what’s the point of attending college and even

Greetings and farewells mark the boundaries of conversations; they are often formulaic and are generally claimed to be devoid of propositional content. However, they are often embedded in longer exchanges, and within such exchanges individual expressions may or may not have propositional content. This contribution discusses some of the inherent problems of retrieving speech acts, such as greetings and farewells, from a corpus. This is illustrated with a diachronic analysis of greetings and farewells in two hundred years of American English as documented in the 400-million-word Corpus of Historical American English (COHA). In the nineteenth century, the most frequent greetings were “good morning” and “how are you?” and the most frequent leave-taking expression was farewell while in Present-day American English the expressions hi and hello dominate as greetings and goodbye and “bye bye” as leave-taking expressions. The two phrases “how do you do?” and “how are you?” serve as examples that show how formulaic and literal uses have coexisted over the entire period covered by COHA, with a shift from a predominance of literal uses to a predominance of formulaic uses, particularly in the case of “how do you do?”. However, both phrases remain ambiguous in their uses. The interactants discursively assign a more literal or more formulaic force to them.

Since the late 1930s, cinematic depictions of schooling have generally affirmed the necessity of school as a social institution and underscored the importance of formalized education for children and youth. Movies ranging fromGoodbye, Mr. Chips(1939) toDead Poets Society(1989) have represented school as a place of tradition and order, and films such asThe Corn Is Green(1945);Blackboard Jungle(1955);Good Morning, Miss Dove(1955);Up the Down Staircase(1967); andStand and Deliver(1988) have portrayed teachers as heroic figures. It could seem that the film industry has always portrayed schooling in idealistic terms. But that is not the case. This essay examines the familiar cultural genre of films about schooling, but it does so by looking backward beforeBlackboard Jungle, even beforeGoodbye, Mr. Chips, to the first four decades of cinema—a period when schooling was rendered not as a necessity, but as a joke.

DR. ROSENGART: Gentlemen, I would like to thank you all very much for coming in this morning. On the cardiac side, this is the fourth of these discussion roundtables. They have all been very exciting and provided interesting perspectives on complex issues of the day. On behalf of STCVS, I thank you in advance for sharing your expertise and for your candid discussion of these issues of importance to our readers. DR. SHEMIN: Well, good morning gentlemen, and thank you for accepting the invitation to join this panel discussion. We are in Toronto at the 94th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Thoracic Surgery, and we are going to be discussing the topic of manpower, what is the future? I would like to start out first by just having you introduce yourselves and then we will start our discussion. DR. FULLERTON: I am Dave Fullerton. I am the current president of the STS. DR. MAYER: John Mayer—a member of the American Board of Thoracic Surgery, past president of the STS, and a congenital heart surgeon in Boston. DR. WRIGHT: Cam Wright—general thoracic surgeon in Boston. DR. IKONOMIDIS: John Ikonomidis—cardiothoracic surgeon, Charleston, South Carolina. DR. SHEMIN: And I am Richard Shemin. I have the opportunity to moderate this session. I am chief of cardiothoracic surgery at UCLA in Los Angeles. I have had the privilege of being chair of the American Board of Thoracic Surgery and chaired the AATSSTS Committee on Manpower. John Ikonomidis, who is on our panel, is now taking over that position. My opening general comment is that we have a very unique specialty in that as early as the 1970s, the specialty recognized that surveying the membership and getting a sense of practice modality, types of procedures, the number of people coming into the

Good morning, and thank you for that warm welcome! I would like to begin by acknowledging you—our members. I want to personally thank all of the members who have participated in ASHP’s state societies. ASHP could not ful-fill its mission without the support and inspired leadership of our

"The freest person in the world is a Catholic priest who doesn't want to be bishop."1Seated in the living room of his second floor quarters in Decatur's St. James's Church rectory, Father Martin B. Mangan began on April 30, 1995, to put his internal turmoil on paper. Eventually, the musings and critical self-examination would reach eleven, handwritten, legal-sized pages. Ihusing in his work, he could contemplate the nearby Mangan family crest with its motto "This hand will fight tyranny," or look up to the north wall where a tree of life was hand painted, among its branches and spilling over to adjoining spaces were the autographs of those closest to him, including his "17th best friend," Father Joe Kelly.Perhaps the sixty-four-year-old priest thought of Kelly and others on the wall with whom he had formed deep and lasting bonds. With abundant good humor, twinkling blue eyes, and the Irish gift for the blarney, Mangan had friends from all walks of life, encompassing the then Good Morning America co-host David Hartman and the homeless men who always found a soft touch when they rang the rectory doorbell. Clearly in his last parish, an inner-city church with an elementary school requiring constant attention, he might have been forgiven for coasting, for delivering feel-good homilies, and not upsetting the local power elite. Instead, he was breathing new life and social conscience into St. James, attracting communicants from outside the parish, revitalizing the school, and since 1993, placing himself at the center of one of the most bitter labor disputes in Decatur's history-the lockout of union workers at the A. E. Staley Mfg. Co. by Tate & Lyle, a multinational corporation headquartered in London.By the spring of 1995 Decatur, Illinois, a classic rust-belt city of about eighty-four-thousand residents located near the center of the state, was a "war zone" as the Staley Lockout and intermittent strikes and work-to-rule campaigns at Caterpillar Tractor Company and Bridgestone/Firestone tore the community apart. Already, Mangan had appeared at numerous rallies, organized local and international clergy support groups, written letters to the editor, and even been arrested for peacefully blocking a gate at the plant which produced corn sweetener products. But now he was being asked to literally put his life on the line by fasting until Tate & Lyle engaged in meaningful bargaining with its workers. Family, friends, and parish associates were shocked. Sister Glenda Bourgeois, an Ursuline nun who administered St. James as parish life coordinator, was outraged and angered by the priest's contemplated action. And so, retreating to his quarters, Mangan began writing down the pros and cons of starving himself in service of the cause.2Deeply enmeshed in the struggle, the priest was already the most eloquent voice for the locked-out and striking workers. Behind the scenes he would become a friend and confidante to troubled families caught up in the unfolding tragedy. For those without money, power, or well-placed friends, Mangan was a defender and source of strength. How Mangan, raised in an upper middle class Springfield neighborhood, considered to "the center or to the right" in seminary, and once on the fast track to a bishop's robes, became the vessel into which many Decatur workers poured their fears, problems, and hopes, constitutes one of those remarkable trajectories that enrich and enliven humanity.3A few weeks after the stock market crash of October 1929 signaled the beginning of the Great Depression, Martin Glennon Mangan arrived at 11:35 a.m., December 12. He was the second child of Martin B. Mangan, twenty-nine, a bond salesman, and Marie J. McNamara, twenty-five, a Springfield native whose father, Dennis McNamara, operated a grocery store. Shortly after his birth in St. John's Hospital, the German nuns who cared for him bestowed the nickname he carried through life. According to family tradition, the elder Mangan was nicknamed "Mitts" because his younger brother couldn't pronounce his given name, producing that sound instead. …

The role of the ethnographer can be extremely demanding and challenging. This professional frequently experiences unexpected situations and feelings, which result in deep reflections and cause unpredictable problem resolution strategies to emerge. In this study, we reflected on the experience of living this role, based on a study of Ethnonursing. This reflection is based on an excerpt from the field notes of this study. The reflection was adjusted theoretically and complemented the analysis of the implementation of enablers proposed by Leininger in this type of study. The ambiguities, difficulties, contradictions, challenges and possibilities that emerged from the experienced role led to the broadening of knowledge, an awareness of the multiple roles experienced, the importance of care development, the relevance of being accepted by the other, the sharing of experiences and the development of cultural competence. We consider that this role has changed us, promoting our growth as people and as researchers. DESCRIPTORS: Transcultural nursing. Nursing research. Methodology.

Abstract Jean Rhys’s 1939 novel, Good Morning, Midnight, is a modernist masterpiece of temporal, spatial, and linguistic fragments and collisions. This analysis begins with an application of what Bakhtin established as the mutual enmeshment in the genre of the novel of space and time, or “chronotope,” to Rhys’s novel, and goes on to identify Sasha’s primal experience of shame as the cause of temporal collapse. The mere recall of a shameful moment can ignite a blush, make the body burn—in short, erase the temporal distance between the past and the present, and Sasha exists in a state of shame so extreme that she exemplifies Bruno Chaouat’s concept of hontologie. Rhys records the violent destruction of linear time by the seismic force of the shame effect.

It is time now to take a look at the tales themselves. Given our fourfold division into genres, a selection of tales will pass muster in order to highlight the core of each genre with its characteristic actors, story lines, plots, and outcomes, be they etiological, moral or otherwise. In order to know about Kapsiki tales, we must get acquainted not only with the tricks of Squirrel, the dumb strength of Leopard, and the intrinsic beauty of Guinea Fowl, but also with the suspense generated by a strange woman coming into the village, with the deep virtue of the non-loved wife, and with the intrinsic wisdom of the third brother. Any story we tell is ultimately about ourselves, and the Kapsiki also tell stories about their own life, to themselves and here to us. So now we listen.

The passivity of the education administrators was at first striking, but I came to understand it as a normal response to a system where the concept of safety, as defined by custody officials, always holds sway. Custody was in charge and they held all information confidential. Lives could be at stake, they dramatically whispered.

In Chap. 3, “Bilbo as Sigurd in the Fairy-Story Hobbit (1920–1927),” Tolkien composes The Hobbit as a fairy-story, in the light of his regard for Andrew Lang’s paradigmatic Victorian fairy-story of the northern hero Sigurd. Fairies (=Elves) and the magic associated with them in this redacted fairy-story are based on the Volsungasaga, which Tolkien recreated in his own Legend of Sigurd. Guided at least implicitly by his overarching and developing legendarium, he reshapes the Old Norse story of Sigurd in his own eucatastrophic Hobbit via his own definitions of the fairy-story: comic antihero Bilbo queers the tragic Sigurd while he engineers a cosmic and peaceful solution to the problem posed by the dragon Smaug and the enmity between Men and Dwarves.

This essay establishes the cultural, intellectual and historical contexts of Jean Rhys's engagement with sartorial fashion and addresses her characters’ fascination with the sartorial in relation to modernism's refusal of the stable, unitary self. The author analyses the ways in which the thinking of the avant-garde in art and literature and the avant-garde in fashion converged in the 1920s and 1930s. Attention is paid to Virginia Woolf and to the fashion designer Coco Chanel and the ubiquitous ‘little black dress’ in Rhys's European fictions between The Left Bank and Other Stories (1927) and Good Morning, Midnight (1939). Rhys's engagement with fashion is considered as a structuring absence in recent research on modernism and the city.

This paper studies three modern plays that rewrite Shakespeare’s texts from women’s points of view: Desdemona: A Play about a Handkerchief by Paula Vogel, Goodnight Desdemona (Good Morning Juliet) by Ann-Marie MacDonald, and Lear’s Daughters, a collaborative work of Elaine Feinstein with the Women’s Theatre Group (WTG). First of all, this study defines rewriting as the differentiated repetition with the intention of challenging historical assumptions. According as how each play makes the structural relation with the original plot, the mode of rewriting is classified into three types: the intra-textual rewriting, the inter-textual rewriting and the extra-textual rewriting. Each type shows the possibility of transforming Shakespeare’s characters and plots as well as of reinterpreting his texts from various angles. Another important strategy is the use of theatricality. A variety of staging devices are used to reconstruct the written text, allowing the freedom of encoding and decoding theatrical signs. Therefore, rewriting Shakespeare on the basis of theatricality makes it possible not only to recognize the historical sense of contemporary issues including feminist ones, but also to suggest the possibility of making changes even in real life. It is this multiplicity and changeability that these plays intend to show by rewriting Shakespeare on women’s stage.

Delivered by Jenelle L. Sobotka, PharmD, FAPhA, incoming President of the American Pharmacists Association, at APhA2012, the Association’s Annual Meeting and Exposition, March 11, 2012, New Orleans, LA. Good morning! I am delighted to be here and excited to serve as our Association’s next president. As Marialice affirmed yesterday, the state of our Association and profession are strong and getting stronger. I am looking forward to the next year and continuing to work with a great team of board members, our CEO Tom Menighan, and his incredible staff. I also want to acknowledge the outstanding year of leadership that President Marialice Bennett has provided. It has been a privilege to “be her shadow” this past year. Over the past year, Marialice has been a constant reminder to us to remain focused on the opportunities being placed before us with the Affordable Care Act and other activities. It is up to us to focus on the transforming health care system and continue to build recognition and demand for pharmacists’ roles in the system. This job is our responsibility and the goal of my presidency. I know that our Association is up to the task of driving connections and transforming patient care.

This article considers the response of European modernism to the invention of flush toilets and public restrooms in the first decades of the twentieth century, arguing that modernist writers such as James Joyce and Jean Rhys subverted dominant attitudes toward privacy, propriety, and femininity via images of women using toilets and restrooms. It considers Ulysses and Good Morning, Midnight within the context of debates surrounding women, cleanliness, and public urban space. It also argues that modernist and avant-garde art can be characterized by its representations of dirt and excrement, for which it was often censored or banned.

LWW/JNCQ JNCQ-D-16-00190 February 3, 2017 J Nurs Care Qual Vol. 00, No. 00, pp. 1–2 c 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Copyright Commentary In this commentary a patient describes his recent hospitalization and need for better continuity of care. Looking for Continuity of Care Steven P. Segal, PhD W HO is Dr Jason Lo? Dr Lo was listed as my physician on the whiteboard on the wall next to my hospital bed, but during the 2 1 / 2 days I was in the hospital, I never met him. While “all’s well that ends well,” there are aspects to my recent hospitalization regarding continuity of care that the health care system needs to address if my experience is at all representative. Day 1: I arrived at the emergency depart- ment (ED) at 4:00 PM and was admitted to the hospital at 11:00 PM , relieved to be finally going to a room. The nurse said the physi- cian listed on the whiteboard next to my bed would be in to see me in the morning. Nurses showed concern, were efficient, and shared important information. All seemed well de- spite the seriousness of what I was informed was a potentially life-threatening condition, a deep vein thrombosis and saddle pulmonary embolism. Day 2: Breakfast seemed surprisingly un- healthy, soggy hash browns. I had been up since 6:00 AM , but Dr Lo had yet to appear. The Author Affiliations: Mental Health and Social Welfare Research Group and The Mack Center on Mental Health and Social Conflict, School of Social Welfare, University for California, Berkeley. The author declares no conflicts of interest. Correspondence: Steven P. Segal, PhD, University for California, 120 Haviland Hall (MC# 7400), Berkeley, CA 94720 (spsegal@berkeley.edu). DOI: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000246 nurses indicated I needed to talk to him to find out my treatment plan. My blood pressure was higher than I ever remembered: it was 120/80 at my physician’s office before visiting the ED but now was 165/85 (“white coat” hyperten- sion, according to physician friends). At 10:00 AM , I met Dr R. He had read my file, had a treat- ment plan for me, but said I must first see the oncologist. I was surprised at that. I had never been told I had cancer. Did he mean a hema- tologist? He did and apologized, thanking me for the correction. Dr R, however, continued to refer to my impending meeting with the “oncologist” after lunch. He was apologetic when over again I said “hematologist.” Dr H., the hematologist, came in after dinner and outlined the treatment plan. He would put me on a new medication, Xarelto (rivaroxaban), although there could be some issue with in- surance approval. Day 3 begins early: A “masked-woman” turned on my room lights at 6:15 AM . “Wake up,” she said, “I have orders to draw blood.” She came around to the side of my bed and said: “William, how are you?” I told her “I’m not William.” She looked at my wristband and exited the room without another word. At 7:15 AM , another woman entered my room and awakened me, yet again. She said: “Good morning ma’am, I’m here to take vitals.” Upon seeing I was a man, she too left, saying “ex- cuse me.” My nurse came in later, took my vital signs, was quite thorough in checking me out, and was nice and conversational. She told me my Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. [AQ1]

In the rewriting of Shakespeare’s Desdemona and Juliet, Ann-Marie MacDonald attempts to make the genre transformation in her Goodnight Desdemona (Good Morning Juliet). In the tragedy it is typical to categorize female characters into a wicked woman or a submissive victim. In either case, they are doomed to be eventually put into the trap of tragic ending: the death. On the other hand, female characters in Shakespeare’s comedy are usually empowered with wits and wisdom like a Wise Fool. They are different from those in the tragedy who are deprived of their own voice and place by the given fate. MacDonald raises a question of why Desdemona and Juliet are suddenly changed in their characterization regardless of their intrinsic nature. They appear to be driven into the death by the supposedly fate-ordained designation even though such an ending never seems inevitable. That is why MacDonald concentrates on the intriguing vibrations between genre and gender issues in rewriting Shakespeare. In the comedic transformation Desdemona and Juliet escape from the genric restriction in their dramatic action to show their original vitality, though it is sometimes against our general expectations. In this transformative comedy, we should examine what problems are to be corrected and why such an attempt is necessary. Constance Ledbelly, the new heroine of this play, explores the significance of facing our contemporary problems by reviewing the classics from other perspectives. These three plots of Desdemona, Juliet, and Constance merge into one place where the alchemistic happy marriage of past and present, or of their problems and ours, happens in the Shakespearean setting of comedy. The so-called interpretative community is formed to approach such feminist issues not individually but socially through mutual interactions. Constance’s reworking with Shakespeare’s transformed heroines lets us know that the same tragedy as Shakespeare’s is still going on in our reality. Although Constance’s search for the original Author is a way of avoiding her tragic reality at first, it is ultimately a search for the Self through others’ similar examples. Therefore, rewriting suggests an alternative way of interpreting the original with a mirror which reflects our own life as well. That is what MacDonald intends to tell us in her rewriting of Shakespeare.

[Figure][1] As a profession, pharmacy has clearly put in its 10,000 hours. We are now poised to take advantage of the incredible opportunities that are available through health reform and the PPMI. Good morning. Thank you all for being here today. I feel like I’m with 1,000 of my

Adrienne van Heteren recalls her time at B92 — a small radio station at the forefront of the anti-war movement during the darkest days of the Yugoslav conflict

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to discuss some of the policy and structural changes that have influenced human resource practices in state‐owned enterprises (SOEs), private companies and international joint ventures (IJVs) in Vietnam. The challenges facing human resource management (HRM) practitioners in Vietnam are identified and discussed.Design/methodology/approachA survey of middle and senior managers combined with organisational visits with selected HR managers, CEOs and other senior Vietnamese managers produced the data analysed in this paper.FindingsThe findings suggest that the character of HRM appears to be influenced by not only the cultural context but also the organisational type. Broadly, SOEs still largely practice traditional personnel management, IJVs practice cost‐focused HRM and private firms experiment with a range of innovations in HRM.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper reveals emerging trends in HRM in Vietnam and identifies the pragmatic use of HR practices, which are influenced by organisational types as well as cultural contexts.Originality/valueThis paper adds to the emerging literature on management practice in developing countries. In particular it makes a contribution to understanding HR practices in Vietnam and highlights the important but often overlooked role of Vietnamese companies in the growing private sector.

GOOD MORNING. I would like to welcome everyone to the Annual Meeting of the Society of University Surgeons (SUS) and the 4th Annual Meeting of the Academic Surgical Congress (ASC). It is my distinct pleasure to have had the opportunity to serve as the President of the SUS this year and as a member of the Executive Council for the last 6 years. Most of you probably do not know that I am not the first Simeone to serve on the Executive Council of the SUS. Dr Fiorindo Simeone, my grandfather’s cousin, served as the Chair of the Publications Committee in 1946 and from 1950 to 1952 (Fig 1). Fiorindo came to the United States from Italy as a small boy and went on to have a distinguished career in academic surgery. He did groundbreaking work in improving our understanding the management of vascular trauma, and he is credited by many as setting up one of the first vascular research laboratories in the country. It seemed fitting to pay tribute to his work, and let you know how honored I am to have followed in his footsteps a half a century later. I would like to thank my family for attending and for all their support. I would like to acknowledge my wonderful husband Ted, an accomplished surgeon in his own right, and my 2 children: Sam, who is 10, and Amelia, who is 5. I feel so lucky to have such a terrific and supportive family that gives me incredible joy every day. My parents are also here today, Bill and Pauline Simeone. I would like to thank them for always encouraging me and making me feel there were no limits to what I could accomplish if I put my heart into it. I appreciate their love and support.

Good morning. As I stand before you today, full of pride and enthusiasm, I thank you for the opportunity to share in this wonderful celebration and to serve as your next APhA President. They call Texas the Lone Star State. But do you know what—there is not just one star here in San Antonio. I have the best view in the house, and it looks like a whole room full of stars to me; the brightest stars from across the country. Yesterday, you heard from President Tucker about what the Association is doing to ensure our profession shines this year. The Association’s programming and advocacy are vital, but it is you, the members, who execute changes in practice, that provide the greatest contributions to our patients. The current financial crisis has focused us all. While we cannot solve the root causes of the economic meltdown, we may help relieve some of the suffering. Our patients are feeling anxiety and stress over job loss, worsening diets due to financial struggles, and missed doses due to lost health insurance or other competing priorities. By serving with passion, professionalism, and individualized patient focus, we can guide our patients toward better health, even in these difficult times. The Association is here to help you do just that. By accessing APhA programs and services, learning from peers 2009 Presidential Address

This essay applies Julia Kristeva's Black Sun: Depression and Melancholia (1987) to Jean Rhys's fourth novel, Good Morning, Midnight (1939). Kristeva maintains in Black Sun that the root of women's depression lies in their thwarted mourning for the lost maternal—their refusal to separate from the mother and enter into language and society. Most people separate from—Kristeva says "negate"—the mother and subsequently recover her in signs, in language. Depressives, however, "disavow the negation: they cancel it out, suspend it, and nostalgically fall back on the real object (the Thing) of their loss, which is just what they do not manage to lose, to which they remain painfully riveted" (Kristeva, BS 43). Denying the negation blocks normative language and social development. Black Sun , then, yields significant insights into the heroine of Rhys's novel, Sasha Jansen, whose seemingly aberrant behavior and nonsensical language may now be understood as symptoms of Kristevan depression.

[Figure][1] If just one person can make a difference, think what we can accomplish together. Good morning! So here we are in San Francisco, a city that is known as a place where East meets West—a place where people come together from many cultures and where diversity in all forms is

Interviewer: Good morning, Dr. Bean. Thank you for accepting this opportunity to be interviewed. Your comments will be very useful for the new generation of young and upcoming scientists. Given your very successful career, you likely have much to say and lots of advice to give. My objective this morning is to describe one of your typical days. I am sure it will be fun. Should we start? Dr. Bean: Yes, my pleasure. Please go ahead. Interviewer: My interview will be broken into blocks of 2 hours. So, let us start with the first 2 hours of your day. Dr. Bean: Sure, I get up at 6 AM. I first make coffee and eat my breakfast, which brings me to 6:30 AM; then I do my exercise on a treadmill I have at home, finishing at 7:30 AM. You see, at 62, I must do this, otherwise, who knows what might happen. Then, I walk to work and open my office at exactly 8 AM. Interviewer: Sounds great. I guess at this time you are well-rested, relaxed, and ready to go. Dr. Bean: Absolutely! This is the premium time of my day from 8 to 10 AM. And I have strict instructions to my secretary—never book any appointments in this time block. I want this time for myself, for the most challenging part of my job. Interviewer: And what is that? Dr. Bean: Writing grants. You see, now I am …

Translation: Robert Swenson and Diane LewisCinema, in its early days, was an updated version of the great medieval cathedrals.This simple but striking proposition underlies Good Morning, Babylon (Paolo Taviani & Vittorio Taviani, IT/FR/US, 1987) a meta-cinematographic work written and directed by the Taviani brothers, Paolo and Vittorio, in 1987.Each frame of their film functions as if it helps raise the courses of stone of an imaginary Romanesque facade, a collective project by workers at the service of a master builder, the director D. W. Griffith.In the sequence in which the "restorers" admire the true facade of the Cathedral of Miracles, the one-to-one relationship that links the frame to the "architectural cut" is explicit: a single image condenses the climax of the film and the sense of the story before and after that caesura, exactly as a geometric section in architecture does.Bonanno, the master of the works, who bears the name of the mythical, uncertain builder of the Leaning Tower, is seated like a film director surrounded by his assistants. He observes the set while talking to the Tavianis' camera and says, "I am sure that those who built it looked at it afterwards from here, right here where I'm sitting. They were brilliant. It's a miracle."The implication is that those restorers, by culture and sense of belonging, are the descendants of the builders of old: "I toast you, Church of the Miracles. And I toast the grandfathers of our grandfathers, who built it a thousand years ago, and who handed down to us this craftcarried out with the hands and the imagination."After the "cut," the two youngest Bonannos, Andrea ( Joaquim de Almeida) and Nicola (Vincent Spano), brothers who grew up in Pisa as the Tavianis did, export their father's art to Los Angeles and contribute to the creation of the immense sets of Intolerance (D. W. Griffith, US, 1916).It is the character of Griffith himself who closes the spatial and temporal circle around the "cut" in a famous scene. He calls out to himself something which connects the heroic phase of the American cinema to the phenomenal "media" heritage of the great European cathedrals: "I do not know whether our work, that of your sons and mine, is as beautiful as that of those who constructed the marvelous Romanesque cathedrals. Those and that work, were born as these are born today-from a shared collective dream. I am convinced that your sons, Bonanno, are like those obscure stonecutters who carved their masterpieces on the cathedrals that you honor, that have contributed to render famous the work of art and have helped the generations that followed them to believe in and live a better life. And for this reason I profoundly love the cinema. …

Good morning, my fellow oncology nurses. It is such a privilege and an honour to be here among you today. When I was awarded this special opportunity, I felt an elation that I can hardly express: to be asked by your colleagues to speak! Well, I have held fast to the elation, working hard to drive away the sense of being overwhelmed so to arrive at this day, in this beautiful city in the presence of my friends.

Good morning everyone. It is a pleasure to be here with all of you and an honor to be the incoming President of NSGC. The theme of my speech is leadership so it is really special for me to have Jay Flanagan introduce me. There is nothing better for a mentor than to share the podium with a former student who is about to assume his own leadership role in the AEC subcommittee! Congratulations Jay! There are times that I still need to pinch myself to believe that it is true. I am in awe at the amazing skills, energy, resources, and talks shared with us over the course of the conference. Thank you to the presenters for sharing their experiences and making the conference a huge success and thank you to the AEC subcommittee for the countless hours of hard work over the course of the year to provide us with this fantastic opportunity. NSGC was built on a strong foundation, which is a true credit to the vision and perseverance of our founding members. For the past 20 years, I have watched NSGC mature and grow into an influential organization that has a seat at important tables. Genetic counselors are an important part of medical care. What is nice about this statement? Others agree! We have made some incredible strides and should be proud of our efforts. I would like to share a little bit about myself and share some highlights from the path I followed. Then I’d like to share with you my vision for the coming year. I graduated in 1995 from Sarah Lawrence with a talented group of classmates; many of whom have gone on to hold their own leadership roles in the profession. During the first year of my career, I like many of you, was busy learning the responsibilities of a new job, planning a wedding and studying for the boards. However, at the AEC in 1996, I listened to the presentations with a different ear, because all of the items from the previous year were under my belt and I could start to envision what my career might look like long term. It hit me that I worked really hard to complete my training, pass the board exam, and enter a profession that I had really grown to enjoy in such a short time. I had a lot of years ahead of me to practice as a genetic counselor and I wanted to get involved so that I could contribute to the growth of the profession. In turn, this would ensure that the profession continued to fuel the spark that had intrigued me so much in the first place and took a direction that would fuel my passion over the course of my career. As luck would have it, BRCA1 and BRCA2 were found while I had been in my second year of graduate school. The handful of us practicing in cancer genetics at the time met under the leadership of Rob Pilarski, Cate Walsh-Vockley, June Peters, and Mary Ahrens to discuss the issues we faced. Through the vision, need for support in a new sub-specialty, and the need to develop a protocol for counseling families with a potential inherited cancer predisposition, the Cancer SIG was born and became a model for other SIGs to follow. That pivotal development happened because a group of people who were struggling to find the best way to care for our patients in this new era put an idea into motion. I was also working in Iowa at the time, which did not have many genetic counselors. It was extremely important for me to network at the AEC so I could bring ideas back to the state and attempt to stay abreast of the new trends. I volunteered early on with the education committee and practice issues committee. I volunteered to chair a subcommittee inside of the Cancer SIG, which became the start of my leadership tract. As the needs of our profession grew, my interests became more diverse. I volunteered to work on the projects that interested me and were in some way pertinent to my job (frankly all of the tasks were relevant). The volunteer time Presented at the 2014 National Society of Genetic Counselors Annual Education Conference; September, 2014

July 30, 2014 Good morning, delegates, and thank you for your commitment to AACP and the work of the House. I acknowledge that you have received many reports in your work as delegates; written reports of our committees and task forces, as well as verbal reports from your elected leaders. This

Good morning. I have the distinct privilege to introduce our President, Dr Ron Vender, to you today. Ron was born in Chicago, where he grew up as the second child in a family of five children. Ron has one sister and three brothers.

If you are on the switchboard and you receive a call: state the name of your company, say ‘good morning’, and ask how you can help. Before transferring a call, find out: name of caller, name of person caller wants to speak to, why caller is ringing. If person requested is not available, tell caller when the person will be available and / or how to contact the person via email or mobile. Choose the right level of formality. Choose the easiest phrases to say. Use will to say what you are going to do next, and the present perfect to say what you have done. Be proactive, helpful and friendly. If you are having difficulty understanding, ask the caller to send an email. Ask the caller to call back if you feel that you are unable to respond effectively.

Lady Chatterley’s Lover is probably D. H. Lawrence’s most famous book.1 Almost everyone knows it is a controversial novel. In fact it is one of the best-known of those novels in English that are famous for being controversial. It would surely be a bit naive to assume that this doesn’t impact on the history of the discussion of Lawrence in university English departments where the best known academic criticism used to shy away from Lady Chatterley and prefer several of Lawrence’s other novels when it came to studying his work. In our more biopolitical century the situation is somewhat different, maybe even reversed. Many of the things that once made Lady Chatterley seem controversial or outrageous may now make it seem all the more interesting and urgent to study. We are not as shocked by its subjects as readers once were, or at least not in the same ways. We are more, not less, interested in the politics of literary and cultural history and of course in sex. In those contexts hitherto less noticed aspects of the novel can also come to the fore and offer intriguing and significant directions for the current and future discussion of the book that parallel movements of interest in the period and in the subject as a whole. For these reasons even if we do not think Lady Chatterley’s Lover is Lawrence’s greatest novel we recognise it as one of the key books of its century and we may now turn to it first in ours.

Good morning, nurses and therapists! This is the education coordinator and this voice mail contains extremely important information for all clinicians! Not listening to this message carefully will put YOU in extreme jeopardy!(Well, I exaggerate; however, the consequences to you—and to this agency—ARE dire!) . . . Assuring accuracy and reliability in OASIS data collection is more than just a one-time orientation. This article describes a lively ongoing OASIS educational program creatively using the agency’s voice mail system. The article presents basic OASIS information and is a required reading for clinicians and managers who are interested in accurately collecting OASIS data.

Delivered by Harold N. Godwin, BPharm, MS, FAPhA, incoming President of the American Pharmacists Association, at APhA2010, the Association’s Annual Meeting and Exposition, March 14, 2010, Washington, DC. Good morning. Thank you for the opportunity to speak to you this morning. Every Annual Meeting is a wonderful opportunity to engage with so many friends and colleagues about the future of our profession and our Association. This one is no exception. It is such a beautiful venue in our nation’s and Association’s home. Thank you even more for the opportunity to serve as your next president. I have been proud to call myself a pharmacist for more than 46 years and a member of APhA for 49 years. This is an honor I will never forget and one I share with my family. My wife Judy and my daughters Paula and Jennifer have been at my side for several decades of my involvement in my profession and pharmacy associations. I am pleased to have with me at this meeting my daughter Paula and her husband Shahid, my daughter Jennifer and her husband Kent, and of course my wonderful wife of 46 years, Judy, who has not only been there throughout my pharmacy journey but helps take care of our wonderful grandchildren Kaia and Ella, who could not be here today. In addition, I need to thank my staffs at the University of Kansas School of Pharmacy and the University of Kansas Hospital for their support. Thank you all from the bottom of my heart. I am forever grateful. In addition to my family, I look out into the audience and see thousands of pharmacists from every type of practice in our profession. We are all friends, colleagues, and leaders—truly making a difference. You are my inspiration! Despite current frustrations with the tone and style of its politics, it is difficult not to be inspired here in Washington. A simple walk from the old front steps of our newly remodeled home on the National Mall reminds us of the many challenges this nation has faced. Within a 30-minute walk, one is reminded of how Lincoln saved the Union; how FDR helped the nation through the Great Depression; how so many generations sacrificed in World War II, Korea, and Vietnam; and how central Washington and Jefferson were to the founding of our nation.

Marvin J. Stone, MD: Good morning. Last month Dr. John Fordtran delivered the Alpha Omega Alpha lecture at Southwestern Medical School. For those of you who may not know, AOA is the national honor medical society to which top medical students are elected in recognition of superior scholarship. Many members of our own medical staff are members of AOA. In addition, some of the newly elected medical students will be joining our housestaff in July. For a long time I've thought it interesting to observe the subjects selected by esteemed colleagues when they have the widest possible latitude, that is, the topic of their choice. John chose to speak about medicine in Dallas 100 years ago at the AOA banquet. We are fortunate that he has agreed to give this talk again at Baylor this morning. Now, do not think that the subject he selected was accidental. It was arrived at after much contemplation. Most of us know John as the chief of medicine at Baylor for 17 years and current president of the Baylor Research Institute. I shan't dwell on some of his other activities, such as being acknowledged as one of the leading investigators and educators in gastroenterology, or being one of the 2 founding editors of the best textbook on gastroenterology, or being awarded virtually every prize given in the field as well as several honorary degrees. During the past year, he was elected to fellowship in the Royal College of Physicians of London. Despite these considerable accomplishments and worldwide recognition, I submit that John Fordtran's principal interest is medical history. Why? Not just because of the topic chosen for his AOA lecture, which you will hear this morning. There is in fact precedent for my claim. Twenty-one years ago, almost to the day, John delivered the presidential address at the annual meeting of the American Society for Clinical Investigation, another occasion when he could have spoken on any topic he wished. He chose to speak on the life and career of Samuel James Meltzer, founder and first president of that august organization, which was established in 1907. Ladies and gentlemen, the evidence is overwhelming. It is a pleasure to introduce John Fordtran, sometime gastroenterologist, but really eminent medical historian! John S. Fordtran, MD: Thank you, Marvin, for that wonderful introduction and for your own interest in medical history and for the effort you have made to teach the history of medicine to our students, residents, and staff. Today, I will try to describe what medicine was like in Dallas 100 years ago. Actually, the time frame to be discussed is from 1890 through 1920, and I will also say a few words about the removal of Baylor College of Medicine from Dallas to Houston in 1943.

Certainly, Rhys matters. Since her death in 1979, after her long period of obscurity and the rush of attention following the publication of Wide Sargasso Sea in 1966, Rhys’s work has gained footholds in a number of scholarly fields. Her novels—especiallyWide Sargasso Sea and, increasingly, Good Morning, Midnight—are taught in undergraduate classrooms and graduate seminars. Her work appears in studies of modernist literature, feminist writing, and Caribbean literature; Barbadian poet Kamau Brathwaite famously called Rhys “the Helen of our wars,” signaling Rhys’s position as the instigator of and prize in the battle over the relation of Caribbean literature to the literature of Europe. Several scholarly essays on Rhys’s writing are published in academic journals each year. Reviewing the literature on Rhys in 1998—particularly in the context of the dearth of scholarship on “other major anglophone Caribbean writers”—Elaine Savory claims that because “there has been such an enormous amount of writing on her… there is a Rhys industry” (xiv). Since Savory wrote those words, there have been two international conferences dedicated to Rhys: one in Dominica in 2004, the second in London in 2010. Later, in herCambridge Introduction to Jean Rhys, Elaine Savory declares that “Rhys is now canonical” (114). Rhys’s position in literary history thus seems assured.

“Odd things always happen when the power goes out,” comments writer/director Fernando Eimbcke, reflecting with nostalgia on the moment that inspired his screenplay. A power outage is a moment of experiential simplicity, one that becomes the central rite of passage into adulthood in the film Temporada de patos. “I remember when I was younger, we were in the living room watching television and all of a sudden we were sitting there in the dark, silent, with nowhere to go. So we started to talk and tell stories. It turned into a really special experience” (cited in press kit, 2004). The film’s publicity materials, creating playful intrigue with the idea of what one can do to pass the time during a blackout (“cuando se corta la luz”), invites viewers to ponder the question that launches the storyline: Has the media conditioned today’s youth to see life in the twenty-first century as boring without electricity? This underlies another quandary, one that many filmmakers producing films outside of Hollywood are forced to ask: Is cinema too boring without special effects, flashy locations, or studio sets? Can an enjoyable film be shot with only available light? Can it be produced without power?

Popular melodramas such as Cinema Paradiso (1988), Il Postino (1994) and Mediterraneo (1991) in many ways defined Italian cinema for international audiences in the 1990s: Cinema Paradiso and Mediterraneo won Oscars for best foreign language film and all the films found huge worldwide audiences. Il Postino, for instance, took over $21 million in the United States (Mojo, 2011) and over $80 million worldwide (Guru, 2011). In terms of the sheer volume of people who saw and enjoyed them, these films represent some of the most popular Italian films ever. Their generic location as melodramatic romances also places them textually as popular films and yet they don’t fit entirely comfortably into the rubric of popular cinema. The very fact of their international success ensured they were read by some as art film, connected by association with the modernist Italian films of the 1960s and 1970s, screened in urban arthouses and enjoyed by those audiences interested in foreign cinema. Their emphasis on visual style consolidates this generic location. Both textually and institutionally, the films hover between the arthouse and the popular. This tension, I will argue, opens up what I call the prettiness of Italian cinema.