1. Timing of Impella implantation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock or high‐risk percutaneous coronary revascularization
- Author
-
Federico Pappalardo, Giulia Masiero, Marco Mojoli, Gennaro Giustino, Tommaso Piva, Alaide Chieffo, Marco Ancona, Carlo Trani, Federico De Marco, Gavino Casu, Vittorio Pazzanese, Maurizio Di Biasi, Paolo Pagnotta, Carlo Briguori, Francesco Burzotta, Matteo Montorfano, Giuseppe Tarantini, and Giulia Lorenzoni
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Percutaneous ,mechanical cardiac support ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Myocardial Infarction ,Shock, Cardiogenic ,Coronary Artery Disease ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Original Studies ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ,Internal medicine ,high‐risk PCI ,medicine ,left ventricular assist device ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Clinical significance ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Myocardial infarction ,cardiovascular diseases ,high-risk PCI ,cardiogenic shock ,Impella ,Retrospective Studies ,Heart transplantation ,business.industry ,Cardiogenic shock ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,surgical procedures, operative ,Treatment Outcome ,Heart failure ,Settore MED/11 - MALATTIE DELL'APPARATO CARDIOVASCOLARE ,Conventional PCI ,Cardiology ,Heart-Assist Devices ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
Objective To evaluate the role of the microaxial percutaneous mechanical circulatory support device (Impella® pump) implantation pre‐percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus during/after PCI in cardiogenic shock (CS) and high‐risk PCI populations. Background A better understanding of the safety and effectiveness of the Impella and the role of timing of this support initiation in specific clinical settings is of utmost clinical relevance. Methods A total of 365 patients treated with Impella 2.5/CP in the 17 centers of the IMP‐IT Registry were included. Through propensity‐score weighting (PSW) analysis, 1‐year clinical outcomes were assessed separately in CS and HR‐PCI patients, stratified by timing of Impella support. Results Pre‐procedural insertion was associated with an improvement in 1‐year survival in patients with CS due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with PCI (p = .04 before PSW, p = .009 after PSW) and HR‐PCI (p
- Published
- 2021