1. 3D-printing for the precision assessment of a new medical device
- Author
-
Giorgio Zatta, Francesca Cosmi, Alberto Dal Maso, Cosmi, Francesca, DAL MASO, Alberto, and Zatta, Giorgio
- Subjects
Measurement ,Medical device ,business.industry ,Computer science ,Mechanical Engineering ,3D printing ,Phantom study ,BEStest ,Bone ,Reliability Analysis ,Trabecular bone ,Reliability Analysi ,business ,Biomedical engineering - Abstract
Additive manufacturing played a keyrole in investigating the precision of a recently-developed device that measures the elastic characteristics of the trabecular bone by simulating the application of loads on a virtual biopsy obtained from radiographic images of the proximal epiphyses in the patient’s hand fingers. The simulation results are combined in a Bone Structure Index (BSI), which has shown to be able to detect trabecular bone alterations due to osteoporosis or other pathological situations. In order to obtain a large number of measurements without having voluntary patients undergo unnecessary radiations, the precision assessment tests were carried out on a 3D-printed phantom hand, in which different mimicked trabecular structures (chips) were inserted. Each mimicked bone had a unique internal structure and density and was 3D-printed using radiopaque composite materials. Fifteen different chips were additively manufactured; 20 measurements were performed on each chip. BSI and BSI_T-score precision values were computed according to ISO 5725 and ISCD standards. For all the chips, no relationship was found between the mean [Formula: see text] and standard deviation [Formula: see text] of the measurements in each chip. The range of the 95% confidence interval ([Formula: see text]) was computed assuming the repeatability standard deviation [Formula: see text] as the known standard deviation of the measurement method (average of [Formula: see text] values): [Formula: see text], corresponding to [Formula: see text]. Least Significant Change was evaluated as well: [Formula: see text], corresponding to [Formula: see text]. The 95% confidence intervals are small when compared to the commonly-accepted diagnostic values, where a patient is classified as osteoporotic if T-score -1 and osteopoenic if -2.5
- Published
- 2022